Jump to content

Guiding Light Discussion Thread


Paul Raven

Recommended Posts

  • Members

It's nothing to do with me, it's just a very generous new user on YT who popped up on my screen. I felt people should know about the initial offerings for these shows, but the rest should probably be left to each of us to monitor ourselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

@Vee thanks! I feel completely lost, but Sara's a hottie and I feel like I remember Joe.

Related question: I scrolled through the other videos that were put up on the account, and perversely stumbled into a Doctors episode (I had to click, I saw Kimmer with foot-wide hair and just couldn't resist, lol) but was the guy who played Joe Bradley (Carrie's other victim) also on the Doctors, or does he just have that kind of face?

 

Or Vanessa having to choose between Billy and Mo? No matter which way it went, it would've been GOLD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Re: 1973 GL. I really like Rodell as Leslie. I wonder why the character was always styled with short hair (wig) ? What little I have seen of Adams she comes across as frosty and aloof. She had more life to her acting on Secret Storm. Joe does looks sprayed old. Sara was beautiful. The house set looks like the same set used for Jackie's house in the 1977 episode, it had be repainted/redressed by then. Kit is creepier than what I imagined. I wish more of this storyline was available. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

TGL episode was around late August/early Sept 73.

3 voiceovers in the early part of the episode was a bit of overkill.

Also surprised at Anthony call's grey locks. And Millette looks pretty and youthful. She was 40 at that time. By 1980 she had a much older and dowdy look. Wouldn't happen these days with 50 plus actresses presenting years younger.

And we get to see the change from Barbara Rodell back to Lynne Adams as Leslie.

Barbara got the short end of the stick here with the producers decide to recast with Lynne, the original Leslie.

Don Stewart was looking very hunky here with the tan and filling out the yellow seersucker shirt nicely.

Nancy Addison looked great.

Maybe Victoria should have had another child, with the old pregnant when she left town trope. It could have given Leslie/Mike more to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Before I forget, I wanted to say that even though the August 1973 episode has big technical issues, it's still worth a watch. I never thought I'd get to see the aftermath of Charlotte's death. What I appreciated most was the nuance in how Bert and Mike reacted to the news - as Bert said, she hurt Mike badly, but they still felt sorrow for her ending. Not sure we would have gotten that on the show enough in later years.

It may have also been Lynne Adams' first episode back as Leslie. You can immediately feel an energy difference (and an age difference).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wasn't Holly originally from a very wealthy family?  That relationship to wealth seemed to be completely ignored when the character returned in the late-1980s through the end of the series.  Did Holly lose her wealth in a storyline?  Or was her rich background just forgotten about?  Or am I just wrong about her wealthy background?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hope someone knows. I do not. Here's the Soap Central Character Bio for Barbara Norris, but it isn't clear to me. https://www.soapcentral.com/guiding-light/whoswho/barbara.php I asked AI & it said Yes, wealthy & came from wealth, but you know I don't put a lot of faith in AI's soap knowledge. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There is a GREAT monologue during the JFP/Curlee years where Holly talks about if I remember correctly, an alien landing and she has to explain herself...(I kid you not and it worked) and she refers to herself as a "rich little daddy's girl" so someone remembered. She had enough cake to buy the Journal and into WSPR..(I never knew who the hell owned that, it was Alan, then Roger and Holly? Then Dinah????) I think post Rauch they forgot about that but I always wanted Holly to go toe to toe with the Spauldings, MG has that great Bev way with a sarcastic one liner (with irony thrown in.) They all think it Rog gobbling up stock but it turns out to be Holly...(and she and RR had great chemistry in that "one" little scene when he was giving her stock to have the Journal...RR to his credit acted a bit turned on by MG in that scene and who the hell wouldnt be?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The storyline April and Draper are involved in during the summer/autumn of 1979 seems fairly "benign" but soon turns very serious.  April has a VERY intrusive, wealthy mother (Margo Huntington Dorn).  Margo knows that April and Draper (who've recently had a miscarriage and are theoretically never going to be able to conceive another baby) want to buy a house.  Margo hoodwinks them into buying a house they can't afford.  The house is listed at $100,000 (about $400,000 in today's dollars).  Margo pays the first $35,000 and leads Draper to believe the asking price of the house is $65,000 instead of $100,000.  If Draper finds out his meddling mother-in-law paid 1/3 of the cost of the home and tricked him, he'll be mad as hell.   Meanwhile, Draper has received a job offer from a prestigious New York law firm.  Margo pulls some strings and has the senior partner in the firm rescind the offer, to keep April in Monticello.  If Draper finds out about THAT, he'll be even angrier with Margo than he will be about the house trickery.  All of that is "bubbling under the surface" in the fall of 1979 but will be the next major story, as everything begins to spiral out of control.   Yep, you've got the Karrs and their very basic middle-class house, the Victorian-themed place where Miles and Nicole live, April and Draper's old craftsman house with the exposed beams, the Madisons & their Mission revival house, and Margo with her 1970s-chic penthouse.  Each of the sets is completely different.  And their budget was like zero, lol.  
    • It felt weird and out of place.  I get. While I agree with those on here that he's gotten better, it's still really bad. I'm not seeing the "good" acting some see...but I'll give him a B for being better than when he first started. There's potential. I'll leave it at that. 
    • It's like watching paint dry at a slow-ass pace. It's bad acting. Entirely. Excellent? With Claybon? Never. Ever. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Ah! Good to hear. Isn't it especially odd to think that house fictionally exists not far from the Karrs?  Or, that it was designed non-fictionally by the same person who designed April's place?
    • Good to know I'm not the only one who noticed that. Strange and awkward, and I don't know what they're doing with those fades.   -- Finally, had to laugh at how many Emmys this board passed out today.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Not unless they live in an apartment complex. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That was bad. Product placement is fine, but not here, not now. Besides, no one carries their damn detergent to the living room.   Completely and utterly disagree. I thought Brandon Claybon was excellent today -- maybe his best performance since the show started. No recast needed.   Not unpopular with me. That didn't work. The montage was good, but 5 minutes of Amazing Grace? With all those verses? No. What kind of family breaks into a loud version of Amazing Grace after what just happened??? None. Anita's lecture to Leslie was great. Ending the show -- a really good episode with crackling dialogue -- like that was a mistake.  
    • Today, was a fantastic episode. I loved everything about, including Ainta singing, Amazing Grace. I love the family dynamic of the Dupree's so much. They remind me of my own family at times. Martin & Smitty have come leaps and bounds from where they  started. I genuinely felt a connection between them I can't wait to watch it deepen. Dana/Leslie/Sherry/Ana is a piece of work. Her speech at the Dupree's about her "concern" for Eva and then locking her out of their apartment??? She is pure evil, but I love it. I can't wait to see where the Eva/Kat story goes. There's so much potential there. As for Ted, I need to see Keith Robinson in the role before giving my true critique of Maurice Johnson.
    • I don't recall that we ever saw the exterior of the Madison house.  BUT the interior is definitely Mission Revival.  It has a wrought-iron staircase, and all the doorways & corridors have archways.  I watched a few old episodes over the weekend from that period and really noticed for the first time how uniquely Mission Revival the set is.  
    • I know Daphnee's back hurts, because she was carrying Maurice through those scenes! Still not loving the idea of replacing the actor, but he was giving very little.  Brandon's scenes with Leslie did not hit the way they were supposed to because I was busting out laughing.  One thing I enjoy about this soap is how it plays with the nuance of good and evil. Kat vs Eva and Anita vs Leslie. There are some things that Kat and Anita said that makes it hard to root for them and how the Duprees can be family over everything to a fault. It almost makes them come across as entitled and unlikely at times. And while what Lesile and Eva have done is wrong in different ways, you can see that hurt and sympathize.  Now, what I don't get is what Lesile thought she was doing expecting the Duprees to accept Eva with open arms. Honey, Eva is a Richardson not a Dupree. In the Dupree world, she's Ted's problem unless they choose otherwise, because there ain't a drop of Dupree blood coursing throught her veins (unless we learn otherwise in some twist). Ted is lucky if they don't disown his ass.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy