Jump to content

B&B: Sadism in the Afternoon


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Remember the Dark Knight in Monty Python on the Holy Grail? The character who had his legs and arms cut off and still whistled a happy tune? That's to whom veteran critic Marlena De Lacroix compares Bridget Forrester on B&B, after dozens of painful characters abuses such as losing her man to mother Brooke and having secret love rival Katie perform her new marriage to Nick. Is she the most tortured soap heroine ever? And can we the audience stand her humiliation? Ouch!

http://www.marlenadelcroix.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I personally think Ashley Jones is better, sweeter and more relatable an actress than snooty Jennifer Finnigan. There, I've said it.

As for Bridget, I would love it if B&B took the time out to showcase a Bridget meltdown -- complete with psychotic episodes which she manages to hide from her loved ones (at first). I'd like it to culminate in Bridget threatening to cut off Ridge's balls, slicing Brooke in the shoulder and then going after Nick and Katie -- all with a rather large machete.

Then we would have psychiatric reatment and a slow rebuild of a stronger yet more fragile Bridget. Back to the heroine who has been through a lot but come out stronger as she steels herslf not to make the same bad choices she keeps making. Unfortunately, Bradley Bell cannot seem to envisage the Bridget character without that blowhard Nick to save her poor widdle self. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The problem is that no one really cares about Ashley Jones' Bridget, that's why she been so abused and very little uproar has resulted from it. When Jennifer Finnigan's Bridget was reeling from Brooke affair with Deacon we felt her pain, we rooted for her, we wanted Brooke to hurt. Because JF was an amazing actress, the same can't be said for this also-ran.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree. Ashley Jones isn't the worst out there but she can't hold a candle to Jennifer Finnigan, who put in sterling performances all through her time on B&B. Finnigan brought some kind of charisma to the role I don't find with Jones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IMO, Bridget is where she is largely because of JF. I think Bell never cared about Bridget and instead tried very hard to make first Deacon and Amber and then even Deacon and Brooke are serious supercouple, but JF held her own and therefore people didn't just forget about her and didn't accept all these characters just walking over Bridget unscathed. JF made Bridget into a fixture, somebody who had to be respected at least a little bit rather than ending up like Kimberly (remember her? The "good girl" in the previous Amber triangle?).

I think AJ is doing a decent job carrying on the character. Her Bridget seems softer, both in the good and the bad way. On the bad side, well, she is even more of a doormat than JF's Bridget was, but on the good side she fits better into romantic storylines.

JF sometimes had a similar quality to Heather Tom that a lot of her romantic pairings didn't feel that believable. Her and Deacon worked because SK was a strong actor and she played it as Bridget's first, naive love. But most of the other pairings they tried to put her in, it just didn't feel believable that JF's Bridget would ever bother with a guy like that (remember Ozzie?), that she would be trusting enough to let herself go again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Jennifer Finnigan is the ONLY Bridget to me. There was a certain raw and emotional element to her portrayal that made me not want to take my eyes off of her. I've never cared for Ashley Jones, I didn't like her on Y&R, and I don't like her on B&B. In find her dull and boring. I also don't think she has chemistry with anyone on B&B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's a very interesting perspective because that's not the vibe I got at all! :lol: I never got the impression that Bell never cared about Bridget and JF -- quite the opposite, actually! She was like Amber during her first few years on the show. And pimped in promos and by the show as the new female lead. Heck, they even paired her with her daddy/brother Ridge -- and before Jack Wagner showed up, Ronn Moss was B&B's one-and-only Leading Male.

In my personal opinion, I found JF to be a scenery chewer on B&B. And gave off a rather snotty vibe. Ashley Jones is less Little Miss Perfect and therefore a lot more relatable, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know! It's like second verse, here we go again!  Agreed. Certainly there was concern maybe even fear at the highest levels for the very good reason that what they had was so economically successful, so of course this risk was scary but if anyone was brave she was. Yes, he was. I have seen her associated with getting it on the air one other place but no details nor official title. Not the writer or creator so it made me wonder if she functioned as a kind of uncredited ad hoc producer, but then maybe she just supported it. At any rate that is nothing but supposition on my part. No data! Yes, not a surprise anymore but still so frustrating! On one hand I am appreciative that she is included in this book, but scholarship where are you?!
    • that wasnt her point. She wanted to further demonize Ted; that was the main focus of their talk. She wants to ensure that Nicole leaves him so that he's free and single to be with her. At this point, I dont think she really cares what Nicole thinks of her; she just wants her out of the way Eva is Nicole's stepdaughter and is a Dupree by association. If Nicole takes Ted back then its reasonable that she would accept his daughter and i that happens, Eva will have welcomed to their country club, be invited to their parties, have access to their resources, etc....much like Andre whom also isnt a blood Dupree but is accepted by them via Nicole. Eva got what she got from Anita bc of Hayley. I think its important to remember that context bc they just dealt with an interloper that infiltrated their ranks and hurt her daughter in the worse way. Now you have another unfortunate girl positioned to do the same to her other daughter. The feelings are still too fresh and she doesnt want Eva to get the idea that she would ever be allowed the opportunity to play them again
    • Oh I've seem this! That's part of why I'm curious! The show could put EastEnders to shame on the gangster Aspect! Oh I've seem this! That's part of why I'm curious! The show could put EastEnders to shame on the gangster Aspect!
    • Eve was one of those characters that had the "Jessie Brewer"role. They had heavy storyline, they burned through it and now they are there for support and a touchstone in the community (Marland wanted to give Jessie story, but I agree with Monty...she best served in her connecting role, and keeping that damn Amy Vining busy so she keeps her nose out of things) So charcters are important and why they should have kept characters like Bridget around (even as she is more volatiles then Eve) who didnt need a big storyline but could have been behind the bar making connections and expostion, but Rauch wanted JEVA/JEVA/JEVA and DRAMA (which to him meant a lot of yelling and stupidity.)
    • Why do I feel like (or remember possible

      Please register in order to view this content

      ) Mark Dante operated on Jeff? Also, I was under the impression that Jeff shot himself accidentally. In his drunken stupor he saw Rick and Monica together and he thought hevwas shooting at them.
    • A number of errors in the above article. You wonder how with all that research,how  they slipped through. I think they are conflating Women Alone with Lonely Women. I have never read anything of a serial called Women Alone. However,I am prepared to be proven wrong.   It seems Irna actually WAS interested in TV soaps as witnessed by These Are My Children airing in 1949 on NBC in the early days of TV.   I don't believe that was reluctance, rather simply good business sense as radio's dominance began to wane.   Inferring that was somehow connected to Irna who was off that show 10 years prior.   Again inferring that Phillips leaving 6 years prior had some connection to the eventual cancellation.     Again these two events are in fact one. Irna left ATWT only once in 1970 and returned in 72. She was not working on another P&G show at the time. So either she brought the ratings up or they dipped, depending on which above account you believe   Untrue. A World Apart debuted 5 years after she left AW. And AWA aired longer than a few months. Over a year in fact.   I believe Orin Tovrov was the writer. Irna was not involved in the creation of this show. And no mention of Masquerade an Irna serial  which was on air around this time.   TBD finished in 1962. As we see over and over, these inaccuracies are published and accepted as fact.
    • YES! While I objectively found the writing on RH (particularly during its first few years and then again in its final days) to be excellent, so many of the principle characters were unpleasant, and totally turned me off. I could never settle down and become emotionally involved with a group of people who grated on my nerves.
    • Ugh now we get a Emmerdale and Corrie crossover soon. ugh.. How desperate 
    • This show is definitely not one to deserve the axe.  especially the New Year’s Eve episode was crazy wild! there is a place where u can download nearly all episodes from October 2019 til today. But they don’t accept new people. https://youtu.be/aD-IXEJjymU?si=19wtpwthSNYOe-4y   this is from this years winter break when the returned. I loved it
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy