Jump to content

March 16-20, 2009


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

We may be seeing a different show. There are several stories that are developing, that feature characters that are familiar to the audience. The Brady-Nicole-EJ-Sami-Rafe story, the Daniel-Chloe-Lucas-Kate story, and the Stephanie-Philip-Melanie story can play out for several years. As these stories are developing, you have the Will and Mia connection, who certainly will gain a couple of teenage friends by summer. We still have Stefano, Kate, Maggie, Caroline, Victor, Abe, Lexie.... The show isn't brilliant. But there is a clear vision and I have to agree with where they are going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 116
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I couldn't agree with you more about Maggie, Victor, Caroline and Kate working great as supporting players while also bringing that "vet" feel, which you could never get from Drake, Dee, Stephen, or MaryBeth, because the demand would always be that THEY should be the stars of the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree. The pat was holding them back because fan bases wouldnt allow them to move forward. J/M and P/K had to be front and center everyday all day in an amazing storyline right out of the 80's otherwise it was crap. yet when they did the campy OTT 80's bullshit it also failed. Im glad they cut them out and are moving on.

Oh you know me so well. :lol:

But really, i woudlnt. I would be happy if people came here to discuss Days, but they dont. FYI, i do post at other boards where people like days. I dont just disagree for the hell of it

that is EXACTLY what Days is. and i love it.

very well said, i agree.

Days has placed the cast well. The vets like Stefano, Victor, Maggie, and Caroline may not be front and center, but they are being used. And not just handing out menues and talking to someone in a random scene. Kate is a major player in a b storyline. Maggie is a supporting player in that story. Victor & Stefano are driving storylines.

And just because they are younger doesnt mean that Sami and Lucas are not vets. Ali has been here for almost 20 years now. Further more they are using other people with about 10 years history like Philip, Nicole, etc... and using people with strong ties like Stephanie and EJ.

Days is doing something that no other soap is right now. Gaining people - lots of them - and keeping them.

and i am sure it will fall next week, it always does after a major gain. but then in about 2 weeks it steadys out and does well and does end up keeping most of what they gained.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

I can 99% guarantee Ken Corday is going to meddle with Tomlin/Whitesell/Higley somehow. When something abruptly stops.....when a storyline all of a sudden goes into another direction......that's Ken Corday. He did it to Brash/Cwikly in 2001, he did it to Reilly in 2004, he did it to Sheffer in 2006, and he's gonna do it again.....it's only a matter of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Glad you see the Reilly-isms too. :) The slow pacing, the storytelling, the clear vision, the false tags, the flashbacks (God, I hate seeing those Dan/Chloe sex flashbacks), the fantasy-fakeouts (ie. Nicole knocking Sami out in the church, Kate reveals the truth to Chloe on the plane, EJ finding out the truth, etc), the dumbing down of characters (EJ).

The best thing about the Chloe/Lucas/Daniel/Kate storyline is watching Kate's POV and her messing with Dan/Chloe. But when you watch from Lucas, Chloe or Dan's POV, it's dreadful. Kate finding out was the best thing to happen to this story. It went from a F to a B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree Toups.Do you think the ratings increase is due to March madness.I was looking at the ratings increase and wanted to compare it to last year at this time at it was interesting.March 10 to the 14 had a 254,000 drop with 2,644,000 VIEWERS then the next week March 17-21 had a 306,000 viewer increase with a viewership of 2,988,000 thats about what happened this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think JackPeyton's opinion is all that contrary - it might just appear that way on this board. I happen to agree with him - I haven't enjoyed Days this much since B&C's tenure in 2002. To me the soap is JER-esque but with better dialogue, pacing and acting but with storylines less "ground-breaking". It ticks over very nicely and has interesting character intersections that remove the "different day, same dialogue" angle.

Regarding the huuuuuuuuge fanbases that were meant to be tuning out when J/M & S/K were fired: To be honest I thought there would be a small decrease, not a huge impact. I never thought the ratings would improve. I have often gotten the impression that DOOL fanbases are very active and vocal to compensate for their true lack in numbers together with the fact that they only tuned into the show when their favourites were on and often mentioned F/F the rest anyway - as far as ratings go, they were already "out of the numbers".

The reason the ratings haven't dropped and have actually improved is as JackPeyton says because the deadweight of the show has been removed. It worked on Days because (a) the new stories are well crafted (B) those old vets were played out (yes some may disagree there is still plenty story in those characters left. Maybe for Marlena by herself there is. Maybe Patch's backstory there is - but as couples, its just a boring remix of the old tune...)

To say that there are no vets left driving story is nonsense too that reflects a bias towards certain other vets. At what point do you consider someone a vet? Just because they aren't over 40, doesnt mean they cant be a vet. Why is Lauren Koslow who has been on the show since 1996 a vet, yet Ali Sweeney (joined in 1993), Bryan Datillo (joined in 1993), Ari Zuker (first joined in 1998, 11 years ago), Nadia Bjorlin (shudder, originally joined in late 1999) are not? Yes, these actors are young, but if you aren't familiar with them now you may have memory problems (or ff'd from day one never giving them a chance). These actors driving the A-stories are certainly a part of the Days fabric now - one that is a decade old.

Regarding storyline progression, I think the show has laid out the foundation for at least 18 months worth of story after the baby storyline climax and Chloes affair comes to a head. Kiriakis/Di MEra wars, EJ's fallout over Nicole and Sami, Nicole & Brady etc. There is more but don't want to spoil people. Plus some of the B stories will probably swing into A stories.

My crackpot theory is that Tomlin/Whitesell are writing and producing and giving Dena the Bo/Hope stupid story to write (just my theory - I have no proof). As long as the show sticks to its current formula, I think the ratings will be stable to slightly rising for some time to come.

My second crackpot theory is regarding how Tomlin/Whitesell could create ratings and JER 2 couldn't (post SSK) and Sheffer couldn't I think explains how Days works:

I think Corday doesnt get involved in the show unless his co-executive asks him too. When the co-exucutive meddles with the headwriter and has conflict, the show falls to pieces:

Namely - JER vs Steve Wyman. For every accusation about Ken meddling, I think it all came from Wyman. Conflict between JER & Wyman led to storyline rewrites and down the tubes;

Sheffer vs Wyman - Sheffer starts off with a bang - goes pear shaped as Wyman interferes;

Sheffer & Scott - Scott steps in, hits it off really well with Sheffer, quality of show and ratings start to improve

Higley & Scott - Hate each other, ratings and quality tank

(Higley), Tomlin & Whitesell - good working team, results on screen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Whoa, what a bad week for the P&G soaps when a short week and the high quality of the Parker/Liberty story, featuring popular Jack/Carly, should have at least helped ATWT. And GL was continuing its run of good quality with Dinah revealing to everyone about being in on the kidnapping.

This is depressing!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you for pointing out the truth that AMC's ratings have been relatively stable under Pratt!

I feel the same way about the show these days. There is no more balance. I am relieved to see the ratings go up the week Kendall slept with Ryan, though, and stay steady for Tuesday & Wednesday when they slept together. Maybe now Frons & company will realize this show doesn't need the Zendall fanbase!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don´t think this is true. As a DAYS watcher I really feel the writers are still atleast two steps ahead. I mean, the moment Sami and Rafe grew closer they already started hint at Rafe´s past. And today we will discover something terrible happened to his parrents. What? And who they were? And why is Mia so afraid to tell Will her full name? Could there be a connection?

The show is not waiting with a folded hands desperately dragging the reveal not knowing what to do next. They are already laying foundation for the next conflict after Rafe/Sami ends together. IMO, that´s the right way soaps should operate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Looking at Days and Y&R in the 18-49 women demo on which the networks base their success, it seems to me that it is hard to definitively say what helps soaps do well with that audience. Y&R depends on its older characters and vets to anchor most of its stories, while Days has tossed their vets and foundation couples overboard. It may all be random. I want to see if these improving demos are a trend or merely weekly fluctuations. It is too easy to over interpret weekly fluctuations as gaining audience when they are caused by something else completely. MarkH should do a graph of the last year of this demo group when the ratings from May sweeps are in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know if it's random, or simply that different formulas work if well executed. There is no solution that is universally successful across the board. It's been said that Frons doesn't want to transform OLTL into a Y&Rlite, and I can't argue with that. OLTL should be distinct from the other soaps (and all of them should be distinct from each other) otherwise there is nothing to separate them except the habit of tuning into this station at this time. They would all be interchangeable.

At the risk of speaking out of both sides of my mouth, I think this is what is missing from OLTL right now. There are too many stories overall (and too many "A" stories specifically), and minimal overlapping of the stories and the pacing of the stories is very mechanical. Obviously, Rex/Gigi/Shane/Stacy are what you would call an "A" story (although in my opinion that's several stories rolled up into just a few characters). They're on almost every episode. It involves Roxy and Rex's "father, and they seem to be pulling Brody and Schuyler into that story more, which should add to the complexity and richness. But they should have the story impact even more characters than that, and it should tie to some of the second tier stories.

The Marty/John/Blair stabber story is another "A" story. It minimally involves other characters as "suspects" or props, but for the most part it occurs in isolation. Why aren't Marty and Blair and Todd, at least, being tied into the baby swap story peripherally? Why isn't the audience being reminded that they're Chlope's grandparents? The only people seemingly impacted by the potential reveal of the baby swap are Jessica, Starr and Marcie, and that makes no sense.

Then there are a plethora of second/third tier "B and C" stories that seem to be playing out in almost total isolation from each other. The baby swap, Mathew's paralysis and Cole's drug addiction, Dorian and Ray's romance, Cris and Layla, Markko and Lola to name a few. These may loosely tie into the other stories, but we rarely see those ties. An example is, Jared and Natalie spent three or four episodes in the same waiting room at the hospital (they even had a wardrobe change, but remained in the same setting) and had basically the same conversation all four episodes, but had only minimal interaction with other people in the hospital at the same time. They had one brief conversation with Rex, none with Roxy, or Bo, or Nora, or Matthew, or Cole. Other than token mentions here and there, you'd think they were unaware that Blair was stabbed and there could be a killer on the loose. We know they got tested as matches for Shane, but it was brought up as an afterthought.

All the stories would be improved by including more characters that make sense, and there are so many opportunities for that to happen that are being overlooked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Just watched the episode concerning Olivia's drug use and Abby's persistence, etc. Donna Mills did stellar work in this episode, as did Tonya Crowe and Brian Austin Green (Brian).
    • But by Dinah and Hart...Hart especially looked as if he could not tie his own shoes!  Ed, Holly, Alan, Alex Henry and Vanessa among others were not able to put Roger down....Dinah???
    • The preaching seems to end before the Barnes settle in late December, 1981. The stuff that felt overly religious (the Davidsons believing a miracle will save Lori rather than a surgeon, Jeff's miraculous recovery from a beam of light) was quickly nixed because it wasn't working. The closest thing that you get to that under the Barnes is when Dennis Fraser, the drunk driver who killed Nora and Scott, turns his life over to god. The born-again redemptions out of nowhere seem to stop fairly early into the Barnes' run. I do think Miriam's transformation was much more delicately done with her turning on her bestie Nancy because Nancy was seducing Charles, Miriam's wealthy father, so Miriam offers to testify for the Davidsons in the trial against Nancy over possession of Nora's house. In turn, Nancy repays the favor by pumping an emotionally distraught Miriam with barbituates while Miriam carries on her affair with low level thug turned political aide Norm Elliott. Miriam is used by everyone into her life and finally lands herself in the hospital becasue she has become so addicted to the pills. At the hospital, it is the friendship and kindness of the Davidsons that brings Miriam to a more peaceful place. The Davidsons ability to forgive is both appealing and, at times, dramatically limiting. In this case, the Davidsons lead Miriam to her new Mama, Ione Redlon. Now, under Vinley, Miriam is determined to reconnect with her son, Frederick, and her ex-husband, Paul.   My bigger issue with the Barnes' writing is that they write the storylines with twist endings that sorta come out of nowhere. I know the resolution to the Kate Carrouthers mystery sorta plays out like that so I am curious to see how I feel about that.  The biggest change throughout the writing teams has been the view of morality. Winsor had many characters who could be viewed purely through the lens of black and white, but others explored the shades of gray (often younger people). The brief head writerless period was much better at embracing an action doesn't make a person and there characters were much more gray or at least evil at a more local level (Nancy, in this period, only flirts with her brother-in-law where as later she is actively providing pills to Miriam to keep her addicted and away from her own father). The Barnes, for the most part, seem to embrace this level of political corruption that seems to permeate throughout the show making it clear that power (as well as money) is the root of evil. Even criminal Vince Cardello is presented as less evil than Charles Carpenter, though Carpenter's murder of a resident of his complex was rewritten to relieve Carpenter of any responsibility in the matter. Vinley's work seems more into exploring the why or delving deeper in general. Babs Farley, the hooker who is looking to reclaim her life, is such an intriguing character. She is given such meaningful monologues regretting her decisions and desperately trying to keep away from the hands of her former pimp, Ron Washington, who hasn't appeared yet. Monk and Fernandez seem to be wrongly accused of Lori's attack and there seems to be hints of racism that the show is looking to address. Marianne confronts Gil about his feelings towards God in relation to their mother's death years earlier.  There does seem to be a layer of misogyny to Vinley's work, but it's early so I'll be curious to see how this plays out. There are a lot of attacks on women (Lori is nearly raped, Babs was beaten, Nancy is on the verge of being blackmailed for sex by Tab, and the Russ / Marianne / Gil scenario has hints of toxic masculinity. It's very early so it'll be neat to see if that is maintained.  Jerry TImm lasts about a year I think (March, 1982 - March, 1983). One of the episodes on TouTube has a comment suggesting that Timm was fired by CBN because he had done something in his past that came to light. It didn't seem to be clear what that was.  I like what I've seen of Timm as Gil. He has such a presence that it covers up some of his weaker acting choices. It's unfortunate that he didn't get to play as much of the Gil - Stacey - Amber triangle as his replacement does.  
    • I believe it was Mark Arnold's family that taped all the shows. It was the same with Ariane Muneker - her mother bought a video recording machine in the 1970s, at a time when that type of technology was really expensive John Wesley Shipp's parents also taped all his shows, and has a complete library of every single episode of every soap JWS has appeared on. Same for Cynthia Watros. When the Soap Actors parents pass away, and there are all these VHS tapes in dozens of boxes, it is shame to waste all that. 
    • Personally, I felt that the deletion of the original music from the girls' slumber party episode, and the axing of REM's Losing My Religion from the ep featuring Brenda and Dylan breaking up, were the most painful. The changes really damaged those episodes. I dropped the DVDs after season two, but I've been told by other viewers who kept going that tunes from all the seasons continued being replaced, and the situation only got worse as the DVD releases progressed. Yes, penny-pinching from those in charge was the principle issue, but I wonder how much better the DVDs would have sold if such poor choices had not been made in the name of cost cutting. On the other hand, when Time-Life put out the Vietnam-war era classic China Beach, they dug deep into their pockets and ended up clearing the rights to a whopping 268 (!!!) of the original tracks. This represented 96% of the total. TPTB said that when they were not given permission to use a few of the remaining pieces, they substituted different singers' versions of the exact same songs, in order to preserve the show's integrity as much as possible. The CB set was expensive as heck, to be sure, but to me it was worth it.
    • Oh I knew it was common (I did not realize Muenker's channel was gone - I'm glad I saved all those videos). I just didn't realize it was the case with the rape episode.  I never really felt like she dominated the show in her second stint either, although I can see where she probably did. I can feel it more in some of her first run, because the show was much different before she came in and suddenly a woman we'd seen for a year was [!@#$%^&*] and marrying an entire family.  In that sense Reva is more like Babe than Erica Kane. One of the more infamous AMC lines was, "Babe is love." You just know HB would have said that line about Reva at some point.
    • I disagree; if this were Chris Clenshaw, then I would be worried. But it's a new producer coming in to clearly create the canvas they want to create, and I'm okay with that. Re-introducing characters to shake things up and possibly take some other ones out of the canvas. It'll be interesting to see the finished product.
    • I am ready for our first full week in what feels like a while! They worked Sweeps month!
    • Beyond the Gates: A The Bold and the Beautiful: F Coronation Street: B Days of Our Lives: B- EastEnders: A+ Emmerdale: A- Hollyoaks: B+ General Hospital: C Neighbours: C+ The Young and the Restless: F For me, Beyond the Gates, EastEnders, and Emmerdale led the pack during Sweeps month, with Coronation Street and Days of Our Lives following. General Hospital and Neighbours sit in the middle with what I'd call a "take it or leave it" kind of Sweeps month, and the Bell soaps bombed (per usual).
    • Actors doing this is pretty common. I used to work for a company that produced a very successful sitcom back in the 70s. Actors who were guest stars on the show would ask to be provided tapes of their episodes. I assume they do it for a variety of reasons, i.e. to create a reel of their best work. I know of some soap actors who have uploaded saved work to YT. One is Ariana Muenker, who played Christine Valere on GL. She was uploading scenes from her many soap roles a few months back. Unfortunately, it looks like either she or YT took the channel down. Sharon Gabet and Mark Arnold help the EON YT channel by providing saved episodes. Along with EON eps, Arnold shared a guest stint he did on GL. Those episodes are really interesting because they involve the introduction of Nola's character, which was tied to the Roger storyline. When he came back after faking his death, he hid out at the boarding house. Nola being a snoop figured out something was fishy with him. She ended up helping the police. Very worth seeking out. I don't think anyone else has those episodes.  Makes you wonder if there's more out there than we know of because actors don't want to be bothered to run a YT channel. Can't blame them because it's a lot of trouble, but if only... I agree. While Lucci definitely used her fame from the show to build her brand and get work outside of AMC, Erica was always part of an ensemble. Yeah, she got a couple of whacky stories (like the "unabortion") but she never took over to the detriment of other actors and stories.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy