Jump to content

Another World Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 13.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members
WOMAN WITH A PAST
A 15 minute daytime serial, on CBS, M-F from 4-4:15, followed by THE SECRET STORM, from 2-1-1954 to 7-2-1954, so for 5 months, was the star vehicle for Constance Ford. She played the lead, Lynn Sherwood, a New York dress designer who had all these different adventures.
Constance Ford has long been regarded as one of the finest American actresses.
After a critically acclaimed career in the theatre, she was seen onscreen as Sandra Dee's memorably mean mama in A SUMMER PLACE, in Warren Beatty's film ALL FALL DOWN & in the Joan Crawford hospital drama THE CARETAKERS.
She's best remembered, however, for her dazzling intense performances in primetime. Shows included: KRAFT THEATRE; ALFRED HITCHCOCK PRESENTS; THE UNTOUCHABLES; NAKED CITY; EAST SIDE, WEST SIDE; TWILIGHT ZONE; DR. KILDARE & PERRY MASON.
Mona Kent was the creator & writer. Other actors known to me include Felice Camargo, Victoria Wyndham's sister, and Jean Stapleton. The Producer was Richard Brill. The Director was Marcella Cianey.
After it went off the air Connie played Rose Peterson on SFT and then Eve Morris on EON, finally landing so successfully on AW as Ada Davis Downs McGowan Hobson.
Constance Ford is my personal favorite actress.
Edited by Contessa Donatella
more
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you!  I was completely unaware of this.  Same year Nancy McGowan was born, I believe.  

Thanks for sharing this.  I was thinking it might be "Woman with a Past."  

If I'm not mistaken, Ford played the sister of Don Knotts' character on SFT.  So that is the reference to SFT you mention in your post.  Might be fun to see Ada Davis and Barney Fife on screen together.  LOL.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know that a hack like Carlivati would have done all kinds of callbacks to A Summer Place, camp sogging and clogging up the screen. I'm glad AW never did. 

The whole Pat/John breakup confuses me a bit too as I am not sure if he still expected to go back to Pat after sleeping with Barbara. He seemed to take Pat for granted. 

This story is so rich in layered drama - I wish we could see all of it.

Speaking of Dave Gilchrest, I notice that he was on for 4 years, which is longer than many Lemay introductions. Did David Ackroyd want to leave or was he let go? That's a long time for a character to not have any real stories or pairings. The number of women he hung out with or dated or was hot for is extremely varied - few men would date Pat and fall for Rachel. 

I wish we could see some clip of him. The most I've seen is that tilted camera Paley episode where he is at Iris' pool and is wearing a tight black Speedo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So true as far as Ackroyd's time on AW being a 4 year run.  We criticize many of the writers on AW over the years but Harding Lemay wrote them and in out probably more than any other writer.  I am just amazed the series stayed strong for as long as it did under him with the killing off or recasting roles. just my thought..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was wondering if Harding Lemay did publicity for his book?  For example, did he appear on the Today Show, or similar shows?  Here's the NYT review (perhaps the Times selected the wrong choice of editor to review the book, but that's typical of their coverage of soap-related news.  God forbid, an editor for the Times admitted to watching TV in the 80s, let alone Daytime TV). 

https://www.nytimes.com/1981/03/12/books/books-of-the-times-037956.html

"I wish I could report that we are relieved and uplifted when the break finally comes. But in truth so dismal has the story long since become - so clogged are the pages with Mr. Lemay's undigested anger - that we are, more than anything, numb by the end. Nor does it help much if one doesn't happen to be a fan of soap opera. For if one hasn't ever gotten to know the characters on ''Another World,'' then Mr. Lemay's desiccated plot summaries are not much fun. Of course, I am speaking strictly as an illiterate."

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Please register in order to view this content

Seeing the Marianne in the 1975 and 1976 clips makes it all the more remarkable how completely extinguished she feels by this point (not that long before her exit). The P&G soaps at this time really seemed to want to age up and drain their ingenues. 

The scene at 20 minutes between Jamie and Pat (Pat's last real scene on the show) is an absolute knockout. I am not a huge fan of storylines where people wring their hands over what's written about them in books, but Pat's response to "James" (switching to Jamie as she becomes more vulnerable) here is surprisingly layered - not just the feeling of betrayal and of humiliation, but that he got so inside her head that she wrongly assumed he'd had actual conversations with her about her crimes before writing his book. It plays into the power of fiction, and the power of soaps, especially with long running characters. We think we know what is inside their head and we try to shape what they say or do with our own experiences. It reminds me of Kathryn Hays talking about how she felt like Irna Phillips knew her secrets when she played the early material for Kim.

Beverly Penberthy has such an ethereal directness (similar to Jacquie Courtney) that makes any scene improve and is truly put to good use when she gets the chance. There's something deeply sad in knowing this is her last time to be able to use that chance, but also satisfying - she is showing the ageist, brain dead execs just what they've given up. 

And Richard Bekins is wonderful, as he often is, not downplaying the arrogance and naivete of Jamie, but imbuing him with such a soulfulness. He can do so much with his eyes as the camera just latches onto his beautiful face, making the moment where Pat finally gets him to see just what he's lost all the more devastating.

If they hadn't fired Beverly, I wonder if they might have paired up Pat and Jamie instead of Susan and Jamie. They have surprisingly potent chemistry here.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A critic who takes it upon himself to "review" a book about a TV series (or play or film or album or artwork) which he has never seen, heard, nor has any knowledge of whatsoever, cannot be taken seriously as a credible voice of analysis.

This dithering piece shames the NYT more than it does Lemay.

This is a mesmerizing scene between Pat and Jamie. Beverly Penberthy was the kind of gem (like Jacquie Courtney) whom TPTB should have moved heaven and earth to hang onto, particularly because by 1982, she was one of the few, comforting links remaining to the past.

By now, the long-standing idiocy and incompetence of TPTB is well documented, but it never fails to disappoint how willfully and consistently they crippled the soaps over the years.

Thanks for sharing this.

Edited by vetsoapfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This may be a strange question, but ...  Does anyone know if Beverly Penberthy's salary was used by TPTB in any obvious or identifiable way, after she was fired?  Considering she was the longest running cast member at that time, and I believe she was listed third in the closing credits, she was likely one of the higher paid cast members. So were there any expensive actors hired just as Penberthy was leaving?  And which character sort of moved in and took up Pat's screen time, after she left?  Do these questions even make sense?  

Edited by Mona Kane Croft
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    •   It's just so much fun!   She really was what made the show come together. I remember thinking what a mistake it was to write her out temporarily. I wonder how I'll feel during this rewatch, but I'm fairly certain her absence contributed to the show ending after season 5.
    • Thank you @Paul Raven The Kay/Kill stuff sounds like fire.   @soapfan770 I saw someone asking about old episodes you had... in case anyone has old tapes but not a VCR, DM me, I am willing to convert them for free.
    • I think Krista is too hot or her. I think the current actress works bc she comes across so basic. Thats not a dig but she feels very normal and relatable as an average suburban woman. I think if Krista was in the role, Id want more out of her but I dont think Jan is meant for bigger things
    • https://www.instagram.com/p/DJogu0uJ7mE/ DAYS 9-25-90 First Day in Drag for Jack Deveraux who is allowed to be quite pretty. Matt Ashford plays him.
    • https://www.instagram.com/p/DJogu0uJ7mE/ DAYS 9-25-90 First Day in Drag for Jack Deveraux who is allowed to be quite pretty. Matt Ashford plays him.
    • The sad thing about SC being a great actor is that his character has never worked. Ever. And yes if I don't know what Liam is about and just focus on acting... I can appreciate him. But as soon as I connect him to Liam... I cringe.  Maybe SC should run till he is still young and find himself a role where he can shine. 
    • As I've said before I don't believe the fact that both sisters have cheating husbands (one in the past, one more recently) is a coincidence or anything random. It's pre-thought and pre-planned and the message is clear. Cheaters can be found in all shapes, forms and sizes. Some do it in the most blatant way, they are known serial cheaters and their wives know of their past hook ups (as Dani has already said... she was willing to forgive Bill for his previous mistresses... till Hayley came) and some are more masterfully disguised in the image of the perfect husband. The fact that Dani was jealous of her sister Nicole's happy marriage in the first episodes was not a coincidence. I knew it the first second I heard it. It made me wonder and think what is beneath Nicole and Ted's picture perfect life. The show painted two very different sisters and then gave them the same crisis. It was intentional and dramatically focused on how these women acted after that... How they kept or did not keep their dignity. The contrasts and the similarities are not random. They connected the two stories very well. Telling us that beyond the gates there are secrets... lies and betrayals. And sometimes the happiest ones have the biggest skeletons in their closets. Is all of this a cliche? A soap opera serial cliche? Yes. Does it still work? Yes. And did we need to start with something that is more universal and easier to stomach by the mass audience? Yes. This is only the beginning of the show in terms of stories and themes. We will have years ahead of us to explore different aspects of these people. The first couple of months it had to be a classic sex and betrayal story that makes more people hooked. It's universal. Again. Nothing so far about both husbands being cheaters is coincidental for me. It's too early for that.
    • Thanks, these are great! Joanne Curtis, another soap character punished for having an abortion
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Yes!!! Mona feels  like one of my aunts, love the way she carries herself. Loved seeing Eva pop-up at the gambling place.  Monday was all around good soap. Can't remember the last time an entire episode held my interest.  Loving the fallout and reverberations from Ted and Shea-Butter Sheila's affair

      Please register in order to view this content

      . Tricia Mann Grant is 90s early 2000s quality FINE. As nice as it would've been to see Anita embrace Eva, I'm glad she didn't because we can squeeze a lot more years of conflict out of Eva, Leslie and the Duprees.   Lauren & Sheila, Viki & Dorian, Katherine & Jill all gave us good conflict for decades. Hopefully this follows suit. I understand the concern. Right now there's an issue of quality of black representation on shows more so than quantity of black shows. I'd like to see more predominantly black sci-fi, legal, political, supernatural or medical dramas over the typical who is sleeping with who. However, this is a soap, and this is what happens on soaps. White soap characters do these things all the time, but have the luxury of being seen as individuals, not representations of their entire race. Husbands/fathers like Todd Manning, Victor Newman and Asa Buchanan cheat, lie and swindle all the time but aren't seen as a commentary on white men. Black characters like Ted and New Dollar Bill should be able to do the same.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy