Jump to content

B&B: Susan Flannery


Recommended Posts

  • Members

It's common knowledge that SF is the heart and soul of B&B. She's etched her place in the medium.

For viewers who've watched her since the beginning...what did Flannery bring to the Daytime table? What was her contribution?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Outside of probably Bert Bauer on GL, Stephanie is perhaps the only soap opera matriarch that's been the driving force behind major storylines, as well as being the most popular character on B&B. It's almost unheard of for soap opera matriarchs to carry on such a big presence, as Stephanie has on B&B. Soap matriarchs on all the other soaps were traditionally women who were supporting characters that were there to give advice and look after the family. That wasn't the case with Stephanie, although Bill Bell admitted when he created B&B he didn't think Stephanie would be as an important of a role as she morphed into. Flannery has also said something to that effect.

And without Flannery, there is no Stephanie, so it all comes back to that in some way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

SF is one of the few roles that can never be re-cast. Flannery made such a mark on the role and elevated it to Shakespearian levels of complexity. She wasn't a star till she took on the role. If any other actress on daytime had changed their physical appearance the way she did, they would have been fired for sure. Her metamorphasis from the usual matriarch to a true battleaxe and sometime villain was truly art in motion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To say that Susan Flannery wasn't a star until B&B somewhat negates her role as Laura on DOOL.

She was most definitely a daytime star due to that role and the Bill/Laura/Mickey story,that under Bill Bell's pen helped Days rise to the top of the ratings.

She left Days and scored a role in the massively successful Towering Inferno,which earned her a Golden Globe.

She had a featured role on Dallas in it's heyday as the #1 show on the air and roles in other TV movies.

I agree her role on B&B has only cemented her reputation and stature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Queen, I think Nelson Branco said it best (yes, I know he's not highly rated at SON but bear with me) when he called Flannery the Marlon Brando of Daytime. SF turned Stephanie into a complex, multi-faceted character that transcends the usual gender stereotypes (Erica Kane, for example, is definitely female, feminine -- almost drag-queenly so! Stephanie Forrester could have been played by a man or woman. She is the equivalent of Victor Newman for B&B).

On YouTube they have some episodes featuring Susan Flannery in the early days of B&B. Her scenes with the very talented Joanna Johnson (Caroline) are especially amazing, in my view. Stephanie appears to be confiding, maternal, loving, scheming, enigmatic, controlling and half in-love with Caroline. All in the space of a few minutes! She doesn't transmit any of this with dialogue. Rather, the emotions flitter across her face and deepen the interaction between the two women above standard soap fare.

Maybe I am reading too much into those scenes but I have not been able to tear my eyes away from Flannery since B&B first began. Stephanie was written as the scheming, jealous wife. in Susan Flannery's hands, the character had so many unspoken psychological dimensions, she became human. And compelling to watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes I think Susan Flannery took a very Alexis Colby type role and imbued it with a lot more complexity. There's a wonderful scene on YouTube from around 1988 when she decides to hire a PI to find Stephen Logan. On go the disguise of sunglasses and a fur coat but instead of just being a straightforward trashy plot point of a scene, we see how uncomfortable Stephanie is doing something so ridiculous.

The Caroline relationship was fascinating. Much better than the overplayed "friendship" she had with Taylor. They were two women who often fundamentally disagreed but had a tremendous respect for each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Bill Bell may have created Stephanie Forrester but it is Susan Flannery who MADE Stephanie come to life. Susan Flannery took a character who was your typical rich bitch (a blond Joan Collins if you will although that isn't fair to Collins who is more a comedienne than anything else in her bitch roles)...and made her into the most complex character in daytime.

Susan Lucci once said that she considered the role of Erica Kane to be the greatest role ever written for a woman in daytime. I feel Susan Flannery proves that Stephanie Forrester is the greatest role ever ACTED by a woman in daytime. She's a tour de force. Stephanie is her creation. An Icon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Excellent actress, but over the last couple of years I've been tried of her act. I don't really think she's as extraordinary as people try to make her out to be though.

ETA: I'm not going to discredit Flannery's role as Stephanie Forrester, because she did do a remarkable job, though I find some of the praise to be quite excessive. I wonder what Susan Seaforth Hayes would have done with the role?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, I still stand by my opinion of Susan Flannery's talents. :) Although she has been noticeably more muted in her performances in recent years. No thanks to the poor writing.

Susan Seaforth Hayes would have made a very different Stephanie. Ridge and Felicia would have looked more like her children, for a start. I think she would have been more seductive, perhaps, and sexy, using flirtatiousness and a smile as the mask behind which she would plot and scheme. SF's Stephanie was always much more direct in her scheming. When she hated someone, she owned it. She would come right out and tell them, destabilizing them completely.

Seaforth Hayes would have perhaps been more overtly "Joan Collins" -- picking up what DaytimeFan put in his/her post -- in the sense that she might have made Stephanie more of an Alexis figure. As well as playing up the comedy. SSH is good with the comedy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IMO, that is what made Steph unique though. That most of the time she wasn't a seductive schemer. She was like a bull in a china store. And she was capable of loving the ones she elected (Ridge, Amber, Bridget) almost as fiercely as she hated the ones she hated (Brooke, Sheila). She could come across like a true force of nature.

Pity that apart from her dedicating to Eric and Ridge, Stephanie was much worse in being as consistent in her love as she was in her hate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sorry if I misdirected my post to imply that other's should change their opinion on Flannery, that wasn't my intention. She is a great actress indeed.

Good analysis on Hayes. She probably would have been all those things. I loved her on Y&R during her brief stints, and you're right, she can do comedy really well. I'd love to see her stack against KKL Brooke lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The Day Of The Jackal author Frederick Forsyth dies
    • 6-5   Case in point...lol.   Kat and Jacob can soooo have a spinoff. Just watching her being adamant that Eva is up to no-good while Jacob continues to try to play straight man to the craziness continued to be a hoot to watch. And the sad part is that Kat is on the right trail, just following the wrong clues. Or worse coming to the wrong conclusion. All because of her dislike for Eva.    Meanwhile, Eva continued to make inroads. I know I have said this since the start of the show, but I love how for the most part, the writers write the characters in gray. Not completely white. Not completely black. Most of the characters have moments where they resonate with the audience and then have moments where they are unlikeable. Like technically, Eva should be a pariah. I like that she knows this, understands this, and still shows remorse and still tries to work to get back the lost trust. It makes her so rootable. And played by a star is a bonus.

      Please register in order to view this content

       It is also what makes the rivalry between Eva and Kat so much fun to watch. Also played by a star. Neither one is perfect really, but they are oh so watchable and a nice by-product of the SilkPress storyline.    Same for Anita. I love the regal coldness TT has given to the role. The sense of ruthlessness beneath the beautiful face. And yeah it can be a turn-off. And it's been nice to see a softer side to her throughout this story of her and her bandmates. She is far from perfect. She...is also NOT a doormat so it was great to watch her versus her bandmates this episode.    I like the run-in between NuTed and Nicole. I'm getting used to NuTed. And Nicole's presence has been a little too light for my liking. I can only assume that is to build to the next Nicole vs Silk Press Sheila confrontation which rumor has it will be another good one.    Speaking of which...LAURA IS OUT OF THE HOSPITAL!!!! Praise it be!!! And I thought it was so adorable that Nicole, Kat, and Mona were on hand to welcome her back. I liked that Laura has an open mind toward Eva (unlike her feelings toward SilkPress). Another layer to add to the Eva vs Kat rivalry. 
    • Victoria Principal clearly stacked her Dallas coins real good. In the grand scheme of things, she was smart to walk away from Dallas when she did.
    • When Robert Calhoun became EP I thought GL was finally hitting its stride after some pretty rough years. Unfortunately the ratings during Robert Calhoun's run did not reflect the quality of the show.
    • There was a five week break between the last Friday episode and the Thursday episodes which were the final four episodes. I have a feeling the final four episodes were refilmed to wrap up the storylines. 
    • Yes, I forgot there was a gap between his exit from GL and his start at ATWT. This almost makes me want to cry. He really turned ATWT around (and good for them). It would have been great if someone had done the same for GL. Can't imagine who. The Dobsons were doing Santa Barbara at this point. I mainly blame Kobe. She may not have been the worst EP they ever had, but she almost totally destroyed the Bauers and decimated much of the rest of the cast, sometimes for egotistical reasons. That was a huge mistake and made it that much harder for the show to recover.
    • Douglas Marland began at As the World Turns in September 1985 but it took about a year for his run to show growth in the ratings. 1986 As the World Turns becomes CBS's #2 daytime drama after Y&R.
    • This is not at all surprising. Watching the recently uploaded episodes, the uneveness is SO apparent. Characters are changing at the drop of a hat. The stories are close to incoherent. It's a mess, and we're only up to May. What a fall from grace. An Emmy-winning show with good ratings and within a few short years hitting possible cancelation territory.  I'm surprised CBS and/or P&G didn't try to do SOMETHING to restore its former glory. Was Marland still at ATWT at this point? 
    • I think she did, yes. The only part of that return I remember appreciating was the ripoff they did of Earrings of Madame De, where a secretly broke India sold a trinket and Ross or Alan (I think it was Ross) then bought it for her, not knowing it was hers.
    • 6-4   Getting around to the rewatching and I guess Dani/Bill/Hayley as A story is coming around better to me. I hope that means that I will feel different about Friday's episode which first time around I felt was more of a Wednesday/Thursday episode. Anita's story and Dani/Bill/Hayley (with Kat vs SilkPress being a solid B plot to keep the SilkPress storyline alive, but NOT A story) have been the focus for this past week. So I'm worried I'll feel a way when I get back to Friday's episode. I guess I'm about to find out.   I know I have issues with Dani/Bill/Hayley coming back into focus since the much better paced SilkPress storyline is truly where it's at with so much aftermath/new direction to explore. However, I'm finding that...just like with the story of Martin's secret being slowly woven back into the story narrative...I care a little bit more for it since it's been background since Week 3, Month 1. IMHO the characters...outside of Hayley...have been developed in other plots. The past week and a half has had Dani and Andre growing closer and they have gotten to the 'third month what are we?' talk that I expect in all relationships in real life. And I liked how the writers have slowly had friction between them to see what they are made of? Is it still just a booty call or can it be more? Meanwhile, Bill has been hiding his physical issues for months. Too busy messing with other people's marriages.

      Please register in order to view this content

          So now that they have some more POV to them, it was good to see an organic...and yes, it was organic...reason for them to be in the same room. In this case...the hospital room. Lord, Karla and Timon have such great chemistry. And Dani and Bill were so acting like exes. No wonder Hayley feels threatened. Oh, well. lol. Bonus...the drama with Bill has Hayley and Naomi back in each other's orbit. They don't have enough scenes together.    You all know I was waiting for Anita's story. So how am I feeling? Pretty good. TT has been playing it to the hilt. And I was not expecting the story of a fourth member who killed themselves after being pushed out. And it's had a build. First through Tracy. And now with Sharon...who is swiftly being established as a piece of work. A Have-Not (if not Has-Been) who is not above scheming. Okay. lol. I liked the conversation between Anita and Vernon where she told him the truth, and he tried to hold her up. Whether she deserved it or not, it was good to see. I'm sure all of the secrets are not out yet so I look forward to more. Cuz we know they are not cancelling the reunion. Which fingers crossed...will be at the police fundraiser.     Honestly, I continued to be impressed with how the writers have kept Silk Press Sheila out of jail, but still playing the beats of it all. She's definitely in covering her tracks mode, and it's great to watch. It's also great to see her mixing it up with different characters. I was happy to get the long-awaited showdown between her and Nosy Nurse and Nosy Nurse READ...HER...DOWN. I was just disappointed Nosy Nurse spilled some tea. And that led to SilkPress's scene with Andre. And then Andre...lord...talked too much.   C plot this episode has been Chelesa's love life. I was wondering where it was going to go after her talk with Vernon. Enter...Mystery Woman. I wonder what her secret would be that would get in her way with Chels. Related to an enemy of the Duprees? Married? I am intrigued. And I do like Chelesa getting the spotlight because daytime does not really do it like how they are doing it with her.    Can Kat and Jacob get a spinoff? lol. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy