Jump to content

B&B: Susan Flannery


Recommended Posts

  • Members

It's common knowledge that SF is the heart and soul of B&B. She's etched her place in the medium.

For viewers who've watched her since the beginning...what did Flannery bring to the Daytime table? What was her contribution?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Outside of probably Bert Bauer on GL, Stephanie is perhaps the only soap opera matriarch that's been the driving force behind major storylines, as well as being the most popular character on B&B. It's almost unheard of for soap opera matriarchs to carry on such a big presence, as Stephanie has on B&B. Soap matriarchs on all the other soaps were traditionally women who were supporting characters that were there to give advice and look after the family. That wasn't the case with Stephanie, although Bill Bell admitted when he created B&B he didn't think Stephanie would be as an important of a role as she morphed into. Flannery has also said something to that effect.

And without Flannery, there is no Stephanie, so it all comes back to that in some way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

SF is one of the few roles that can never be re-cast. Flannery made such a mark on the role and elevated it to Shakespearian levels of complexity. She wasn't a star till she took on the role. If any other actress on daytime had changed their physical appearance the way she did, they would have been fired for sure. Her metamorphasis from the usual matriarch to a true battleaxe and sometime villain was truly art in motion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To say that Susan Flannery wasn't a star until B&B somewhat negates her role as Laura on DOOL.

She was most definitely a daytime star due to that role and the Bill/Laura/Mickey story,that under Bill Bell's pen helped Days rise to the top of the ratings.

She left Days and scored a role in the massively successful Towering Inferno,which earned her a Golden Globe.

She had a featured role on Dallas in it's heyday as the #1 show on the air and roles in other TV movies.

I agree her role on B&B has only cemented her reputation and stature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Queen, I think Nelson Branco said it best (yes, I know he's not highly rated at SON but bear with me) when he called Flannery the Marlon Brando of Daytime. SF turned Stephanie into a complex, multi-faceted character that transcends the usual gender stereotypes (Erica Kane, for example, is definitely female, feminine -- almost drag-queenly so! Stephanie Forrester could have been played by a man or woman. She is the equivalent of Victor Newman for B&B).

On YouTube they have some episodes featuring Susan Flannery in the early days of B&B. Her scenes with the very talented Joanna Johnson (Caroline) are especially amazing, in my view. Stephanie appears to be confiding, maternal, loving, scheming, enigmatic, controlling and half in-love with Caroline. All in the space of a few minutes! She doesn't transmit any of this with dialogue. Rather, the emotions flitter across her face and deepen the interaction between the two women above standard soap fare.

Maybe I am reading too much into those scenes but I have not been able to tear my eyes away from Flannery since B&B first began. Stephanie was written as the scheming, jealous wife. in Susan Flannery's hands, the character had so many unspoken psychological dimensions, she became human. And compelling to watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes I think Susan Flannery took a very Alexis Colby type role and imbued it with a lot more complexity. There's a wonderful scene on YouTube from around 1988 when she decides to hire a PI to find Stephen Logan. On go the disguise of sunglasses and a fur coat but instead of just being a straightforward trashy plot point of a scene, we see how uncomfortable Stephanie is doing something so ridiculous.

The Caroline relationship was fascinating. Much better than the overplayed "friendship" she had with Taylor. They were two women who often fundamentally disagreed but had a tremendous respect for each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Bill Bell may have created Stephanie Forrester but it is Susan Flannery who MADE Stephanie come to life. Susan Flannery took a character who was your typical rich bitch (a blond Joan Collins if you will although that isn't fair to Collins who is more a comedienne than anything else in her bitch roles)...and made her into the most complex character in daytime.

Susan Lucci once said that she considered the role of Erica Kane to be the greatest role ever written for a woman in daytime. I feel Susan Flannery proves that Stephanie Forrester is the greatest role ever ACTED by a woman in daytime. She's a tour de force. Stephanie is her creation. An Icon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Excellent actress, but over the last couple of years I've been tried of her act. I don't really think she's as extraordinary as people try to make her out to be though.

ETA: I'm not going to discredit Flannery's role as Stephanie Forrester, because she did do a remarkable job, though I find some of the praise to be quite excessive. I wonder what Susan Seaforth Hayes would have done with the role?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, I still stand by my opinion of Susan Flannery's talents. :) Although she has been noticeably more muted in her performances in recent years. No thanks to the poor writing.

Susan Seaforth Hayes would have made a very different Stephanie. Ridge and Felicia would have looked more like her children, for a start. I think she would have been more seductive, perhaps, and sexy, using flirtatiousness and a smile as the mask behind which she would plot and scheme. SF's Stephanie was always much more direct in her scheming. When she hated someone, she owned it. She would come right out and tell them, destabilizing them completely.

Seaforth Hayes would have perhaps been more overtly "Joan Collins" -- picking up what DaytimeFan put in his/her post -- in the sense that she might have made Stephanie more of an Alexis figure. As well as playing up the comedy. SSH is good with the comedy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IMO, that is what made Steph unique though. That most of the time she wasn't a seductive schemer. She was like a bull in a china store. And she was capable of loving the ones she elected (Ridge, Amber, Bridget) almost as fiercely as she hated the ones she hated (Brooke, Sheila). She could come across like a true force of nature.

Pity that apart from her dedicating to Eric and Ridge, Stephanie was much worse in being as consistent in her love as she was in her hate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sorry if I misdirected my post to imply that other's should change their opinion on Flannery, that wasn't my intention. She is a great actress indeed.

Good analysis on Hayes. She probably would have been all those things. I loved her on Y&R during her brief stints, and you're right, she can do comedy really well. I'd love to see her stack against KKL Brooke lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Beyond The Underwear Oops I mean Gates!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I swear this entire time I thought Roman knew about the Phillip/Vivian letter lol.  I do like how mature Roman/Kate are as a couple.  It makes me sad the new writers never got a chance to write for John/Marlena. I agree with @AbcNbc247 that the Felicity stuff is a bit after school special-y.  I am pretty sure that (most) of the viewing audience is aware that a grown man should not be shouting at any teenage girl especially one with disabilities.  Just let Xander apologize and move on. Linsey Godfrey was in her Sarah baby voice mode today and it irritates me to no end.   I know it's a cutesy thing her and Xander do but it's annoying. Bringing Kevin back is strange, but I do like the use of history.  I do think Rex probably could have been used instead, but whatever.  I don't care about Rex much either lol.
    • I mean over the past decades. But I do agree that in recent years now, the writing is not working for them as well as it used to then. It's same old, same old...which is what made the Damian storyline refreshing. At least for me.   
    • Did Denise give any interviews where she talked about her first few years on GH... '73-75? I wonder if she had any regrets leaving Days for GH, as from what I've read, the show was in the dumps writing-wise, so am thinking she didn't have great story? Any Leslie story highlights I've seen always start with '76, after Gloria Monty took charge.
    • I know! It's like second verse, here we go again!  Agreed. Certainly there was concern maybe even fear at the highest levels for the very good reason that what they had was so economically successful, so of course this risk was scary but if anyone was brave she was. Yes, he was. I have seen her associated with getting it on the air one other place but no details nor official title. Not the writer or creator so it made me wonder if she functioned as a kind of uncredited ad hoc producer, but then maybe she just supported it. At any rate that is nothing but supposition on my part. No data! Yes, not a surprise anymore but still so frustrating! On one hand I am appreciative that she is included in this book, but scholarship where are you?!
    • that wasnt her point. She wanted to further demonize Ted; that was the main focus of their talk. She wants to ensure that Nicole leaves him so that he's free and single to be with her. At this point, I dont think she really cares what Nicole thinks of her; she just wants her out of the way Eva is Nicole's stepdaughter and is a Dupree by association. If Nicole takes Ted back then its reasonable that she would accept his daughter and i that happens, Eva will have welcomed to their country club, be invited to their parties, have access to their resources, etc....much like Andre whom also isnt a blood Dupree but is accepted by them via Nicole. Eva got what she got from Anita bc of Hayley. I think its important to remember that context bc they just dealt with an interloper that infiltrated their ranks and hurt her daughter in the worse way. Now you have another unfortunate girl positioned to do the same to her other daughter. The feelings are still too fresh and she doesnt want Eva to get the idea that she would ever be allowed the opportunity to play them again
    • Oh I've seem this! That's part of why I'm curious! The show could put EastEnders to shame on the gangster Aspect! Oh I've seem this! That's part of why I'm curious! The show could put EastEnders to shame on the gangster Aspect!
    • Eve was one of those characters that had the "Jessie Brewer"role. They had heavy storyline, they burned through it and now they are there for support and a touchstone in the community (Marland wanted to give Jessie story, but I agree with Monty...she best served in her connecting role, and keeping that damn Amy Vining busy so she keeps her nose out of things) So charcters are important and why they should have kept characters like Bridget around (even as she is more volatiles then Eve) who didnt need a big storyline but could have been behind the bar making connections and expostion, but Rauch wanted JEVA/JEVA/JEVA and DRAMA (which to him meant a lot of yelling and stupidity.)
    • Why do I feel like (or remember possible

      Please register in order to view this content

      ) Mark Dante operated on Jeff? Also, I was under the impression that Jeff shot himself accidentally. In his drunken stupor he saw Rick and Monica together and he thought hevwas shooting at them.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy