Jump to content

Guiding Light Discussion Thread


Paul Raven

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 17.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

By mid 85 GL compared to 5 years earlier only Ross, Vanessa, Henry (?) and Ed remained remained. Everyone else had been written/killed off-not a good position to be in.

The only Bauers were Ed and Rick.

Doug Marland had set up the Reardons as the next core family but they too had been whittled away, basically down to Maureen at that point.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I remember how heralded Claire Labine's arrival on GL was. Kim Zimmer even went on Live with Regis to promote the new regime's first episode. I had never watched Labine's work before so I didn't know what to expect. Her first episode included a fantasy sequence with Reva and Josh duking it out in a boxing ring and bad slapstick comedy with Pilar Santos. Looking back Labine and her kids were probably aiming for a zeitgeisty Ally McBeal feel but it didn't work. GL's best comedy came from the characters and their inherent personalities, not from zany gimmicks. 

 

May Meresi was a pitiful character ("cigars! cigarettes! cigarillos!") but once she was unmasked as Mary Murto I realized that Elizabeth Hobgood was actually a good actress stuck with a crappy role. Just as the character was starting to get interesting she was cut. I remember fan speculation that May was originally supposed to be Stacy Chamberlain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I still don't understand why it didn't work better. Either Labine was just past it or Rauch/CBS/P&G was interfering, or some mix. GL would seem an ideal fit for Labine, but she inherited an incredibly tacky, garish iteration of the show.

I thought May was definitely supposed to be Stacey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I think she was sabotaged from day one - I've said this before but I've rarely if ever seen one fired actor after another going to the press and blaming the new headwriter the way they did with her. Beyond that, I just think, similar to her OLTL run, she couldn't make the current show work or didn't have a producer who was able to actually work with her.

The same cringey comedy that had managed to mostly work on GH and then became a struggle on OLTL was even more of a struggle on GL, because you couldn't just give Blake Lucy Coe's old lines - GL had many complicated characters. 

And in contrast to some of the attempts at comedy, there were pieces of abject misery I just couldn't get through, whether it be a shootout in the Bauer kitchen, Tony beating up Selina, or Cassie being locked up in a tower and then having a late term miscarriage via a car crash while on the run. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For example? Also, did they happen before or after Rauch fired them? What I'm trying to get at is if it was after they came back to save Rauch's backside when he couldn't find anyone who would come work for him. Because I can imagine that things might have changed when that happened.

Edited by Contessa Donatella
more
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can't explain it. Perhaps it was an exaggeration & most of what she really wanted to do is what got shot down & not literally "everything." Although considering the writer who said it, well, they are not prone to exaggerating. I remain puzzled. It seemed to dovetail perfectly into the fact that she had such a bad go there, as to why that was so. 

I know the reason she left GH was because she was exhausted & wanted the year off but ABC made her do OLTL, so no time off. Was it after that for GL? Just thinking on paper ... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

On paper, Labine would seem like such a good fit for GL, because her best headwriter stints (like on GH) were sterling examples of character-driven writing, and GL's main strength was its deep roster of complex characters. In theory, GL should be a perfect playbox for a character-driven writer, since its lead characters had clear flaws and were often driven to behave in self-destructive ways. So a lot of the conflict that leads to great drama could just emerge organically from their interactions and reactions to ordinary situations. 

But it seems like the Labines weren't fans of the show and didn't take enough time to really learn about the characters and their motivations; during this era, a lot of the long-running characters seem like 2-D cutouts of themselves. And conflict is often coming from external bad guys, usually affiliated with either the mob of San Cristobel. During that September 2000 episode I shared, Reva is reduced to being an unwitting victim of her new boyfriend Noah and his shady associate. Love her or hate her, Reva is normally a human cyclone of drama, but in this episode she gets nothing to do except be pulled around by the plot machinations. What a waste!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Didn't Labine bring on Noah? I remember switching it on after hearing about the writing change, seeing Zimmer (who was already on my last nerve in those days due to the Rauch Queen of Love era) once again shacked up with this beefcake (Mark Dobies) who looked too young like the total cliche soap boytoy* and thinking 'no.' I think Labine even tried to write him up, like he was a Jon Lindstrom or even John J. York capable of carrying more colorful or nuanced character material, and just no.

(* - in fairness, Dobies later did quite good work on OLTL in an utterly thankless role that went through many bizarre changes.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 member




  • Recent Posts

    • John Spencer      pg. 445    THEATER THE GLASS MENAGERIE    October 1979     Gentleman Caller      NYC THE GLASS MENAGERIE    1979 - 80    Gentleman Caller        Tyrone Guthrie Theater   Minneapolis   MONSIEUR DE MOLIERE     1979  - 80      Tyrone Guthrie Theater   Minneapolis   ROMEO AND JULIET     1979 - 80        Tyrone Guthrie Theater   Minneapolis  LAKEBOAT      1981                  NYC     007 CROSSFIRE      1984      Romanov      Actors Theatre of Louisville     CAROUSEL      1986 - 87    Jigger  The Opera House at the Kennedy Center     Washington, D. C.     FRANKIE AND JOHNNY AND THE CLAIR DE LUNE  
    • Maeve makes a few sporadic appearances, but returns full-time the next spring/summer. She's back in time to see Bill and Michelle graduate, although she skulks around town and wasn't going to tell anyone she was alive. She comes back wearing this HUGE hat---which was a throwback to the old Vanesaa. lol.
    • Aww, yeah it's very heartbreaking and I mostly enjoyed the Nola/Vanessa scenes because they finally let their walls down and came together in a beautiful moment. So Nola was at the hospital already and bumped into Vanessa, who had MRI papers that fell out of her hand and Nola went down to pick them up and asked her what was going on. Later, Vanessa confided in her about her disease. Then, Nola told Zachary on the beach (he prodded her and already alluded to knowing something was going on with Van), and then Vanessa found out she told him and got a little upset. Now, however, Nola is strangely absent while everyone is mourning her death. I'm curious if Nola will actually tell people about her MRI results. I would assume so. Only Nola, Rick, Roger and Zachary know anything, although there is the MRI results letter from the mail that everyone has missed seeing at home. I'm sure it'll all come out at some point. But... I just saw the next episode and the opening already cut Vanessa out and added Dahlia and Zachary. I guess Maeve is gone for a long time

      Please register in order to view this content

       That will break my heart seeing the town continue to mourn her and assume she's dead. I can't wait to see her return though, and I have to imagine feelings will be torn between loving that she's alive and being very angry she did all of this. While I hate what Vanessa is doing, I'm happy to hear it's not totally against her character. I think you're right, had Henry still been around, she wouldn't put him through this. I'm still surprised she is with Bill, though. I get her feelings on Matt, because she wants him to move on, but still very heartbreaking. I'm glad this was Maeve's choice to have a break vs. being fired.    Interesting, so I'm curious to see who they eventually pair Phillip with. They're flirting with a Phillip/Annie pairing, but I'm not sure if they'll go that route with the Jeva drama, her growing pill addiction, and Rick's past with her.  Ugh, yeah I'm so sad to see Bridget do a total 180 in the last couple weeks. She has always been a strong character from what I've seen, but now she's just bending over backwards to get Hart to love her and it reeks of desperation. Yeah, sure, this new Hart is eye candy, but I'm already tired of seeing Hart/Dinah have sex all over Springfield and the Cayman Islands haha.
    • Yes.  I remember them together during the early summer of 1986.  They didn't share scenes again for 30 years until 2017 because Carrie wasn't on the show when Anna returned during Sydney's kidnapping.
    • I can see Kim being that way. Well, Kyle didn't have to say yes. LOL. The suicide attempt feels plot-driven. I don't know if even Long could've made it work. She'd spent so much time trying to make Reva and Kyle into a couple, it feels odd to just have them give up. Not to mention how odd it is to have Maeve agree to marry him. Re Charita---surely they could've at least tried  finding clips with who was still there. Maybe they wouldn't have been "big" moments, but surely she'd interacted with Ross, Vanessa, and Henry. Vanessa had dated Ed, FCOL. But Mo and Rick were there---surely they could've bothered to find some clips of her with them (and they did interact a fair amount) and used them. And with Ed they could've found some shot of her talking to him and just not cut to whoever was playing Ed in the clip. That to me is what feels lazy---they had more than a year to figure it out, and they went with a bunch of photos. If you were sort of centering it on Rick anyway---then find clips with them and use 'em.
    • I definitely think it's time to write off Nina for good. I think her killing Drew might actually be a good idea. She could completely lose it after losing both Sasha and Willow and she ends up murdering Drew and eventually she gets caught and sent away to prison for a long time. 
    • I hope it's okay to post this here(as in from DC)  
    • Quick question - did Christie and Leann share any scenes together in the '80s before Leann left the show?
    • This is the perfect way to encapsulate the situation. So many morally-reprehensible stories were foisted on the show and its characters in ATWT's dwindling years. Rape should never be used as a cheap plot device or in a way that degrades the victim. Jack's sexual assault was another heinous example of how nasty the the show's tone had become. The fact that people like Hogan Sheffer, Ron Carlivati, Jean Passanante, Charles Pratt, Dena Higley, etc., somehow end up winning awards for their material, decimates the credibility and integrity of the awards, IMHO. Soaps used to have a solid moral core and did not originally wallow in the gutter, rolling around in filth and depravity just to be cool, hip, campy, or whatever else modern-day PTB aim for. Thank you. Cruelty, degradation and misogyny are not components which lend themselves to successful soaps, which have always been predicated on warmth, family bonds, and providing a comforting haven for their audience. The genre has been crippled because the cynical and ignorant executives in charge understand neither the shows nor what the audience wants to see.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy