Jump to content

Guiding Light Discussion Thread


Paul Raven

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 17.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

So...in reading the recaps of the reveal that Carrie killed Diane and Joe--it sounds anti-climactic. Carrie just cracks and tells Ross? Was it as big a letdown as it seems? Plus, I don't think she'd been in town that long before Diane died.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She hadn't been, although they had some run-ins.

They also said Carrie and Diane knew each other before arriving in Springfield - another case where backstory doesn't really up the stakes from what I've seen. 

I still think killing off Diane was a mistake, although considering the purges of the early-mid '80s on GL at least she went out with a bang rather than just leaving offcamera.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Diane was the impetus for Carrie's DID.  She unsuccessfully tried to have an affair with Carrie's husband while they lived in San Francisco, and then taunted Carrie about it (much like she had done with Alan and Elizabeth).  It was also a classic mystery tale that the person killed had many enemies for many reasons.  Diane had been written into a corner and with all of those who had been wronged by her, she could've never carried on Springfield. It was also a great mystery because so many other secrets were revealed during the investigation.  She was literally the woman who knew too much…

She knew Alan had illegally adopted Phillip, she knew that Henry was Quint's father, and she knew Carrie had been in a mental hospital.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, she had her chances and slipped out of trouble in the past. 

First, when Elizabeth fired her as Phillip's nanny.  Then when Roger found out that Alan paid a witness to perjure himself at the custody trial.  And when she tried to break up Ben's marriage.

So, it was unlikely that soap justice could be put off any longer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I didn't think she had either. But the SOC who's who (which is an iffy source, I know) said she got there in March. I swear it's August, meaning Carrie was only there about a month before Diane died.

Which also means Jane Elliot was there about a year? I wish more of this was online, even with subVanessa. Stuart is really just wrong in the role. Or if not wrong, just clashes with how Maeve played it.

I guess I didn't realize Diane and Carrie's husband had had an affair. I thought she somehow framed him for embezzlement and then he killed himself.

Diane also knew Ross had used Amanda. And that Alan had colluded with Roger and gotten him out of town. And if she didn't know Vanessa had sent Ed Rita's address in San Francisco, Joe had the info and it got mixed in with her blackmail stash.

I think I read an interview where Sofia said it was her decision to leave---but she hadn't expected to be killed off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They didn't have an affair, but Diane was in love with him and repeated the Alan and Elizabeth thing.  She was blindly loyal to a bad guy, and it wound up hurting his wife (in this case Carrie) because she thought that they were having an affair.

Also, I would argue that if Carrie came to town and had multiple scenes where she argued with Diane, the mystery would've been too obvious.  And, Diane's murder led to Ross's redemption, whereas he was no longer as much of a bag dude.

In hindsight, it was reflective of the sexism of the times.  A female character like Diane had to be punished.  While guys like Alan and Roger were just sexy rouges (as well as rapist, thieves, and extortionists).

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As much as I love Douglas Marland, I think he was asking a lot from GL fans by having Carrie, a relative newcomer, mixed up in so much story.  In the time she was on the show, Carrie managed to kill off Diane and Joe, fall in love with and marry Ross, develop DID, sleep with Josh and tank Justin and Jackie's relationship (and if Marland had had his way, Carrie also would've murdered Jackie and then have her alters confess to it at the trial).  And that's just what I can recall from off the top of my head.

Again, placing Carrie/Jane Elliot in the center of so much action was a HUGE ask.  I think we needed at least two years just to get to know Carrie before plunging her into so much drama.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I also wonder if her child would have come back into play - I think he was dead but you know how that goes on soaps. 

GL was going through so much upheaval at the time. Clearly viewers were willing to embrace some change, given the popularity of Nola, Kelly, and Morgan #1, but I do wonder how they felt about Carrie. Jane is such a brilliant actress, but she was such a departure from many of the leading ladies of GL in acting style and presence. It would have been a bit like Judith Light joining ATWT in 1978. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Again through modern eyes, but I wish Alan and Roger suffered a bit more due to the loss of Diane.  She was such a Lady Macbeth-type, and she really helped build the Spaulding empire.  So, it would've been at least a minor victory for her passing to have Alan acknowledge how much his company had lost by not having Diane's assistance to carry out his plots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I'm screaming at those clips and gifs.  THIS IS PURE GOLD.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's always been my thought. I can't imagine that the show would play up the unseen AD so far in advance without them casting a *star*. After today's episode, I wonder if he'll somehow be connected with Diane. It was strange that Diane mentioned her very distant family today. I can't recall Diane ever talking about her backstory. Maybe he's her much younger brother?  It's also possible he's connected to Diane during her time in LA. Sally's already said she crossed paths with him. OC, I think Dumas is Mariah's mistake.... As a side note, it was good to see some mixing it up - Adam with Clare/Kyle and Sharon with Tessa.
    • Here's the place to share some memorable criticism. You don't have to agree with it, of course (that's often where the fun starts). Like I mentioned to @DRW50, Sally Field was a favorite punching bag in the late '80s and early '90s.   Punchline (the 1988 movie where she and Tom Hanks are stand ups): "It's impossible to tell the difference between Miss Field's routines that are supposed to be awful, and the awful ones that are supposed to be funny." -- Vincent Canby, New York Times. "It's not merely that Field is miscast; she's miscast in a role that leaves no other resource available to her except her lovability. And (David) Seltzer's script forces her to peddle it shamelessly." -- Hal Hinson, Washington Post. "As a woman who can't tell a joke, Sally Field is certainly convincing. ... Field has become an unendurable performer ... She seems to be begging the audience not to punch her. Which, of course, is the worst kind of bullying from an actor. ... She's certainly nothing like the great housewife-comedian Roseanne Barr, who is a tough, uninhibited performer. Sally Field's pandering kind of 'heart' couldn't be further from the spirit of comedy." -- David Denby, New York   Steel Magnolias: The leading ladies: Dolly Parton: "She is one of the sunniest and most natural of actresses," Roger Ebert wrote. Imagining that she probably saw Truvy as an against-type role, Hinson concluded it's still well within her wheelhouse. "She's just wearing fewer rhinestones." Sally Field: "Field, as always, is a lead ball in the middle of the movie," according to Denby . M'Lynn giving her kidney to Shelby brought out David's bitchy side. "I can think of a lot more Sally Field organs that could be sacrificed." Shirley MacLaine: "(She) attacks her part with the ferociousness of a pit bull," Hinson wrote. "The performance is so manic that you think she must be taking off-camera slugs of Jolt." (I agree. If there was anyone playing to the cheap seats in this movie, it's Shirley.) Olympia Dukakis: "Excruciating, sitting on her southern accent as if each obvious sarcasm was dazzlingly witty," Denby wrote. Daryl Hannah: "Miss Hannah's performance is difficult to judge," according to Canby, which seems to suggest he took a genuine "if you can't say something nice ..." approach. Julia Roberts: "(She acts) with the kind of mega-intensity the camera cannot always absorb," Canby wrote. That comment is so fascinating in light of the nearly 40 years Julia has spent as a Movie Star. She is big. It's the audience who had to play catch up. And on that drag-ish note ... The movie itself: "You feel as if you have been airlifted onto some horrible planet of female impersonators," Hinson wrote. Canby: "Is one supposed to laugh at these women, or with them? It's difficult to tell." Every review I read acknowledged the less than naturalistic dialogue in ways both complimentary (Ebert loved the way the women talked) and cutting (Harling wrote too much exposition, repeating himself like a teenager telling a story, Denby wrote). Harling wrote with sincerity and passion, Canby acknowledged, but it's still a work of "bitchiness and greeting card truisms." The ending was less likely to inspire feeling good as it was feeling relieved, according to Denby. "(It's) as if a group of overbearing, self-absorbed, but impeccable mediocre people at last exit from the house."
    • I tend to have two minds about Tawny (Kathy Najimy) fainting during Soapdish's big reveal. You're the costume designer, if anything, you should have known the whole time. I guess it's an application of what TV Tropes calls the "Rule of Funny." Every time I watch Delirious, I always want the genuine romance in John and Mariel's reunion at the deli counter to last longer. Film critics had their knives out for Sally in this period. I'll start a separate thread on the movies page.
    • I don't think so, but I wouldn't be surprised if he was Dumas this whole time.
    • Tamara Tunie was serving up grand dame diva fierceness.
    • Nick told Victoria that he and Sharon had married in England.  Victoria was shocked.  Then she realized he was kidding.  He confirmed it was a joke and they're platonic. I don't even know what to say about that.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy