Jump to content

May 4-8, 2009


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

And this is why, amongst other reasons. Luke and Laura, SUCK HARDCORE But at the end of the day, Anthony Geary doesn't know [!@#$%^&*] about good soap, and he never has. He is an ungrateful fool who doesn't deserve any of the accolades he has gotten.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Okay, I just want to ask while you guys are on the subject. The way I remember Laura's little Cassadine tryst is that Laura was on the island, on the island, on the island (indicating a long time...hehe) and while Stavros was persistant she continually resisted him until he brought her "proof" of Luke's death. It fit with the story because during that time Luke WAS presumed dead as a victim of the avalanche. It was during that time that Stavros finally convinced her that Luke was not going to come and save her and she agreed to his terms. While she still thought there was hope of a reunion however, she resisted.

Am I not remembering that right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't remember all of it, but I do remember the uproar with Luke/Laura fans at the time because they felt that Laura would never betray the Luke/Laura love bond.

Many of them at the time sided with Luke in all of it and took their rage out on Laura.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, absolutely. MAB plus JG was lethal. The single hugest linear weekly decline Y&R had experienced in its entire 36 year history, bar none.

But after JG left, and MAB brought in HS, and Paul Rauch joined later, things clearly have turned around. For how long is an open question. Here is the evidence:

HW regime

Average weekly HH ratings change

Kay Alden, -0.010

Jack Smith with Kay Alden, -0.004

Lynn Latham (overall), -0.003

Lynn Latham (2006 with legacy team), +0.001

Lynn Latham (2007 without legacy team), -0.006

Arena Bell/Griffth, -0.028

Arena Bell, +0.004

YRwriters-1.gif

Maybe we can watch them fall to their knees in a hail of gunfire, desperate, gasping, terrified, bloated...as we then watch them slowly die in agony over the span of weeks before our eyes.

Oh, I guess they did that with Alan Quartermaine. Really uplifting. Yup, that's what we want to see....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IMO, I always found that to be outrageous as Luke did RAPE Laura. No rewrite will ever change that. I will never ever understand how female viewers could and would cheer for Luke Spencer. He's a rapist. Sorry, I know a lot and I mean a lot of people LOVE Luke and Laura, but the reality is, he did do that. That IMO, that's unforgivable.

If Luke wanted to always be on the run, he should have ran away long ago without Laura. His precious Laura, who was just an obsession of his just like she was to Stavros. Laura could have been a great heroine independent of Luke Spencer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No, I think her time for that has past. It would have to had have taken place after the 1981 wedding. As a struggling single mother who has to overcome many obstacles. Something that we would have watched unfold over the past 28 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree this might have been best.

But Genie is still fronting movies for Lifetime and Hallmark. She can drive stories...now as women in midlife trying to rediscover her sense of family and identity.

I totally think Genie could rock that as a "widowed" Laura. I realize that doesn't work with ABC, the desired demo...I'm not advocating for it. But I don't think "her time has passed". Which is why I am not a daytime exec :).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am so happy for Genie that after ABC rejected her that she was able to have some acting success in those tv movies.

You are right and the lesson is to not care about these soaps or their love stories too much. One that it has taken me years to learn, but I am finally there.

You are also right. I never saw the rape so I got caught up in the Luke/Laura aftermath. As a woman, I knew better, but told myself it was only a soap. I will never make that mistake again.

Last word: I never blamed Laura for keeping Nikolas a secret or what happened on the Cassadine island. It wasn't like she much choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh Genie defintely can still carry a show - thus the reason in my original soap opera From These Roots I have her as the lead.

But as Laura I think the time has gone. Esp. in this world of modern day soaps where couples are forever united. Just like the Steve/Kayla thing I mentioned. So many bought into that sap that Kayla kept herself pure all these years waiting to be united with Patch in Heaven. It made me want to throw up. I mean they wrote Kayla as if she hadn't even gotten laid in the 20 plus years since Steve died. She just sat back and waited for him remaining ever faithful.

I think if Luke/Laura had not been the phenomenon they were with fans, I think it would have been written at some point that Luke did run off. Because he always hated being tied down. He hated that life. I think in the old style writing of soaps it would have been easy for them to write him abandoning Luke.

But it worked out better since Genie wanted out of GH too at the time for them to lure her back and have them run off together on their great adventure when Geary wanted to leave the show.

If things had been reversed and Genie wanted to stay I think Luke would have died or would have just left - in the same way that Laura disappeared and was presumed dead the year before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh I agree with you. It wasn't Laura's fault.

And it wasn't like Luke was being a saint back home. Sure he thought Laura was dead but damn he first slept with Jackie Templeton not long after Laura disappeared and then he slept with Holly too - and fell in love wtih Holly at that. If I remember correctly he even got her pregnant. Isn't that why Robert married her in the first place, because she was pregnant.

How someone could blame Laura was beyond me when Luke wasn't faithful either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Okay I can buy that when Brook Lynn was a teen.  Now she knows the child is a boy one would think she'd be slightly suspicious.  Then again, Gio looks nothing like either of them so maybe not lol.
    • I've been behind & just got caught up & the last 3 days were amazing!
    • Yeah.  The hot, poor bad boy with a chip on his shoulder but with a heart of gold was a common soap trope in the 80s 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's been an issue with me... the lack of a cohesive 'Have Not' crowd that has focus other than Leslie/Eva.   I would beef up Jan, Mona, Laura, Joey, and few other male characters.. and not just be out to overthrow the Duprees.. but co-existing and broadening the scope of the show since the show is called Beyond the Gates. I think the set up the show has with everything revolving around the Duprees will become predictable especially if they always win.   It would be like Victor Newman on Y & R for 40+ years.. always winning, hardly ever losing.   With MVJ/Guza.. both trained under that mindset... I fear that will happen.   I've always heard from a performer that is playing a character like Leslie/Dana that you have to find the victim/hurt beneath the surface in order to play a villain/villainess... and I think that's why I enjoy watching her.. because she brings so much more to the part than what the writers put on the page.
    • I figure that was really hard for Dom to do. I completely GET why they wrote it the way they did but I wonder if it was necessary. Meanwhile I have 2 really icky ideas in my head. Drew is going to blame Tracy KNOWING it was not her. Dante is going to blame Lulu.  After that, everyone else is going to be mad at Lois.  Tracy is going to double down on wanting to get rid of Sonny. Sonny's going to be more dug in to stay because he now has a new descendant. 
    • I can actually buy Brook Lynn being so self-absorbed and incurious that she never thought to question why her mom and grandma were so attached to Gio. 
    • It was overkill and the whole narrative Lois was too nice to the orphan kid when he was little, WHAT? Like Emma said no one thinks Gio is a troublemaker that gets 14-year-old kids drunk for fun. That being said, Lulu figured this Gio thing out in episode, but Brook Lynn never once questioned Lois and Gloria's attachment to a child that was the same age as the baby she gave up?  Ever?
    • Thanks for finding that. I may have been thinking of this blog entry.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy