Jump to content

Recasting and pregnant actresses


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I know in some cases, instead of writing characters out when an actress goes on maternity leave, a soap will simply bring an actress in. In other cases, they will write the character out until the actress is ready to return. I was thinking about this again because of some of the clips I've seen and the recent discussion of when Anna Stuart filled in for Maeve Kinkead at GL back in the early 80s, as well as because of what's going on in the UK, where Coronation Street has had to write story around the departures of two of the show's best and most leading actresses, Alison King (Carla Gordon) and Jane Danson (Leanne Battersby).

Which method do you prefer? Is there a method which was more common at one point and less common now?

Are there any situations where recasting or not recasting had a significant effect on the status of the character?

Like Laura, on GH. Do you think the status of her character was compromised because Genie Francis went on maternity leave for over a year?

Do you think a show should always try to replace a pregnant actress so she won't have to play out miscarriage sequences in her late term (as Lynn Herring, Maura West and Kassie de Paiva had to do in the 90s)? Should this be up to the actresses, or does having a genuinely pregnant actress playing this material more unsettling for viewers (at least those who know the actress is really pregnant)?

Who are some of the pregnancy recasts who stood out for you (in a good or bad way)? I still remember Hayley Sparks, who replaced Beth Ehlers as GL's Harley during her breaks. I actually liked her more in the role than I liked her as Courtney Baxter on ATWT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Only If the Recast is a good one, such as Hayley Sparks. I have seen some that were bad and some that were good. Passions did one with both Lindsay Korman and McKenzie Westmore, and I liked McKenzie recast better than Lindsay's. I also think if the Character is in a big storyline where she is needed than just find a good recast for the character. I also think that cause the actress is pregnant the character have to get pregnant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Who were the fill ins for McKenzie and Lindsay? Gabi from SuBe was a fill-in at one point wasn't she?

Sometimes I prefer the show making a character pregnant if the actress is pregnant, but it depends on the story. On DAYS, when Billie wasn't supposed to be pregnant, it was still very distracting, and difficult, to watch scenes of Krista Allen, 8-9 months pregnant, as Billie was forced to go back on heroin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think recasting or not really depends on where the story is at that point and where it's going, and how long the actress plans to be out.

I had to hand it to Mary Beth Evans and DOOL that they didn't recast her. Steve and Kayla were a pretty hot commodity back then; I don't know that the viewers would have cared for a temp, no matter how good she was. They did a lot of hiding behind bags, lying in bed (which worked cuz Kayla was being poisoned). Still it was funny because MBE's face changed--she joked about her nose spreading across her face-- so it was really obvious she was huge. I don't know if they wrote the poisoning to accomodate her pregnancy or if they were going to do that anyway, but it fit with what was happening storywise at the time, and MBE wasn't off for too long anyway.

On the other hand, I remember Christine Jones subbing for Erika Slezak for some time. She did fine. I don't think the character was significantly affected at all.

A rather unique scenario played out when Kate Mulgrew was still on RH. Kate got pregnant but gave her child up for adoption. Mary was very briefly played by a temp, who was not great, but it had no impact on the character (other than, I'm assuming, viewer displeasure) but I don't think it really changed anything. But then, Kate had to play out Mary's pregnancy. That must have been difficult.

I always wondered about that. Genie's pregnancy came not long after Luke and Laura returned to town from Canada in the early 90s. I always wondered if the show had intended on keeping L & L in that action-adventure-couple mode they were famous for, and if GF's pregnancy put the kibosh on that. It was at this time Laura decided to live in the old Ward house and become Earth Mother, while Luke continued his adventurous ways. They made a huge issue out of her wanting a stable home vs. Luke hating the whole domestic scene and it contributed to the breakup of their relationship. I mean, I don't know for a fact, of course, but I do believe her pregnancy made GH shift gears with Laura.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I only found out about it online within the last couple of years, so I'm not sure about the press other than from what I've googled. From what I gathered, there were rumors in the rags of an earlier fling with William Grey Espy but he was not the father. She apparently had a boyfriend but was not wanting to get married at that time. Also, she and her daughter reunited years later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I still love the way ATWT handled it when three of their actresses got pregnant at the same time. They were all enemies of character Barbara Ryan, who had her evil ex-husband kidnap them and take them to a spa, where they were aged 50 years by a mad scientist!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Gabi was Lindsay's subb and Catlin #2 from Sunset was McKenzie's subb. Some say she was better than McKenzie. I liked her but I don't personally see where she was any different from McKenzie. Major Stars that are parts of Supercouple shouldnt be recast just written out, like kidnapped, went to visit relatives out of town, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I remember when B&B's Katherine Kelly Lang went on maternity leave in 1997, the voiceover announcer made it clear to viewers that the 'new' Brooke was only a temporary replacement by saying ''While Katherine Kelly Lang is on maternity leave, the role of Brooke Chambers is temporarily being played by Sandra Ferguson." Although it would've been nice to see KKL playing out the scenes where Brooke learns that son Rick was the one who shot Grant, at least the storyline didn't have to be prolonged or wrapped up quickly to accommodate KKL's absense.

I remember when Laura Wright was pregnant in late 1998, Guiding Light must've given her only a few weeks leave, because she was seriously only off screen only 2 weeks at most. It was right at the height of the Cassie/Hart/Dinah storyline and they wrote Cassie off by having her leave town for a bit because a drugged-up Josh was making advances towards her, but just as soon as she left, she was back, giving birth in a car during a snow storm with Dinah helping her out. Then she was off again for about a week or so.

Overall, I think it's best when the show plans well-ahead to pace out the character's storyline so that the maternity leave doesn't occur during a moment of heavy storyline. Then, do alot of pre-taping and post-taping so that the actress's absense isn't too noticeable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I do agree that I wish there was more gay representation in terms of singles. I also had hoped we'd get a Black couple since it was a Black soap and I don't know that we've ever seen that on a US soap.  With that said, it's still early days so I can imagine we'll get that at some point. I am impressed they launched with as much LGBT representation considering how US soaps can be.
    • Thank you. I know we're all supposed to see that BTG is progressive when it comes to queer characters, but it's telling that they won't commit to showcasing gay or bi males who are single and looking. That relationship couldn't be any more traditional. Will we ever get a bedroom scene with Smitty and Martin? I have my doubts.
    • This is a pretty huge thing IMO, but I guess we will see what happens? Can't get any worse then already. 
    • This can be difficult for a soap to depict. So far she's only shown an interest in women. Will a man come into her life? If she commits to a male, there will be  backlash, but if it's women only, them where is the bi/queer aspect? Personally, I would have liked a single gay male on the show dealing with hook ups/relationships etc. Smitty/Martin married with kids is limiting in those terms.
    • Of course, how could I have forgotten those thrilling episodes depicting the fire? Also we had the GCAC rooftop set that came out every Summer. Moving on to Friday's episode. Victor is propped in his chair, answers his cell and tells the caller 'Let him in'. Seconds later Kyle enters. So does Victor have security on the front porch? It would have been better had Victor taken the call, and then said to himself 'Well Kyle, let's see what you have to say'and fade out. Next scene Kyle enters, indicating that the first call was from the Ranch entrance and time had passed . Nit picky but I get frustrated when they do stuff like that.
    • Jordan was gone from '87 to mid-'89. He left just weeks after Robert's late '86 return.
    • Jordana Brewster is making a new movie. https://deadline.com/2025/06/rob-riggle-jordana-brewster-the-pirate-king-1236426287/ Kelly Rutherford posing for a magazine cover with her son. Kelly Rutherford Photographed with Model Son Hermés, 18, Years After Custody Battle  
    • I don't think Chelsea has a true label just yet. She's just finding out she has an interest in women. I think the awkwardness is aligned with the character as we've seen. This is the fool who keeps filming her family when embarrassing things happen and live streaming it. I actually think it's refreshing she isn't just jumping into a relationship  and that they're playing the beats of her trying to figure out who she is.
    • Wow, do I agree with you. Chelsea is coming off as ridiculous. All she does is look for a woman to date while not caring about her business at all. That she's bi is great, but they're not writing her like she's bi. She seems to be lesbian. Yeah, I know -- "no labels." I just don't find the writing for her story to be anything other than awkward.   -- I hope we get some diagnosis finality with Bill's trip to the hospital. I don't want to see these trips to the ER every other day. -- Naomi is going to blame herself for Bill's health problems? GMAB. -- Ashley doesn't read as a real nurse in the slightest. -- Another day, another rinse and repeat conversation with Derek and Ashley. YAWN. -- Kat is making mistakes, but she's fun to watch and listen to, regardless. -- I still think the Joey/Vanessa/Doug gambling story sucks. I know Doug is deeply in debt, but I don't like him acting this meek and submissive.  -- I'm not sure what Joey's plan was from the beginning, or why he had to seduce Vanessa at all to get his way. I'm not sure what Vanessa ever saw in Joey -- why doesn't he give her the ick? -- I'm fine with a story where Doug and Vanessa take out Joey.  -- The fades to commercials were pretty bad today.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy