Jump to content

AMC: Friday, April 10


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Hm... Then one has to wonder:

1. If she was horrible, Elizabeth Korte would have pushed for her dismissal.

2. If she were not horrible on GH, how come she sucks at AMC? I don't buy that whole "not every writer is suited for every show". If you're a mediocre writer, perhaps, but if you're really good, that makes no sense. At first she might have been afraid of the new show or something, but now... Her reputation is going down the drains slowly...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I agree with you.... Its a cop out to say a certain writer is not suited for a particular show.... its hard to assess her work currently as she is just listed as an AHW along with Walsh and Daran Little......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was just thinking about you, darlin'... LOL!

Anyway, in my opinion, she was showing growth -- learning the characters, writing good dialogue... but she was cut short due to, allegedly, Daran Little's absence. She hasn't written a script, I think, since February. So I guess she's mainly focused on layout, thrusts and outlining (since we can't say "breakdown" or else JHC will shriek: NO MORE BREAKDOWN WRITERS!!! -- kinda like NO MORE WIRE HANGERS!).

As far as being a hit or a miss, Sylph, she is a good script writer. Elizabeth Korte apparently saw that because Korte assigned a all of Sam McCall episodes to Thomson. That's the reason why GH's team is what it is. There are brilliant people on that writing staff. Including Guza. His stories may not be the best, but he knows a good writer when he sees it and knows just how to use that writer's talent to his benefit.

Unfortunately, we have Beldner as an editor. I've "heard" that GH's editor Korte is the one who assigns outlines to script writers. And the way she does it is fairly obvious. Dillon Quatermaine heavy episodes were always written by Micheal Cinquemani. Carly heavy episodes went to MVJ. Carly/Sonny fight scenes went to Susan Wald (I miss her, too), and Mac/Quatermaine/Confrontational Scenes went to the fearless Mary Sue Price (fearless, because she GOES THERE).

IMO, I think AMC needs a better editor and a person who is able to understand their SW's. Pratt seems to be getting there. Again, IMO, Rebecca Taylor (who I think is the weakest link on AMC's SW staff) has been handing in decent material FINALLY these last few weeks. But, also IMO, Pratt's been challenging her. She's forced to get out of her box. We know I dislike her writing so you know I mean it when I say she wrote that COMPELLING episode on 2/13 which was set up for Greenlee's death. She wrote very beautiful dialogue for David and Krystal last week as well. A woman who spends most of her time writing scenes where characters villify David and make him seem like he's the Devil. She actually was able to get outside of that and write emotionally charged and history based dialogue for that character -- a character I think Rebecca Taylor doesn't understand.

But, back to my main point, I don't think Thomson's been given the right story or the proper characters to write. I think that someone on the writing staff -- preferably Pratt -- should ask her which characters speak to her. Play up to her strengths. That's clearly what Guza does on GH. As I've mentioned in other posts, despite what a lot of us might think of his particular type of storytelling, the man is a writer's writer. He knows how to get the best out of the writers he's working with to make his crap shine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought Tracey's scripts were good. Sure, her first episode was rocky, but whose first isn't? But it's hard to judge her, because she's written four scripts since the start of the year, and she hasn't written a script in nearly two months. She was hired primarily as an AHW, and with Michelle Patrick back in the saddle, she is not needed to write scripts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Cheryl was gone before Lemay came back but I agree with your thinking that he would rather a character from a family he introduced to the show than a family he did not originate.  I remember reading somewhere in the early 90's probably after DS left as writer, their was an either a writer or a producer who made a comment that their intent was bring the McKinnon family back to AW.  Would have made sense for the newer viewers from the 80's.  Much like Lemay's attempt to bring the Frames back from his writing in the 70's in his 1988 return
    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
    • The other issue with Missy: in June 2020, she "liked" some social media posts by Candace Owens -- things Candace said that were against Black Lives Matter.  That is described here https://tvline.com/news/melissa-reeves-racism-days-of-our-lives-instagram-controversy-2894568/ I don't know if that was ever resolved.
    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
    • Sally Spencer was a decent actress, but the writing destroyed the "M.J." that Kathleen Layman had built. Layman had a quiet strength about her, and she and Osburn really felt like sisters. Spencer's character should have been either an unmentioned sister, or maybe Jake's that grew up close to Kathleen, M.J. and the rest, but was away for a few years before joining the force. Kristen Marie was o.k., but I always got a mousier vibe from her. Being pigeon-holed with Scott for most of the run hurt things for her, as well.  The Loves were also underserved between Rhonda Lewin and Philece Sampler. Philece would have been better as Nicole. Thank goodness Anne Heche  showed up for the next round of auditions. Christopher Holder was mediocre as Peter, but given a shot, I think Marcus Smythe could have stuck around for a while.  I would have had Peggy Lazarus be a Frame -- possibly an ex-wife for Vince with an agenda. Smythe and Hollen had  a fun chemistry that could have kept the two around.. Bringing recasts for  Cheryl and Ben back mixing it up with other Frames. Corys, Lawrences at the time might have kept all the families stronger. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy