Jump to content

Lorraine Broderick as AMC head writer


Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

I thought McTavish made him a terrorist. The material about him being Laura's child pornographer and killing the boy who had shot the films with her happened while Broderick was still there, I think.

  • Replies 722
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

Broderick's AMC was a pretty diverse show, and I think she'll love writing for the Hubbards.

Robin Mattson's Janet was always my favourite interpretation of that character. Broderick did some amazing work with that character and with Mattson in the role. That was one of the few succcessful redemption arcs in daytime over the past 15 years or so that I can recall at the top of my head, too bad it's all gone to hell since (I'm NOT a Kate Collins fan).

  • Members
Posted

I liked her work at ATWT.

A lot of people don't,they say that period was too dark.

She wrote David Stenbeck. She did the baby switch of Lily's baby and Denise's baby.

She featured the vets a lot.

When Chris Goutman took over he fired her and replaced her with Leah Laiman

  • Members
Posted

I think she was good at some parts of ATWT. I liked that Andy returned and had some decent story. I liked that Lily had matured. I liked some of the other moments. I liked the idea of the Tom/Margo breakup, although they completely destroyed Emily's character in the process. I don't know if she got ATWT. Or FMB didn't. There were so many new characters, they fired Daniel Markel for no reason and brought David back as an all-seeing, all-knowing sociopath, Reid, whose abs were more interesting than his personality (the Spencer Trueman of his day), and there were other odd decisions, like having Kirk and Sam vanish, having Denise come in as a bitter shrew who had sold her baby (which meant fans never really liked her when the show tried to redeem her later on). Too much Molly. Too much Julia. Too much Eddie. Trashing Lyla and making her into a bad mother who only cared about putting Katie in kiddie pageants. Some of the stories did work, but I think Penny Hughes summed it up best when she came back for Nancy's birthday and said, "Who are these people?"

  • Members
Posted

For many of the reasons mentioned, she is a step in the right direction. I never enjoyed AMC more than her time with the show in the mid 90's. It was the last great time period for the show. Since 1998, there have been stretches of goodness few and far between. I am very excited at the prospect of her coming back... I've wanted her to come back ever since she left. Didn't Frons offer her the job in 2003, and she declined? I wonder what has changed?

  • Members
Posted

That's why I wonder if this is just a short-term gig.

Perhaps if people like her work, as I'm sure they will, Frons might keep her around. If he doesn't have another hack like Pratt who needs a job.

  • Members
Posted

Yes, although that was FMB, and MADD. Lorraine was still at AMC then. She came along about a year later.

I get very picky with ATWT because when I started with the show it was close to perfect, but I just never felt like they really understood ATWT. And the Liz Hubbard fiasco also suggested FMB or MADD did not know PR.

  • Members
Posted

Her AMC was good but she started running out of gas and AMC dropped to #5 in the ratings and was close to dropping even further to #6 and that's why she was fired.

  • Members
Posted

I'm not going to get excited. This is not the same AMC as before. Broderick is good and all but she still has to write with what she has now, and that's not a whole lot.

  • Members
Posted

I guess we should also talk about her DAYS run, which some said had good potential before Corday had another Corday moment and fired her.

  • Members
Posted

I agree I dont think they understood ATWT. I had forgotten about the Elizabeth Hubbard fiasco. She had a stroke and was written out. Goutman came in and brought her back. Hubbard and Taylor were treated badly by FMB and Lorraine Broderick.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • I don't think he ever gained much traction on GH. He should have stayed with The Doctors. Was Mark just a toned-down version of Nick? Were they basically the same character?
    • All I can think of is if a lot of big names were leaving around that time she wanted him back as a stopgap, although I have never seen any real evidence that he was popular with GH viewers.
    • I loved watching Shanice hand Leslie her ass and finally shutting her up. It was so good. I also love Martin & Smitty's family.  Anita has to have some sort of plan giving Leslie the tickets to mail for Winterfest. She has to be setting her up for a fall. It's pretty obvious to me Vernon is not cheating with Sharon. I think Sharon is helping him with his terrible singing voice for Winterfest. I still believe Bill & Dani are endgame but I love Dani & Andre too. I am definitely enjoying this story. And making Hayley a black widow is a nice twist.
    • Sorry for the spam. Wasn't sure where to put this, it's from Tony Geary's husband's IG. Tony watching Genie and Maurice on Mo's show.
    • This show is really trundling along BTW. When is someone going to show up to slit Beastmaster's throat or crack the whip on metrosexual Sidwell? (BTW, openly presenting this cheery bon vivant as casually bisexual would at least be something vaguely diverting.) At least kill Brennan by year's end. I'm bored.
    • She told Vanessa to "DOUBLE her offer" on the Jarvis house.  The Jarvis family accepted the doubled price.  Assuming the house has an appraised value of $2,000,000, she's theoretically paid the Jarvis family $4,000,000 for the house.  The bank would loan Leslie 80% of the appraised value ($1,600,000), and Leslie had to pay the balance with cash at closing --- $2,200,000.  She only had ONE million.  Where the hell did she get the rest?!  And now she's got contractors working on the house all day & half the night.  Who's paying THEM?  I keep thinking all this will crash around her.  Either that or the writers have absolutely no idea the limits of a million dollars.  Sounds like a "lot of money", but it obviously ain't when we look at Leslie's spending since she got that million dollar check in August.     
    • Maree Cheatham     pg. 403

      Please register in order to view this content

            MATLOCK Sister Peggy (1) 2025   Ray Wise    pg. 428 movie THE WOLF IN THE WELL    Roland Carmel    2024 THE NAPA BOYS    Officer Toland   2025   PodCast HAVOC TOWN      Josiah Abbess       2025    
    • Vernon is an idiot. Why would he have Sharon in the same hotel that Leslie is staying at?
    • Yes, that out of the blue return was odd. Maybe GG found a forgotten clause in the contract he signed when he was wooed to ABC and they were forced to take him back! Like George Reinholt he talked about the contract that promised him primetime roles. But it was loaded in the networks favor. I think it was Gloria Loring that re-signed at Days on the promise of primetime opportunities, but that was all it was- she was put up for guest spots and TV movies but not necessarily guaranteed that she get the role.
    • I still am baffled by why Monty brought back stunt hire Gerald Gordon in the early '80s out of nowhere for like a year. I haven't found anyone who can come up with a thing he did in that second stint of note.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy