Jump to content

Knots Landing


Sedrick

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Oh, "Man of the Hour" gets painful in that very arch sequence where the theatrical bereaved mother shows up and repeats the title over and over lol. But I have become very fond of Steve Shaw. I wish they'd done more with him and Michael, though I believe they do get some story and he's still going strong in Season 7.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

 

I feel like KL went soapy too soon in S2 and that the latter half of that season and S3 were more or less course corrections, letting us get more acquainted with the characters, before trying again at the end of S3 (this time, obviously, with more success).

One idea I always had for a pretend S15 was Mack and Karen learning of Eric's death and that he left behind a new wife, who might be pregnant with his child, or (as we learn) could have been two-timing him with one of his best friends.

 

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think season 2 was the show realizing that the self-contained element wasn't going to work for them so the writers just decided to become serialized/soapy for the sake of it.. not because it was ready to be so.

@Khan as you mentioned... Sid dying was really the spark that caused the show to begin the full on soapy descent in an organic way since grief isn't something that can be resolved in just one episode.

               Plus, Sid dying actually spurred Abby to become the Abby that we knew and loved because in season 2, she still had Sid to lean on and to bail her out.  Once her security blanket was taken from her, she had to rely on different strengths and assets beyond just her big brother and her sex appeal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly.  The pieces weren't in place for the show to become a continuing drama in the vein of "thirtysomething," much less a full-fledged soap opera, especially with many of the characters still undeveloped. 

Moreover, David Jacobs tried very hard in S2 to maintain his original vision for the show as "Scenes from a Marriage x 4," but it seems like there was no variety in the stories being presented.  People either were cheating on their spouses or thinking about cheating; and on a series that aims to depict a late-'70's SoCal where people can "sleep around" with no real consequences, it all amounted to a big bunch of nothing.

The way I see it, KL's transition from "Family"-like domestic drama to full-blown soap opera happened in stages.  Sid's death at the top of S3 transitions KL into a series with several, ongoing storylines, if not a soap opera quite yet.  They're still some self-contained, one-and-done stories, but no longer is KL a show where major events are over and done with within sixty minutes.  Then, with the Gary/Val/Abby triangle, which culminates with Val leaving Gary at the end of S3, you see KL transitioning once again into a soapier show, one that'll feature juicier storylines, but still grounded in the middle-class realism that defined seasons 1 and 2.  Finally, you have the start of the "Who Killed Ciji Dunne?" storyline in the latter half of S4, with the montage of Ciji's lifeless body washing up on the shore symbolizing the "death" of KL as we had known it to be and the moment where the show is finally ready to play with the "big kids," DALLAS and DYNASTY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IMHO, I don't believe that scenario would have been plausible, if only because Val wasn't the same woman she had been years before.

When Lucy was taken from her, Val was a love-struck, hillbilly teen, whose husband had just flown the coop, and whose own mother refused to protect her or her baby from J.R.'s goons.  By the time Bobby and Betsy were born, however, Val had grown into a successful novelist, who lived comfortably with her mother in the suburbs in the house she obviously received from her latest divorce from Gary.

J.R. was cruel to take Lucy away from Val, but he kinda had a point (Lucy was a Ewing, and Val simply was in no position to take care of her).  If he had taken the twins away from her as well, then he would've been just an [!@#$%^&*] for the sake of BEING an [!@#$%^&*], lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Then season 5 got corporate with Lotus Point, ventured into James Bond/action thriller territory with Wolfbridge, and also got glamorous. I think going corporate and glamorous was a response to Dynasty blowing up and becoming a pop culture phenomenon. Dallas also got corporate and glamorous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It would have been interesting to me if Meg started becoming closer to Greg (Paige would have left Greg at this time and he'd be lonely and full of regrets so he'd decide to be more a part of her life), and at the same time we got the story you mentioned. St. Elsewhere had a story where Mark Craig's son died and his pregnant wife was left comatose. Mark and his wife Ellen began raising the baby and Ellen became overly attached, leading her to break down when the wife woke up and the baby eventually was given back to her. I didn't care for the story on St. Elsewhere but I could see it working with Mack and Karen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Of the so-called "contract" cast members, I'd venture to say these are recurring: Bryton James, Camryn Grimes, and (possibly) Michael Graziadei.  I've suspected since 2018 that Kate Linder and Christian LeBlanc are recurring.  And I believe we all know Miss Ordway is, because she said so. lol.  
    • Dante blaming Gio instead of his dweeb son and the other dweeb was just ridiculous. Gio's paternity story is going in circles with no reveal. I've already started fast forwarding Drew and his stupid ho Willow's story. Kristina's story is beyond dumb with no great payoff.
    • Sarah (with the English accent) isn't just some random character.  Sarah was once the housekeeper for Eliot Dorn and Margo Huntington.  One of the following 2 scenarios happened a few months ago: (1):  One night, while Margo wasn't at home, and while Oscar the Doorman wasn't at his post, a burglar sneaked into the private elevator, rode up to the penthouse, stole several thousand dollars worth of Margo's valuable diamonds and pearls, and tied-up Eliot Dorn and Sarah the Housekeeper, ensuring that Eliot and Sarah couldn't pursue the burglar back down to the lobby or phone the police to apprehend the burglar. OR --  (2): Eliot Dorn was SLEEPING with Sarah the Housekeeper, and the two of them conspired to steal Margo's jewelry and went on a lavish spending spree and then tied THEMSELVES up to make it look as though a burglary had occurred in the penthouse. Margo Dorn currently believes Scenario #1 occurred, and she's rather annoyed that the "incompetent police" haven't located her stolen jewels yet.  Eliot and Sarah know that Scenario #2 actually occurred.  When Sarah stopped by the Unicorn and saw Eliot kissing Raven Swift, Sarah snidely said, "Oh! This must be Mrs. Dorn!  Nice to meet you, Mrs. Dorn!" Sarah knew good & damn well Raven isn't "Mrs. Dorn" because Sarah worked for Margo Dorn on a daily basis for many months.  That was Sarah's not-so-subtle way of announcing, "I'll be paying a visit to District Attorney Logan Swift and letting him know that his wife is sleeping with you, and I'll be paying a visit to WMON to let Margo Huntington know that you're sleeping with Mrs. Swift!"  lol.     
    • The AMC hate came from Jamey Giddens/DC and their industry friends, IMO. For whatever reason I always felt they targeted the show, and it was wrong. AMC ratings were decent and even went up under Pratt (Yet, he was fired). The ratings were also good under Broderick and lowered out after her interim.  There was no reason to be upset with the show other than it being slow. They literally played it safe and did the best they could in 2010 and 2011. 
    • I have very detailed synopses of all 1976 storylines for the soaps from the Daytime Serial Newsletter. Please let me know if you are interested in a particular show and I will post it in the appropriate thread. As I stated they are very detailed, so I don't want to clutter up threads if posters are not interested.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Surely we (and Billy Flynn) are not going to be saddled with a character named Aristotle Dumas? This isn't 1970's Edge of Night.
    • What annoys me a little bit about the "day players" is they sound a bit too "Brooklyn-ish" sometimes.  Obviously, the show was taped in New York City, and the actors are all New York actors, but Monticello is supposed to be located in Illinois or Ohio.  Occasionally, they grab actors and actresses for small roles who have VERY distinct New York accents, which contrasts sharply with the main cast, none of whom have noticeable accents (except for our dashing European gigolo, Eliot Dorn, of course).  The heavy Brooklyn accent works fine if the character is a bookie, or the owner of a pawn shop, or a guy who's selling stolen guns on the street corner.  But when it's a steadily recurring character -- such as the first Mrs. Goodman, who worked for Miles and Nicole -- it's pretty jarring to me sometimes.  And you'll see it often -- such as an "under-five" character who witnesses a car accident, or a character who witnesses a shooting, or the occasional desk clerk, or waiter.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy