Jump to content

ATWT: June Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

So we both liked Iva then. I really wish she were still around in some capacity. I thought she added a great deal of complexity to Lily's character, when they were in scenes together. I have a scene on tape from early 1993 when Lucinda and Iva were sparring about Lily, riveting stuff. That story where Holden took Aaron from her really upset me at the time. Then he gave Aaron to Julie, not known for being a loving mother (I say this as a Julie fan).

The dismantling of the Hughes family is one of the more odd decisions of the past 10 or more years. It could be worse - most of them weren't killed, or turned into psychotics - but all those years of history flushed, even as Bob, Kim, Tom, and Nancy are still part of the canvas. It's almost like this long, depressing tease from ATWT. Even worse for me is they keep showing the Snyder family, but only Snyders I either hate or don't care about. At least bring the tolerable Snyders back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 165
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

They need to bring back all of them. There is way too much Meg on right now. The show keeps focusing on the same characters.

Andy, Frannie and Iva need to return to Oakdale. They can get rid of Dusty. I never liked McCouch in the role anyways. Let go of Cady McClain. I sm so tired of her popping in and out and get rid of Paul. Roger Howarth has ruined the character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I desperately wanted them to run a chem test with him and Luke, but eh, who am I kidding. These people don't care about chemistry.

I will say, though, that I was shocked to learn that Matt Cavenaugh isn't gay. I read an interview where he said that he's always been labeled gay since childhood, and that he really doesn't care if he is, but he's not gay.

They've made the Hughes family too old. Casey's the only "young" one on the campus. You have octogenarian Nancy, post-retirement Kim and Bob, and middle-aged Tom and Margo. They've passed up too many opportunities to keep the Hughes name alive...Chris was poorly, poorly mistreated. Don Hughes must not exist anymore, even though he has TWO kids who are in the prime storyline age range. Frannie and/or Andy would be great additions to the late 30s/early 40s group.

My ideal ATWT is squarely based around the Hughes, Stewart, and Snyder families, with the Snyders not as prominent as the other two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They even brought in one of Don's kids, Ryder. I never liked him that much but at least they could have tried. There's so much about the Hughes family I'll never understand, why Andy was written out, why Frannie was never brought back. Then with the Stewarts, the only time we get a new addition is when they decide to bring back Dani as some weird sleaze who was bedding the man once considered her father.

aTWT has so much history available if they could just use it. If they're so recast happy then bring in a recast for Frannie or Sabrina. Then even when they do bring in recasts of old characters, they make them into completely unrecognizable and unpleasant personalities, like Pigsty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought Ryder was ok. He is a major improvement to today's teens. Andy was written out because he didnt fit the hot stud model. Whatever...the guy could act. I have no idea why Frannie or the Stewarts were written out. Dani....Ugh..what a wasted opportunity.

Knowing Pissy she would make Frannie or Sabrina murderers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Bob, Susan, Tom & Margo are on today?? What in the World is going on? No Meg or Paul to be seen. No Katie either but dammit she is in the previews for tomorrow's show. Why cant Katie just die??

I actually thought today's show was decent. Emily wanting a baby?? Emily is an awful mother to Daniel. She doesn't need to be a bad mother again. Enough with baby making stories Pissy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Does anyone still have episodes from June 1 to today? If so, can you possibly check for the episode director and script writer (last writer listed). My ATWT credits source is away. I would greatly appreciate the help. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

June 1 show: Director...Christopher Goutman....Writer...David Levinson

June 2 show: Director...Michael Eilbaum...Writer..Gordon Rayfield

June 3 show: Director ...Michael Eilbaum....Writer...Susan Dansby

June 4 show: Director...Michael Eilbaum....Writer... Peter Brash

June 5 show: Director : Habib Azar.........Writer: Gordon Rayfield

June 8 show: Director : Christopher Goutman.....Writer : Cheryl Davis

I'll have today's show later or tomorrow. I tell you and I still dont get hired here. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It was nice to see vets like Don Hastings and Marie Masters today!

MM and KMH really had some great lines today too. Like when Emily said that she wanted to have a baby and Susan blurted out: "Do you know how old you are?!" :lol:

And also when Susan thought that Emily was inspired by Bratie in her baby wish and said to Emily: "You're not Katie" and Emily replied: "Why would I want to be?!" :lol:

Those lines alone made today's show worth watching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

    • As always, really interesting to get your impressions! I was only watching sporadically during this period (whereas I was transfixed during the Marian storyline), but if I remember correctly 1996 was a pretty rough transitional year. It came at a period where P&G was playing musical chairs with its executive producers--ATWT was hit especially hard by this. The current executive producer, Michael Laibson, is out in November 1996, replaced by Paul Rauch, who stays for nearly 6 years. While Rauch has a few really bad ideas that cause long-term damage to the show, those don't really kick in until 1999, and his first couple of years are very strong. So once you get to 1997, you should see the show rebound significantly. 
    • Haha love a little drunk posting

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I’m up to April 01, 1996. I think I’m starting to understand what many have said.. things are different. I miss the community vibe of Springfield, when you had people working at the hectic newspaper, the choatic diner, the rich were coming in for coffee, or the TV network was abuzz about the latest scandal. Things have become a little more tunneled into their own storylines. Right now, for me anyway, there isn’t a strong desire to see what happens next, ever since the Brent/Marian story ended. It was a darker, more suspenseful storyline that really got me intrigued and waiting to see what happens next, while everything else was just a nice view of midwestern families living their dramatic lives. And I love that too, when the characters and storytelling is strong, but right now, some things are a little stale. In these last 5 weeks, we had two bigger events: Nick and Susan’s wedding:  it was sweet, but I really found it weird they played music over their vows instead of being able to hear them. Then, they leave town immediately after and for good? We really didn’t get a ton of time with them - one minute Susan is in a hospital bed, post-coma, celebrating the new year, and now she’s married and gone. I’m having a hard time with the revolving door of characters since my early ’95 watch. This year we’ve lost so many characters, gained so many characters, and to what end? Henry’s funeral:  this was so sad, considering the real actor passed. I’m curious what other fans thought about the funeral. Granted, when an actor passes, you don’t have much time to plan ahead, so you need to insert it into whatever storylines are happening at the time.  But sadly, this funeral happened when everyone was hating each other. Vanessa was upset with Matt because the Amanda secret came out and he kept it from her. Quint showed up, with his very young affair no less, which made both Nola and J upset. Amanda was there which upset both Blake and Ross. Roger insisted he give a speech which upset everyone. Vanessa was mad at Quint for bringing his young girlfriend, and then Dinah was so upset about her grandfather, which was emotional, but everyone is currently at odds with Dinah. The flashbacks were effective, and the most emotional scene was Vanessa’s breakdown when reading Henry’s letter to her.  Otherwise, it was a pretty hateful funeral, which felt icky. Otherwise, my quick pros and cons currently happening… Pros: Alex and Hawk are great and funny. He gets under her skin and it’s hilarious to watch her react, but she needs him. They were in LA trying to get dirt on Amanda’s former life and Hawk was living it up with young gorgeous women and all the spending money at his disposal.  Generally, the Amanda and her secret storyline is interesting and I really like the actress. Alex vs. Amanda is entertaining. Tina came onto the scene around the time Nadine died, but she’s been given a backstory which is interesting to me now. She’s a prostitute, who means well, and is trying to take care of her daughter, Dahlia. She grew up with Frank, who has a soft spot for her. Marcus, in a new storyline he desperately needed away from Dinah and his dad, has taken a strong liking to Dahlia. She sings well and he plays saxophone well, so their music is endearing. Sadly, Tina got involved in a robbery gone-bad, where they held up a Spaulding board of directors meeting. She flees, but Frank catches her outside and is forced to arrest her, while Cleary (she’s back!) arrests the main bad guy involved and saves the Spaulding family. I’m curious to see where this one goes, but curious, was Tina actually on the show before this or is she a brand new character? Cons: The Dinah/Hart/Roger storyline is pretty stale now. I need something new. Lucy and Alan-Michael are barely on since Brent left, which is sad. You spend an entire year on a storyline that builds their relationship, brings strife and wedges, and now that they’re finally able to be together in love with no obstacles, you never show them? I want to see them happy! Oh and Lucy and Bridget/David haven't had a scene since Marian tried to get 'a room at the boarding house, which is weird because we haven't seen Bridget react to Lucy being alive. I don't even know if Lucy even lives at the boarding house or with AM, but it's sad pretending like Lucy/Bridget/David were never close friends. Reva/Josh, which is hogging airtime, is a serious whiplash. One week Josh loves her, she hates him; the next week, she loves him, he hates her. He’s always lying to Annie, but now he’s marrying her again, the second wedding in 4 months. I’m also very tired of Marah, her angst over everything, and their overwhelming concern over her. As much as I don’t like Buzz, it is funny watching Reva work at the diner, but I’ll never side with Alan so watching him have feelings about Reva/Buzz or Reva/Josh does nothing for me. Finally, the other small B storylines are only on like once a week which isn’t enough:  Gilly/Griffin/Viviane, Michelle/J, Blake/Ross/Rick, Rick/Abby, Holly/Fletcher and the baby. Something that just popped up out of the blue is David Grant leaving Springfield out of nowhere. He professed his love to Bridget, who turned him down, so he decides to leave when Griffin gives him a job opportunity. Sadly, another character written out for many new characters being introduced. Makes me wonder who is making these calls - the producers, the network, the writers, the fans?
    • OH. The AMC/OLTL Crossover with helicopter, down in the woods, 2 very pregnant, both give birth, only one baby lives. We are on the same page!!!
    • Backtracking because BTG has been distracting me from keeping up with GH. Why is Carly always involved with a paternity lie? Lulu is Dante's (wife? if Im correct) so she has the right to tell him about his son. If anything, she's in a better place to reveal paternity drama than Robin was. As for Robin...I'm conflicted about whether it was HER place to tell AJ he was Michael's dad. Being with a man who's pretending to be someone else's baby daddy is wild. Dante was snoring blaming everyone  but Rocco, however he was right about Jason. A convo isn't enough, neither is trying to be your son's friend. Adolescents need a disciplinarian. At least Lulu made Rocco and Danny scrub the house. 
    • May 2025: Stephanie Sloane interviews Kirsten Storms about all of Maxie's romances in the past 20 years: https://www.swooon.com/gallery/general-hospital-maxie-romances-spinelli-johnny-nathan-kirsten-storms/
    • I saw a new BTG promo during Watson tonight (Sunday May 11).   I don't remember what I saw (and I wouldn't say here on the nonspoiler thread anyhow). I know only that it was different from the "next on BTG" preview at the end of Friday's episode. If anyone catches the new promo, please post it on the spoiler thread.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy