Jump to content

Return To Peyton Place Discussion Thread


Paul Raven

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I think it depends on the couple and how well they are working. Slesar always brought "star couples", with great chemistry, back together, like Adam and Nicole Drake on EDGE. I was surprised that he broke up Laurie and Vic Lamont completely on that same show, however; a move which, if done often enough with couples the audience roots for, can indeed be frustrating for the audience,.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 224
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Oh God, how mortifiyingly absurd...for the record, during HIS tenure as head writer, the show won TWO awards for its writing...AND Cenedella has at least one highly acclaimed novel to his credit.

So tell me, where is your evidence that Cendella wrote soley off of her ideas? LOL. Opinions are WORTHLESS when the person presenting them has no repect for the FACTS.

I have to say that I am constanly amazed at how often your opinions are NOT rooted in anything factual. You appear not to have the slightest knowledge of how these things work. Nixon RARELY wrote the scripts - she PLOTTED them. Cenedella was one among who wrote the scripts, dialogue and the subplots. Others included Kiki McCabe, Don Wallace, Ralph Ellis, Elspeth Eric, Frances Rickett, Kathy Callaway and Robert Newman

On top of which, when faced with facts (such as the one which PROVES the character Steve Frame on AW left the show on the SAME day that Mary Matthews died) you ignore them! Again, absurd.

Edited by toml1962
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yet again, when faced with an opinion you disagree with, you degrade yourself by hurling personal insults. I cannot fathom what...issues drive you to such petulance, but acting out like this is simply not appropriate in these forums. I would respectfully ask you to calm down, and try to reign in your gratuitous aggression in the future. Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Of course, I never said Cenedella wrote solely off Nixon's ideas. In regards to the Mary Matthews death timeline, I have already and repeatedly corrected the problem. You just cannot let it go, for whatever reason. So in your rush to flame, again, you've gotten yourself confused...again. I cannot spend all my time reminding you that contrasting opinions or reviews are not "wrong" just because they contradict yours. This is a public forum where everyone's views are valid. I am sorry that you cannot control yourself enough to post and act like a rational adult, but for the sake of the board, I hope you make more of an attempt to do so in the future. Remember what I've explained to you multiple times before: this is not a battlefield where one has to "win" the war of opinions. If you disagree with someone, try saying so respectfully. If that is beyond you, simply move on. But your outbursts will not help your case or your credibility, I'm afraid.

Edited by vetsoapfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But isn't that more-or-less reflective of real life? Frankly, I find it admirable that Slesar had the courage to split up couples without the emphatic promise of an eventual reunion. Otherwise, it lends itself to fostering a supercouple mentality and mystique on the part of certain viewers that, IMO, has hurt this genre immensely and irrevocably.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would argue that Cenedella was fortunate to have inherited the show from AN since Nixon apparently left AW in good shape. He didn't have to resuscitate the show the way some HW's do when taking on a new show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly. You get it. Working with a legend like Nixon, and taking over a stable show that she left in great shape, makes a writer's job much easier, and not everyone is as lucky as Cenedella to be in such a position. When Douglas Marland took over GH in the late 1970s, he inherited a total mess, but he was able to work miracles with the series, and turned it around. When Pat Falken Smith succeeded him, she commented in the press how lucky she was because Marland had worked his butt off for two years and left her a great, well-structured show. It's only logical to accept the fact that inheriting a stable show makes a writer's life easier than inheriting a mess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Similarly, when Douglas Marland inherited GUIDING LIGHT (after leaving GH) from the Dobsons in 1980, he commented as well that his predecessors had left the show in terrific shape.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Members

RETURN TO PEYTON PLACE EPISODE 96 AUGUST 14, 1972

CAST

CONSTANCE MACKENZIE CARSON

BETTY ANDERSON HARRINGTON

RODNEY HARRINGTON

STEVEN CORD

HANNAH CORD

MARTIN PEYTON

ELLIOT CARSON

CONSTANCE TELLS ELLIOT ABOUT HER VISIT WITH BENNY TATE. STEVEN AND HANNAH TALK AND PLAY CARDS AND STEVEN TELLS HER HE MIGHT RUN FOR D.A. BETTY AND ROD ARGUE OVER THE PEYTON INDUSTRIES AND BETTY PACKS HER SUITASE AND TELLS HIM WHEN HE COMES TO HIS SENSES SHE WILL LET HIM KNOW WHERE SHE IS AND LEAVES. WHEN STEVEN LEAVES THE MANSION HANNAH TURNS OUT THE LIGHTS AND GOES INTO THE DEN AND LOOKS AT THE PAINTING OF MARTIN PEYTON AND SAYS ' MARTIN WHAT WILL EVER HAPPEN TO THAT BOY" MARTIN PEYTON APPEARS BEHIND HER AND SAYS" I ALWAYS SAID HANNAH LET THE CHIPS FALL WHERE THEY MAY".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, Henry Slesar eventually reconciled Adam Drake and Nicole. However, a more interesting couple (Steve Gutherie and Deborah Saxon) were never reunited. Also, I believe (althought this could have been done by Lou Schofied and Margaret DePriest) that Slesar began the show when Adam was in a relationship with Roxanne Carey (played by actress Martha Gilphen). Someone told me that there was a hasty scene which ended that relationship, but I had missed it.

I think that everyone on earth would have been happy had Laurie Karr and her husband Vic Hastings reconcilled. I think that Liz Hillyer and Steve Prentiss should have returned to one another (again, that couple could have been seperated by Schofield and DePriest). I think that most pople waited for Tony Cooper and Jill Farmer on Somerset reunion.

Was Slesar responsible for breaking up Sam and Lahoma Lucas?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have a question about the sets on Return to Peyton Place. Although I remember being impressed by the sets, I always wondered how they compared to the prime-time version of PP. For example -- Were the sets on the daytime show exacty the same set-designs used on the prime-time show? If not, were they at least similar? Or totally different set-designs? I'm thinking particularly of locations that were used heavily on both shows, such as Connie's house, Connie's bookstore, Ada's bar, and the Peyton mansion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I believe you mean Vic Lamont, danfling. Vic Hastings was a character on Another World. And, no,not everyone on earth wanted Laurie and Vic reunited. I did not. I never bought the Vic/Laurie relationship. It was very unusual in that their marriage was the very last thing that Emily Prager played. She left in December 1972. Laurie was not shown on camera again until Jeanne Ruskin took over in March 1973. The first thing her Laurie did was express discontent with her three month old marriage, Four months later she had an affair with Johnny Dallas. I never had time to even contemplate Vic and Laurie as a real married couple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've read that the Peyton mansion was the same set as the primetime series, but I'm not sure if the others were modeled after any of the original sets. Good question though! I also wonder if anybody knows if this show did much on location shooting?

BFORE02, I was wondering where you got that episode synopsis? Is there a chance you have that episode? I still dream daily about one day seeing this show lol. I'd settle for one full clip even.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Leslie and her family are from Chicago? Anita's background also includes being a former Chi-Town native? Might they connect this and go somewhere with it?
    • Honestly who's to say Leslie even birthed Eva, I mean she's a liar, I wouldn't believe a word she says about Eva being Ted's(or hers)
    •   1. 11/1/83 cast/set list:  

      Please register in order to view this content

          The "11/2/83" video you posted of Ruth Buzzi's scenes includes Roman and Hope in them, meaning the video you posted is actually 11/1/83, since Roman and Hope aren't in 11/2/83.   2. The video you posted of "11/2/83" has scenes with Roman and Hope. As you can see from my cast/set list, Roman and Hope are not in the 11/2/83 episode (see above note):   4573...11/2/83: Cast: Mickey, Julie, Doug, Maggie, Neil, Don, Marie, Alex, Liz, Andre as Tony, Gwen, Chris, Eugene, Sandy, Letitia, Charlene, Mrs. Whiting, Wanda/Guard, Dave, Delia, Saleslady # 1, Saleslady # 2, Figure in Dark, Raven/animal, Cats/animals, Birds/animals.   2.  11/3/83 :My video collection starts with 11/4/83. so I don't have the 11/1/83 or 11/3/83 video, but in addition to the cast/set list for 11/3/83, here is also the parking clearance call sheet for that day, showing Ruth was not only in the cast/set list but did work that day:     They even had hired the animal trainer and all the animals for the day, so It's sort of a certainty that her scenes were not cut that day, or it would have been a big waste of the budget. 3. As for 11/7/83, I just fast-forwarded through that whole episode myself. Letitia is in it from start to finish. It's her big final episode where she is killed. She starts the episode saying "Eugene, are you there?" In the next act, Marlena shows up and meets Letitia's lion. Later in the episode, Letitia is killed by "Eugene" (the Salem Slasher in a Eugene mask).   So, as we can see from your own post, the 11/2/83 date you have listed on that video is incorrect, since Hope and Roman are in that video but not in the 11/2/83 episode.It seems the dates you have on all your early November 1983 episodes are incorrect.   When you post videos and suggest that my data is incorrect, do you not first compare who is in the scenes and see if that matches who is in the episode? You didn't do that with the "11/2/83" episode, which based on Roman and Hope being in it means that is actually 11/1/83. Best to do something like that first before suggesting my data and research is incorrect.
    • Within the Dupree family, I predict Vernon/Anita will be conflicted about what to do about Bill and his role in the whole Ted/Silk Press Sheila situation... especially since Bill knows where the particular bone about Martin is buried. Dani, Chelsea, and Naomi's reactions to what Bill possibly did isn't hard to guess.. but Hayley's reactions will be interesting to hear.  Especially given her recent pregnancy scare.. she might not be so much on Bill's side, or she'll totally surprise us and be totally on Bill's side.   Either way, I think Martin's secret will be the main focus in May sweeps.. with the fall out of the Eva secret playing out in the background... while the Joey/Vanessa/Doug thing continues to boil/develop.
    • Hotel was The Love Boat on land but a little soapier. I will forever maintain that Hotel was a time slot hit. I don't believe that 1983/84 Hotel was a better show than Knots Landing.
    • The Golden Girls key episodes by ratings September 14, 1985: The Engagement (series premiere), rating 25.0, #1 Season highs February 22, 1986: Adult Education, rating 25.2 October 4, 1986: Ladies of the Evening, rating 27.3 November 8, 1986: Isn't it Romantic, rating 27.3 February 6, 1988: My Brother, My Father; rating 24.6 November 26, 1988: Sophia's Wedding (Part 2), rating 24.3, #1 September 23, 1989: Sick and Tired (Part 1) (season 5 premiere), rating 23.5 January 12, 1991: Sisters of the Bride, rating 19.3 May 9, 1992: One Flew Out of the Cuckoo's Nest (series finale), rating 18.9 Season lows October 19, 1985: The Triangle, rating 18.6 May 16, 1987: Empty Nests (season 2 finale), rating 17.8 February 20, 1988: And Ma Makes Three, rating 18.0 April 29, 1989: Rites of Spring, rating 18.7 April 28, 1990: All Bets are Off, rating 15.8 February 16, 1991: Older and Wiser, rating 11.6 October 26, 1991: Mother Load, rating 10.9 Ten highest-rated episodes October 4, 1986: Ladies of the Evening, rating 27.3 November 8, 1986: Isn't it Romantic, rating 27.3 January 3, 1987: The Sisters, rating 27.0 November 22, 1986: Family Affair, rating 26.8 January 10, 1987: The Stan Who Came to Dinner, rating 26.6 January 24, 1987: Before and After, rating 26.4 February 28, 1987: Whose Face is This, Anyway?; rating 25.8 September 27, 1986: End of the Curse (season 2 premiere), rating 25.6 November 15, 1986: Big Daddy's Little Lady, rating 25.3 February 22, 1986: Adult Education, rating 25.2 Ten lowest-rated episodes October 26, 1991: Mother Load, rating 10.9 September 28, 1991: The Case of the Libertine Belle, rating 10.9 October 19, 1991: Where's Charlie?, rating 11.0 February 15, 1992: Ebbtide VI: The Wrath of Stan, rating 11.3 February 16, 1991: Older and Wiser, rating 11.6 December 14, 1991: The Pope's Ring, rating 11.7 April 25, 1992: Home Again, Rose (Part 1); rating 12.3 October 5, 1991: Beauty and the Beast, rating 12.7 November 2, 1991: Dateline: Miami, rating 12.7 December 7, 1991: From Here to the Pharmacy, rating 12.8
    • The timing is strange, though. How far in advance would they normally be on location? The Achille Lauro hijacking was on October 7, 1985. Nancy had arrived in Egypt in the storyline by October 18. But the character of Hawk, Chris' Native American friend from Arizona, had already appeared onscreen by September and brought a letter telling Chris to be in Egypt by October 25th.  Why did they already have the link to Arizona before the reason to cancel the shoot in Egypt?  The dust and the jar it came in were from Egypt though. Nancy bought it there and sent it to Mac as a gift before she came back to the states and followed Chris to Arizona.
    • Actually that is not what happened. Nor is the timing right for it to have been. We learned from a WOST interview with Pete Lemay  in 2006, which can be found on YT, that it was Fred Silverman's idea to do the 90 minute show. I don't know how much you know about him but he had these amazing successes as head of daytime at both ABC & at CBS. Then he came to NBC where basically everything he touched turned NOT TO GOLD but to shite. Some of the most expensive shows ever produced up to that time were huge flops. Although even he, like a broken clock, could be right on occasion. However, as we know, he was not right about the 90 minute show. As a matter of fact, afterward,  NBC programmers, who worked FOR him, were asked why they did it & they were quoted as saying it was because they couldn't think of anything else to try. It was a stupid idea from a man who had reached the point where he was throwing anything at the wall to see if it would stick.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy