Jump to content

Y&R: Week of March 23, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Members

If they recast, it should be for a period long enough for Jill to go to London to "heal" with her mother and brother Snapper. That way Jill is off-canvas until Walton is hopefully able to return. I don't think they should push this story too far without Walton.

In the meantime, I have to admit that my favorite ideas would be to see Adair or Dickson do a TEMPORARY return (a few weeks, while they get Jill to London)...just because it would be fun to see how they do in 2009. But I think Jill should be sent away until Walton can do her storyline again.

I saw those AFTRA pictures...and Walton sure looked tired in them.

I agree on both scores. Kay gave a PITTANCE to everyone (1/10 of 1% and so far), and Jill got the majority. So, if Kay gets the bulk bast from Jill, everyone else can keep their shares, IMO.

And I love, love, love that trailer. I hope they keep it as Kay and Murph's personal "retreat".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 296
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Yeah, but intentionally so. The point was that the "Duchess" (or Empress, or whatever) was in a diner...in other words, a perfect visual evocation of the last four months of Kay's life (for a Restless Style story on her

and subsequent absence).

So, we were supposed to see "tattered princess"..."Queen who'd seen better days".

Maybe, to put it in different terms...More "Princess Margaret" and less "Queen Elizabeth".

I liked, therefore, that these were edgy. They weren't showing Kay as her regal self, but Kay as icon-in-ruins.

That said, even though the Indian Princess was supposed to be hideous...I thought it was a revelation...because there is still a sultry soul there!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Okay, so color me stupid—I was worried Jess Walton is having serious health issues, but other sites said their sources are revealing that Jess is in the middle of serious contract negotiations and that's why she's being temporarily recast. Apparently, she needs to take a paycut.

So who is right? I am really worried if it's a health issue, but everyone is telling me otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am wondering the same thing, because DC is now suggesting, in essence, permanent recasts, including:

It would sadden me if this was just a "Martha Byrne" ploy...try to scare Jess into accepting a sh*t contract by threatening a recast. Come on, folks. Jess needs to look at the industry financials and her probability of landing another job this good, but Y&R needs to understand that she is one of their top-five or top-ten players.

Anna Stuart

Deidre Hall

Jane Elliot

Victoria Wyndham

Well, in that list, the ONLY one who would do Walton's Jill justice is Jane Elliot. But she has a contract.

Stuart is intriguing, and I could see her as a kind of hybrid of Dickson, Walton, Adair...with plenty of her own stuff mixed in. But could Stuart channel the "manicurist" within -- the insecure girl from the wrong side of the tracks? The Monday preview clip, where low-born Nikki tosses off that Jill is now just "some nobody's daughter", is truly Jill's worst nightmare, I think. She married the Abbott patriarch to escape her roots...and that was part of the attraction to Phillip II too.

Strangely, though, I'd be more at peace with this recast if it IS a contract issue. I don't want Walton to be ill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't want her to be ill too—and if she is having contract troubles they'll need to handle it somehow. I do not want to see someone else as Jill. Not at this time. Not after 22 years of Walton. Sure, everyone can be recast.

I wonder if they asked Cooper-Braeden-Scott-Davidson-Linder to take a paycut too?

Although Davidson and Linder probably wouldn't have trouble with it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am surprised by the Jess Walton contract negotiation rumors. Don't they usually put actors on the back burner when they are undergoing negotiations so they can avoid exactly these kinds of situations? We barely saw Brad when Don Diamont was being ushered out. He only popped back on our screens after the decision had been made to fire him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ehh, Daytime someowhat confirmed heath issues and has never been wrong with these things in the past.

I would take what they say over what Daytime C posts reports via a-cousin-of-a-brothers-best friends-roommates-mothers-friends-set-side-source reports, lol. Dont get me wrong, i like DC a lot - check it saily - but a lot of rumoprs/gossip are just that and nothing more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy