Jump to content

July 13-17, 2009


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

How the heck can AMC be 3rd in the HH yet 6th in total viewers? :huh:

Meh it's not over for soaps, they're still viable, they just need people in charge that care about the genre, instead of the same recycled hacks over and over.

It's the people in charge are the ones ruining the soaps

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I think that the headwriters and producers want to save their jobs so they are writing what they consider to be entertaining stories featuring characters that the fans "like." The reality is that they are delusional and have no respect for us the fans so they tell the incoherent stories and overexpose characters until we hate them. They are so caught up in formulaic drama for drama's sake that they forget to tell entertaining stories. It does not matter any more. It's over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I still think there is a market for soaps, probably not the current brand of soaps, but some version which could air in daytime. I also think that it's still possible for soaps to have a decent level of quality even with few viewers and a small budget. I know the soaps are going through very hard times now but I think many of them are run by people who don't know soaps, or who are burnt out, or don't want to know soaps, and don't care about viewers. There's network interference as well but I still believe if the networks just got their act together and if a better quality of producers were onboard then things would turn around. There's still some good in daytime, here and there. I know all the soaps get bad breaks now but I think some of it is in their control. I've seen Sheffer and Hamner pull the type of stuff at other soaps they are now pulling at Y&R, so I do think if they go then the show might improve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, I agree. I think they are done. Daytime lost much of a generation of viewers starting in the the late 1980s and has never recovered. Daytime soaps sealed their own fate when they let that happen. There are shifts in taste, where a viewer goes from one show to another, and there are generational changes, where viewers tune out on an entire genre. A generation tuned out on soaps and now nothing can bring them back. Once you lose a generation, you also lose their children. In a strange way, I think there is a parallel between daytime soaps and the newspaper industry. The only difference in my opinion is the world needs newspapers. I think soaps once served a purpose beyond pure entertainment. Now, they aren't even entertainment for many people.

I agree totally with this. You mentioned OLTL in a previous post and it is a great example. It is stuck at a 1.8 and that is fine I guess. Once GL is gone, whether OLTL is in last place in the ratings or third place has nothing to do with OLTL. It solely depends on whether other shows are moving up or down around it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I completely agree that the soaps can be repackaged in the daytime tv to attract a younger audience. I have always thought that the telenovela format is the way to go. Yet something like the Real World might work. A combo reality/drama soap without expensive sets or camera work. I am not sure that year round episodes will be feasible any more, maybe 20 to 23 episode seasons like in prime time. Of course, ABC will hire the same tired headwriters and producers and use the same annoying characters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I dunno.... I think it's too early to start hemming the shrouds. Daytime isn't dead yet. I think with all things currently we are seeing a 'corrective'. There is a huge societal shift doing on in almost ever facet of life, and it's too soon to predict how any of it will look in the end. I think we will see Daytime Drama continue in some format - reduced, redone and perhaps only on one network - but we will have it. Telling serial stories, as Tony Geary so rightly phrased it, is part of the human makeup and we've had them forever. So much will depend on how our multi-sensory children grow and express their expectation. We've seen the 'end' of the radio generation and the literature generation, now perhaps it's happening for the tv generation as well, as everything shifts towards the net. In that experience radio and literature adapted. TV has yet to catch that particular wave even though some try.

I think 20 years from now we will still have daytime drama. My selfish hope is that GH is one of the ones that can continue in some sense, but even if it isn't something will be there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wow, I really thought ATWT would go up last week. I was all for them bottoming out in order to get rid of the head writer and executive producer, but it seems like they think hiring some new writers will help the situation (a band aid solution when an operation is necessary). If the new writers can talk them out of doing these stupid self-contained episodes, that will help - but I am beginning to wonder if it isn't all too late.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I strongly agree its been evident to me "for years" they are writing "against" the genre esp ABC soaps

they do "the complete opposite to make an easy success"

fans have said for years what they want to see

but the steadfastly refuse and continue to do so listening to their focus groups.

Which is tanking two of my shows.

I think they want them to fail for other programming for

the time slots. Its pretty obvious they aren't writing for success in two of my favs I've watched for years.

What better way than to say

"hey they aren't watching them"

never mind they make it impossible to care to follow them with lousy story lines, piss poor dialog

its the dialog that gets me in a rant most of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree. The soaps are collapsing. A downward trend, not now..not last month...not last year...this has been going on for many many years and the reason has to do with not one or two factors but with several factors, sort of like a 'perfect storm'.

People, get ready, in the next five years the soaps are dead. Probably Young and Restless will survive on CBS or at a cable channel, maybe along with Bold and Beautiful..maybe if we are lucky enough, maybe as a weekly series.

cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Really an excellent point. I'm worried about Derek but he's not working. The Duprees being too good somehow ... well, if they say it instead of be it, okay yes, I would worry but as long as they keep on being good, geeze, that's something to celebrate, not worry!!!  Party on?!
    • I blame Mitch.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I agree. For now. I am sure in a year's time...a new family (or old) will start to appear on the show. 
    • There's some irony in Philip being forgiven, because it forces everyone to admit that Victor was wrong to change his will.  Everyone, eventually including Xander, (I presume), seems to think it was wrong for Victor to divide his estate in Xander's favor.  I appreciated Stephanie forgiving Philip, because she's got no skin in that game.  But, Belle's line about Philip missing Xander because he misses Bo did not ring true.  I think Philip would be sad if Bo dies, but I think he's more concerned currently about Xander. I am enjoying this EJ mystery so much that I am hereby taking a vow not to read spoilers.  I am also vowing — for the last time — to stop harping on this, but: the concept of a “sepsis treatment” remains absurd. Hospitals prevent sepsis through vigilant infection control; once sepsis sets in, it causes multiple organ failures. Treatment involves supporting each failing organ individually. The notion that a single medication could magically reverse organ failure is medically laughable. However, I like the contrast of Kim going through cancer, which is incurable in their universe.  Kayla's comment on the health of both of her siblings was both heartbreaking and an interesting twist.  MBE is also totally underrated.  She is carrying the weight of so many stories.   And, I like the use of Kayla as an audience surrogate.  She's arguably the most "real" person in Salem. Kayla isn't psychic, she wasn't SORASed, she's not a billionaire, and she doesn't have a bionic eye.  So, I enjoy that we get her perspective of the nuttiness that surrounds her. However, I don't get what gives her the authority to turn down EJ's offer.  I understand that they need a hospital figurehead to show us scenes of the competition to buy the hospital.  But, unless the entire administration has been let go, the Chief of Staff wouldn't make those choices.
    • But why worry about something that might not happen? Right now, most things revolve around the Duprees. We have no idea if or how long that will continue. For now, it's working.
    • The Duprees not having any staff is a bugbear for me. They've included the background staff at the Country Club but no one at the Dupree home. Even just an extra bringing in a tray of food/drinks or responding to a request from Anita would suffice.
    • Shut up, Dante and Lois.  I actually don't mind this particular soap trope, but in the context of this storyline, it just feels forced and unnecessary. If anything, this Dante/Gio tension needed to begin months ago. Plus, this storyline, in general, isn't doing Lois any favors either.  Emma comforting Gio was really sweet though. It's definitely time for the two of them to have their first kiss. And, Joss playing Secret Agent Barbie will just never work.
    • Note to makeup - Smitty’s eyebrows, bad clamshell look.  

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy