Jump to content

Edge of Night (EON) (No spoilers please)


cct

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

1) I've often wondered what the solution SHOULD have been to the Larkin Malloy situation.  Yes, he was extremely popular as Jefferson Brown, he had great chemistry with Sharon Gabet's Raven Swift, and the story of Jeff Brown's "reign of terror" (and death) was GOOD material.  Watching him become so coldly evil and watching him knock off one victim after another was very memorable to me.  I can see why Slesar found it necessary to "revive" Larkin Malloy in the Schuyler Whitney character, but the entire Jefferson Brown storyline was predicated on the fact that Schuyler was dead.  It was almost an anti-climax to reveal that Schuyler was still alive, after all.  

With Draper and April gone, it made sense to step-up Raven and Schuyler into their roles as the young adult leads.  But when you'd planned for Schuyler to be dead, and now suddenly he's not, and you're having to rework all your long-term story projections, and there's a writer's strike also -- I believe it CRIPPLED Henry Slesar for the rest of his run on the show. 

Surely none of us really wanted Smiley Wilson, the Republic of Eden, and all the shenanigans of the Maskers.  That period became an unfortunate segue into the Nora Fulton storyline, which like the Jefferson Brown story, was (potentially) a GOOD story and a classic Edge story.  And we know it was essential to tell the Phonebook story simultaneously with the Nora Fulton story, as the two were intended to merge in the denouement.  But the PACING always seemed off to me (too little of the Nora Fulton investigation, and too much of the Phonebook storyline.)  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

Thank goodness, the WGA came along and changed the process.  It is so weird to think that for years, writers were essentially given a budget rather than a salary.  So, these creative guys had to allocate money to scriptwriters, rather than having them directly employed by the production (along with benefits like health care and social security).  I recall Harding Lemay discussing a similar situation in his memoir.

It is impossible to imagine a modern writer in charge of two soaps simultaneously.  Especially given the intricate plotting of a Slesar soap.  I realize they were produced by the same company, but the idea that Sommerset and EON were on different networks is an additional unique consideration.

Much I like hoped that someone would be inspired by Lemay's memoir to write a MadMan-style drama about writing midcentury soaps, imagine being able to watch a dramatization of Slesar's pitches?  We've had some series about actors on soaps, but I am fascinated by the interaction between the productions and advertisers. 

Also, how cool is it that PG Woodhouse watched Edge? 

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Henry was one of a kind. There has never been another talent like him. Not Agnes, Not Bill, Not Doug. Only Irna for her type of melodrama.  But no one matched Henry's ability to do a daytime crime/mystery soap consistently for 15 years. And write Somerset for 2 years. SFT for six months during those Edge years. Even his clunkers were better than anything done by other writers since he was fired in 1983.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks for reading it.

That was one of my main takeaways with the 1979/1980 material, which probably isn't even seen as his best. Just compare the inner life and complexity of a character like Deborah to later "lady supercop" figures like Harley or Josie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Watching both TEON and SOM live during the time Slesar wrote the series, I was thrilled to see that each one was on fire creatively; excellent entertainment that kept me glued to my TV set.

Soap historians rightfully praise the likes of Phillips, Nixon and Bell for their contributions to the genre, but Slesar was also a master writer in his own right, and deserves so much respect. No one else has ever been able to match his ability to weave intricate, absorbing mystery dramas on daytime TV. 

I'd say Slesar reached his zenith in the early 1970s with the original Whitney-family/Jonah Lockwood saga, but even his later material, which isn't seen as his best, was miles above anything we've seen on soaps for the last few decades. Slesar could write it all: mystery, romance, domestic strife, and even comedic bits. The best aspect of his work is that during it all, his characters were layered, complex and INTELLIGENT.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And other than very few casting misses during the Slesar era (first Kelly, Chad, Jim Deidrickson when they were under pressure to go after the youth demo with model types to match some of the other soaps in the early 80s) all the performers were good to most excellent.  I always thought the first Nicole replacement (although I like some of her scenes when I watch now) was a big misstep. Too young, too different.  The second recast was somewhat better and also a capable actress.  They cast real actors, most with stage experience. Contrast that with GH under Valentini...

Edited by VelekaCarruthers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Both were half hour soaps so I think it would have been easier to headwrite two soaps at the same time.

Edge of Night was a soap that would have faltered if expanded to an hour so I'm glad it never expanded.

Slesar's biggest misstep was keeping Raven on so long.  While popular, it really diluted the crime and mystery format by having her be the lead.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • What consequences are there to suffer? He didnt commit any crime and everyone already hates him. If anything this will set back the progress he's made with Naomi
    • Yes and I also loved how she focused on Chelsea and Naomi when she spilled Bill's involvement in all of this.
    • Danny: Don't drink it. Just hold it. Rocco drinks three laced cups.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • OH, I AM.   And it looks like it's a pretty good episode so I might watch later on this weekend after work cuz I see a lot of scenes with people I actually like. Very happy to see Rocco/Danny appear to be getting story, too. 
    • I do agree that a revival of EON would work, if it doesn't fall into doing all of the typical soap opera tropes... which it became guilty of in the final few years of the show with the over abundance of Raven/Sky at the expense of the actual detectives, police, etc. And I know it was mentioned earlier that Raven had lost any true connections on the show with the death of her on screen mother, and the loss of April/Draper/Deborah.. and I do agree with that. I actually thought the show would have done something with the Shelley character that could have connected her to the Raven character.  There were a few scenes where the two would have scenes and size one another up before they would go their separate ways.. so I assumed perhaps they would have been revealed as half-siblings and/or perhaps cousins.  Alas.. not to be.
    • It definitely flowed beautifully. So much that I was annoyed when Vanessa/Doug because I wanted to get back to the party. I know it was intentional to build up tension and suspense. It worked. lol. I'm glad it was there in hingsight because it gave us that great conversation between Doug and Vanessa. Foreshadowing? And yesss!!! This episode was sooo old school soap giving beat after beat after beat leading up to the unveiling of Eva as Ted's daughter. And we still have plenty of fallout/aftereffects to work through.   Speaking of...Bill, Bill, Bill lol. Good to have confirmation HE was the scary lawyer.   I'm sure I will have a busy Monday, but I can't wait for it. I don't know what I'm looking forward to more. Probably Anita vs Silk Press Sheila tbh. And yes, I feel they will be matching each other 'blow for blow.' 
    • And if they go there, it could also be tied to Johnny completely cutting him off, possibly going to work for Titan, etc.
    • @AbcNbc247 maybe it is just that they've gone to that well too often, and I don't like when DAYS goes dark, but I'm OK with EJ abusing drugs, and just skipping the whole sobriety part. Side note: experiencing hallucinations of my son killing me would be enough for me to never want to take a pill again.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Part of the reason that Courtney worked at OLTL was because the show had an actual character for her to play.  One that was somewhat different than her character on AW, and after the way she was treated over at AW.. it had to have been nice to be courted onto a new soap that actually valued your contributions.  
    • I figured the "long" was already implied 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy