Jump to content

July 13-17, 2009


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

How the heck can AMC be 3rd in the HH yet 6th in total viewers? :huh:

Meh it's not over for soaps, they're still viable, they just need people in charge that care about the genre, instead of the same recycled hacks over and over.

It's the people in charge are the ones ruining the soaps

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I think that the headwriters and producers want to save their jobs so they are writing what they consider to be entertaining stories featuring characters that the fans "like." The reality is that they are delusional and have no respect for us the fans so they tell the incoherent stories and overexpose characters until we hate them. They are so caught up in formulaic drama for drama's sake that they forget to tell entertaining stories. It does not matter any more. It's over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I still think there is a market for soaps, probably not the current brand of soaps, but some version which could air in daytime. I also think that it's still possible for soaps to have a decent level of quality even with few viewers and a small budget. I know the soaps are going through very hard times now but I think many of them are run by people who don't know soaps, or who are burnt out, or don't want to know soaps, and don't care about viewers. There's network interference as well but I still believe if the networks just got their act together and if a better quality of producers were onboard then things would turn around. There's still some good in daytime, here and there. I know all the soaps get bad breaks now but I think some of it is in their control. I've seen Sheffer and Hamner pull the type of stuff at other soaps they are now pulling at Y&R, so I do think if they go then the show might improve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, I agree. I think they are done. Daytime lost much of a generation of viewers starting in the the late 1980s and has never recovered. Daytime soaps sealed their own fate when they let that happen. There are shifts in taste, where a viewer goes from one show to another, and there are generational changes, where viewers tune out on an entire genre. A generation tuned out on soaps and now nothing can bring them back. Once you lose a generation, you also lose their children. In a strange way, I think there is a parallel between daytime soaps and the newspaper industry. The only difference in my opinion is the world needs newspapers. I think soaps once served a purpose beyond pure entertainment. Now, they aren't even entertainment for many people.

I agree totally with this. You mentioned OLTL in a previous post and it is a great example. It is stuck at a 1.8 and that is fine I guess. Once GL is gone, whether OLTL is in last place in the ratings or third place has nothing to do with OLTL. It solely depends on whether other shows are moving up or down around it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I completely agree that the soaps can be repackaged in the daytime tv to attract a younger audience. I have always thought that the telenovela format is the way to go. Yet something like the Real World might work. A combo reality/drama soap without expensive sets or camera work. I am not sure that year round episodes will be feasible any more, maybe 20 to 23 episode seasons like in prime time. Of course, ABC will hire the same tired headwriters and producers and use the same annoying characters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I dunno.... I think it's too early to start hemming the shrouds. Daytime isn't dead yet. I think with all things currently we are seeing a 'corrective'. There is a huge societal shift doing on in almost ever facet of life, and it's too soon to predict how any of it will look in the end. I think we will see Daytime Drama continue in some format - reduced, redone and perhaps only on one network - but we will have it. Telling serial stories, as Tony Geary so rightly phrased it, is part of the human makeup and we've had them forever. So much will depend on how our multi-sensory children grow and express their expectation. We've seen the 'end' of the radio generation and the literature generation, now perhaps it's happening for the tv generation as well, as everything shifts towards the net. In that experience radio and literature adapted. TV has yet to catch that particular wave even though some try.

I think 20 years from now we will still have daytime drama. My selfish hope is that GH is one of the ones that can continue in some sense, but even if it isn't something will be there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wow, I really thought ATWT would go up last week. I was all for them bottoming out in order to get rid of the head writer and executive producer, but it seems like they think hiring some new writers will help the situation (a band aid solution when an operation is necessary). If the new writers can talk them out of doing these stupid self-contained episodes, that will help - but I am beginning to wonder if it isn't all too late.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I strongly agree its been evident to me "for years" they are writing "against" the genre esp ABC soaps

they do "the complete opposite to make an easy success"

fans have said for years what they want to see

but the steadfastly refuse and continue to do so listening to their focus groups.

Which is tanking two of my shows.

I think they want them to fail for other programming for

the time slots. Its pretty obvious they aren't writing for success in two of my favs I've watched for years.

What better way than to say

"hey they aren't watching them"

never mind they make it impossible to care to follow them with lousy story lines, piss poor dialog

its the dialog that gets me in a rant most of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree. The soaps are collapsing. A downward trend, not now..not last month...not last year...this has been going on for many many years and the reason has to do with not one or two factors but with several factors, sort of like a 'perfect storm'.

People, get ready, in the next five years the soaps are dead. Probably Young and Restless will survive on CBS or at a cable channel, maybe along with Bold and Beautiful..maybe if we are lucky enough, maybe as a weekly series.

cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Cady had a fairly posh accent or manner as Rosanna - the character was a 180 from Dixie when she went to ATWT, and it was a huge success initially. As someone mostly only familiar with the nagging, miserable or clueless Dixie of the mid-late '90s and early 2000s it was what convinced me Cady could act. I thought she was incredible in her first run. Later, in future stints, her hair and story and performances were all over the place but a lot of that was down to the show for me. She brought some of Rosanna back with her to Dixie in her ill-fated return and a lot of people didn't like it, which I understood but I did think the character needed some change. I think she's had a little bit of the same persona and arch performance in every role she's played since, including Jennifer Horton at DAYS or Kelly at Y&R, who later became a maniac and was easily the worst work I've ever seen Cady do. It has kind of infected her overall mannerisms, I'll allow that, but I do think she brought Dixie back together as herself while still evolving the character when she returned to AMC again in 2012-13. Nonetheless, for me the upshot is that this is a character where Cady's kookier recent performance style suits the role. But I can understand it grating for people.
    • Yeah, Loretta Swit's passing stings. My late dad LOVED the show (he died last November) and watched it religiously. In first run and repeats.  And I was literally born the day after the show's premiere, so I grew up with it! I know many loved later, softer Margaret, but I loved Early Hot Lips. In real life, I'm all for less misogyny, but to me, the early years of M*A*S*H were just funnier. May Loretta Swit rest in peace. Thanks for all the memories connected to my dad!
    • FROM THE VAULT: WEEKLY DAYTIME NIELSEN RATINGS: WEEKS OF 10/29/73-11/2/73 & 11/5/73-11/9/73:  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I agree that she isn't Dixie or Rosanna and shouldn't be acting like either. I just found it strange that she had a naive Southern character and a wealthy urbane character in the past and didn't experiment with accents before (unless I missed it, correct me if I'm wrong). She used to do improv characters on YouTube. She's probably doing something similar here.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • And here I thought I'd never think about Lauren Tewes again after her brief appearance in Twin Peaks Season 3.
    • I may be the single person who does not mind Transatlantic Campy Pamela. I think it perfectly suits this sort of Absolutely Fabulous-esque supporting character she's playing much more than it did when Cady tried weird and often broad stuff at AMC* or Y&R, or later stints at ATWT. She's not Dixie and she's not trying to be. I will freely admit some of the other chances she took at other shows often came off stiff, hammy or downright mortifying (Kelly Andrews, come on down). (* - and I say that as one of the few who was somewhat into Cady trying to make Dixie more cosmopolitan in the Rosanna Cabot mold in mid-2000s AMC, just to liven the character up again)
    • There’s absolutely nothing exciting happening storyline wise but I’m always happy to see the vets on my screen so I’ll take what I can get. It’s also just nice to see them all dressed up in the same room, it always gives classic Y&R vibes. The best part? No Phyllis. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Well now we had Ashley's reaction-and weren't we all gasping when she appeared to hate it-but she was just joking!! She loved it. Now we have to see Abby's reaction, and maybe Mamie could come back to say she loves it. How about Jill via Zoom giving her opinion (she'll love it) and bring in a day player to play Mrs Martinez to say she loves it also... I feel bad to keep dumping on this show (not really) but when the choices they make are so inane, it's the only entertainment value the show has. Let's unpack the Nikki birthday story. So Claire wants to throw her Nana a birthday bash as away of endearing Kyle to Victor. Don't quite get the logic there,but OK. She hires a party planner who makes ridiculous suggestions. Slightly annoyed that Y&R are hiring someone for this role for 5 episodes when we never see doctors, co- workers etc. But OK to that to. With all the talk we are expecting something special. What we get is the Jazz Lounge hideously decorated with some ugly tablecloths and a few tacky decorations. They needed a planner for this? Then the guest list consists of family members (no grandchildren)and a few others. Hardly a party. As usual the costuming is pretty awful. A red and black theme ? And our guest of honor is sporting a do that looks like a cross between Cameron Diaz in Something about Mary and Marie from Roxette. They should have had an intimate dinner and ditched all the fanfare. Would have been way more believable.
    • Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy