Jump to content

Coronation Street: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I haven't really watched much of 2001, especially early 2001, but I've been watching the few I had and that I'm uploading, and what a very dour time this must have been on Corrie. This one had the questionable decision to put both Toyah's rape story and the smear test mixup in the same episode, along with Roy and Hayley battling Fiz's lies about Roy (I still don't know why they even brought Fiz back after that). The only light relief is Vera at the clinic.

The POV in the episode is also questionable, as a lot of time is spent on the doctor (the one who knocked up Maxine) talking about how unfair it is to criticize the clinic, and a lot of time is spent on Peter berating various characters for accusing him of rape, finally tearing into Janice and Les with a story about how a Navy mate of his killed himself because of rape accusations. It's an extended monologue of rage the likes of which I rarely remember seeing with a male character on Corrie since the old days of Len in the '60s.

I get the feeling the people who took over and started the bigamy plot had a very different view of Peter than Jane McNaught did.

At least they did have a few good scenes with Toyah running through the back door and out onto the street, camera zigging and zagging with her as if she's in a maze.

Please register in order to view this content

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Carl, thanks for posting the interview. In it LeVell notes that Kevin would be sympathetic towards Jenny but he most certainly wasn't when she was being carted away-the compassion he showed moments before seemed to be a trick to keep her from hurting Jack. Oh, well. He hasn't addressed the continuity gaffe himself, has he? It seems only a spokesman for the show has.

Edited by TimWil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought I remembered reading about Bet going to a country and western bar, but didn't realize I had the episode. I thought it might be kind of fun but it turned out to be depressing...

Please register in order to view this content

I don't know how fans at the time tolerated all that Maureen, Reg, and Derek.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When they let Maureen have dramatic moments, I liked her, but all the silly girly fluttering was just irritating.

Anyway, watched the last two episodes and Liz and Michelle are a poor double act. They're the same character, and they have reduced Steve to a level where I am expecting him to start sucking his thumb.

Julie's exit was believable and bittersweet and very much true to her character. I can see where Katy Cavanagh would want to play new roles, but I also wonder if she'd had some of the writing she had in her last week, if she would have stayed.

I like Todd the way he is at the moment. I hope they won't can him for the damage done to him in previous stories.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-93643/The-Corrie-untouchables.html

This is a strange article, in that they got all the firings right but the Grimshaws. I'm surprised that there would ever have been any plans to write out the Grimshaws at this time (spring 2002), as Jason and Todd were probably the only male totty for a lot of younger viewers, and Eileen was likely at least somewhat popular as well.

Were there ever any plans to write them out?

What went on with that Eve character anyway? Did they just give up on her after Jacqueline Pirie left? For a woman who was married to Fred and was landlady of the Rovers, she seems completely irrelevant. Even in a lot of the episodes I've seen from that time, she's just standing behind the bar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I only have one or two episodes from these years left to upload, but I thought someone might be interested in this one, as it's one of those from Maureen Lipman's very brief run on the show as a stopgap when Julie Goodyear had to quit early.

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm just about done uploading what I had of 2001/2002.

This reminds me of what Sally Dyvenor could do with dramatic material. I guess at least they have calmed her down a little from too much comedy or too much bitterness.

I read that Tracy Shaw abruptly left the show because of a pay cut (I wonder if she regrets it...). I wonder if they had plans for Maxine if she'd stayed. It seems like she was heavy in story even at this point, what with bringing her parents in, which was surprising for a character who had already been on for 7 years. Her mother is [!@#$%^&*] annoying. I mean ANNOYING. And she seems to have been to the John Savident Performing Arts School.

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Cheryl was gone before Lemay came back but I agree with your thinking that he would rather a character from a family he introduced to the show than a family he did not originate.  I remember reading somewhere in the early 90's probably after DS left as writer, their was an either a writer or a producer who made a comment that their intent was bring the McKinnon family back to AW.  Would have made sense for the newer viewers from the 80's.  Much like Lemay's attempt to bring the Frames back from his writing in the 70's in his 1988 return
    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
    • The other issue with Missy: in June 2020, she "liked" some social media posts by Candace Owens -- things Candace said that were against Black Lives Matter.  That is described here https://tvline.com/news/melissa-reeves-racism-days-of-our-lives-instagram-controversy-2894568/ I don't know if that was ever resolved.
    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
    • Sally Spencer was a decent actress, but the writing destroyed the "M.J." that Kathleen Layman had built. Layman had a quiet strength about her, and she and Osburn really felt like sisters. Spencer's character should have been either an unmentioned sister, or maybe Jake's that grew up close to Kathleen, M.J. and the rest, but was away for a few years before joining the force. Kristen Marie was o.k., but I always got a mousier vibe from her. Being pigeon-holed with Scott for most of the run hurt things for her, as well.  The Loves were also underserved between Rhonda Lewin and Philece Sampler. Philece would have been better as Nicole. Thank goodness Anne Heche  showed up for the next round of auditions. Christopher Holder was mediocre as Peter, but given a shot, I think Marcus Smythe could have stuck around for a while.  I would have had Peggy Lazarus be a Frame -- possibly an ex-wife for Vince with an agenda. Smythe and Hollen had  a fun chemistry that could have kept the two around.. Bringing recasts for  Cheryl and Ben back mixing it up with other Frames. Corys, Lawrences at the time might have kept all the families stronger. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy