Jump to content

What type of soap characters are you most attracted to?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Any character, as long as they're written for properly.

I've loved villain/vilainesses, heroes/heroines, gray characters, and just about every other type of character out there. I think it all goes back to the writing and even the acting.

If any type of character is forced down our throats, written out of character, and is just way too inconsistent, it will be hard to the audience to accept.

The talent of an actor or actresses can even make or break a character, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've always been more attracted to the female characters rather than the males. Personally, as bad as the writing for their characters can be, I always find them the most fascinating to watch. Male characters rarely intrigue me, and are so bland. The last time I fully enjoyed a male character was in 2006 Y&R's Jack Abbott, but the show as a whole was dreadful. I don't have specific preferences for characters, sometimes I like well played over-the-top divas or subdued (yet intriguing). Overall, I love a character that is complex, has nuances, and always keeps you guessing. That's why Roger Thorpe on "Guiding Light" was such a great character, played by an equally terrific actor. The relationship between Roger and Holly Norris was far more layered, and intriguing than that of Luke and Laura IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Character types that will most likely get me to watch:

Larger than life villains like Stefano Dimera, James Stenbeck, Helena Cassadine

Sexy villainess like Clare Devine (Hollyoaks)

Schemers like 90's Sami Brady, Vivian Alamain, Kristen Blake, Matt Clarke

Psychos like Sheila Carter, Annie Dutton

Evil Twins like Derrick Evans

Hmmm....I see a trend. LOL

DP, Annalynne McCord was born to play a sexy bad girl. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was just thinking that. I'd take any character that was well written. The kind that when you watch, you can tell that the writer has taken the time to get inside the character's head and planned it out instead of relying on general archetypes.

I hate to reuse someone's example, but take Roger Thorpe. He was a wonderful character because he often defined labelling. Sure he was a villian, but he genuinely cared for Holly, despite their complicated and violent history and was truly remorseful about what had gone down between them. We also felt his pain when he dealt with a father who always made him feel inadequate. We felt his love for Blake and Hart and we knew that he would do anything for his children.

A character should be like an onion. The further you get to the heart of a character, the more layers you encounter. Because very few of us are complete saints or sinners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm pretty consistent in my taste.

For men, I always favor smart guys over hunks. My favorite male characters of all time are Lucky Spencer (original version), Adam Chandler, Ric Lansing, and Stefan Cassadine. They differ in many ways, but all were or are very smart, and have a dark side. That isn't to say that they are all bad guys- I think Lucky 1.0 is one of the most moral characters ever written- but they are all very capable of brooding, and seem to struggle with themselves more than most other characters.

For women, I love high-energy characters, or smart women. The latter is pretty rare on daytime, but I would put two of my favorites, Alexis Davis and Liza Colby, into this category. While both have made some atrociously stupid mistakes, I felt that both actresses really brought an intelligence to their portrayal of the characters that matters more to me than that the character make good choices.

High-energy characters basically refers to Lucy Coe and Maxie Jones. Maxie has always struck me as Lucy's successor, and I love them both dearly.

I would also say that acting is much more important to me than writing. Ric Lansing has been one of the worst written characters in daytime history from his arrival. And Liza, Alexis, Adam, and Stefan have all been written pretty horribly at one time or another. But all of the actors did their jobs with such conviction that I was willing to forgive the characters anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Yes, I forgot there was a gap between his exit from GL and his start at ATWT. This almost makes me want to cry. He really turned ATWT around (and good for them). It would have been great if someone had done the same for GL. Can't imagine who. The Dobsons were doing Santa Barbara at this point. I mainly blame Kobe. She may not have been the worst EP they ever had, but she almost totally destroyed the Bauers and decimated much of the rest of the cast, sometimes for egotistical reasons. That was a huge mistake and made it that much harder for the show to recover.
    • Douglas Marland began at As the World Turns in September 1985 but it took about a year for his run to show growth in the ratings. 1986 As the World Turns becomes CBS's #2 daytime drama after Y&R.
    • This is not at all surprising. Watching the recently uploaded episodes, the uneveness is SO apparent. Characters are changing at the drop of a hat. The stories are close to incoherent. It's a mess, and we're only up to May. What a fall from grace. An Emmy-winning show with good ratings and within a few short years hitting possible cancelation territory.  I'm surprised CBS and/or P&G didn't try to do SOMETHING to restore its former glory. Was Marland still at ATWT at this point? 
    • I think she did, yes. The only part of that return I remember appreciating was the ripoff they did of Earrings of Madame De, where a secretly broke India sold a trinket and Ross or Alan (I think it was Ross) then bought it for her, not knowing it was hers.
    • 6-4   Getting around to the rewatching and I guess Dani/Bill/Hayley as A story is coming around better to me. I hope that means that I will feel different about Friday's episode which first time around I felt was more of a Wednesday/Thursday episode. Anita's story and Dani/Bill/Hayley (with Kat vs SilkPress being a solid B plot to keep the SilkPress storyline alive, but NOT A story) have been the focus for this past week. So I'm worried I'll feel a way when I get back to Friday's episode. I guess I'm about to find out.   I know I have issues with Dani/Bill/Hayley coming back into focus since the much better paced SilkPress storyline is truly where it's at with so much aftermath/new direction to explore. However, I'm finding that...just like with the story of Martin's secret being slowly woven back into the story narrative...I care a little bit more for it since it's been background since Week 3, Month 1. IMHO the characters...outside of Hayley...have been developed in other plots. The past week and a half has had Dani and Andre growing closer and they have gotten to the 'third month what are we?' talk that I expect in all relationships in real life. And I liked how the writers have slowly had friction between them to see what they are made of? Is it still just a booty call or can it be more? Meanwhile, Bill has been hiding his physical issues for months. Too busy messing with other people's marriages.

      Please register in order to view this content

          So now that they have some more POV to them, it was good to see an organic...and yes, it was organic...reason for them to be in the same room. In this case...the hospital room. Lord, Karla and Timon have such great chemistry. And Dani and Bill were so acting like exes. No wonder Hayley feels threatened. Oh, well. lol. Bonus...the drama with Bill has Hayley and Naomi back in each other's orbit. They don't have enough scenes together.    You all know I was waiting for Anita's story. So how am I feeling? Pretty good. TT has been playing it to the hilt. And I was not expecting the story of a fourth member who killed themselves after being pushed out. And it's had a build. First through Tracy. And now with Sharon...who is swiftly being established as a piece of work. A Have-Not (if not Has-Been) who is not above scheming. Okay. lol. I liked the conversation between Anita and Vernon where she told him the truth, and he tried to hold her up. Whether she deserved it or not, it was good to see. I'm sure all of the secrets are not out yet so I look forward to more. Cuz we know they are not cancelling the reunion. Which fingers crossed...will be at the police fundraiser.     Honestly, I continued to be impressed with how the writers have kept Silk Press Sheila out of jail, but still playing the beats of it all. She's definitely in covering her tracks mode, and it's great to watch. It's also great to see her mixing it up with different characters. I was happy to get the long-awaited showdown between her and Nosy Nurse and Nosy Nurse READ...HER...DOWN. I was just disappointed Nosy Nurse spilled some tea. And that led to SilkPress's scene with Andre. And then Andre...lord...talked too much.   C plot this episode has been Chelesa's love life. I was wondering where it was going to go after her talk with Vernon. Enter...Mystery Woman. I wonder what her secret would be that would get in her way with Chels. Related to an enemy of the Duprees? Married? I am intrigued. And I do like Chelesa getting the spotlight because daytime does not really do it like how they are doing it with her.    Can Kat and Jacob get a spinoff? lol. 
    • 1986 began with the EP change from Gail Kobe to Joe Willmore and the HW change from Pamela Long to Jeff Ryder. Over the course of 1986 there was turnover in the HW ranks: Jeff Ryder, Jeff Ryder and Mary Ryan Munisteri as co-HWs, Mary Ryan Munisteri and Ellen Barrett as co-HWs, Joseph Manetta, Joseph Manetta and Sheri Anderson as co-HWs. The 1986 ratings reflected the quality of the show. GL was saved from cancel territory in 1986 because Capitol was still CBS's lowest-rated daytime drama.
    • As Michael should be...DARK.   I'm just getting through my first few scenes of Rory as Michael. And I'm already picking up chemistry with LW, EMcCoy, and SMattson from the jump. I liked Rory as Noah on Y&R, but felt it was wasted potential. So far...he's proving me right. 
    • Oh, lord. Those rumors are true, aren't they?
    • Is it supposed to be romantic that Victor and Kyle are using Claire as some sort of contractual agreement? Ridiculous. I was waiting for Claire to squirt water out of the huge flower on her dress. And within minutes of the Monday episode beginning the first mention of ...guess who???  
    • I haven't been able to watch GH lately, but I just saw this clip.  Wow.  Rory Gibson is so different from his time at Y&R.  This really speaks to the bad writing at Y&R I guess! A lot of fire here.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy