Jump to content

Y&R: Week of May 25, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 801
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

There is very little natural chemistry on between the actors on Y&R compared to what you find on DOOL or AMC. The writers are on Y&R are convinced (wrongly) that their pens determine chemistry (thus the many painful weeks of Billy/Mac, a story I wish I had FFed) and do not play to their actors natural strengths & affinities.

Jack is still my fave of the four, but that's really just because of PB's performances. On paper, Jack is pretty useless. And really, they all are. Those are grown adults with adult or nearly adult children. Any day now, their kids could make them grandparents. The sad thing about the quad is that you could send all of them to Bold & Beautiful and they would fit right in with the aging bimbos (Brooke, Ridge, Nick, Taylor.)

On Days, Sami has twins by two different fathers. They should do the hat trick with Sharon and give her triplets by three different fathers. Take that, DOOL!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think that is the concern that some people have...that it is too plot-driven.

That said, I have to remind us about the period from January to August 2008...when we dialed back from "plot-driven" in the post LML era. The shows ratings sank at a faster rate than at any other time in the post Bill Bell era. The weekly ratings declines were atrocious.

In the time since JG left, the ratings have SLOWLY started climbing up (positive trend, surprisingly), but still haven't recovered all the ground lost during those disastrous months. So, a little "plot driven" may be needed to save the show.

I will not deny that there have been a lot of OMG moments...including when Nick said he wanted Sharon back on Friday...and that is going to keep some viewers coming back. Even though I now hate that weather-vaning pig because of it.

I have been totally thinking that. Nick and Sharon have become Ridge and Brooke. I didn't need to see that!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Y&R is very character-driven, even to today. The issue is WHAT KIND OF CHARACTERS are on screen. Nick has regressed so much that he disgusts me. And I'm sorry but Michelle Stafford is wrong. JM can't just smile and make it all better. An actor like James Scott might be able to use his charm to save someone like the current incarnation of Nick, but JM cannot.

Where are the characters to root for? Where are the characters with noble qualities? Where is our version of Jack Snyder (even if he can be a jerk, he's still a hero)? Where is our Vicki Lord? Where is our Angie Hubbard (and don't tell me it's Olivia!)? There is something wrong with the show when the root-for character of the week is a sociopath sadist torturing an innocent woman.

Maybe that's why I want Raoul to stay. I see him as a potential hero. I don't know. Are there any characters on the show you're rooting for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Which obviously is not true. Billy acts resentful when Chloe insists that he cares for his daughter because he wants to run after Mac. He won't even pick her up when she is fussing because he is mooning over Mac. Billy has no motivation for staying with Chloe and Delia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Amen. I love flawed, grey characters. But it was so nice, after Nick got together with Phyllis...that he was such an honest straight-talking man with integrity. He was a dude who tried to help Noah cope, helped his epilepsy rattled dad build shelves, played charades with his friends, and tried to be a good friend and lover to his redheaded gal. I found him relatable, and always striving to make the right choices.

That's all over now, and I won't perseverate. But it is a loss.

And you are right. There is not one man on the canvas now--except maybe Murphy (and I'm worried about him, because he BRIBED the governor, no matter what he said)--that's just straight up, straight forward, honest, no agenda. Well, I guess JT. But I don't get to see him struggle and make good choices. I don't get to see him, period.

Amen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I didn't... but in this age, when Y&R is the only soap that actually bothers to hide some of their spoilers and give vague info, who would know in such detail what will happen in the next six months... it's all fanfiction, I believe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I mean, Billy is real. Many young fathers are like this...think Levi Johnson (I'm speculating).

Billy, in isolation, would be fine. At this point, though, we have TWO stable interesting couples (Michael-Lauren, Murphy-Kay), but we don't really get to explore their relationships. I mean brownies-in-bed and gin-games-in-bed were TERRIFIC. But we don't get nearly enough of that, and we don't see these couples -- as couples -- solving problems together. Lauren was absent during the Silver Chipmunk saga, and that was really Amber's story anyway. Kay-Murphy have real potential, but one assumes they're headed to a ride on the backburner.

I know many disagree, but I really loved having one young-ish, vital, sexy, happy, funny couple that was not all Sturm und Drang, front-burner.

I'd be better with their demise...certainly their descent into this agony state...if there was another couple filling the void.

JT-Victoria are really too mild and soft for that. And Bloom-Engen (note, I'm not saying Heather-Adam) sparkled...but that was never pursued as Adam got turned into what he is now.

Noah has real potential for "young love", but not with his Edens. Kevin-Jana and Daniel-Amber are clearly on the road to ruin, and we get little insight into the romantic dimensions of their lives. (I'm sure I'm alone, but I think that quad could be much more interesting as Bob-Carol-Ted-Alice anyway--talk about shattering some daytime taboos).

My only hope is that

is a romantic lead, and a strong one. But I see no available females for him. Don't say Colleen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And yet even while mooning over Mackenzie he asked Chloe & Deila to come back when she moved out.

Billy loves Delia & cares about Chloe.

If he wanted to leave he would've left but he wants to have his cake & eat it too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Oh wow that’s pretty awesome! I wish I had  approached him but there was so many people 
    • In the current environment, while it's small, there is a crumb of good news: Apparently, San Antonio voted for a DEMOCRATIC mayor, Gina Ortiz, beating the "right-hand man" of Gov. Greg Abbott, former Texas Secretary of State Rolando Pablos. https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5337199-gina-ortiz-jones-wins-san-antonio/
    • Love this! You are both adorable. Wow
    • I have not gone back to watch much of 1987, but from what I've seen lately, it doesn't feel like the writers or producers had any sort of plan. The show feels as if it's constantly in flux.  I will give it credit for this. It's watchable for the most part minus Lisa/Jamie which I find nearly unwatchable now.   I don't find Cheryl mousy. I think she has a lot of quiet strength, but she was saddled with the Scott romance which the writers did not invest in. She had a good friendship with Julie (also criminally underused), and her interactions with Ada were enjoyable as well. I also like Layman, but Spencer was extremely talented and when Cass returns, Schnetzer and Spencer have some wonderful scenes. Spencer also fits in with Alexander, Hogan, and Marie.  I'd forgotten just how much I missed seeing Wallingford. IT was so good to see him again. Even when they didn't have a major plot, Felicia/Cass/Wallingford/Mitch always brings a smile to my face.  
    •   Dani’s cute ass party planner. He gave me some tea but I was so drunk I don’t remember it.
    • NBC must have been grateful to have LHOTP, it's only hit and still strong after several seasons. Their next established show was Rockford Files at 45th. They didn't develop any comedies and relied on movies and mini series  which didnt establish viewer loyalty and habits. Their only new hit was mid season's Project UFO which debuted Feb up against Rhoda/On Our Own on CBS and How the West Was Won on ABC. It opened with a strong 36 share beating CBS and close to ABC as HTWWW had a 36 share over 3 hours. The next week UFO saw a respectable 32 share, then a 31 so it was slipping. A 28 share followed but a few weeks later it jumped back up to a 34. So no blockbuster but compared to what else they had, there was potential, So next season NBC sent it to Thursday up against Mork and The Waltons and it bombed.  They were smart to see potential in Chips, which took off on Saturdaysnext season. ABC was on a roll with Love Boat, 3's Company, Taxi, Eight is Enough adding to their hits. Their only real flops were Redd Foxx and San Pedro Beach Bums, an Aaron Spelling misfire. Like Redd Foxx, Harvey Korman was lured to ABC but his series was a filler that did well but was considered a time slot hit. Nancy Walker and Rob Reiner were also given series on the philosophy that not only were they popular names, their absence from popular shows like Sanford, Rhoda and All in the Family might weaken those shows. CBS were relying on old favorites. Betty White was strong the first few weeks then faded. Incredible Hulk was their strongest newbie. It was lucky for CBS that NBC was doing so badly or else some of their weaker shows would have really suffered.
    • That outfit looks like something Martin would wear lol.
    • Omg not we both ran into people from the show this weekend!
    • I guess he was let out the gates, because he's outside. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy