Jump to content

Lorraine Broderick as AMC head writer


Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

Eden was from the early 90s. It's probably better than their soap runs, although that's not saying much. Soap fans can spot Diana Barton as a psycho who seduces her married ex in a locker room, and Jeff Griggs as the dead husband of the lead heroine, who appears in fantasies and flashbacks 500000 times to have sex with her. And Jack Armstrong as the wacky lifeguard/musician who loved the ladies. Armstrong was a lot better here than he was on the soaps.

  • Replies 722
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

I can't wait to hear what went down behind the scenes and who or what prompted Lorraine Broderick to come back. When do you think we'll hear something official?

Paging DavidEvanSmith. Your presence is requested in the Lorraine Broderick thread. :lol:

  • Members
Posted

LOL that's random. Where has he been anyway? :P

I know Agnes Nixon doesn't have much power anymore (even if she is still hired as a consultant by ABC) but I strongly suspect she played some sort of part. It's too bad the lady is way too classy to ever even slightly bad mouth anyone, otherwise her website would be brilliant gossipy fun right now :)

  • Members
Posted

I'm interested in finding out what the consensus is on Black and Stern when they wrote for Falcon Crest, considering they were writing when the show was at the height of its success.

Ben (Peter Parros) was introduced on ATWT in 1996, and was the only one of the new characters who would stay in the long term. This is sort of like what happened to Days in 1980 with the "St Valentine's Day massacre"- you know, when longtime characters were axed and nobody cared about the new characters except Liz Chandler (Gloria Loring).

  • Members
Posted

Awwww...Eric...like if you didnt know DES already. You know what he's up to!biggrin.gif I havent seen him post here or GMOB board. He must be busy with all his men....hehe

Yup it is....

It's funny how Carly has evolved. I am glad you grew up just a bit. Of course I can still see her scheming to get what she wants.

I agree..way too much Eddie Silva and Georgia. I couldnt stand either one. I was glad when they left. Another of Broderick awful characters to arrive in Oakdale.

Pretty much

  • Members
Posted

AMC and ATWT are two different animals, so what worked for AMC might not have worked for ATWT. On the surface the two shows come off as very traditional (or at least they used to), but I think that's where the similarity ends. From my standpoint, ATWT always used a more cohesive style of storytelling, was full of relatable characters who seemed like real people, and used a very serious, earnest tone, while AMC was more likely to use contrasting elements in their approach to storytelling (fantasy storylines juxtaposed with intelligently done, contemporary issues-based stories) and characters (contrasting the very real, e.g., Joe, Ruth, and Mona, with the outrageous, e.g., Phoebe, Billy Clyde, Opal), as well as lots of comedy in the form of social satire and camp. The contrasts and the comedy combined to help form the AMC template, and they are what drew me to the show in the first place. Agnes, Wisner, and Lorraine (and yes, even Megan, to an extent, in her own little dumbed-down manner) executed the template expertly, for the most part. I think that Felicia and Lorraine tried to bring these AMC-style elements to ATWT, while still trying to keep true to what ATWT was all about, and it didn't quite gel.

  • Members
Posted

I'm going to change subjects slightly. But what storylines or characters would you like to see Lorraine Broderick bring to the frontburner? After commenting in the Daniel Kennedy thread, I really feel the show needs to explore the Colby / Petey coupling. There's too much history with their families to ignore. The show must put Daniel Kennedy on contract; he's too good to lose.

I feel like Daniel Kennedy's agent now. :lol:

  • Members
Posted

It's hard to say because a lot of the people who are staying with the show seem to be dead end characters, at least for me.

I would like to see her give more focus to Natalia.

I would like to see Jesse lose his job on the police force and go to work as a PI or something else. I'd like to see Natalia's principles clash with her family loyalty, and her choosing her principles, with some fallout with Jesse and the Hubbards.

I would like to see Erica seriously question where her life has gone in recent years and have a lot of storyline with Adam, as they push each other's buttons and take each other back from the brink. Of course, David Canary may not be with the show much longer :(

I would like to see David move away from the baby obsession and get a new love interest.

I would like to see Jake thrown out of the hospital. He can go run a shelter or something else where he can try to lecture people and he can find some sort of outlet for his constant moral outrage.

  • Members
Posted

The first thing on LB's agenda should (and might well) be to restore this show's families. GL died with its families so decimated and bare that they practically pushed all of the leftover characters together to form one big awkward family...and it was just depressing. I want the Kane crew to come back in fine form. Whether or not they reunite Erica and Jack, they need to keep their families intertwined. That's one reason why I wouldn't mind a Greenlee return. Bring back Greens, recast Lily and Reggie somewhere down the line maybe. Perhaps try again with Sean. The Chandlers...nuColby is a good way to start. Killing Stuart was not, but keep Scott around. Scott and JR as rivals is a natural. Unfortunately, the Chandler family is lacking in younger characters to bring back into the canvas. The Martins are not, however, and with Joe and Ruth retired and off the show (:(), it's important to keep the Martins on the show. Jake can FOAD, but recast Jamie pronto. Bring back Brooke, please! She's not a blood Martin or a Martin by marriage anymore, but she and Tad have always been on good terms, and I miss their friendship. The Hubbards are fine...just recast Randi. As for the rest...it's nice to still have fringe characters who can move between the major families. Opal is at home with the Martins as well as the Kanes and sometimes the Chandlers. David can stir crap up no matter where you put him.

I just feel that the show is extremely hollow right now. The foundation is falling apart, and it's just...daid. I don't like it.

  • Members
Posted

The JR/Scott rivalry falls flat for me because JR is a whiny baby all the time, so this is nothing new, and Scott is a scold who goes around lecturing people while he's making out with his aunt. I'd rather see them become friends for a while before any rivalry.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • On that same note, it's astounding to have mobster Sonny in the same office with Mayor Laura chatting it up about their mutual grandson. Think about the reaction if John Gotti and Mayor Eric Adams had a friendship

      Please register in order to view this content

      ?? I guess the Logic behind Sonny & Jason acceptance is like when i saw a documentary where FBI agents said they'd rather deal with the mafia than terrorists or cartels---they're the "lesser of 3 evils". Anyway I'm about 30 years late on this convo.
    • Im confused. Does Jessica know anything about June's relation to Tyrell? At the start of the episode, it seemed like June was gonna slip that he was her son but she caught herself but later in the episode she referred to him as "my boy" and Jessica had no reaction like that wasnt a surprise to her No, Anita was putting money in the account every 6 months but we werent told how much was in it when Leslie became a beneficiary. The show has set it up that it was multiplying based off the interest so that its really worth quite alot now. I dont buy it but thats what they've told us
    • What was the point in Lori's return as Mrs. Max Hollister? That little story never made much sense to me.  Were there plans for a permanent return? Or even a new family with her as the matriarch?  
    • I guess it depends on your device.  I can watch CW shows via their website on my Windows PC.
    • Ooooo A Liam episode? I'll watch it later today. They sure are churning the daily episodes out early.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Welcome back, Shawn Douglas! It's been a while. It really is too bad that the writers don't really have an interest in the character because there are still a lot of ways that he can be used effectively on the canvas. He should have been a part of the 60th anniversary celebrations as well. If anything, just to represent Bo and Hope. And I'd much rather see Jada paired with him than possibly with Theo. But I enjoyed him getting caught up with Belle, and comforting her. I'm sure they'll find their way back to each other at some point but I do like them as divorced friends. I just hope we see it play out onscreen. Belle being a dick about Sami again was unnecessary though. And we finally saw Liam again!  I'm curious to see how this storyline is going to play out, and who's going to be weaved into it. He and Abe do work well together too. And we learned that he has a kid. Hopefully, we'll learn more about his character in the future. But I'm not really sure about Johnny and Chanel suddenly having problems with raising Trey. They've wanted a baby for so long, so I don't understand why this is even an issue. They should know by now what it's like to raise a baby. But I did enjoy Johnny's scenes with EJ, and that Johnny still hasn't refused to forgive him. This storyline was/is very clunky, but having the two of them be at odds is the right decision. There's so much story potential that can be drawn from that. As for Chad... there was no time for us to see his reunion with Will, but there's time for us to see him talking BS with Leo? I don't get it. And I don't get all this random dating app stuff either. Leo and Javi were boring af too. If we're forced to endure them, can they at least have some real conflict? The two of them losing the baby was the perfect opportunity for it. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy