Jump to content

Y&R: Week of May 11, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Is the show really plot-driven right now? Yes and No.

I think there are TWO shows on Y&R right now. One is character-driven and it includes most of the Newmans, Abbotts and sometimes the Chancellors. The other is plot-driven and it includes the Crimson Lights foursome, and sometimes the Chancellors.

Plot-driven is stuff dropped from the sky. The return of Clint, for example, so that we can get to Kevin's breakdown and give some sort of story for Kevin/Jana/Amber/Daniel and the Fisher Baldwins and (to a smaller extent) Kay & Murphy. This Art guy is yet ANOTHER plot-driven plot for presumably the same group. These characters don't make things happen. They just go through a series of externally created adventures, sort of like the characters on Scooby Doo or Gilligan's island. That's why (with the obvious exception of Kay), Kevin/Jana/Amber/Daniel/Michael/Lauren/Gloria/Jeff could all be cut tomorrow and the show wouldn't lose a thing. And I hate that I had to put Michael in that group but TPTB have turned Michael into just a support of Kevin and Gloria.

Character-driven stuff is Nikki/Paul's romance because of course she would turn to him, Victor/Ashley's rebound romance, Jack trying to play hero for Sharon, Nick letting little Nicky make all his decisions, Victoria being a jealous bitch, Phyllis trying to be smart and save her marriage even though she has to act out sometimes still, Jack using/teaching Colleen, Colleen wanting to hurt Victor because of Brad, Heather lack of judgment and desperate need for some happiness, Lily being a princess and wanting the fairy tale she never got but felt she was entitled too, Billy looking to someone outside of himself for validation and love and being unable to appreciate what he already has, Sharon's free fall in the hopes that Nick will actually catch her and her continued despair because he hasn't, Jill imploding upon the loss of her "mother" and Kay's relative equanimity at the loss of her "daughter" and all the amazing stuff with Adam right now, which is all about his character and how far he's fallen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Right I'm not saying the whole show is plot driven but you summed it up perfect for me. When I see that I see opportunities for writing like that may takeover, I am very much hoping that's not the case. I can enjoy the character driven stories The Phyll/Nick/sHARON/JACK stuff. The Victor/Nikki/paul stuff, the Adam stuff is plot driven at this point don't know how they plan to bounce him back. Don't get me started on the Dan crap. Like I said it's not unwatchable, it's not unwatchable only because of the character driven stories still being told.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wow, what a great post! I liked the first Lily and Daniel. Like the first JT/Colleen, I do not understand how that was lost. Every time they find gold...they squander it. As for the family dynamics issues, another great point. You're absolutely right. People fight over their family loyalties ALL the time.

And yes, I think people who are on here posting about Y&R everyday, at some level, love this show. Maybe not in its current incarnation, but still...

Another great post! The excellent question is whether some of these "out of left field plot twists" are killing the show? I think they are making it more exciting...but I also agree that Clint Radisson (for example) damn near ruined the sublime Kay/Marge story. So, it is definitely a risky time.

I think they're trying desperately to goose the ratings during sweeps...and that brings out the worst in EVERY show...but I'm going to withhold judgement until I see the long-term payoff. The Kay-Marge sweeps stunt, for example, bought us MONTHS of excellent story across the whole canvas. So, that could happen again.

So, the question this inspires in me is this:

There ARE two audience for soaps. There *is* the plot-shocker audience. This is the audience that inflates GH's ratings every time they do a stunt. This is the audience that loved OLTL last May.

Then, there is the "community, family, romance, social relevance" audience.

I _think_ Y&R is trying to satisfy both audiences right now. If they can pull it off, it is brilliant. But it is risky...could they alienate both?

I will point out that since MAB became solo HW, Y&R has done the IMPOSSIBLE: slow ratings GROWTH. Let's see if that continues or maintains. If yes, then all the naysayers are ... from an economic/demographic/ratings perspective ... plain wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think there are three audiences.

  1. Escapists/Romantics
  2. Coffee Clatchers/Comfort Foodies
  3. Obsessive/Media omnivores

Escapists watch soaps for just that. They want beautiful people with beautiful problems in beautiful homes. Sharon's life is a mess but oh what a lovely mess. She's gorgeous. She gets to have sex with Nick, Billy and Jack. She lives in the Abbott mansion. Her life is falling apart but it's all good because it's a literally a treat to watch. This group is related to but not exactly the same as the Romantics. The Romantics say they want a happy ending and sweet sappy times for their couple. What they really want is for their couple to suffer deliciously. They want to escape into the drama of a high-stakes romance.

Coffee clatchers see characters as old friends. They know that Nikki is an ex-stripper and that Kay & Jill are meant to be enemies. They know that Victor is kind of a douchebag and they might even hate him but they still want to see him on their screens. They're attached to the characters as if they were an extended family. And they want to see real problems on screen. Nick the adulterer, Gloria the overbearing mother (the show is missing a golden opportunity to present Glo as mom-in-law from hell to Jana & Lauren, and also missing a chance to create a misguided rivalry between J & L for Glo's "affections), and Phyllis the desperate housewife are all like people we know in real life. So when Nick & Sharon remember Cassie it doesn't feel gimmicky, it feels real and painful, because we knew her too and we can connect with how sad it was for them.

Obsessive/Media omnivores might describe might describe most of us here. We nitpick but we do it because we care. We see that Billy is being modeled after a young Jack, that the gaslighting story is take off on both Rebecca & Gaslight, that Cane as Phillip III is ridiculous, and so on. We're meta about our soap because we value the construction as much as we value the experience.

If I'm honest with myself, I am probably all three viewers in one. It all depends on what mood I'm in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ouch! Truth hurts though.... nothing brilliant, still enjoyable (for me anyway) but I can see that changing soon lol. The Y&R threads in the spoiler forum right now put the fear of god into me....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm definitely a "coffee clatcher". I can barely stand Victor on most days, but there would be a huge hole in this show without him. I still think of characters and actors that have only been on the show for 10-15 years as new. Then I have to remind myself..."Hey, wait. Sharon has been on this show for over a decade now. Damn"!

No one in daytime, imo. After I watch an episode of GH, Y&R is like a symphony. Characters on Y&R are treated like precious gems. On GH they are treated like Sh!t. That doesn't mean Y&R gets a pass. There's definitely room for improvement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Mostly a coffee clatcher here but a bit of an obsessive media omnivore. This is how I like my dramas though. I have a range of viewership from sports, cartoons, action/adventure, serial dramas, comedy, reality, thrillers. My viewership is invested based on specific elements of each for instance I love watching NBA and sportscenter but I'm probably mostly watching during finals because that is the most exciting element for me. With drama, I love to watch beautiful characters with relative/realistic conflicts, work through their dysfunction. It doesn't always matter to me who ends up with who as long as the history and connections are the beats that are played, but I get that it matters to some. So I agree the shows have a range of viewers to cater to however, I always have this issue with pop culture because while I believe it's not impossible to make most of your market happy I also believe in spreading yourself too thin. With that said, Y&R is the only daytime soap I still watch now and I love it. I lput it in a different class howver when I see the decline I start preparing myself for the worst and I'm preparing for the day I no longer view it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Which, IMO, is problem number-one right now with Y&R. No breath-taking romance, no heart-stopping passion, no "EEEEEE!"-worthy hookups of any kind. Just evil chipmunks, grisly deaths, convoluted schemes (both financial and criminal), and Sharon's Craft-O-Matic adjustable vagina. (Oh, and mentally cracked dames, stroking their kitties and vowing revenge. Haven't forgotten about you, Patty Jane!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What?! Get outta here! You?

What good does being "in character" do, though, when everyone's either without story, trapped in bad story, or hopelessly tied to the Fisher-Baldwins just to get story?

As opposed to before, when she got by on divine providence or pure, dumb luck?

I don't question your Y&R-love, Mark, but I do question whether you and I are watching the same Y&R.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • According to this article, Victoria Rowell says was asked to audition for Anita Dupree   https://apnews.com/article/beyond-gates-renewal-d7369f7a60a0a992483294acb950ef6d
    • For years I did NOT go by Laura's opinion of Luke. Today I certainly do not go by Laura's opinion that Sonny somehow is good for Port Charles. Actually when it comes to being a judge of people's characters, and the issue is Laura, I just remember Esme.
    • Good point. It would provide some conflict with Jack. As much as I am not interested in Claire, I don't find it difficult to understand why she might be a bit reluctant  to commit to a guy who has already been divorced twice or is  3 times?before he is 30. That's a natural obstacle that Claire would be hesitant about. But in GC every relationship is true love and various past marriages are forgotten.
    • He had no chance of getting on The Sopranos

      Please register in order to view this content

      I’m in NYC, and I can’t help but wonder if NYC prosecutors, politicians, etc. ever felt the way that Laura did, back in the 80s-90s when they were taking down the mob.  “Oooh, don’t put John Gotti in prison. The guy who comes in after him might be worse” 
    • Happy 18th Birthday, Sophia! I like that Tate gave her a birthday party. And that Marlena counseled him about whether or not he has feelings for Sophia, and his relationship with Holly. I like how messy Tate is and I hope he continues to be messy. He just needs to have more argument/fight scenes with Doug III

      Please register in order to view this content

      Days just needs to work a little bit more on establishing better chemistry between Tate and Sophia, but I still think that’s mostly due to Rachel Boyd. Sometimes, I think that Sophia might secretly be scheming, but with the way RB plays it, (if that’s what they’re going for), it doesn’t seem to be working. Tate was also really sweet and dorky during the party too The drug scenes didn’t do much for me though. I don’t mind that Kevin panicked and ran off with the drug once he heard Steve and Shawn coming, but I felt like that story was the weakest part of today. But I am interested in seeing what happens next. And I couldn’t help but laugh when I noticed that Steve and Shawn had matching jackets Btw, I see Mayor Price established a quid pro quo with Xander today lol I wouldn’t mind that being more than just a plot point. It could lead to some pretty good drama if it’s handled correctly. And it would be a lot better than Xander declaring war on Sweet Bits/Chanel and Felicity.  And Stephanie, finally having her mother to confide in about her life, her relationship with Alex, etc. has been one of the best things about the Paula/Jeanne episodes. The book thing still seems very Ron/Jamey-like though, mostly because it’s so centered around Alex, sort of like how GH used to make storylines about Liz all about Finn or Franco Hopefully, Stephanie talks to Kayla about the book. I’d like to hear more of her perspective on it. I also like that Kayla and Marlena were there for each other as well. These are such better ways to use all three of them. And, we got an update about John One other thing I’ve noticed about the Paula/Jeanne episodes (except for the ones that are worked on by Jamey) is that they’re longer than Ron episodes. Episodes usually clock in at around 40-41 minutes now, as opposed to 35-37, or as short as 31. I like that. 
    • Also Victor being the obstacle for Kyle/Claire feels forced. If anything it should be Diane. Diane has a history of having issues with the Newmans, doesn’t she? Jack could be the one trying to reel her in while she’s meddling in Kyle and Claire’s relationship. They’re making the characters of Diane, Victoria, Nick, Sharon be way too complacent when they could have a stronger role in the younger characters like Mariah/Tessa, Kyle/Claire etc 
    • A year later we had these ratings for the week of May 11-17 1987. This was probably the last time the CBS soaps (at least til Dallas’ finale) ranked this high. Dynasty had already ended its season.  CBS reran the Dallas Early Years movie on Saturday night against Golden Girls’ season finale, which was the failed Empty Nest back door pilot.  Interestingly a repeat Family Ties was #1 this week. The week before the season finale of Family Ties beat out Cosby as well, but it was Cheers that beat them both out with Diane’s exit.  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Hello to everybody!

      Please register in order to view this content

      I'm writing a series of essays about the first time of a LGBT character in US soaps. I already have datas about Sharon Duvall in DAYS (1977) as first Bisex, Lynn Carson in AMC (1983) as first Lesbian, Hank Elliott on ATWT (1989) as first Gay (someone have or can find the episode in which Paul Ryan finds out about Hank and does not take it very well? I have seen Hank's coming out to Iva and when Hank gets a bullet to save Paul's life from the latter evil father and when he gets tested for HIV after finding out Charlie's diagnosis, but Soap Opera Digest recaps are too much concises...) and Billy Douglas on OLTL (1992) as first LGBT teen in both daytime and primetime TV (I have seen all the episodes on You Tube. BTW, what a great storyline, why it was ignored by the Emmys? Andrew Carpenter and Billy's father players are both really great in their roles! Oh, well, if OLTL was not nominated for Best Drama in 1994 with Marty's gang rape story which won four major awards and was spectacular, no surprise at all - sadly) and I have read something about Azure in The City (1996) as first Trans, but I'd like to see the episode where Bernado finds out and Azure confirms what is said in that newspaper to have something to quote. I like quoting, it gives the essays more depth. I already read the biweekly recaps from Soap Opera Digest on Tumblr and single episodes recaps on IMDB, but I'd like to have more to write about. And something more about critics and public opinions - I only knows that the storyline was rapidly axed because of bad writing and bad performance by Carlotta Chung, but I have nothing to quote.   PS Thank you @JAS0N47 for your incredible and rich site (and work on it). In particular for the Nielsen ratings on weekly basis lists since 1974 and for everything about Sharon Duval - specially for the script of the confession episode dated 23 May 1977! I'm not a DAYS viewers (I'm Italian, I live in Italy and on You Tube there is almost nothing if not short videos), but I've seen some clips of Marlena's first possession (Deidre Hall is terrific in it! Storyline is garbage, but it has its chilling moments and it is funny - I laugh everytime I remember Kristen say to Marlena "according to the book of demonology"! Was she an espert of demons or what!? ) and read on Soap Opera Central daily recaps about infamous Melaswen (brainwashed Marlena has a particular sense of humor - killing ex alcoholic Maggie with a bottle of wine and Alice with her donuts...), so I know something about the soap. Little, but better than nothing.
    • May 14, Asher Antonyzyn (Danny) interview

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Yes, they did say 27 sets!! I wondered at the time if they could all be up at the same time.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy