Jump to content

How should ATWT end and who should come back??


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 129
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I'd actually like to see Betsy reappear, as played by Meg Ryan as well. Whereas Julianne could do it out of love for the show, it's not like Meg is doing anything else.

I'd love to see Jennifer's ghost appear; Gillian Spencer is still around. And let's not forget the most essential character from the past: Elaine Princi as Miranda Marlowe, Bob's wife the international spy. What the [!@#$%^&*] were they thinking?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Was that before or after he dated the ballerina?

It would be great if Meg and Julianne did return, although it doesn't seem likely. I wish they could ask Marisa Tomei as well. She could return to ask Lisa to move with her to London, and Lisa ends up falling for a dashing duke who accompanies Marcy to Oakdale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

At this point, post-The Wrestler (where she was actually excellent), Marisa Tomei is actually more prestigious a "get" than Meg Ryan. But I never understood her role or place on the show other than she apparently tried to put the moves on Bob at like age 17. What was wrong with this show back then? Wasn't that the Dobsons, of all people? Were they also responsible for Miranda, side by side with James and Barbara and Danny Pintauro? I don't know about any ballerina.

I'd like to see at least one of those people make an appearance, preferably Julianne Moore. Two is too much to hope for but I'd push if I was the EP.

Incidentally, if anyone can think of a reason not to reunite John and Lucinda I'm all ears. That was a perfect tentpole couple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think she was before Miranda. I think she may have also been played by Leslie Denniston, who went on to marry Don Hastings and then played Maeve on GL and finally Carolyn Crawford, of the endless Carolyn Crawford murder mystery.

I never knew that about Bob and Marcy. It does sound very odd. She kissed him to get back at Frannie, then wanted him for real, and jumped him in his office, and Miranda saw them and used it to divorce Bob.

I'm glad that story didn't happen now, she probably would have drugged him and done who knows what.

The Dobsons did Miranda, and James and Barbara, and James's sister Ariel, who married John, and was part of the John/James blood feud of the early 80s (John always stayed out of James's later returns -- I was never sure why). And Mr. Big and the Tom/Margo pairing. The other big feud was James/Gunnar, and Barbara having the past life visions where Gunnar was her stable boy or whatever and James was the cruel master of the house.

It's interesting that ATWT cast Meg Ryan, Marisa Tomei, Julianne Moore, and Courtney Cox all within a few years. Courtney just had a day player role, but that hasn't stopped her from being lumped in with ATWT for decades.

I would love to see that. I hope Larry might return, if they even bother to ask.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I understand the Dobsons made history with James, Barbara, Paul, Gunnar and all that, introducing Craig and Margo and Betsy and so on, and I like much of their work, but some of these other things are still so bizarre. I mean, why on Earth would Bob Hughes marry an international crook?

Incidentally, is the character Terry Lester played alive or dead? Royce? I never understood what was supposed to have happened there; did the story get altered or changed? What is the whole mystery regarding Kirk and Sam?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think they might have been told, or decided on their own, to spice Bob up. I don't think the people at ATWT then were fond of the Hughes family. Don was written out, and Nancy and Chris were sidelined and even put on recurring. I guess the pairing of this exotic woman and staid Bob was supposed to be interesting, especially when they added WTF stuff like Miranda going to the jungles to find her long lost teenage daughter, Bilan. The Dobsons did a lot of crazy stuff on ATWT. I guess it worked to a degree, but ATWT was never a crazy show. GL was more of an off the wall show than ATWT, not in terms of freezing the world, but in terms of emotional states being more high pitched and mad. Yet, they seemed a little more balanced at GL. I know the Dobsons are supposedly a little crazy. I wonder if boring Oakdale pushed their buttons.

The odd thing is that only a few years later, we got an international jetsetter who had heavy ties to criminal worlds, and who had a long lost daughter she had left in the jungles of Montega. And yet viewers happily embraced Lucinda and Sierra.

Royce is still alive. His split personalities murdered his sister, Neal. After he integrated, he no longer knew himself, and he dumped Emily at the altar. He stayed around Oakdale for several months, helping to introduce Samantha (who was conning the Walshes, but actually turned out to be a real Walsh after all) before leaving, as the show had no story for him. I think Marland had planned a longer story involving Royce's multiple personalities and murdering his sister Neal, but then he passed away.

Royce was a tough sell but I did love Neal, his sister. I was very upset when she was killed. 1993 was a very hard year for me and ATWT...

Kirk and Sam, in late 1998, got a note asking them to come to the docks. They had a picnic there, or something, and then they were never seen again. They were, presumably, taken by someone. The implication was James Stenbeck, or his son David. I don't know if the show planned to ever address this again (the timing was horrible, as Sam's daughter Georgia had just come on the show), but it has been dropped ever since.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You've probably already seen these, but patc2000 has some good clips up from the Dobson era, with Tom, Margo, James, Barbara, Gunnar, the OTT Dee murder trial with the noisy crowd and face-pulling jury (remember when soap trials had a lot of extras?). Lots of good stuff.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQj-3SGWdUQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLIS9KLhaHc&feature=related

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you for the clips. "Bilan" sounds like some sort of deadly bacteriological agent.

Yes, I remember the endless, labyrinthe paternity/child stories the Dobsons did on GL and ATWT complete with international intrigue. I liked a lot of what I saw of their GL, and I suppose the James and Barbara story worked great on ATWT given the rush in the '80s to emulate the adventure tales on GH, and we got Tom and Margo and so on, but some of the other stuff seems so out of place and ill-suited for Oakdale. Then of course they got Santa Barbara. It's a pity they were driven out of daytime, odd fit for Oakdale or not; their complicated, over the top madness was for the most part divine.

Since it's turned into a history lesson can someone explain to me the deal with Holden's amnesia on ATWT? Why did Marland do that, and didn't he want it to be permanent? What is the timeframe; was Martha Byrne gone at the time, and when and how did she return?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Neal was Mary-Kay Adams, right? I saw Julianne Moore on The View and she seemed to have a huge soft spot for the show, then again, she seems like a lovely person generally speaking. It would be a beautiful gesture if she came back for a day, though I could totally see her people being all, "Whaddayou, CRAZY!?" I know they recast Frannie and Sabrina with actresses who did NOT look alike, I'm not sure which was which, but Claire Beckman (aka Silver Kane #2 on AMC) played one of them and she runs a theatre company in Brooklyn. Obviously Moore would be the real draw though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The odd part of their ATWT run for me is that they wrote heavily for the Stewarts, which had not really been done in some years, and was not done afterwards. Their run was basically the only time in about 25 years that Ellen Stewart had stories. I'd love someone to ask them why they preferred the Stewarts to the Hughes family. I also wish they had gone back to GH at some point. Perhaps they still could. I would love to see Steve Burton read a script where he uses farming equipment for sexual references, or serves his pet Spinelli for dinner.

Martha Byrne had left the role of Lily in 1989. Lily was burned in a fire that killed her con artist husband (ageless Thomas Gibson of Dharma and Greg/Tales of the City/Criminal Minds) and she fled Oakdale. She lived with nuns or something. Lily returned in late 1990, with plastic surgery, played by Heather Rattray.

Lily and Holden married, but she had a miscarriage, and they drifted apart. They were just about done when he learned Julie had had his son and given him to Iva to adopt. Holden confronted Julie in her New York apartment. On the street outside, he was mugged and left for dead. He had permanent brain damage. He could not remember anything about his life. It was a precursor to when this was done with Jason on GH. Marland said it was not amnesia and Holden would never get his memory back.

Holden could not remember Lily, or anyone. Rattray's Lily left town. He had to start over again. Marland at this time called Martha Byrne and asked if she would return as Lily. Byrne agreed. This led to when Holden ended up going to Malta and saw Lily singing in a club, recently married to Damian Grimaldi.

Holden fell in love with Lily again, but he was very, very cold, and it just never felt right. I don't think it helped that Marland died not long after the story began. The future writers had little idea of how to deal with Holden. It was a particular black mark for me when he took Aaron from Iva because Aaron was "his" son, and then proceeded to foist the child on Emma because he was more interested in pursuing women. One of the women had a son and he treated her kid more like his own than he did Aaron. Or I thought so at the time.

Anyway, Jon Hensley left in 1995, after Lily decided to stay with Damian and their baby son, Luke. When Jon returned a year later, the new producer, Felicia Behr, decided that Holden needed to be the "real" Holden again. Holden got in a bar fight, hit his head, and all his memories came back. He was his old self again.

It was disrespectful to Marland's work, but I think they made the right decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The curious thing for me is, why was the amnesia/brain damage done? Sure, Heather Rattray was a cold fish, but did Hensley want to go "darker?" What did they have in mind for him if not Lily, or were they always banking on Martha Byrne coming back? I wonder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I found it to be a rather odd way to deal with a character departing for parts unknown.
    • Today reminded me as to why I’m a little disappointed in the name that the new Pope chose

      Please register in order to view this content

      Luckily, EJ and Johnny, and pretty much every other character saved today’s episode.  I didn’t expect Javi to be the one to save Sarah though, and I don’t mind it at all, because if it means that Javi is finally going to get his own identity/character, away from his douchy bf, I’m all for it. Javi’s scenes would’ve been a lot better had it not been for him. EJ and Johnny were the best part of today. Their conversation hit a lot of important beats and I’m so looking forward to seeing them play out. And now that EJ knows that Johnny is going to work for Xander, that opens up another dynamic to their storyline and to the Kiriakis family storylines as well. Tying them all together could be really good. There are so many story possibilities that can come out of this. And I thought Carson Boatman did a pretty good job again too.  I also liked that Johnny was there to comfort Chanel after everything that happened with Sarah. They’re so good together. But I do have mixed feelings about Chanel possibly forgiving Johnny so quickly. Hopefully, the question that she asked him at the end of today leads to more conflict for the two of them.  And yeah, still no changes in Alex’s character lol 
    • Awesome, thanks so much for taking the time to grab this episode. I had a quick review of your rip because I was curious why it was 700MB and 30 minutes. The first 10 minutes of the episode is 3169 (opening credits at 5 minutes and again at 15 minutes). I thought we had the full HD version of ep.3170 on the YouTube channel, but it appears they added the wrong episode but labelled it 3170. 
    • I guess, according to Mike Manning in the Michael Fairman chat, he was almost Derek 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • OIC Thanks. I saw thzt & looked for a prior  ... never mind. 
    • I imagine Brad will blow through all the money in a year and come crawling back, just as Portia warned him not to.
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • That's a name I haven't heard in a minute. Thanks! 
    • Well, since I'm still up unexpected past my growing-into-it bedtime. lol.   I finally got to rewatch Monday's. I even rewatched Friday's to take it all in. Now that we got the reveal and hit the climax of the SilkPress Sheila storyline, now we get to watch the aftermath and/or turns that come with its climax. So far, so good. Friday left us with three cliffhangers. And what I found surprising was how I felt about them over a rewatch.    I know some of you all felt a way about the dialogue during Kat vs Eva. I remember liking it more the first time around and it was nice for them to have these scenes to establish more of a frenemy vibe for them going forward. That still held up. But I found myself agreeing with you all about that dialogue. lol. Still, it was nice to have both of their POVs.   Second up was Silk Press Sheila vs the Duprees. And I was happy to get a brief spat with Dani in there. But the rest standouts for me was Anita and Martin. Haters can hate and given the tail end of the episode, I will agree to a fault, but Brandon has impressed and he was on fire on Monday and had great subtle work on Friday. And that subtle work made it all the better. Like I believe I said when I was watching...BC has a much better grip on his character and seems to be realizing what his tics are so has started to be able to know when to turn it up and when to dial it down. And for the most part (emphasis on most), he got that. Meanwhile, TT was giving fierceness, and I was here for every minute of it. Her reading SilkPress. Her being quip about it. Her 'BE STILL.' Ooooo she had a chokehold on me as Anita gave what I was expecting her to SilkPress. WORTH THE WAIT. I also loved Vernon's CHOOSE SILENCE. I wonder though if SilkPress will figure out Martin's condition from her observing Anita and Vernon with him.   And speaking of worth it...Oooo YES Nicole vs Ted was worth totally worth it. Oooooo I knew DD would nail it, and it was all so well done. The fight between the part of Nicole who is a therapist vs Nicole as a woman who wants to express how she feels. And being so angry. And how there would be moments when it would shoot out of her. And how she would restrain herself. But how she felt she should not be restrain. Just the levels of processing and layers. And DD played it all so well. I do wish Maurice gave just a little bit more, but overall, I thought he did a good job even if it was just Ted coming across as a deadbeat and not at all redeemable. And Kat being there for her mother was so beautiful.   Minority, but I love the montage though yes, it did run a little long. Given how the Duprees like to bond (and also as I mentioned from my own very recent family experiences), it did not seem out of place to me.     That said...let's see how the aftermath worked in today's episode. Overall. Cuz RC can be hit or miss. 
    • I wonder whose brilliant (

      Please register in order to view this content

      ) idea it was to do an almost complete rip-off of the "who killed Tom King"-storyline. That's some quality style writing right there.....  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy