Jump to content

All: In 5 years how many soaps will still be on the air?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I think the bad economy might actually help the soaps to a certain degree. Yes, they're losing ad revenue because the Big Three and others are cutting back and the ratings aren't what they used to be but the companies that still are buying ads know that they have a certain audience with the soaps, even if it's lower than it used to be. And most soap advertisers, other than the auto and entertainment industries, tend to sell nearly recession-proof life staples: toothpaste, detergent, shampoo, common pantry items, etc. It would be far riskier to spend precious ad money on new game, talk, or reality shows in those slots when they have no built-up viewer loyalty and aren't yet certain of their exact demographics. With soaps, those factors are already known and factored in to their decision-making.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Well to stick with the dying relative analogy, do you pretend that that relative is going to be around years from now even as you pump them full of morphine? Doesn't that person and their loved ones deserve to face their dying head on if that's how they choose to face it? Should you not talk about where to scatter their ashes or ask them who they'd like to pass their precious possessions on to just because you find it too painful regardless of whether they do?

You don't want to be "bogged down" as you put it, would you rather be surprised and just wake up one day to discover your show's been canceled? If you would then so be it. But I have no problem acknowledging that some of these shows aren't going to make it ,if for no other reason than a tiny part of me hopes they will make way for something else. (Blasphemy, I know...) We've seen plenty of shows come and go: Search for Tomorrow, Capitol, Generations, Another World, etc... They all had people who watched them and mourned them.

I understand the discussion bothers some people but that isn't enough reason not to have it. No one is forced to take part. If we can talk about writers, actors and EP's coming and going, then those of us who wish to ought to be able to talk about the shows living or dying without a giant freakout. The web community is tiny. Those of us "dead pooling" have no more real effect on a show's survival prospects than a psychic doing a tarot card reading. It's the people off the boards who are or aren't watching that have a real effect. And all the forced optimism won't change that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

True, true, true. I think we're talking about two different types of people. There are the overly optimistic who just want to fence themselves into a state of not believing that soaps' days are numbered, and there are the people who know that soaps' days are numbered, but aren't ready to bury them are still open to options that may keep them going. Believe it or not, I think I'm closer to those who believe that soaps are over no matter what than I might be to the people who truly believe that all of the shows currently on the air will be on the air for decades to come. I mean, I say things like "Well, twenty years from now, I'm sure OLTL's Sam is going to be one effed up individual," but in my mind, I know that odds are, there won't be a twenty years from now...as opposed to not even having the thought (that in 20 years, Sam will be nut city) or actively anticipating the day, 20 years from now, where Sam will be holding people hostage. I fall in the middle of the two mindsets that are more prominent. I wouldn't be surprised when the shows leave, but I wouldn't be surprised if they stayed on, either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

All My Shadows, you're arguing with the notion in mind that there are more than two types of people in the world when it comes to soap viewership, and clearly that just mustn't be true. It's either the blind and ignorant who are forcing optimism because they can't deal with reality, or those who are evolved and clear-headed enough to accept and discuss openly that daytime is just gasping for its last breath and so we must take our time now to make sure we're prepared and have been put in the living will and are ready to split the inheritance.

I guess it's outlandish to think that there are those who KNOW they have no control over the end result but like to spend their time watching, debating, and celebrating the fact that the genre is still here, and by that reinforcing that the genre is still vital and worthy of care and attention. It just must be better to sit around and start thread after thread taking bets about what year this soap will take a nosedive into the cancellation bin and when this soap will be transferred to another network while the new network hopes to choke the last few breaths out of it for one more year before cancelling it once and for all. That's a much more productive use of our time and a great expression of our devotion to the genre, and a perfect illustration of why we're all here.

And isn't it just a more clever way to make a point when it's dripping with sarcasm?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I forgot to address this. I really hope that somebody creates a web drama that causes some buzz. Again not something open ended but something more in the vein of an independent film, that could appeal to the lapsed and soon-to-be-lapsed soap viewer like myself.

Of course it would probably take another writers strike to make something like that happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL. I feel for you, Dave, I really do. I'm not as annoyed by the threads as you are, but I get why it grates on your nerves so much. I don't really care if there's a new gloom and doom thread everyday...the only time I really get aggravated is when the same person posts, essentially, the same thread once a month or so (and I have one person in particular in my mind right now, and luckily, he hasn't shown up in this thread yet). If others choose to contemplate what's going to happen and how it's going to happen, that's fine and dandy. I just choose not to, but I also choose not to bury my head in the sand and act like nothing's wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think "daytime drama" will disappear any time soon. If there are only two 30 min. soaps on the air, they will be padded with Grey's Anatomy and Desperate Housewives reruns. A network is not going to air 4 hours worth of Judge shows a day. That's eight episodes, that's embarrassing. They will be forced to be more creative than that. Even though the numbers may be sucking, I think deep down people in this country are uncomfortable with the idea of any form of entertainment becoming extinct. We don't have the 37 game shows airing a day like we used to, but we still have them. Be prepared for a huge backlash if soaps are wiped from the canvas. I just don't see it happening any time soon. Again, things will probably change, but soaps won't completely disappear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But didn't game shows almost vanish with the exception of a few that had what it takes to hold on? Specifically Price Is Right, Wheel of Fortune and Jeopardy. Then someone took a chance on Millionaire, The Weakest Link (which failed) and Deal or no Deal. Likewise, I really believe that we can't move on to the next stage of daytime drama until we bury some of these current shows.

I know this makes me a heretic but if it would bring me a soap with strong women, a truly diverse cast and people who actually work for a living, I'll hold a pillow over Reva Shayne's face my damn self!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL, no, I feel you. It all feels so hopeless and fans get so frustrated because it seems like there's all the wrong people making all the wrong decisions in all the wrong places. I would love to see someone like my mother on a soap, and you would be entertained by her, but the only way that'll ever happen is if I'm writing it.

Those two hypothetical 30 min. soaps left standing would be the cream that rose to the top. When I was a kid, there were more soaps and many more game shows. We had one reality judge show, The People's Court, and two or three fictional judge shows like The Judge and Divorce Court (Do you guys remember those?? Don't get me started on them...). We also had more talk shows, Geraldo, Sally, et cetera. Now morning news/women's chat shows eat up the morning, then soaps, LOTS of judges, and a handful of talk. We're evolving, and honestly, I don't know what the hell will be next.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The difference between soaps and games, though, is that games transitioned into their current position over several decades. In the 50s and 60s, game shows were most popular in either daytime or primetime, and then when the 70s rolled around, primetime game shows pretty much went away, but daytime thrived (golden age of game shows and daytime TV in general, folks!) and syndicated game shows found their footing and became institutions, too. Most of the real popular daytime shows also aired in syndication...Price is Right had a healthy eight-year syndicated run...Match Game had two successful syndicated runs, one that aired while the CBS version was still going strong, and another one that replaced the CBS version...Family Feud did six years in syndication while still on ABC, which was the same for Let's Make a Deal...Hollywood Squares ran in syndication and on NBC at the same time. The 80s continued in pretty much the same way, but by the end of that decade, it began to be adios time for daytime network games. Game shows were able to transition from one area (being mainly daytime, sometimes primetime, shows) to another (being mainly syndication, with the less traditional shows in primetime) without it being so abrupt. And there also wasn't a mass exodus of the "old" and an incoming of the "new." 30-40 years ago, there was The Price is Right, Family Feud, Jeopardy, Wheel of Fortune, Password. Today, there's The Price is Right, Family Feud, Jeopardy, Wheel of Fortune, Password. Sets, hosts, announcers, and some rules have changes, but at the heart of each show, the main idea is still there.

Soaps really don't have the money or the time to be gradual though. If there are gonna be format changes, it'll probably happen the way GL changed last year...on a set date, with all of the changes happening at once, which is really a shame. People keep talking about how soaps evolved from radio to television, but even then, there was a considerable amount of transition. The first hit TV soaps came in the early, early 50s, but radio soaps were still running until the early 60s. Even GL did four years of broadcasting on both TV and radio before becoming TV only.

I would personally love it if soaps could somehow squeeze into the early evening area. Not only would the ratings be higher (regardless of what the storylines are), but it would then actually make sense when people compare US soap ratings with UK soap ratings. I love my Jeopardy and Wheel of Fortune at 6 and 6:30, but if I could get half-hour versions of AMC and ATWT there instead, I'd totally be there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Arguably DAYS OF OUR LIVES has been brilliant lately & definitely was last week. But, here I am with nitpick & technicalities. This was the only misstep but it was just a stupid thing that should have been caught. Deidre Hall as Marlena has this one problematic line, "It didn't matter how many identities you had, I always knew exactly who you were, you were the man who saved my life." - Marlena, DAYS, 6-2-25 Unfortunately the flashback closest to it was when Marlena was on the phone, terrified because she thought he was Stefano. Yes, it's true that the line is not accurate. There were many times when she did not feel the way she is claiming because of whatever was going on in story with his 'retconned to hell & back' identity & origin story. Does it keep the whole week from being called excellent? Nope.  
    • The Vault has been down all night.
    • Notable: Glendale is not exactly a progressive enclave.

      Please register in order to view this content

      Newsom is a craven opportunist, but his comments today were exactly how better people need to handle Trump.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I decided this primetime soap deserved it's own thread as the Primetime soaps thread is very cluttered and why shouldn't NBC's Lorimar soap mot have a chance to shine? In doing a deeper dive into the second season ratings I was surprised to see that FR actually had an uptick in the ratings when NBC moved it to 9pm Tuesdays beginning March 82. I'd always assumed this move was a desperate one as NBC were running short of programming and had given up on the show,deciding to let the final episodes play out and be hammered by 3's Company  and CBS Movie. But the numbers paint a different story. In it's 10pm slot up against Hart to Hart, which regularly finished in the Top 20, FL premiered in 53rd place and placed in the 40's and 50's as the season continued. But come January 82 the numbers surged a little now moving into the 40's hitting #43 in Feb. Hart to Hart was #11 Then in March Bret Maverick was moved to 8pm with FR @9. First week 16th March FR #47 15.1/24 3's Company #3 Too Close for Comfort #5 CBS Movie #60 Not great but #2 in it's timeslot March 23 FR #44 15.6/25 3's Company #4 Too Close for Comfort #5 CBS Movie #33 So even with a stronger movie on CBS FR's numbers went up. March 30 FR #31 16.6/26 3's Company #9 Too Close for Comfort #5 CBS Movie #56 Best rating/position yet Tues April 6 pre empted Tues April 14 FR #36 16.0/26 3's Company #5 Too Close for Comfort #11 CBS Movie #59 Maintaining previous week's numbers Tues April 21 FR #33 15.6/24 3's Company #3 Too Close for Comfort #5 CBS Movie #60 Numbers down a little (reflecting general spring downturn) but best ranking of the season so far Tues April 28 FR #35 15.1/23 3's Company #9 Too Close for Comfort #6 CBS Movie #42 Tues May 4 FR #27 15.2/24 3's Company #5 Too Close for Comfort #4 CBS Movie #41 Season finale and highest position of the season. Looking at those numbers I wonder why NBC cancelled the show? They had very few hits and here was a show that was holding it's own and moving up in the rankings in a tougher timeslot. And being a serial, the storylines could continue to build the following season. And I'm sure the desirable W18-49 demo was good. Some might argue that CBS were shower weaker movies, but even so, soap viewers are pretty loyal. I guess Grant Tinker arrived at NBC and wanted a classier look but there was room for FR on the schedule. I mean, the following season Knight Rider,Powers of Matthew Star and the A Team arrived so there was still room for more populist fare. Flamingo could have stayed at 9pm-the replacement Gavilan bombed (surely FR would have done better} or moved back to 10pm. The following Jan NBC had a hit with A Team Tues 8pm. Had Flamingo followed it, it might have really taken off. As it was they tried Bare Essence, which flopped. Oh well,it was not to be...    
    • Always, in every way, Cass/Wally/Felicia foundational to my viewing. And, I think if we look at the aftermath of the disastrous 90 minute show that we find too many pockets of some kind of lost time at the show plus way too much of change-ups in exec & writing leadership and of course we also reach the first time it becomes notable that NBC wants to get rid of the show so they can put a new soap they own in the timeslot.
    • If the MAGAts were easy prey enough to get manipulated into voting for the tangerine-tinted terror, they'll fall for anything.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • And this came out as the "feud" and the media pushing the protests in Los Angeles got all the media attention. They know the press and the public will not care or can be manipulated into approving.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Hope you will enjoy the 1976 storyline from the Daytime serial Newsletter. The show had just expanded to an hour so new characters and stories were required. The Soderbergs had been writing since late 73 and the show was still #1. Looking foward to comments and discusssion Pt.1  For over two decades As the World Turns has depicted the events in the lives of two Oakdale families: the wealthy and influential Lowells and the less affluent but equally respected Hughes family. Judge Lowell’s granddaughter Ellen is married now to Dr. David Stewart, whose adopted son, Dan, is actually her own illegitimate child. Dan was once married to Dr. Susan Stewart, by whom he has a daughter, Emily. Dan then married Liz, the ex-wife of his late brother Paul. Liz was the mother of Dan’s daughter Betsy, who believes to this day that Paul was her father. Liz died tragically the day after their wedding. Ellen and David have two daughters, Carolann (Annie) and Dawn (Dee), now of college age. Dan has recently fallen in love with Kim Dixon, who was about to divorce Dr. John Dixon until injuries suffered in a tornado caused amnesia and left her with no memory of her love for Dan. John is using this respite to solicitously convince Kim of his love for her. Nancy and Chris Hughes had three children: Bob, a doctor, Donald, an attorney, and Penny, who, after tragically losing two husbands due to automobile accidents, is now living in Europe, where she is married to a racing-car driver. Bob was married while very young to Lisa Miller, then a scheming and selfish young woman, whose machinations destroyed their marriage. She is the mother of Bob’s son, Tom, who is divorced from Carol, who is now married to Jay Stallings. Tom is currently married to Natalie Bannon. Bob later married model Sandy Wilson, a marriage which ended in divorce, and Sandy is now married to Norman Garrison, who is her partner in a beauty products concern. Norman blames Bob for Sandy’s  recent disillusionment with their marriage, and, ironically, Norman suffered a heart attack during his verbal assault on Bob at a Hughes family party; and while Bob rode with him in the ambulance to the hospital, Bob’s beloved wife, Jennifer, Kim’s sister, died in a car crash while driving home alone. Lisa, more mature and considerate of others now, is married to attorney Grant Colman, but her life has been complicated by the recent arrival in town of Grant’s ex-wife, Joyce, and the incredible news that she and Grant had a child after their separation, a child Joyce gave out for adoption but now wants to reclaim. Now the story continues... The picture has now come clear for attorney Grant Coiman. He has learned that his ex-wife Joyce neglected to tell him she had a child shortly after their divorce and had given the boy to Mary and Brian Ellison for adoption. Grant, after seeing the adoption papers and considering the boy’s interests, tells Mary he feels the child should remain with them; they are providing a fine, stable home for him. Grant’s wife, Lisa, is pleased with his decision, feeling he has thus closed the door to the past and they can now go on with their own lives. But Joyce has learned that attorney Dick Martin is now back in private practice, and she tells him she was confused when she gave Teddy up years ago and wants him to represent her in a custody action to get her son back. Dick tells Joyce she has a very weak case but he’ll do what he can. He goes out to Laramie to see the  Ellisons, upsetting them very much. Grant, meanwhile, has confided in Chris Hughes, his law partner, that while his name was on the consent form for the Ellisons’ adoption, he didn’t sign the papers; he had, in fact, never known that he had a son. But he’s afraid to open a new can of worms by signing a consent form now, as that would reveal that the adoption papers are not legally correct. Grant confides the situation to Lisa, explaining that if he wanted to,  he could probably get custody of Teddy himself, but that’s not what he feels would be best for the child. Mary Ellison finally breaks under the strain of Dick’s visit and tells Brian that Dr. Paulk, the doctor who arranged the adoption, told her he didn’t know where to find the baby’s father and so he signed the consent form himself. She painfully explains she kept this secret knowing that Brian wouldn’t go through with the adoption if he learned the papers weren’t legally sound. Brian quickly calls their family lawyer, Jerry Butler, who immediately phones Grant to be sure he backs the Ellisons’ claim. Dick realizes from Joyce’s story that Grant couldn’t have signed the papers and tells him he knows. The only person who has a right to file for Teddy’s custody now is Grant; he’s the only injured party. And the moment he files, Dick can sue for invalidation of the Ellisons’ adoption. Grant finally files, to settle the custody question once and for all, but technically he's filing for custody himself. Tom Hughes and Natalie Porter are married in a small, lovely ceremony at the home of his grandparents, Nancy and Chris Hughes. They honeymoon in the Southwest and return full of expectations of happiness. Natalie is disquieted, however, when flowers arrive which are not from her new husband. She covers by pretending to check with the florist and tells Tom it was a wrong delivery and they have told her she might as well keep them. But she knows who sent them. Natalie is upset when, shortly after, Luke Porter arrives in town and seeks her out. But Luke insists he is there only to assure her this is a final farewell and he has now decided to concentrate on. making his own marriage work. Sandy Garrison, Bob’s ex-wife, is working at the  bookstore to fill in for Natalie. Her estranged husband, Norman, recovering from a heart attack he suffered during a drunken confrontation with Bob at the Colonnade Room, is still telling anyone who will listen that Bob and Sandy are having an affair, but ironically will let only Bob care for him at the hospital. His recovery is hampered by his easily aroused temper. Norman anxiously tries to persuade Dr. John Dixon to convince Bob to swear he slipped at the restaurant, thus making them liable for a costly lawsuit, but John won’t do this. Chris discovers a large amount of money missing when checking the books on the Garrisons’ business, but doesn’t want to upset Sandy with this. More to come...
    • The cynical (i.e., the dominant) me has the very same thoughts.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy