Jump to content

Y&R Rowell interview


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I'm sorry, I stand corrected. I rounded the years in my first post, to make an even decade, when it should have read 1973-1982, instead of 1973-1983. Next time I'll make sure it's precise. Makes a big difference, doesn't it? I guess you couldn't come up with a black character in the 1973-82 time peiod, could you? Didn't think so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I am trying to understand the formal definition of "mammy" here.

So, wikipedia says this:

So, for the debate to be productive, individuals would express the ways in which Mamie is -- and is not -- similar to the above discussion.

====

I think the early history of African American character integration on Y&R is undeniably problematic.

Jazz Jackson started out as a thug, working with Tony DiSalvo. He turned into a good guy when he worked with Paul and Andy. He then got his brother, Tyrone, for the controversial whiteface/Mr. Anthony storyline. I do not remember how Jazz disappeared, but he seems to have eventually fizzled.

Amy Lewis and Commander Lewis were intriguing, but the Commander (a widowed father, as I recall) was never properly written for, despite being played by the amazing Brock Peters. Again, my sense is that the character eventually just fizzled away.

Amy was one of my favorite young female characters in the 80s...despite the fact that she was seldom written for. She could have been the STAR of that show. Eventually, she preceded Lynn "Yes Boss" Bassett as Paul's secretary. She too, it seems to me, faded away.

Carl Williams also had the most intriguing, well played partner, Selena, played by Fay Hauser. She too had the range to have made her a leading front burner character. But she seemed to be dragged out for mysteries (kind of like Gil is now...albeit with more of a presence), and eventually fizzled away.

Then we had the gangster "Kong". Was he one of Mr. Anthony's thugs? Later we learned that he was really "Nathan"...and Nathan's life of crime was premised, in part, in his illiteracy. It was regrettable with all the low-SES white characters (e.g., Dorothy and Wayne Stevens, Ron Becker) that they reserved illiteracy for their African American character.

Amy discovered Kong's illiteracy, taught him to read, and that was eventually his path to serving as one of Paul's associates.

Aunt Mamie has been discussed. I actually thought they tried hard to show that the Abbott's really loved her, and that she had played a surrogate mother role...but the bottom line was that she was the maid. She didn't eat with the family, she served at functions. That was fine...Esther does the same...but it wasn't necessarily balanced.

Mamie, of course, ended up being the launching pad on which her nieces Olivia, and later Dru, were introduced. Dru, of course, was introduced as a homeless runaway and petty thief...and again illiterate. Nathan "paid it forward" by teaching her to read...but now we had TWO illiterates on this show...both African American.

I would say, then, that the whole history of the treatment of African Americans on this show prior to the introduction of Olivia, Dru and Neil was pretty...spotty. The good news was that there was a presence. The bad news was that the presence was mostly servants/illiterates/thugs. Selena/Frank Lewis/Amy were welcome counterpoints.

It also is worth mentioning that Keesha (whose ethnicity changed...when Jennifer Gatti took over the role, did she become italian or hispanic??) started out as multi-racial (possibly including African American), and she is the character (along with Cricket's mom) whom they saddled with AIDS. Malcolm married her. Let's not forget that Keesha slept with Nathan (killing his marriage)...and that before Nathan died he had abducted his son.

Malcolm, for all of Shemar's popularity, never really got a major story IMO. (Did he? I am not remembering one). He had sex with Dru when she was under the influence of cold medicines. Did he ever have a strong, true front burner tale with lasting implications for the canvas? There was that singer, Callie (?) whom he was involved with (again, as I recall, hiding out from a Detroit thug boyfriend)...the first actress perished and was replaced by Selena Goines. Then (names elude me) there was that woman Neil and Malcolm were fighting over, leading to a distraught Malcolm to "perish" over a bridge in Africa.

We have the fact that even on his last return, Malcolm just sort of fizzled out.

We have Yolanda as a drug-addicted mess. We have Devon as a street-kid/runaway.

There is no denying that Y&R has had a number of African American performers over the years -- many strong -- but I wouldn't say Y&R has kept the picture "balanced" There has been a definite emphasis on criminals and persons starting at lower levels on the opportunity ladder.

==

I just WISH Y&R would commit to writing for persons of color, in a way in which they are fully participating members of the canvas, front burner, integrated, with a mix of heroes and villiains and varying socioeconomic statuses. I realize Y&R is not unique in this failing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Mamie was a stereotypical Mammy character. It was embarrassing as hell. She served the Abbotts and acted as a sounding board for their problems. As time passed, they expanded her role, but she never got John. Mamie was topped by the "ignorant can't read talking ebonics street wise kid" Dru showed up and the stereotype was out of control. I hated Dru with a passion for that. Neil would not give her a second look until she was cleaned up and can't say that I blamed him. I give Y&R credit for having black characters consistently, but they haven't done right by them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not that interesting. She's IMPOSSIBLE TO WORK WITH.

It's not a sexism thing, it's not a race thing, it's not anything other than the fact that production-wise? She's more difficult than she's worth. And most people int he industry are well aware of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Neil was always embarrassed by her. I remember the Newman's New Years' party, where Neil was going to take Dru, and he showed up at the Abbott mansion and told her to change, that her dress was not appropriate. It was a glittered mini-dress... mid thigh length, in a bright chartreuse color. the color was a BIT loud, but the dress was fine, appropriate for NEW YEARS EVE, and fit her personality. Instead, Neil wanted her in black velvet and pearls... and that's what he got (That

MOFO just KNEW she would wear something not right, he brought that dress WITH HIM). But when the party started, Ashley walked in wearing almost the SAME DRESS that Dru originally had on, except the hem was 2 inches longer MAX, and it was silver. By this time, Dru was presentable to polite society, but Neil bristled at ANY colorful comment she might have made, even after Victor EXPRESSELY told him not to change her, he thought she was a breath of fresh air.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh yes. Honestly, this is when I started hating Neil. I mean, he DIVORCED her because she refused to give up a career he didn't like (modeling).

Ugh.

With Neil's sanctimoniousness, inflexibility, hypocrisy, addictive tendencies, chauvinism...I really feel maybe the route to go is to finally let him be the villain he is. Give him a Scarlett O'Hara moment ("I'll never be dissed again"), and then let him be a bastard. I honestly think that would work. Maybe he's great with his family, but he's learned at Victor's right hand...and he's RUTHLESS in business.

Then, show Tyra for what she is (an acquisitive social climber who engineered her current situation with Neil).

Now we have Macbeth and his lady. And THAT is worth watching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The hell she was.

Being a maid is NOT the same as being a Mammy.

Equating the two is insulting.

She did.

But the VIEWERS had the problem so TPTB backed off.

"Ebonics" is a stereotype now?

Eh.

Neil fell in love with her AS SHE WAS.

That was the point.

Apparently all Black characters must be like Christel's Lily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know for sure. I think I remember reading that Bill Hayes helped him get the job at Days. But I may be wrong about that. I was thinking of their friendship offscreen or something.

I guess Bell liked him after that becasue as you said he acted on all 3 of this shows since the 70's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • @Toups Tyler Topits listed in alpha order with the breakdown writers 5/12 Monday episode. O'Connor still listed as both breakdown and script writer. Kreizman wrote today's script.
    • Marland was long gone by this point.  He quit in either August/September 1982. I think it was due to letting the actress play out her contract and use her for party scenes and/or scenes with Phillip/Justin.   I was surprised she was still on in June 1983 myself, because I figured she had been written out before Pam Long joined the writing staff. Thankfully, having episodes uploaded during this period on Spauldingfield YT site has helped to connect some of the dots.  It looks as though Pam Long starts the first week or so of May 1983.. and in those first few weeks: Morgan and Evie were both written off and Lillian/Mindy/Billy/Beth/Annabelle all come onto the show.    
    • @MaximThis really  old song popped into my head this morning .... 

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • For any military veterans and family: Military discount for *NEW* subscribers for any type of ParamountPlus subscription, "for the life of the subscription" (whatever that means). Includes: active duty, retirees, reservists and National Guard, veterans, dependents and spouses. Military veterans will receive 50% off new subscriptions (They have a verification process) https://help.paramountplus.com/s/article/Does-Paramount-offer-Military-discounts For existing subscribers, who would be eligible but haven't used the discount: (from the same paramount help link) Question: I’m an existing ParamountPlus subscriber in the military. How do I get the discount? Answer: To take advantage of the military discount offer*, you’ll first need to cancel your existing subscription, then re-subscribe to Paramount+ [at the verification link] on your desktop or mobile browser. During the signup process, your credentials will be verified to confirm your current status. Once you've been verified, your discount will be applied in the next billing cycle.
    • What a lovely gif!!!!!! @Maxim

      Please register in order to view this content

        @Maxim  
    • I didn’t find it that interesting

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I can't watch until later (Canada issues). What is Philip's motivation for stealing the drug? Only plot I cared about today and you did not mention it 
    • Doug III’s first day of work. Hope he does a good job… or that Tate tries to sabotage him somehow

      Please register in order to view this content

      His scenes with Holly were nice though. They’re sweet together and I understand why some people think that they have more chemistry than Tate/Holly do. And I liked that Doug III opened up to her about his past. Maybe that could lead to something good happening in the future.  I also enjoyed Roman and Kate, and how they’re both being tied into EJ’s shooting. The mystery of it all is really compelling. I don’t think Roman is the shooter though either.  I didn’t have much sympathy for Kristen though. She has no one to blame for Rachel’s problems than herself. But at the same time, I’m really surprised that Days actually remembered the Alex/Kristen fling. I thought Ron had erased that from existence. I’m not shipping them at all, but I’m definitely shipping a permanent end to Brady/Kristen but after today, I’m not so sure about that either.  And, Johnny and Chanel were still great together
    • https://parade.com/news/beyond-the-gates-actor-flexes-like-a-wrestler-in-viral-shirtless-photo
    • Some country club revelation thoughts from a casual watcher no one asked for. The Great: Daphnee Duplaix gave the best performance we've seen yet. Nicole's dialogue was also well thought out and felt character specific. TJ Maxx Ted was also pretty good. Trisha Mann-Grant steals every scene she's in. Often without even trying. Carrying multiple episodes worth of exposition heavy soap dialogue with starts and stops and recapping and drama and humor is no small feat and she nailed. Vernon telling Lesliana to STFU.  The Bad: So much of the dialogue for the rest of the cast was overly written. Martin said "You are a vile human being with a hole in your heart!". Marty, what are we doing? It's SO dramatic and sounds so silly coming from this grown man. Do Bill and Hayley do anything but talk about the Duprees? And the nerve of her to get so excited to find out Ted is a cheater when she and her husband are too. There should be a hint of shame mixed in with your glee, ma'am. The Questionable: Coffee and a rendition of Amazing Grace after finding out Nicole was betrayed by her husband. The Duprees are an odd bunch. The stinger of one segment had Anita prepared to lambast Lesliana, when we came back someone else was talking. When Anita eventually said something to Wig, it was a lukewarm at best. And then of course she thought singing a song about something that should absolutely not be extended to her son-in-law. The entire family allowing this deranged woman to speech at them in their own was...nuts. I know she said something about what would the neighbors say but my GOD. Is she just going to be allowed to trespass whenever she feels like it now? The focus on Leslie and her wig usage as an oddity is...odd. I think Chelsea said something like "and she wears wigs!" (while wearing a buss down middle part). Okay? It's just not that odd for a black woman to change up her hair. It's the different names that's the problem. I know it's meant to be humorous, in a throwback soap kind of way, but it fell flat for me.  I'm sorry I find the whole family to be WEIRD. It's like they want us to see them as ruthless yet benevolent, open yet furtive, snobbish yet tooth achingly sweet all at the same time. I cannot get a lock on the family dynamics. Everyone is just there.  I'm gonna cry if this show doesn't start giving us ages (or close to it!) for these characters. Because if Eva is 21-22 then Martin was being given crayons, a soda pop and blinders when he was 15-17 years old. Martin had to have been under 8 for me to buy this story, which would make Eva and Kat late 20s (Martin is at least 35 since he wants to run for president), which I don't think they're meant to be. It's honestly minor but it bothers me. I've mentioned this to @Vee but I think the optics on opening the show with both sisters discovering their husbands of over 30 years are cheaters should've been considered. I doubt there was any intention behind it, no one's rubbing their hands together as they scheme to say the married black men can't stay loyal but how does it look? Maybe it's just me. Honestly it's probably just me!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy