Jump to content

Emmerdale: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

After I think... Only two episodes have aired, and I barely saw him yesterday, so I'm not sure abotu the rest yet (and Emmerdale is the major UK soap I knwo the least about--core characters, etc :P ). So I can answer better after a few LOL.

The other storyline is some blonde called Charity who likes to steal cars...

Edited by EricMontreal22
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think you would like Emmerdale once you got to know the VERY confusing backstories. Of all the UK soaps it's most like a Doug Marland or Agnes Nixon soap. It has the wacky characters and bizarre family relationships of Nixon in particular, although not as much heart.

I think Aaron's first time in a gay bar would be February 2010? March?

Edited by CarlD2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This might be his second time in a gay bar LOL he wasn't too comfortable anyway. He met Jackson there who got a bit mad at him... And yeah, when I used to watch Emmerdale when CBC aired it with Corrie ages back, I did take to it more than the others actually--so what you say makes sense. (It does have may fave of the UK soap themes...)

Amello--I quite like her--but she's still some blonde to me right now ;)

Edited by EricMontreal22
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

HAHA Damn. It must be March if Jackson was there--as that's when he was introduced according to Wiki.

I wonder how this and EastEnders will do on Vision. I know a LOT of fans were very upset that BBCanada stopped showing EE--and Vision Network needs far far far lower ratings to keep on. It does seem a mistake to program Emmerdale at the same time as the CBC airs Corrie--but that's just West Coast (Vision Network is based in the East and doesn't time change their programming, so their soap block airs 9pm there, 6pm West)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have to say after three episodes, I already find myself getting into Emmerdale--much more than EastEnders (though it's nice to see the older characters I know), and I haven't missed catching up on Coronation Street the past little while at all (I haven't really been too into it Corrie in a long time, I admit...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm glad you're enjoying Emmerdale. I think you would enjoy the show's past as well. It's a shame a lot of clips have been taken down recently. If you want a few scenes from their earlier years just PM me.

I haven't watched the show much in the last month or two, as I am not overly involved in the stories (I kind of miss the heart the show had a few years ago), but I still enjoy it and will get back in soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm sorry but I seriously question what these carefully worked-out plans are. Ryan has barely had any storyline in his year and a half on the show. I also don't know if he is "massively" popular. Popular? Sure. James is a handsome and charismatic actor who does a good job when he gets the material. MASSIVE? I doubt it. He has barely had a chance to do anything on the show other than let us see what a nice butt he has in coveralls.

As for going back to Hollyoaks -- I doubt it. Marquess is dumping anyone and everyone he did not create and he would probably also see John Paul as a part of the past, or a threat to his creation, Bart McQueen, the wizened looking block of wood passed off as a hunk. I also don't know if Sutton would want to go back, especially since Hollyoaks might not be on much longer.

I wonder if they may already be writing her out, she seems to have nothing in the village, even the relationship with Jai is over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • You know what is a great way to stop these unclear "rumors"?  Just stop posting them and then back tracking with words like "apparently".   Anyhow, I didn't find the Tracy/Lois scenes as good as I hoped.    
    • Jason, in thinking this over, I realize that we look at this space, differently. To me it is a potentially collaborative space. Now that I've realized this, what I should have said, "I'm having a problem because what I'm seeing is not matching up with your descriptions. Maybe these files I just got are misdated. Maybe it's something else. I will keep you posted. Meanwhile this episode, its edit, is ready, even though I might have to issue a corrected date later. But, people can enjoy the performances now. 
    • Thank you for the constructive suggestion. 
    • But how is it "apparent" that she signed a new 3-year contract? Your wording had a voice of authority -- as if you knew it was true. A better way to post about it? Say you read online that she signed a new contract, but have no idea if that's true.
    • This interview actually reminds me a bit of Kim Zimmer’s press during the infamous clone storyline on Guiding Light, or Deidre Hall during the possession story on Days. All three were seasoned daytime veterans who made it clear they valued airtime for their characters, not just being part of a romantic pairing. It seems that idea was part of the pitch behind these bigger-than-life plots. They all took big swings in their performances. When I read Kim Zimmer’s memoir, I thought she captured it best — she wanted to be respected for being willing to take those risks. To paraphrase her, she knew it was ridiculous for Reva to think she was pregnant after menopause, but she still threw herself into those scenes and made them real. That’s what really struck me about Victoria Wyndham’s interview too. She responded like a real person. It felt like she was telling Michael Logan that she knew Justine — and a geriatric pregnancy with twins — was totally preposterous, but that she still deserved credit for trying to keep the show alive and entertain the audience. And honestly, I think that's more than fair. Logan is looking for a reductive answer for who is to blame.  And, she's telling him to accept that they were all well-meaning.  Which is not a defense of bad storytelling.  But, I understand that she's frustrated because she interpreted Logan's critique as a lack of commitment, and she wants him to know that she was committed! (maybe not for the best, but committed).
    • Fine, you only had to say so. It's not a problem to me NOT to post this. I have no idea what this means. 
    • Oh, really? I think we're really getting close.  What does "apparently" mean to you? To me, it means that this is something I think has happened but not something I absolutely positively know to have happened. When I use a word like "apparently" as I have here, I am doing so by intent. Can you think of a better way to communicate that?
    • Wow...I was not expecting a montage.   I know SilkPress did not!!! Poor Eva.  Lol. Funnily enough I missed that.     
    • For the record, VW thought having the twins at their ages was absurd & who wanted that story, was some group of fans, who wanted her & Carl to have a chance at having children together. Not any fans that I knew of, but supposedly they existed. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy