Jump to content

Y&R: Week of May 11, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

There is something about this couple that speaks to me, they denote to me a modern couple, who have faced life and found something in each other they are definitely not the sugar and spice cookie cutting couple, and I enjoy them, what most see is sex, i see it as a strong bond, I don't find them boring at all, I find that I like there talks, i love that they enjoy playing games, i like how they have been woven into the fabric of the show, on a daily basis you see Phick interacting with different characters, that bodes well for their future, definitely, I think the writers need to write for this modern couple,Phick can survive this as long as the writing is there. We get so bogged down discussing what was instead of what is, and to me Phick works on so many levels, work, home and the integration of step children and child of their own,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IF it's Nick's baby. There is a very good chance, with these writers, that Sharon could have a bouncing baby Abbott BOY.

I suspect there are lots of game changers ahead of us.

ETA - My rationale for an Abbott boy would be that it ties Sharon together with the two most important families on the show. It also ties the quad together for years to come regardless of how they are paired up. If it's Nick's? Doesn't happen. Personally, I think it's Billy's with Jack stepping in to raise the baby as his own.

Also, Sharon and Billy had a ton of chemistry. I would be surprised if that was not revisited down the road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't read usenet but if they have anti CM/Mac thread, then BRA-freaking-VO! I have half a mind to start one here myself. Not only is she painfully dull, she has sucked the life out of Billy. Thank goodness, Billy gets his spark back when he's with the Abbotts but the minute he's around Mac, he's like a inept paramedic trying to "revive" a plastic doll.

I wouldn't mind a Sharon/Billy story. They seem like they would be fun. Really Billy and anyone but Mac would be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's because she's even more bland and lifeless than Mac should be. Mac was never "happy" (except with RK playing her, but that's another story) but she sure as hell wasn't this damn bland and boring. Mac should be a little hard around the edges because things that have happened to her in life has left her jaded, but to be void of ANY emotion isn't it. When Ash Bash was playing Mac she had her walls up but there were moments (when Kevin really needed help, with Kay) that she let those walls down and showed real emotion but CF just isn't doing it. Even when Mac found out that Billy, the love of her life isn't her cousin afterall, there was...NOTHING! That should affect even the hardest person in the world. To learn that you were robbed of the life you wanted and hoped for with the love of your life should have compelled CF to give us something. Anger, sadness, a moment of weakness but we got nothing but the same mundane expression from CF which was utter and sheer boredom and lifelessness. I wanted to like her, I really did and didn't want to automatically dislike her because she looked old as her mother or seemed to sleepwalk through her first few weeks but this lady just ain't cut out to be Mac.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought Adam was turning him into a seeing eye dog, he'll be allowed everywhere then. He might even play into Colleen's big storyline, she finds the Zap and takes him home thinking he's Fisher only to be terribly confused when there are two dogs at the Abbot hostel.

- bookmarking to remember to continue at page 36/83, if I ever get time to come back to this thread!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • My hunch is what you've described. JFP is likely back working on transitioning the show to a new studio and embracing new technology for its production model.
    • The woman who was the co-chair of Latinas for Trump is now complaining about his targeting immigrants that she thought were "safe." I also read a puff piece from yet another "insider" journalist who lives to normalize fascists - this one with a tech bro who was venting off the record because he thought voting for Trump was cool and would show up the Democrats and maybe we'd get Greenland, but now he's getting upset.  These people still support Trump, and Republicans, they just want to make sure they get credit for being respectable. And they will get it.
    • I really do wish someone could. Just a few characters in very simple backdrops, with very real problems that are just a little larger than life, like the '50s and '60s. All the characters having a level of dignity or respect. And their inner lives are what dominate the story, even if there are outside forces at play.
    • It's a lesson to never be loyal because once your use is up, you're shown the door. MSW was the only bright spot for CBS for awhile, and once they were back on top... they promptly sabotaged the show as a repayment for all that the show had done for the network.  
    • The show made a mistake in not bringing in more McKinnon kids, specifically bringing back Ben. Kathleen was leaving, and while I like you am very fond of Sally Spencer as MJ, that didn't seem to be a common view. They also decimated the character in a truly sick storyline. So that just left Cheryl. 
    • Between Gwen and Cat, the show often seems to side with those who cause lots of cruelty to Jack and Jennifer. I am half-surprised that the show hasn't brought Peter Blake back for more of the same.  I don't really know if there is a purpose for them in Salem now, but I do feel a sense of stability and rightness when Melissa Reeves is back in the role of Jennifer and back in the Horton house, in spite of...well, a lot of offcamera stuff we all know perfectly well. 
    • I like to call her an FC-reject character

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I’m sensing you’re not really a John Black fan from your posts. This has been some of the best soap Days has done in many years but you seem completely opposed to it lol.
    • The John Black character has been a part of my life for decades. I like heroes being honored, however imperfect they may be.  I'm glad they are giving him a long farewell and tribute.
    • Annie Dutton was anything, but sane when she was introduced.  She was very tortured and looked like she was on the verge of tears when she was first introduced.   While people, and writers, made it seem as though Annie lost her mind because of Josh.. I truly think that Annie had a lot of untreated mental issues that didn't manifest until her marriage to Josh. Sonni was also anything, but strong when she was first introduced either.   Claire in 1983 was a complete 180 from the Claire that we got in 1986... and I do agree that her character was degraded.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy