Jump to content

Y&R: Week of March 23, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Members

If they recast, it should be for a period long enough for Jill to go to London to "heal" with her mother and brother Snapper. That way Jill is off-canvas until Walton is hopefully able to return. I don't think they should push this story too far without Walton.

In the meantime, I have to admit that my favorite ideas would be to see Adair or Dickson do a TEMPORARY return (a few weeks, while they get Jill to London)...just because it would be fun to see how they do in 2009. But I think Jill should be sent away until Walton can do her storyline again.

I saw those AFTRA pictures...and Walton sure looked tired in them.

I agree on both scores. Kay gave a PITTANCE to everyone (1/10 of 1% and so far), and Jill got the majority. So, if Kay gets the bulk bast from Jill, everyone else can keep their shares, IMO.

And I love, love, love that trailer. I hope they keep it as Kay and Murph's personal "retreat".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 296
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Yeah, but intentionally so. The point was that the "Duchess" (or Empress, or whatever) was in a diner...in other words, a perfect visual evocation of the last four months of Kay's life (for a Restless Style story on her

and subsequent absence).

So, we were supposed to see "tattered princess"..."Queen who'd seen better days".

Maybe, to put it in different terms...More "Princess Margaret" and less "Queen Elizabeth".

I liked, therefore, that these were edgy. They weren't showing Kay as her regal self, but Kay as icon-in-ruins.

That said, even though the Indian Princess was supposed to be hideous...I thought it was a revelation...because there is still a sultry soul there!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Okay, so color me stupid—I was worried Jess Walton is having serious health issues, but other sites said their sources are revealing that Jess is in the middle of serious contract negotiations and that's why she's being temporarily recast. Apparently, she needs to take a paycut.

So who is right? I am really worried if it's a health issue, but everyone is telling me otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am wondering the same thing, because DC is now suggesting, in essence, permanent recasts, including:

It would sadden me if this was just a "Martha Byrne" ploy...try to scare Jess into accepting a sh*t contract by threatening a recast. Come on, folks. Jess needs to look at the industry financials and her probability of landing another job this good, but Y&R needs to understand that she is one of their top-five or top-ten players.

Anna Stuart

Deidre Hall

Jane Elliot

Victoria Wyndham

Well, in that list, the ONLY one who would do Walton's Jill justice is Jane Elliot. But she has a contract.

Stuart is intriguing, and I could see her as a kind of hybrid of Dickson, Walton, Adair...with plenty of her own stuff mixed in. But could Stuart channel the "manicurist" within -- the insecure girl from the wrong side of the tracks? The Monday preview clip, where low-born Nikki tosses off that Jill is now just "some nobody's daughter", is truly Jill's worst nightmare, I think. She married the Abbott patriarch to escape her roots...and that was part of the attraction to Phillip II too.

Strangely, though, I'd be more at peace with this recast if it IS a contract issue. I don't want Walton to be ill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't want her to be ill too—and if she is having contract troubles they'll need to handle it somehow. I do not want to see someone else as Jill. Not at this time. Not after 22 years of Walton. Sure, everyone can be recast.

I wonder if they asked Cooper-Braeden-Scott-Davidson-Linder to take a paycut too?

Although Davidson and Linder probably wouldn't have trouble with it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am surprised by the Jess Walton contract negotiation rumors. Don't they usually put actors on the back burner when they are undergoing negotiations so they can avoid exactly these kinds of situations? We barely saw Brad when Don Diamont was being ushered out. He only popped back on our screens after the decision had been made to fire him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ehh, Daytime someowhat confirmed heath issues and has never been wrong with these things in the past.

I would take what they say over what Daytime C posts reports via a-cousin-of-a-brothers-best friends-roommates-mothers-friends-set-side-source reports, lol. Dont get me wrong, i like DC a lot - check it saily - but a lot of rumoprs/gossip are just that and nothing more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Today's episode was excellent. Clearly it was confrontation day and they didn't disappoint. I'm glad they didn't forget Mona in all of this and gave us an opportunity to see how she's dealing with this. A major highlight for me were the Kat and Martin scenes. Their chemistry is off the charts and I don't understand why we haven't gotten more of this. I love how they take turns calming each other down. They feel really well matched and believable as siblings. Speaking of siblings, they anvils were dropping strong that Kat and Eva are twins but I do wish someone would mention that they are essentially hood twins which might throw people off the scent.  I'm one of the people who enjoyed Joey and the gambling storyline so it was nice to see him again. It was nice to see different characters like Mona and Eva in that element instead of the usual players. When Doug arrived I don't know what hit me but I just see a funeral in his future. He seems so hopeless and has the worst luck. I just can't see him surviving the year at this rate.
    • In fiction there has become an expectation by some that every Black character should represent excellence and perfection. It's not like we are talking about a Tyler Perry show where none of the characters are happy and everyone hates each other with a passion.
    • And on rewatch, I could've done without the unsubtle praising Matt like he was the only one who ever accepted Van as she was...but TPTB and their agendas.  It was totally in character for Vanessa to shut down emotionally until she was alone. While she could be volatile, both she and Henry believed in keeping emotions private.  Thank God it's still Bryan Buffinton in the role for both Henry's and HB's funerals. It just wouldn't have been the same with Ryan Brown, who couldn't act his way out of a wet paper bag. Roll My Eyes.
    • I can probably believe the Spauldings reacting that way, as Alan barely cares about anyone but himself and maybe his family, while Amanda only had that one experience with the Coopers, but I see your point. I do think 1997 was a better year than the last 3-4 before it, for whatever that's worth. You are right about Marcus. Kevin Mambo winning two Emmies (the latter during periods where he had nothing to do) helped.
    • I think @Darn @Faulkner and others have a fair point re: it being an unfortunate look and coincidence. I can see their point about the two Black husbands in rapid succession, without much time in between. Frankly, based on the early casting notices I thought before the show's debut (and I still suspect) that Ted's crimes might be far worse than infidelity or a secret baby. That would've mixed it up more. It's a soap, people are going to cheat, but it might've given them more variety if Nicole was stepping out first. Still, I wouldn't trade the Leslie/Eva reveal material for anything right now. Still, Fanfic Account #3 is just looking for any weapon to attack the show for not accepting his unsolicited scripts. When it's not the husbands it's Martin, or Chelsea or Dani. He's seething it got renewed.
    • I'm pretty sure Lucy and Bridget never even have another scene together for the rest of the time they're both on the show. Bridget isn't even invited to the wedding! The lack of community feeling and continuity of non-romantic relationships during this period is very jarring. Characters suddenly only seem to interact with a handful of other characters, rather than characters across the canvas. I'm deep into 1997 in my watch right now and find that it's even stranger because the show goes back and forth between ignoring history in order to manufacture some kind of separation between characters (for example, at one point Amanda refers to the Coopers as a family that the Spauldings "barely know," despite her and Alan spending the better part of 1996 going to war with Buzz over 5th street, and Alan has absolutely no reaction when he finds out about something bad that's happened to Abby, which seems pretty out of character given how close they were in 95/96) and ignoring history in order to create a sense of community that doesn't quite fit (characters who couldn't stand Amanda are suddenly acting all buddy buddy with her). The wheels really feel like they're coming off in 1997 (although I know some would argue that the wheels started to come off years earlier). Watching the Marcus/Dahlia romance again from a 2025 perspective is so weird. Marcus is a full grown man who must be at least in his mid-20s and he's dating a teenager who is not only still in high school, but is still fully a year away from graduation, and no one says anything about how creepy that is. I feel like the buzz around Marcus gave the illusion that the show was more invested in him than it ever actually was. Even during his "big" story where he's arrested for Cutter's murder, he actually doesn't appear on screen very often. He's imprisoned, Griffin is brought on, other characters make a fuss about trying to get him out, but there's a long stretch of time where he doesn't appear at all. I've been keeping episode counts while I watch and between Cutter's death in mid-November of 1995 and the end of the year Marcus/Mambo only appears 7 times (and of that only twice in December).
    • The letter reading was very emotional, and Maeve really got to me too. I was a little worried because Vanessa doesn't give a speech at the funeral, which surprised me, but then we got the private letter reading and her true emotional reaction and I was satisfied there. The YouTube channel I watch these episodes on (if not on our Vault), also had upset commenters talk about how Nola's line about Henry not accepting her at first/seen as a gold-digger was totally untrue. It's sad the writers don't do their homework and give fans the respect (and the characters respect). And yep, Bill got up and spoke at the funeral too, which was nice.  I didn't even realize that was Sharon Leal until you said it!  I had to Google it. I loved Sharon Leal in Boston Public back in the day haha. LOL at your Reva/Josh ALWAYS commentary. What is RME though?
    • Leslie is an extreme liar and manipulator. I'm not sure what her point was in trying to convince Nicole she wasn't trying to hurt her. As much as Eva did help orchestrate the entire plot I feel like there was too much piling on. Eva never said she wanted to be a Dupree so Anita was extremely out of line for that comment.  
    • Thanks!

      Please register in order to view this content

       That's positive and something to look forward to for sure, because you're right, 1996 so far isn't nearly as good as 1995. Ohh - what is Lonatrat?  Sadly you're probably right. I did feel like David was rarely seen once Marcus came on. That would have been an interesting spin, having Frank and Tina be teenage lovers and Dahlia really being his daughter. I'm getting the sense that Tina won't be seen too much anymore, as she just left Dahlia with Frank/Eleni as she's heading to jail for a while. I like the Tina actress too!  Her voice sounds a bit like Rosie Perez to me, which I love. I tried to find her online, but coming up empty. This was the only thing I could find about Tina Crede - a character snapshot video with clips and stills of her (randomly starting just before the 1:00 mark):

      Please register in order to view this content

      That's wild that the David actor is nearly 40 here! Definitely surprises me.
    • 5-6   Meh. It already looks like a scattershot week.    5-5 was actually a good episode. Damian and Lily. Phyllis finally going on the warpath that I knew she could get on with Billy and Sally. Nate started to question Audra and Victor's alliance. And I was not even bugged by Kyle and Claire.   But then there's Cole's off-screen story. Kyle and Claire going back to being whiny. And them even wanting Adam's penthouse just sounded like trying to keep the set around. And Diane shouldn't even give a flying frak about Billy's opinion. And Tessa, Daniel, and the guitars...yeeeah no.   But hey...JM looked good in that short. And those pants.  I agree. One of Y&R's good points with fans has always been that you do at least see the vets. And IN stories. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy