Jump to content

EastEnders: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

The positives of the episode:

Once they got past the dull yelling in the rain and actually got to the hospital, Stacey's birthing scenes were extremely effective. Smart writing choice to shift the focus onto Stacey's shame and guilt and how it threatens her future. Lacey did a wonderful job in those scenes and when put in a minimal role, Ryan was fine. The use of Julia's Theme was more than appropriate and really added the right amount of poignancy. The constant reminders of Bradley were heartbreaking, not only because Stacey finally realized just how much she ruined Bradley's life, but because the comments which were meant well, like Dot saying the baby has Bradley's eyes or saying she wanted to put up a photo of Bradley, were just twisting the knife. Finally, for at least one episode, the enormity of Stacey's lies and Stacey's murder of Archie came back in a big way.

The scenes in the Vic were great. The sense of community without a lot of clowning around is something I've really missed on the show in recent years. Pat and Peggy were of great use, whether it was talking about childbirth, about Bradley, or the refreshingly layered moment between Pat and Janine.

The Golds. I think they have a lot of potential. I am becoming more and more interested in Vanessa, thanks to her chemistry with Max and the glimpses at her private life. Harry has a menace about him but he's not an over the top figure, they're taking their time. Jodie I still like, I think she has so far been played as someone who is bubbly and accepting but not "thick." Of course going on about how gorgeous Darren is might make her seem a bit silly but it's nice to see a sweet character who doesn't go around messing up words to show us how "cute" she is. She's sort of what they tried to do with Preeti. I still think they could have done more with Preeti.

The stuff I didn't care as much for:

Tanya and that overfamiliar SMIRK of hers as soon as she walked onscreen. Nothing ever changes with this character. Oh Max, I'm a good parent, you're not. Nothing says good parenting like trying to murder her husband, taking up with psycho Sean, the games she played with her daughters regarding Bradley's funeral, et al. Oh Max, I've found (yet another) love of my life, and he's so much better than you are. Wasn't this the same crap she said when she was with Jack? Tanya cannot live even a moment without a man. I cannot take any more of Max making puppy dog eyes at "Tan." When this character comes back for good I wish they would make drastic changes to her and to her relationship with Max.

Spending so many of Lauren's scenes remembering that she ran her father over. I actually wonder if this is one of the main reasons why she is being recast. What an awful writing choice that was.

I think this has to be the end of the line for Ryan and Janine. He has behaved like he has a split personality with how he acts towards her. He wants her to be good, yet he indulges her in her stupid schemes, time and time again. Now suddenly he says he was wrong and she's not good underneath so she has to go. Ryan just wants to have Janine around so he can feel morally superior to her. Ryan is one of those "I'm a good person because I say so" types of characters, and his sanctimoniousness oozes off the screen. If they want to rush towards a Stacey/Ryan relationship then they should have started this months ago, instead of having the silly bet stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Carl takes Tanya hate to a whole new level. :) It's as if she did something to him.

I detest her, but not this much. :lol:

Jane is another b!tch that needs to be written out. Ever since Grant Mitchell left she's been useless and a pain.

Ross Kemp ain't comin' back, right?

Edited by Sylph
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think Ryan and Stacey will be paired with Lacey leaving at the end of the year. If it does happen, it will be short-term.

I think the best thing is to keep them close and develop a friendship that doesn't cross the line. Stacey is going to need a friend when she finally sees what a psycho Becca really is. I wonder if this episode is foreshadowing Becca kidnapping or harming Stacey's baby.

With Kat/Alfie coming back, Becca will have to kicked out of that house to Jean's liking. :lol: Maybe that can trigger something.

I do wonder if she'll leave without telling him he's the father though. Or maybe she tells him shortly before she leaves?

Harry and Vanessa have an intriguing relationship judging by this episode. It appears that they're both equally nasty to one another in very different ways. Harry's abuse seems to be more psychological, while Vanessa seems to intentionally do things to piss him off and indulges in affairs too. They have a sort of Den/Angie-like dynamic to them in the sense that both seem to be destructive towards one another.

Edited by Y&RWorldTurner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The best thing with Den and Angie was the humor. I don't know if we'll ever get that again. But I think Harry and Vanessa have a very interesting relationship. There's something about that family, because he gives the appearance of letting his wife and daughter do what they want but underneath the reins are held close. I hope people will give them a chance, as I've already seen a lot of writing Vanessa off because they think she's just repeating her Footballers Wives character.

I think Ryan and Stacey will have a brief relationship, or almost have one, but then Stacey will have to leave. They are suddenly changing it to where Ryan loves Stacey but I don't think Stacey feels the same way about him. I think Ryan will eventually learn about her killing Archie and will let her leave so he can protect her and his child.

The problem is I don't see what is left for Ryan. The stuff with Janine pretty much died for good with this episode, if you ask me.

Perhaps they should have him leave with Stacey.

Becca's definitely going to go nuts at some point. I wonder if she might end up causing Charlie's death.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think Ross is ever coming back.

I was actually trying to be restrained about Tanya. :lol: I just cannot stand the smugness. This character has no reason to be smug, considering her background and the circumstances of her relationships, yet it is her default mode. If they actually explored that, fine, but instead, it's usually just bedhopping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wonder if these hour long episodes help the ratings a lot. EastEnders has been holding its own during the World Cup this year so far, while Corrie and Emmerdale haven't been fairing so well. They're all down a bit, but EastEnders is closer to its normal range than the other shows.

I think it's quite amazing that the show managed to pull in over 7 million against a World Cup match and then pull over 1 million viewers on the BBC3 repeat. Also, keep in mind, the show isn't even airing in its normal timeslot for the most part during the World Cup.

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/soaps/news/a232616/soaps-ratings-roundup-june-23.html

Edited by Y&RWorldTurner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Considering that this was one of the biggest episodes of the year, and that Eastenders usually benefits from more consistent scheduling than Corrie and a later timeslot than Emmerdale, I actually thought the ratings would have been a bit higher. There was some talk in DS's ratings thread the day before about how Eastenders did so much better than Emmerdale around that timeslot and people just must be more interested -- yet when the ratings for EE's Wednesday's episode came out there was very little discussion of them, people either said nothing or were upset that the ratings were lower than expected.

Edited by CarlD2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wednesday's episode started earlier at 7PM.

The show was against and beat a World Cup match on ITV, this was as good as it was going to do. The fact that they got over 7 million with that kind of clash and started an extra 30 minutes earlier than it usually does is very good. Also, the over 1 million viewers that tuned into to the BBC3 repeat was very impressive as the show wasn't even that low in its original airing. Also, considering the show doesn't normally air on Wednesday's either.

Both Corrie and Emmerdale received their lowest ratings of the year this World Cup season, EastEnders ratings have been consistent and even beating the World Cup matches it was against on several occasions.

The show wasn't going to do much better than this, even if it was a hyped up episode, they've been scoring within the same range and their normal range this World Cup season, the other soaps really haven't.

The World Cup match EastEnders clashed with actually gained viewers after the clash period was over, even though EastEnders got more total viewers for the night, so I think this was always as good as they were going to rate.

http://mediatel.co.uk/newsline/2010/06/24/tv-overnights-bbc-ones-eastenders-outshines-the-football-once-again/

Edited by Y&RWorldTurner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I sort of agree with you on this. While i would be great to see Grant again (He is my all time favourite character on EE) but where could his story go ? He could be apart of Peggy`s exit and could be a support system for Phil`s drug addiction. But i doubt Grant can be used for stories again. Unless Courtney starts rebelling and does teen antics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I guess this is another example of how some EE fans tend to overhype the show and how they make it more difficult for expectations to be met. Until I read your post I didn't know these would be seen as good ratings. When I read Digital Spy this morning the ratings were either not talked about or were framed as being low or disappointing for the show, some of that by EE fans. This after time spent the day before talking about how the lower ratings for Emmerdale proved people don't care about watching Emmerdale and Eastenders has done great. So the very sudden stop to that talk made me wonder what had happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy