Jump to content

Your Soaps Supercouple?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Not that long ago, CBS Soaps In Depth published their list of the 100 Greatest Couples On CBS soaps. I don't remember the order, but the top four were Y&R's Victor and Nikki, ATWT's Lily and Holden, B&B's Brooke and Ridge, and GL's Josh and Reva. Do you agree with this list? I can think of some substitutions for at least two of these, but what are your thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

This may be a bit off topic, but I HATE supercouples. I hate the whole philosophy on soaps that two people are meant to be together no matter what. It adds for very little character and relationship growth. I like characters to have numerous relationships without being attached to the stigma that they were specifically meant to be with a specific person for the rest of their lives. I think supercoupledom is what crippled DAYS, in particular, the most and gave them these rabid fanbases they don't accept the partners of their favourite couple with anyone else.

Bill Bell was very much against supercouples. Though Victor and Nikki always went back to one another, that never prevented them from having successful relationships with other people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I like supercouples because true supercouples wound up having the kind of stories I used to like. They would be targeted by an enemy, there would be a lot of running around, a lot of running around while holding hands, maybe going undercover to try and get the goods on the badguy, and they would fall in love while danger lurks around ever corner. Also, they would have location shoots so they could run around outside. GH's Frisco and Felicia were the perfect supercouple for all these reasons. Budget concerns and a getting away from action and adventure killed the supercouple. But even the supposed last supercouple of GH, Sonny and Brenda, just watch the 1990s opening and what are they doing? They are running around, running around holding hands, and running around holding hands on a beach. If you don't do these simple things, you just are not super.

AMC would deviate from this formula with Nina and Cliff and Greg and Jenny. But other than those two, I don't think that show ever really had supercouples.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Which is sort of effed up because neither Dallas nor Dynasty were particularly action-oriented. Definitely not in the "He's going to freeze the entire world!" or "We have to find the missing jewels!" sense, at least. Dynasty and Dallas were about business and family, family and business. Family relationships, business relationships, and how the two worlds collided.

They can attribute the glamor to the nighttime soaps, as well everyone getting rich suddenly and some other things (OLTL's Buchanans), but they need to stop blaming David Jacobs and Aaron Spelling for the daytime soaps all wanting to be like GH. They should be blaming themselves for wanting to piggyback off of its success, but if they want to credit the person who began the whole thing, her name is Gloria Monty.

Well then, ATWT is no longer ATWT, then.

And they wonder why the die-hards started tuning out. Why in the world should DAYS/AMC try to pander to youth audiences in non-summer months? They generally air early! Teens are in school! Collegians are most likely in class! It doesn't matter if they watch on SoapNet because those ratings DO NOT MATTER!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Supercouples were so "faddish" as the article pointed out. They worked for that particular era of soaps in the 80's, but by the late 80's it was no longer in style, and GH and DAYS both started to lose success with that formula. Hell, Gloria Monty even recognized this herself when she returned to GH in the early 90's, she knew that what worked before wasn't necessarily going to work then, but her second run was a disaster for other reasons altogether.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm with Alvin. The super-couple thing, in the long run, has hurt all of these shows. Every last one. It goes back to what Sylph said in another thread about evolving, and how soaps live in this reality that is completely unidentifiable to most people. The super-couple concept is a great example of that.

I also think that because of the super-couple fad, most of the shows have wasted WAY too much air time trying to force it to happen again, instantly. And it never, ever works. "Supercouples" happened because all the stars align in the right place (writers, actors, stories), and usually are never really planned.out. When the character of Luke was brought on, NOBODY said "This is what we're going to do with Luke and Laura, and people will remember them for all time". It's a happy accident. But since then, almost all the shows keep trying to force that magic to happen again. Not saying that it won't - there's a good chance the stars will align again for some show at some point. But this need to TELL the audience "They're a new supercouple so get used to it" is really a detriment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You beat me to it, Scotty!

I was just going to post that the REAL soap super-couples are the non-romantic ones. Viki and Dorian. Jake and Vicky on Another World (BEFORE they stupidly decided make them a couple in the last few years) Cass and Felicia on Another World. Jill and Katherine on Y&R. Stephanie and Brooke on B&B. THOSE are the "supercouples" that truly stand out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Great minds think alike brimike. Great minds think alike. ;)

To me, Viki and Dorian are the best non-romantic couple in Llanview. I suppose you could also throw in Nora/Lindsay or John/Todd. But none are better the original.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Add Roger and Holly to the mix, perhaps the biggest and most anti-supercouple ever. I just loved them, because underneath all of the dark hatred and shame, you know they loved one another and couldn't function without interacting. They might have had a marriage and sexual realtionship at one point, but most of their time was spent apart, not together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That sums up my feelings towards them as well.... I have always had couples I've enjoyed, but every couple has a shelf life and there comes a time for them to be split up.

Tad and Dixie from AMC will always hold a special place in my heart in terms of "supercouples" I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Congratulations to Carlos Alcaraz on his second win at the French Open!

      Please register in order to view this content

        If the standard of play in the women's final yesterday wasn't of the highest caliber, that is not something you could say about today's final. It was absolutely fantastic tennis. 
    • When Barbara's letter was read (partly in Barbara's voice), there was commenting upthread that Barbara's voice is similar to the voice of Naomi's unhoused client June.  It did sound like her.  June is played by Jasmine Burke.  Per closing credits, Barbara was voiced by Sherita Bolden.  Still possible that they are connected. From our discussion on the May thread:  Looks and/or voices similar between June, Haley, and Tracy.   Tracy looks like Debbi Morgan. LOL so June might be connected to Haley, Tracy, or Barbara; and/or Samantha&Tyrell. I love that we don't know!
    • In the 1987 episodes, Mary has wonderful conversations with MJ and Cheryl. This is a realistic family with believable dynamics. Mary's ambivalence towards Vince is played nicely. Denise Alexander is so good here. I don't know what happened that the writers or producers just decided to chuck it all away. I don't FF these scenes. The show had a strong family that could have had years of storyline and they did nothing with them. I really don't get it. 
    • I can't speak for Sonni, but I thought Annie came off as neurotic from very early on. That's just how Cynthia Watros plays her parts, and the writing went along. I don't think Claire was mentally ill - they claimed she had a brain tumor, didn't they? I am never sure just why they made the effort given that she was leaving anyway. 
    • @DeeVee Claire is a perfect example. So many women came to Springfield as competent, smart, and talented professionals. Then they’d attract a so-called “good guy,” get dumped, and spiral into complete chaos. What always strikes me is how clearly it plays like a male fantasy—yet it was written and sold to a female audience.  I'm not a content expert, but I don't think cis gendered women fantasize about losing control of their mental faculties in response to an orgasm. Similar to Holly's story, it seems repulsive, because I don't believe women fantasize about becoming more vulnerable and appealing to men after they've been assaulted.
    • I just watched some parts of an episode of GL where Roger has just been shot by Holly. Rita then admits to Hillary that Roger raped her. Kasdorf is such a fantastic actress. I wish there were more of her work available. 
    • -- Alex Alegria has almost a full sleeve tattoo on one arm and a large tatt on one pec. I see no indication that the show is covering up his ink,
    • Didn't Carrie2 even seduce a minor? Ick. Oh, yeah, and she even tried to seduce Alan, but this was his post-prison era when he was trying to prove to everyone he had changed. It's funny that of all people he didn't go for it. Wait. Josh had an affair with Vanessa? Or she just thought he did? I know people always say "it's just a soap" but the way mental illness is portrayed on soaps (and that goes for pretty much all of them) has always been not great, especially PPD. They practically turned Claire into The Joker. She also was trying to seduce men. (I notice that now Mary Ryan Munisteri is listed as co HW with Ryder in the 1986 episodes, Claire has calmed down a lot. Never thought her GL career was very good but seems like she tried to course correct that a bit).
    • sss Ms. Tunie is a goddess. I feel all the anger, pride, sadness, arrogance, dignity, fear, love, and other emotions in everything she does as Anita.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy