Jump to content

The Doctors


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Rick, I watched The Doctors from the late 60s through the end, and I agree with many of your comments.

I believe that Carl is right regarding Matt and Maggie. I read an interview with Lydia Bruce years ago. She stated that she received hate mail when she assumed the role of Maggie from Bethel Leslie, who was beloved by the audience. Lydia commented that she was not really accepted until she had to fight for Maggie's marriage to Matt, so it is likely that the current story developments were a deliberate attempt to manipulate audience sympathy toward Lydia.

My justification for Matt's behavior is that he is a typical male who cannot admit he is wrong. Matt brought Karen into the Powers home. Any jeopardy in their marriage has been Matt's responsibility, but he has spent so much time defending Karen, he feels guilty. That guilt has manifested itself in his dreams and thoughts. I do not think Matt is truly attracted to Karen, and he certainly does not love her. He has reiterated this ad naseum to both women. But, now that he has realized Karen's manipulative behavior and unhealthy attraction to him, he has allowed the situation to go too far. Instead of admitting defeat to Maggie, he avoids her and refuses to engage in a dialogue which will ultimately indict him for his behavior. My husband, coincidentally another Matt, is exactly the same way. When I am right and he is wrong, he becomes even more stubborn and will fight to the end before conceding defeat.

Unfortunately, in the 70s, this stubborn side of Matt Powers becomes more of the rule rather than exception. If you find his behavior uncharacteristic now, just wait until he

Maggie begins to act uncharacteristically, as well. This was partly to blame for audience defections in the mid to late 70s, as it became more difficult for fans to justify and accept changes in personality for the sake of story.

We should all consider ourselves suprememly blessed for the opportunity to see these episodes again, when scripts weren't written by committee and directors did more than merely block scenes. I am ever thankful to SFM, Retro, and Jeff for bringing The Doctors to me. I hope it lasts a good long while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am certain she is Jo Henderson. I recognized her, too, the instant I saw her. The cheekbones and the eyes. Even with the red hair, she is unmistakeable. This is fifteen years before she would star daily on NBC's Search for Tomorrow, and exactly 20 years before her very tragic death at the age of 54.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am very thankful to all those you mentioned above who have brought TD back for a whole new generation of viewers to enjoy. I certainly do; I was born over a decade after the episodes we are watching now were filmed.

There is at least one cast member of TD from this era still with us and watching along with us - I found Carolee Campbell's Ninja Press website and emailed her, sending the link in my message. I just heard from her a couple of days ago and she said, "I am all caught up"!!

For those who aren't with us anymore, I hope their family members - spouses, kids, grandkids - are able to watch the episodes and enjoy them, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I noticed these, too, Paul. When Steve's disembodied, chroma-keyed head taunted Karen, I was reminded of Dark Shadows! Was your mis-spelling of Ohrbach's an intentional wink at the Dark Shadows credit scroll? wink.png Part of the fun for me is surveying the dresses, the falls women wear in their hair, and the false eyelashes. I remember it took my mother an eternity to put on her "face", as she called it, and all of the wigs and falls.

Lydia allows her hair to grow much longer. I do not recall her hair being the cut it is now, so for most of the early 70s, it's the longer, lighter style. She reverts back to much shorter and darker hair near the end of the series.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wonderful, Amy! Where have you been? I noticed that you stopped posting near Christmas. It is good to see you have returned.

I thought Jada Rowland was an excellent replacement as Carolee and played the role with such intelligence, but I also have a very special place in my heart for Carolee Campbell. I loved her down-to-earth portrayal and good-natured, humorous self-deprecation. As much as I enjoy seeing these episodes, most of which I do not remember or never saw, I do hope Retro runs The Doctors long enough for us to get into the real nitty-gritty of Steve and Carolee's romance, and the complications caused by the awful Dan Allison.

Happy New Year to you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm happy to be back! Things have been pretty crazy lately, but Happy New Year to you, too!!

Two latter-day TD actors will be appearing on SVU: John Pankow (Danny Martin, 1981-82) will be guesting in the next episode (1/14) and the week after (1/21), Armand Assante (Mike Powers, 1975-77) will be playing Det. Amaro's (Danny Pino) father.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can see why fans hated to see Bethel go, especially since it seems to have been fairly sudden (was Lydia just a temp recast, as some say, or was she a permanent one all along?), but it's saddening to read that Lydia got hate mail. I'm glad that turned around and the show was patient enough to let this ride out. I think Bethel was terrific at combining Maggie's seeming toughness with the tender heart she hid underneath (and I especially loved her relationship with Nick as his "school chum"), but I've also been impressed with what I've seen of Lydia early on (I watched some of her early episodes even though I'm still technically behind). She adds a lot of surface vulnerability to Maggie and doesn't rely as much on the sarcasm that would seem like an imitation. What impresses me most is that she still plays Maggie this way in the 1982 episodes, so even after nearly 15 years of unstable writing and an extended period where they all knew the show was on the way out, she didn't phone it in. That takes strength as a performer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In my watch with my mother, I wound up the board meeting episodes, when Matt gives his long speech about judgmental attitudes and how no one but God has the right to judge. And we met the main man on the board, who was, refreshingly, presented as a taskmaster and too rigid, but also allowed to be fair and willing to listen. Today he would be paid off by Bunker or we'd learn that he hates Matt because his great-grandfather is a supervillain.

What I liked the most about these episodes was that Nick and Althea tried to approach the board so differently, but they both ended the same way - humiliated, berating the board and Bunker. It's a great reminder of just how made for each other they are. And Althea's rage over a right to privacy and how sickened she is by people trying to tell her who to be and not caring about her ability because her "morals" aren't good enough for them - this is all so timely for modern women, and modern America, that it makes me want to cry.

Althea is such a special character. I'm so happy to get the chance to know her. And as someone who always loved Liz Hubbard on ATWT it's refreshing to see her very different performances for a very, very different character. It's a treat I never expected to have, outside of the episodes that saynotoursoap and others were kind enough to upload.

My mother watches GH and gets through it better than I do these days, but she's told me repeatedly how much she's grown to love The Doctors and how much better it is than anything on daytime now.

I just hope there are more people out there like this (and people who actually get Retro TV) and we'll at least get to the early '70s. I really want to see Virginia Vestoff and Nancy Barrett.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I mean this with the utmost sincereity, Carl, it is so sweet that you watch with your mother. If mine were alive, I would watch with her, too, and she might even enjoy it. Regardless of your relationship, you should all appreciate your mother. You have no idea the loss when they are gone.

I am curious. How do you watch? One episode a day, five days a week? I wish that I could, but I have no self control. I watch the full hour, every week night, 7 to 8pm without fail.

It is my understanding that Retro is contracted for one full year of airing -someone correct me if I am wrong. This would take us to the beginning of December 1969, at least. Virginia Vestoff starts in the autumn of 1969, I believe around October/November, so we should definitely see at least a few weeks of her, should Retro not sign up for another year. In order to see Nancy Barrett, Retro will have to agree to another year. Nancy begins in the summer of 1971.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If possible we watch anywhere between 1-3 episodes a day; it just depends. Sometimes there are long gaps before we watch any. She didn't think she'd care for the show at first, because of all the green and because she thought the characters were tough to follow at first, but once she got into it she really got into it. John Rice is one of her favorites so I don't know how she'll feel when he's gone. (I hope someone interviews Terry Kiser at some point...)

Thanks. I'm so looking forward to seeing Vestoff as Althea that I'm afraid I'll end up hating it, but I am trying to keep my expectations low. I really loved her work on Dark Shadows, so whatever happens, I'm just happy if I get to see more of her daytime work.

I do remember Nancy saying she hadn't intended to get back into daytime so soon after DS, but she did, so you're right, that's a while off. I hope they have it up to that point. If any of you know any ways to get more people to support Retro TV, let me know. I called my cable company and I wrote Retro TV - I'm not sure what else there would be to do.

One of the other parts I like about the show is seeing what references they make to current events. One new episode I caught a bit of had Matt and Maggie talking about Mike's commencement speaker discussing how modern youth reject their elders, and why they shouldn't. It reminded me that The Doctors, while having a few young characters (mainly Liz, if you don't count the children), was written firmly from an adult POV, whereas today's soaps often feel like a 50-60 year old trying to pretend they're writing for a 16 year old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can't imagine anyone else but Liz playing Althea, but I have to admit being curious about Virginia Vestoff's take on the character. From what I read, Liz had gone off to Hollywood at this point and guested on "The Virginian". The episode was written by none other than Bethel Leslie - and Bethel went to bat for Liz to get the part:

http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1755&dat=19701219&id=jTkgAAAAIBAJ&sjid=SGYEAAAAIBAJ&pg=2941,1702648

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That was nice of Bethel. I think Liz had the charisma and look to make it in primetime or film; perhaps she just played as too old. Either way, I'm glad daytime kept her.

One thing I'm interested in seeing as I get to the spring episodes is if the show changes tonally once John is gone and Bethel is on the way out, and people like Ed and Jody arrive (and Martha gets more airtime). It already feels like Nick has changed a great deal tonally (although maybe he was like this before the story with Liz and Althea started).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Posted in another thread on this board: LOVE OF LIFE   Head writers :                   Esther & Richard Shapiro (September 1970 - February 1972) Loring Mandel (Feburary 1972 - April 1973)  Claire Labine & Paul Avila Mayer (April 1973 – April 1975) Margaret DePriest (April 1975 – December 1975) Paul & Margaret Schneider (December 1975 – September 1976) Gabrielle Upton (September 1976 – November 1978)
    • Please register in order to view this content

      Marnie Schulenburg's widower. She was such a strong person. (I did not realize he played the Tucker Carlson knockoff on Succession)
    • She has the Bo Buchanan curse.  Agreed, Carly's reaction would be quite interesting. 
    • I agree. Even the discussion about cuts at the end of scenes. I'm binging THE DEFENDERS right now, and it has those cuts. Is it odd? Oh God yes. Heck, I will say it's worse than what has been discussed here because it does not bother me here and this was back in 2017/2018.   That said...I am starting to look forward to BTG finding their proper rhythm.     
    • Louise, what memories & Brooks with her! Other favorite domestics: Lucinda's butler Matthew, Ginger on GL, Vivian of course on AW. A notable butler & a notable cook at the Qs. DAYS Ivan taking care of Vivian Allamain all of those years. Oh, on AW Carl had a driver who sometimes had other duties: Ito? I recall him being Asian. I always felt sorry for Louise & Brooks when Mac & Rachel would fall out. How difficult it must have been for them with all that tension & heaven forbid they be in the room for one of their fights, which were violent & mean-spirited & loud! 
    • I don't believe JFP wanted rid of Donna because she was isolated. She wasn't any more isolated than most characters on the show at that point. JFP just couldn't live out her fantasies with Anna Stuart the way she could with Linda Dano. She degraded the character instead, as happened to Donna under a number of regimes.  Donna, Rachel and Felicia were never characters who were all over the canvas. Felicia probably had the most reach of the three, as she ran restaurants for a decade, but they had their own spheres.  Rachel had a large role in Felicia's alcoholism storyline, as Felicia tanked her relationship with Cory Publishing and then her drinking caused her to start a fire at the TV studio, meaning Rachel had to fire her from her talk show. Rachel was at Felicia's failed intervention. Felicia and Donna had some back and forth during that strange period where Donna was dating Cass. 
    • This show has many, many old school influences in how it approaches recapping, elder characters or supporting players, certain character monologues, etc. Some of that is stuff that feels straight out of the Bell formula or B&B, and some of it feels even older to me. That's not entirely a compliment or a positive nor is it a whole negative. It's a very wonky mix at times of dialogue that tries very, very hard to be hip and current - with varying degrees of success or cringe - with old-fashioned soap storytelling exposition and character monologuing. It's actually fascinating to watch, good or bad.
    • Emphasis on the work...VANISH.

      Please register in order to view this content

          I've discussed this at length in the monthly threads on the main A stories as established by Week 1...which Martin's secret was one of them. Most soaps would have an A story one week with all the B/C plots just orbitting about. BTG did that well itself in the first two/three weeks. But like I mentioned before one of the A stories (Dani/Bill/Hayley) they can't keep going to that at the moment since it was already overkill by the end of Month 1. The other one...the Silk Press storyline...was really the only one that has been well-paced in my opinion with twists, turns, and builds...including subplots and near-misses. But that was not going to explode before May Sweeps. So that left Martin's secret...which as I said...started off well. I loved how it started with Martin having problems sleeping, but NO images. Then we got sounds. THEN we started to get images. And NOW those images are getting more established. But before we got all that, his storyline...which has been established to be a main one...vanished for a month and a half. While it worked for the storyline since Month 2 gave Martin (and Brandon Clayborn to grow) time to be more established...along with his family...the story of his secret could have also been a story that had a nice slow burn (which I love) to the show while having the other B/C plots orbitting it. Again, not mad at it since it allowed the audience to learn more about Martin and his family life. It also allowed for other B/C plots to grow on the audience. I also think the story development for that A story might have suffered from the writers still trying to find a rhythm that works for this show.   In any case, I also said that I felt they might go old school soap in May. And by old school I meant as an A story is climaxing, the writers take another story that will be the next one and start to build it up again, while also starting another plot as a C plot. And right now, we have the SilkPress storyline climaxing while Martin's nightmares (with images) have finally started to come back into play. I mentioned when I saw the promos of Martin vs Ted that hopefully the reveal would trigger Martin to the point that we FINALLY get to see what he did. So far...how Martin's been acting since the reveal, being so triggered, I still feel that is how we will see how things happened...allowing the next A story to finally take off.    Fingers crossed.   
    • You know what? After all the men she's been with dying, it's only appropriate that she try her hand with women. Only then will she discover how much of a curse she is when it comes to relationships. Of course, I don't think the show would go there, but if they do, I wonder how Carly would react to her daughter being with Robin's.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy