Jump to content

ATWT: Elizabeth Hubbard: Why is she rarely mentioned?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

One thing I notice sometimes with LaHubbard is that because she tends to throw out the script and do her own thing, the directors can't follow her. Some of her best lines are missed because the camera isn't on her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Oh gawd I agree...Lucci is so overrated. IMO she sucks as an actress. It's obvious why it took her so long to one that Emmy. When she won it was like....let's just give it to her already...LOL

It's LaWalsh not LaHubbard....LOL...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I guess James counts as a male lead, but there wasn't a lot of romance in that rewritten piece of trash story.

I was kind of throwing reasons out there, but I guess it really boils down to the fact that Lucinda hasn't really had a story centered on her in a good ten years, which is probably that crap with James and David. Even her cancer story wasn't as much about her as it was Luke's gettin' smacked on by his stepGAYGramps. She got a pre-nom this year, and I was like WTF did she do this (last) year? It's not like she's going to be submitting that horrid mushroom hunting episode.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You mean David being Lucinda's son? :rolleyes: That James and Lucinda were former lovers? :rolleyes: Yeah, it was a piece of trash!

I was surprised she was in the pre-nom too. I wish she would actually get nominated and win. LOL at your mushroom reference...

I read where Liz knows how fans want more of her and the vets in meaningful storylines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is Liz's first pre-nom. I know we were all surprised that she wasn't pre-nommed the year of her cancer storyline. It was such a shock.

And Quent, Liz has won the Daytime Emmy for Lead Actress. Once for The Doctors in 1974 and then for an afterschool special movie about one of the first ladies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • My hunch is what you've described. JFP is likely back working on transitioning the show to a new studio and embracing new technology for its production model.
    • The woman who was the co-chair of Latinas for Trump is now complaining about his targeting immigrants that she thought were "safe." I also read a puff piece from yet another "insider" journalist who lives to normalize fascists - this one with a tech bro who was venting off the record because he thought voting for Trump was cool and would show up the Democrats and maybe we'd get Greenland, but now he's getting upset.  These people still support Trump, and Republicans, they just want to make sure they get credit for being respectable. And they will get it.
    • I really do wish someone could. Just a few characters in very simple backdrops, with very real problems that are just a little larger than life, like the '50s and '60s. All the characters having a level of dignity or respect. And their inner lives are what dominate the story, even if there are outside forces at play.
    • It's a lesson to never be loyal because once your use is up, you're shown the door. MSW was the only bright spot for CBS for awhile, and once they were back on top... they promptly sabotaged the show as a repayment for all that the show had done for the network.  
    • The show made a mistake in not bringing in more McKinnon kids, specifically bringing back Ben. Kathleen was leaving, and while I like you am very fond of Sally Spencer as MJ, that didn't seem to be a common view. They also decimated the character in a truly sick storyline. So that just left Cheryl. 
    • Between Gwen and Cat, the show often seems to side with those who cause lots of cruelty to Jack and Jennifer. I am half-surprised that the show hasn't brought Peter Blake back for more of the same.  I don't really know if there is a purpose for them in Salem now, but I do feel a sense of stability and rightness when Melissa Reeves is back in the role of Jennifer and back in the Horton house, in spite of...well, a lot of offcamera stuff we all know perfectly well. 
    • I like to call her an FC-reject character

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I’m sensing you’re not really a John Black fan from your posts. This has been some of the best soap Days has done in many years but you seem completely opposed to it lol.
    • The John Black character has been a part of my life for decades. I like heroes being honored, however imperfect they may be.  I'm glad they are giving him a long farewell and tribute.
    • Annie Dutton was anything, but sane when she was introduced.  She was very tortured and looked like she was on the verge of tears when she was first introduced.   While people, and writers, made it seem as though Annie lost her mind because of Josh.. I truly think that Annie had a lot of untreated mental issues that didn't manifest until her marriage to Josh. Sonni was also anything, but strong when she was first introduced either.   Claire in 1983 was a complete 180 from the Claire that we got in 1986... and I do agree that her character was degraded.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy