Jump to content

Another World Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

There wasn't enough context in the bit I was quoting -- it was from the Corinne Jacker article so it specifically meant 1982. Gail Brown would have turned 45 in 1982 but I am not sure whether *Clarice* was intended to be as old as that. Was she young and foolish when she had Cory with Robert Delaney, or merely unmarried and foolish? And if I were Jacker I might not have been boasting of a contemporary geriatric pregnancy storyline in 1982 when it had already been done years before with Ada.

Not sure if this article has been discussed before, but while I was pondering the problem of Clarice's age I came across it. It claims that Clarice was the first "continuing" comedic character in daytime soaps.

https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-kane-republican-gail-brown/76993998/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 13.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I just watched a few scenes in the posted episode.  Yes, the set has been painted and the furniture and curtains are nicer than Ada had.  I think the lattice work may be new, as I don't remember that feature when it was Ada's set.  Generally the entire set is brighter and less drab than when it was Ada's living room, when it looked a lot more worn and working-class.  But the Shea's were also working class, so not sure where they got those fancy curtains.  LOL.  

If anyone wants to do a more thorough comparison, there is a lengthy scene somewhere on Youtube in Ada's living room from 1979, between Ada and Rachel.  It's a well known scene when Ada tells the story of hearing Rachel cry at night missing her father, and Ada admits she could not give to Rachel what she really needed -- her father's love.  In that scene, you'll get a good look at Ada's version of that set.  Not to mention, this 1979 scene should have won Emmy's for both actresses and the writer. If you are a long term AW viewer, this scene just might make you cry.   There used to be two versions of this scene on Youtube -- a short edited version and a long version.  The long version is better, of course.   

Edited by Mona Kane Croft
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh boy -- Here we go again with another incorrect "first!"  What is it with all these claims of daytime "firsts" that are just plain wrong??  Clarice was certainly not the first continuing comedic (I prefer the word humorous) character on daytime.  By the way, I am not blaming Xanthe for this false information, Xanthe merely shared it with us.  The blame should go to the person who wrote the original article.  

There have been continuing humorous characters on daytime since day-one.  And by 1975 (the year Clarice was introduced) there had been dozens.  Particularly, Agnes Nixon's version of AW contained ongoing humorous characters, not to mention the humor Nixon later used on All My Children.  And please never forget, while Harding Lemay was writing AW, Clarice was as tragic as she was humorous. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In the Irna Phillips universe there were small cities clustered near each other. They were Oakdale, Illinois [ATWT], Flat Rock, Centerville, Somerset, [itself] Bedfordtown, Brookville, Ogden, Centerville, Bay City, Illinois, [AW]. – Donna L Bridges (These were supposed to represent the actual bedroom suburbs around Cincinnati, where P&G's International Headquarters were.)

 

 

Please register in order to view this content

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am always interested in interrogating these claims and testing what they mean or don't mean. As mentioned in the article, Clarice was originally intended to be very short term (3 days) but they liked Gail Brown and created a longer-term story for her. It's not clear to me where the author of the article pulled the claim from -- did the show provide the description? Did Gail offer it as part of the interview? Was it a description with currency in the soap press? -- but could it be possible that Clarice was the first character created as comic relief who went on to have a dramatic story of her own (as opposed to being in a long-running supporting role)? 

[Disclaimer: In defining firsts, we can prove that X is not "the first" if we can prove that Y was earlier -- but that doesn't necessarily mean that Y is the actual first until we prove that nothing else was earlier than Y. So Bay City being in Michigan can prove that Ryan's Hope is not the first soap to be set in a real location, but does not prove that Another World was the first.]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Meanwhile, was Gail Brown ever able to give an interview when they didn't mention her sister?

Clarice is worthy of praise in any form.  It is a rarity that we get someone with even slightly unconventional beauty as well as such a well-rounded character.  It is interesting how many times that they tried to create a family around her.  First the McGowens, then the Hobsons, and the Eweings (AW really had a thing for copying Dallas).  I feel like saddling her with Larry, who was an uncharismatic character played by an actor that by certain accounts was difficult to get along with on set, really doomed Clarice. 

However, it was remarkable to read on AWHP that she returned for Ada's funeral, I had no memory of that.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh yes, it was very touching. Remember, Clarice's father Charlie was married to Ada at the time of his death making Clarice the stepsister of Rachel and Nancy. There was a delay in getting Ada's body to the church or wherever the funeral was being held so this gave the three "sisters" an opportunity to reminisce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well,  Lahoma Vain Lucas would be an earlier example of this from AW. She was a humorous character who had dramatic material also.  And, although I'm not an expert on early All My Children, I'm confident Agnes Nixon used humorous characters (who also had dramatic storylines) on AMC before 1975. We'd need someone who knows early AMC to provide the specifics.  And even before Nixon, there had been humorous characters.  Just because I (or you) can't name them does not mean that Clarice was the first.   

But the opposite is not necessarily accurate either.  Just because I might not remember a humorous character on daytime earlier than Clarice, does not mean I should go around claiming she was the first.  Or maybe I don't remember a soap opera matriarch earlier than Nancy Hughes.  But that doesn't give me the license to post that Nancy Hughes was the first matriarch on a soap.  Being a soap opera "first" has nothing to do with someone's memory.  It should have everything to do with the truth -- not just what I remember.   But I have come to believe that is what people are doing. Another example -- I don't remember a female journalist on a soap before Mary Ryann.  So I'm going to post online that Mary Ryan was the first female journalist on daytime.  That is just crazy thinking.  

I guess what I'm saying is: In my opinion, if a person is going to post something as fact, it is that person's responsibility to prove they are correct.  It is not everyone else's responsibility to prove them wrong.   But that doesn't seem to be how it works with soap opera history.   Again, crazy.

Edited by Mona Kane Croft
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

One other point about Clarice - tangentially

It was mentioned in 1982 that Ada and Clarice closed their salon.  It's a shame that more US soaps couldn't establish a hair salon as a consistent meeting place within their show.  I'm not talking about nutty spas with scifi youth serums.   In the UK, Corrie's hair salon has been the site of multiple stories, as it is a logical setting where people of different classes can get together and talk about recent events.  For example, I don't think Rachel and Paulina would hang out at the same diner, but it is reasonable that they would see each other while getting a blow out before an event in Bay City.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Interesting.  I was watching both shows at the time, but had forgotten the chronology.  Funny, but I do recall an interview in which Harding Lemay claimed that both the Ewings of Dallas and the Carringtons of Dynasty had been named because of his characters on AW.  I guess Lemay's ego got in the way yet again.  LOL.   But I still love him anyway.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Please register in order to view this content

 

 

 

 

Blaine could've been in development early, but I don't know how David Jacobs would have known her name

 

 

And, given that they were nine years apart, there could've been multiple reasons for sharing the same last name including

Unless, Harding Lemay wants to take credit for naming

But, it is doubtful 

 

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • So Doug just leaves Vanessa there with Joey? He's a f*cking loser. Vanessa needs to divorce his arse 
    • Tina Sloan tied Jerry VerDorn record when Guiding Light was cancelled - 26 years uninterrupted 
    • Very true...but TPTB all were desperate to get into prime time or films and couldn't, so they looked down on their own industry and tried to infuse themes that just didn't work in soaps. I would have thought after 9/11 the shows would have gone out of their way to provide that warmth and comfort that the audience wanted, and to bring old viewers back. Budget cuts? Just bring back kitchen sets, both ATWT and GL got rid of those besides one each..(the Snyders and the Bauers) You don't need super fancy sets if you have the writing. 
    • LMAO they didn't 

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • LY has a job on another show. She's going to be on the Legally Blonde prequel "Elle" 
    • From what I can put together, the 1980s had several actors with interrupted runs. Michael Zaslow: 1971-1980, 1989-1997 Maureen Garrett: 1976-1980, 1988-?, ?-end Christopher Bernau: 1977-1984, 1986-1988 Peter Simon: 1981-1984, 1986-1996, ?-end Maeve Kinkead: 1981-1987, 1989-1996, 1997-end Robert Newman: 1981-1984, 1986-1991, 1993-end Jordan Clarke: 1983-1987, 1989-1993, 1996, 1997-end By 1989, I believe the longest-tenured cast member without a departure was Jerry verDorn.
    • I know they were popular, but once they tamed Van's shrew, I thought Billy just brought Van down. Since they had just Nola and Billy sitting around in 97, an interesting thing would be if they had developed a friendship that turned into something else while Van was "dead". Maybe Billy lives at the Boardinghouse (to work on repaing his relationship with Bill) and works at Company instead of the stupid diner. Nola and Bridget give him a job there and Nola and Billy (who had originally been a bit antagonistic) slowly build up a relationship and then Van returns. A returned new lease on life Van would return to her "high hat ways" and take on the Spaulding's for control of the company with Billy helping her behind the scenes.  I know that Jordan was on sporadically because of his issues and them not know if they could trust him not to fall of the wagon, but they could have done it slow..and give Van and Nola a new reason to get in each others hair (I love a good Van/Nola tussle.)
    • Congratulations to Coco Gauff on her second win in one of the GS tournaments, the French Open.

      Please register in order to view this content

          Perhaps it wasn't the most well-played match in history, but that's something no one will remember in a few years time.
    • The thing with Martin (for me) is that he should have been Anita and Vernon's kid. I honestly think he would have been fine being an older or younger brother to Dani and Nicole. It also would have made his relationship and kids feel more realistic. A handsome salt and pepper late 40s/early 50s congressman who settled down and adopted kids to fit an image for politics. Not that he didn't want this lifestyle but it is what he needed to do to get ahead. Also, we don't often get older characters playing LGBT roles not just on daytime but across most media. It would have been a refreshing take. As an alternative, Sam and Ty could have been Martin's kids from an earlier marriage a la the NJ governor that was outed. We could have also seen parallels between Vernon and Anita thinking back to how they handled Martin coming out compared to the way they accepted Chelsea.  As for Martin being Nicole and Ted's kid, I do wish in this case he was not tied to a marriage and kids, so that he could date and sleep around like any other character on a soap.  Yeah, I didn't get it...but what I did get is that girl is a bit crazy like her mama.  Vanessa and Joey talking about the poker table...get these people off my screen. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Unpopular opinion, but I didn't think the show should have reunited Billy/Vanessa at all until the final stretch of the show. When watching the 1989 episodes when both Vanessa and Billy return after being off the show... I liked that Vanessa had moved on from him and that the show was hinting at her wanting to reunite with her first love Ross while looking down at Nadine for being the one Ross was dating.  And I loved the twist where Billy and Nadine teamed up to keep Vanessa/Ross apart.   This was an interesting concept that sadly the writers dropped with the show deciding to make Vanessa pine over Billy between 1990 and 1993 when they finally reunited.   To me, Vanessa pining over Billy seemed out of character. At least once Billy was carted off to prison in 1994... she and Billy divorced and stayed divorced until the final months when they finally found their way back together.  During the years when they were divorced, I liked that they had maintained a friendship and connection.. with viewers (like my late mom) wondering if they would ever decide to make it work again. I wish the show had tried that with Josh/Reva because by the time of the final episode when they rode off into the sunset, I didn't care because we'd been through the make up and break ups between them for over 10+ years by that point.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy