Jump to content

Lorraine Broderick as AMC head writer


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I think it's more of people realizing that it "wasn't so bad" - and at most times, actually quite good - under Broderick... especially when they compare her body of work to McTavish's or Pratt's. She respected the characters and attempted to honor AMC's reputation for socially-relevant storytelling wherever possible. And the idea of having someone like that at the writing helm sounds like a DREAM considering the utter nightmare AMC viewers have been put through in recent years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 722
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Well, it isn't the obssession with baby switches, if that's what you're thinking. I've always said I love a good baby-switch (storyline). IMO, the one between Jenny Wolek and Katrina Karr on OLTL was probably the best written story ever on soaps, if not the best one about this subject.

I've yet to recall even one story of LB's where I was COMPELLED to watch everyday, lest I wanted to suffer a fate worse than death. She IS good, but I also feel like she tells her stories from the head, and not from the heart, if that makes any sense. Compare that to Pam Long, who, even when she screws up, still delivers the whole gamut of emotions (and sometimes, within the same scene).

The difference between someone like Agnes Nixon and someone like Lorraine Broderick, is the difference between a show that is currently being head-written by someone w/ a vision, and one that is being written by the breakdown writers in lieu of a headwriter until a suitable one is found.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That does make sense. I think with proper guidance, this can be a good choice. Without it, we end up with stuff like all powerful psychos roaming the town, although she did that more on ATWT and OLTL than AMC.

Did you see Long's OLTL work? What did you think of it? I'm half surprised she isn't in contention for this ABC job. She lives on the West Coast doesn't she?

Have you ever seen Emmerdale? Their baby switch story last year was very good. Some of it is on Youtube.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Of course, I want someone who honors AMC's long-standing tradition of character-driven, topically relevant storytelling to write this show. I just feel like "recycling" even LB in that chair is not the way to go. You have a writer, Jeff Beldner, who's been there forever and a day, so why not give him the opportunity? Now, I'm not saying I know for a fact that he'll be the Second Coming (remember, that distinction belongs to Ron Carlivati), but it COULD be the best of both worlds: someone with a long association with the show, but who might come to the job with some fresh ideas.

GUIDING LIGHT, after all, lasted as long as it did, because more than one person could write that show. I want the same distinction for AMC. I don't want it to be like Y&R, a show that, apparently, only one person understood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Back when Frons fired Richard Culliton in 2002 SOW reported that he had approached both Kay Alden and Pamela Long about replacing him. Obviously neither worked out but he approached Alden again several years later when it was time to replace McTavish, so maybe Long is still on his list of possibilities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wow, that is harsh.

Some of AMC's most HEARTfelt moments in its history occurred under Broderick. In general, either you're saying that McTavish / Pratt / Passanante turned in stellar work, or your perception of AMC over the last two decades is that it's been consistently horrible. Which is it? Because, with a few small gaps, they've each been there at the top of the writing team throughout that time.

Long did some good work on Guiding Light... and that was it. I would pick Broderick over Pam Long to save my own life.

On that note, let me add that I do recognize (and not in a vague way) Broderick's faults: She can meander on the pacing of the storyline - - sometimes it felt like she needed more exciting "punches" along the way. And at times she has a tendency to go TOO emotional, to the point of where the story becomes dark. Some viewers even expressed irritation that the show was too dialog-heavy, though I would NEVER make such a complaint of AMC today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Stop right there. Remember, Carl, it's Pratt who's been replaced, not Frons. ;-)

I felt it was the most intense and exciting OLTL had been, quite frankly, since the peak of the Paul Rauch/Peggy O'Shea era. I, for one, never cared for the so-called "golden age" of Gottlieb/Malone/Griffith. I felt that show was the work of people who piggybacked their own stories and characters onto OLTL's canvas in the name of "reclaiming its roots", and to hell with those who thought otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm saying, AMC has not felt like AMC since 1991 - and even there, I think I'm being generous. I watched the show before then, and for a few years afterward, out of a sense of loyalty to certain characters (namely, Erica, Mona, Phoebe, Brooke, Palmer, Joe & Ruth, Myrtle, Natalie, Tad, Dixie, and maybe a few others). Yes, Broderick co-head-wrote during the amazing 1987-88 season, when we had the one-two punch of Mark Dalton's drug addiction and Cindy Parker's battle w/ AIDS (not to mention, Laura Cudahy's death). But can you really build your reputation as a writer on one good year, people?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's an extremely slippery slope. If you're gonna play that card, why don't we just say OLTL has not felt like OLTL since 1978 with those pesky Buchanans? Golly, when on Earth are they gonna leave? Some might say you have unrealistic expectations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You're right, Vee, I probably do have unrealistic expectations.

For the record, though, OLTL ceased being appointment viewing for me probably after "Buchanans of the Old West." I'm sorry, but time travel? No.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'll admit that Long certainly brought energy to OLTL. Her tenure along with the tail-end of the Labines, ironically, was probably the only time I found OLTL interesting under EP Jill Farren Phelps. And I'll also admit that after Long / enter McTavish, I found OLTL to be pretty soul-less all the way until JFP and McT were out. BUT... that isn't saying much. Because I thought it was REALLY bad otherwise. :lol:

Like you, Khan, I'm also one who considers the Rauch / O'Shea (and to some extent Schnessel) years - let's just call them the Tina & Viki years - of OLTL to be the show's REAL heydey. I think the current OLTL honors that era, along with the Gottlieb and 70's eras, pretty effectively today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Recent Posts

    • Fireplace in same location in both homes, but Lulu has bookcase instead of door to another room May 13, 2025

      Please register in order to view this content

      ^screengrabs from Video clip of May 13 Lulu/Carly scene at Lulu's house video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9DtlZ3el6w   April 1, 2015
    • Portugal qualifying was the only shocker. I'm really happy for Iceland. IMO, the automatic finalists – Spain, Switzerland and Italy – had the best performances. I love the studio version of Azerbaijan, but on stage, it was a disaster.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • May 12, 2025: Jordan and Laura meet at Lulu's house.

      Please register in order to view this content

        April 1, 2015 the childhood home of Luke, Bobbie and Pat Spencer Young Luke with his parents. (LW as his mother) Clip from April 1, 2015 which shows more of the set: (Chloe Lanier as Luke's sister Pat) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H81KId9qb_I
    • As Blanche once said, "You're feeling magenta."

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Robert Benton, Director of Best Picture Winner ‘Kramer vs. Kramer,’ Dies at 92
    • Randomly came across this while on Instagram, but Shelly Burch (Delilah Ralston) and Danielle Harris (Sammi Garretson) are going to be on The Locher Room on May 20 at 7:30 PM EST.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Randy (Doug's friend who works for Joey) -- Joey told Randy weeks ago that Joey's plan was to get Doug into so much debt that Doug would be forced to get Vanessa's real estate holding turned over to Joey, to use for money-laundering.  That's been the plan all along, which the viewers knew.  The only thing new is that Joey finally told Doug this. I think Joey is written badly.  I also think Jon Lindstrom is doing "Now I am going to act menacing".   But I don't really feel the menace.  It's too overdramatic and it doesn't feel like a real person.  Jon is a fine actor on GH, so I don't know what's happening here -- the entire BTG mobster premise is badly designed/written.  I don't know if Guza pushed for a mobster storyline?  Or did Jon?  (Jon wrote a novel about Hollywood mobsters). It just doesn't fit.  It feels (to me) like this storyline for Jon was just shoved onto the canvas but it doesn't fit all all. Monday's scene of Mona coming into the "casino" to check up on where Leslie supposedly lost money in the slot machines -- and Randy explaining to Mona that there are no slot machines, there is nothing but the card room.  I had to laugh because they had characters comment that it's just a card room and not a casino -- the show is now acknowledging that there's nothing there.  If they are going to do this, then have it make sense for Fairmont Crest residents to visit a high-end glamourous casino, and not a random room with one table. So what money is Joey laundering? A while back, Joey told Vanessa that he knows about her sexual philandering because owns the escort service that she'd been using. But I don't care...  I'd just prefer that the entire mobster storyline go away. 
    • I caught up this past weekend. The show is better written, but I have been bored with the show. I did notice it ranked in the top 5 again this week, so that's a good sign.
    • I can't take this show seriously. I truly miss WJB writing this show. Bradley didn't inherit his dad's talent.
    • Maybe if there had been a good close up or two
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy