Jump to content

How much of a garbage daytime soaps really are?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I think you're being unfair. That's no way to talk about your last intimate encounter. In no way do you remind me of Truman Capote by way of Wal-Mart.

Oh, Sylph. You are my favorite paranoid schizophrenic. You always try to claim it's people taking you out of context, attacking you for no reason, twisting your words. Unfortunately, the common denominator in these situations is always you.

What you wanted was to school people in the most effete way possible about why soaps are "a garbage" (you use the "a" to signify cultured speech, I love it, like "a art," "a entertainment" - OICWHUTUDIDTHAR). And you put in a good go. You got people to bicker a little. You caused a minor fluff. I'm sure you see yourself as the soulful, breezy truth-teller of the SON boards, the aristocrat-cum-graffiti artist. Perhaps you envision yourself as Eileen Heckart in The Bad Seed, drunkenly trampling through the scene and scandalizing the neighbors to steal the show.

You try so hard to be so hard-hitting. But when you put all that careful artifice and stagecraft aside, sweetheart, this is just the Internet and everyone thinks you come off [!@#$%^&*] crazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, as many have pointed out, I don't think that the genre per se is in any way garbage. In no way. I don't know who put the "you like everything else but soaps" thought out there in the world. :blink: Yes, I have a totally different way of watching them, yes, I don't care about discussions "OMG! Did you just see how Sharon told Phyllis [something]! That was hilarious!", yes, I know who Rimbaud is, yes, I am an elitist (how does that jeopardise anyone? :blink:)... And that sort of thing. Perhaps my flaw is that I do see it as some kind of literature, something... I am very Lemay-esque in these regards, I want them to become something more, something better. Then I see something dumb on TV, then I question people about it, then an avalanche heads my way "Oh, Toups, look what he's doing! Tell him, Toups! Ban him, Toups! If he doesn't go away, I will, Toups! He's wrecking your board, Toups!" :blink: I honestly have to ask myself when and how did I become this super-annoying, horrible, wicked, fire-spitting "persona", who rubs people the wrong way. That just boggles my mind.

Also, I don't get it why people have to believe that when I say something negative - and I know most of the time that's the case - that that means I'm some kind of a pathetic, evil, wicked soul who likes to push other people's buttons, to provoke, to offend... That sarcasm is my modus vivendi (there you go - a Latin phrase once again). My problem is that I don't like it when I see hypocrisy - at least it sounds to me that way - in that everyone here has this weird notion that you must be positive because if you're not then you don't like soaps, then this, then that, "We have to be positive!" dictatorship is bloody rigid boring. And fake. I believe that when you truly love something you point out the flaws, you wish it became better, which is why you point out to some things... Being all nice and lovely and denying does nothing. I am allergic to that. And this might sound fake but perhaps I'm wrong. Perhaps I am the one who misinterprets people all the time.

So this is not an answer to your question, but if the thread stays open, I will reply. Definitely. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

First I had a silly feud with Khan over Latham's son. That sky-rocketted impossibly fast.

Then Vee started hating me.

Then brimike got all upset and left the board.

Now bellcurve hates me.

There were others... I forgot.

:unsure:

Yup, DeeDeee hates me, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, yeah - I got upset. But I didn't leave the board (obviously). Just took a break for a little while. You know how it is - things get too personal, too heated, and then I'm like "Wait - this is an Internet message board. Take a step back and breathe" So I did it. And it'll all good now. And besides - it wasn't Sylph that was the problem. It was me. I took things too personally in a discussion with a few posters (not just Sylph), and now I don't take things as personally anymore because I find I enjoy the "company" of those on this board, and missed it while I was on a break. But it was never a Sylph-issue.

Sorry to get off-topic - just wanted to clarify my role in Chapter Three of The Sylph Chronicles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Are we in for a "The Many Manic Episodes of Sylph" retrospective here? Because if we are, I'm going to need to save this for posterity. Please continue, Jesus - I mean, Sylph.

And BTW, darling, it's not that everyone is positive but you. I am often horribly bitchy and negative about a great many things in daytime. It's that you actively look for ways to espouse the most extreme opposite view of everyone else, not because you necessarily believe in it, but because your conception of your own persona is so hollow that you feel you must take that position in order to be noticed. That's what I despise: Your plasticine revolutionary posing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We've just misunderstood, everybody. Just because someone believes something isn't garbage, doesn't mean it's not. It's the big elephant in the room. It's still very possibly garbage. Because some people know better than them.

A fine line between criticism and condescension. Present oneself consistently on one level and people will generally stoop to that level to communicate with one. It's actually not hypocrisy, it's an attempt by others to communicate in the only way you've proven you know how.

But we've all misunderstood. Party's over. We're fools for thinking we ever had it right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You know, back when I was one of the most hated people on the board (and likely still am), before this version of the board - some surely remember how I told off the entire administration when I first left, especially that cow Bree - I didn't have to post threads positing some perfunctory, inflammatory question which were really meant to be constructs for open forums all about me and my issues and my persecution complex, where I would hold forth like a Marlene Dietrich impersonator about how no one understood my quest for quality and art. I just had my opinions and stuck by them. I didn't have the same sweaty desperation that permeates Sylph's every post, to be noticed, to be scandalized, to be attacked, just so he can then do his softshoe about how the board is a sunny prison of vapidity where only he, the lone critic, longs for something better.

Sylph of course thinks he is the only one who thinks that way. I felt that way about the board at times, and still do; it is the reason my posts here are so brittle and nasty. But I never post anything I don't have a legitimate stake in, and I never want to make it about "my struggle." Because if I didn't want to be here, I simply wouldn't be here. I don't go in for banners and this is the only avatar I have ever had, or probably ever will; I don't care for that kind of silly stuff. And I think there's a lot of stupid [!@#$%^&*] on this board. But I'm here for what I get out of it, and I know that I've already said everything I can about its problems. There is nothing more tiresome than the 'revolutionary' who thinks they are the only one to see something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Toups is so going to close this before I say something, obviously off-topic... How is it that one day I'm "great" the next I'm a "person". Then I get kisses, then I'm a "douche". Then I'm manic, schizophrenic, then (a) God and Jesus... There were others...

I've alveys in my megalomania craved to re-post this:

This is my favourite post ever. Truly. I love it. And thank you, brimike. Even if you, just perhaps, weren't serious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Always, in every way, Cass/Wally/Felicia foundational to my viewing. And, I think if we look at the aftermath of the disastrous 90 minute show that we find too many pockets of some kind of lost time at the show plus way too much of change-ups in exec & writing leadership and of course we also reach the first time it becomes notable that NBC wants to get rid of the show so they can put a new soap they own in the timeslot.
    • If the MAGAts were easy prey enough to get manipulated into voting for the tangerine-tinted terror, they'll fall for anything.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • And this came out as the "feud" and the media pushing the protests in Los Angeles got all the media attention. They know the press and the public will not care or can be manipulated into approving.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Hope you will enjoy the 1976 storyline from the Daytime serial Newsletter. The show had just expanded to an hour so new characters and stories were required. The Soderbergs had been writing since late 73 and the show was still #1. Looking foward to comments and discusssion Pt.1  For over two decades As the World Turns has depicted the events in the lives of two Oakdale families: the wealthy and influential Lowells and the less affluent but equally respected Hughes family. Judge Lowell’s granddaughter Ellen is married now to Dr. David Stewart, whose adopted son, Dan, is actually her own illegitimate child. Dan was once married to Dr. Susan Stewart, by whom he has a daughter, Emily. Dan then married Liz, the ex-wife of his late brother Paul. Liz was the mother of Dan’s daughter Betsy, who believes to this day that Paul was her father. Liz died tragically the day after their wedding. Ellen and David have two daughters, Carolann (Annie) and Dawn (Dee), now of college age. Dan has recently fallen in love with Kim Dixon, who was about to divorce Dr. John Dixon until injuries suffered in a tornado caused amnesia and left her with no memory of her love for Dan. John is using this respite to solicitously convince Kim of his love for her. Nancy and Chris Hughes had three children: Bob, a doctor, Donald, an attorney, and Penny, who, after tragically losing two husbands due to automobile accidents, is now living in Europe, where she is married to a racing-car driver. Bob was married while very young to Lisa Miller, then a scheming and selfish young woman, whose machinations destroyed their marriage. She is the mother of Bob’s son, Tom, who is divorced from Carol, who is now married to Jay Stallings. Tom is currently married to Natalie Bannon. Bob later married model Sandy Wilson, a marriage which ended in divorce, and Sandy is now married to Norman Garrison, who is her partner in a beauty products concern. Norman blames Bob for Sandy’s  recent disillusionment with their marriage, and, ironically, Norman suffered a heart attack during his verbal assault on Bob at a Hughes family party; and while Bob rode with him in the ambulance to the hospital, Bob’s beloved wife, Jennifer, Kim’s sister, died in a car crash while driving home alone. Lisa, more mature and considerate of others now, is married to attorney Grant Colman, but her life has been complicated by the recent arrival in town of Grant’s ex-wife, Joyce, and the incredible news that she and Grant had a child after their separation, a child Joyce gave out for adoption but now wants to reclaim. Now the story continues... The picture has now come clear for attorney Grant Coiman. He has learned that his ex-wife Joyce neglected to tell him she had a child shortly after their divorce and had given the boy to Mary and Brian Ellison for adoption. Grant, after seeing the adoption papers and considering the boy’s interests, tells Mary he feels the child should remain with them; they are providing a fine, stable home for him. Grant’s wife, Lisa, is pleased with his decision, feeling he has thus closed the door to the past and they can now go on with their own lives. But Joyce has learned that attorney Dick Martin is now back in private practice, and she tells him she was confused when she gave Teddy up years ago and wants him to represent her in a custody action to get her son back. Dick tells Joyce she has a very weak case but he’ll do what he can. He goes out to Laramie to see the  Ellisons, upsetting them very much. Grant, meanwhile, has confided in Chris Hughes, his law partner, that while his name was on the consent form for the Ellisons’ adoption, he didn’t sign the papers; he had, in fact, never known that he had a son. But he’s afraid to open a new can of worms by signing a consent form now, as that would reveal that the adoption papers are not legally correct. Grant confides the situation to Lisa, explaining that if he wanted to,  he could probably get custody of Teddy himself, but that’s not what he feels would be best for the child. Mary Ellison finally breaks under the strain of Dick’s visit and tells Brian that Dr. Paulk, the doctor who arranged the adoption, told her he didn’t know where to find the baby’s father and so he signed the consent form himself. She painfully explains she kept this secret knowing that Brian wouldn’t go through with the adoption if he learned the papers weren’t legally sound. Brian quickly calls their family lawyer, Jerry Butler, who immediately phones Grant to be sure he backs the Ellisons’ claim. Dick realizes from Joyce’s story that Grant couldn’t have signed the papers and tells him he knows. The only person who has a right to file for Teddy’s custody now is Grant; he’s the only injured party. And the moment he files, Dick can sue for invalidation of the Ellisons’ adoption. Grant finally files, to settle the custody question once and for all, but technically he's filing for custody himself. Tom Hughes and Natalie Porter are married in a small, lovely ceremony at the home of his grandparents, Nancy and Chris Hughes. They honeymoon in the Southwest and return full of expectations of happiness. Natalie is disquieted, however, when flowers arrive which are not from her new husband. She covers by pretending to check with the florist and tells Tom it was a wrong delivery and they have told her she might as well keep them. But she knows who sent them. Natalie is upset when, shortly after, Luke Porter arrives in town and seeks her out. But Luke insists he is there only to assure her this is a final farewell and he has now decided to concentrate on. making his own marriage work. Sandy Garrison, Bob’s ex-wife, is working at the  bookstore to fill in for Natalie. Her estranged husband, Norman, recovering from a heart attack he suffered during a drunken confrontation with Bob at the Colonnade Room, is still telling anyone who will listen that Bob and Sandy are having an affair, but ironically will let only Bob care for him at the hospital. His recovery is hampered by his easily aroused temper. Norman anxiously tries to persuade Dr. John Dixon to convince Bob to swear he slipped at the restaurant, thus making them liable for a costly lawsuit, but John won’t do this. Chris discovers a large amount of money missing when checking the books on the Garrisons’ business, but doesn’t want to upset Sandy with this. More to come...
    • The cynical (i.e., the dominant) me has the very same thoughts.
    • Oh wow that’s pretty awesome! I wish I had  approached him but there was so many people 
    • In the current environment, while it's small, there is a crumb of good news: Apparently, San Antonio voted for a DEMOCRATIC mayor, Gina Ortiz, beating the "right-hand man" of Gov. Greg Abbott, former Texas Secretary of State Rolando Pablos. https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5337199-gina-ortiz-jones-wins-san-antonio/
    • Love this! You are both adorable. Wow
    • I have not gone back to watch much of 1987, but from what I've seen lately, it doesn't feel like the writers or producers had any sort of plan. The show feels as if it's constantly in flux.  I will give it credit for this. It's watchable for the most part minus Lisa/Jamie which I find nearly unwatchable now.   I don't find Cheryl mousy. I think she has a lot of quiet strength, but she was saddled with the Scott romance which the writers did not invest in. She had a good friendship with Julie (also criminally underused), and her interactions with Ada were enjoyable as well. I also like Layman, but Spencer was extremely talented and when Cass returns, Schnetzer and Spencer have some wonderful scenes. Spencer also fits in with Alexander, Hogan, and Marie.  I'd forgotten just how much I missed seeing Wallingford. IT was so good to see him again. Even when they didn't have a major plot, Felicia/Cass/Wallingford/Mitch always brings a smile to my face.  
    •   Dani’s cute ass party planner. He gave me some tea but I was so drunk I don’t remember it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy