Jump to content

AMC: Pratt's bible


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Just a question to the person who mentioned Joe & Leora's affair. I remember that story and to the best of my ability it was more of a just a flirtation thing and they never slept together - same as it was for Ruth and David Thornton a year or so before that.

I know that Wikipedia says Ruth slept with David and that it was during the time Joe was attracted to Leora but they have the story all wrong. Ruth got attracted to David when she separated from Joe back in the mid-70's - they separated over Phil and Tara that time.

Joe developed feelings for Leora and Ruth got jealous but they never slept together as far as I remember and as far as I can find in any of my sources.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ruth definitely cheated on Joe with David Thornton. They were having an affair, and she was going to run away with David, until Joe suddenly took ill. That had to have been around 76 or 77, when I started watching the show. Pretty certain about that. As for Joe and Leora. I thought they had slept together, or at least the implication was that they had slept together. Whatever the case, I'm sure that Pratt won't be looking at the Martin family circa 1978 for story ideas LOL. As far as TPTB are concerned, the only ancient history on AMC that matters at all is Erica's life. But they do need a demographically desirable female character to carry the Martin torch. And I don't mean Krystal LOL!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ruthie was getting her groove on with the younger doc LOL! I often wonder if Ruth's rape by Ray Gardner was Agnes's attempt to redeem Ruth in the viewers' eyes after she cheated on Joe. She does have a track record of redeeming characters through rape and making them more sympathetic to the audience. Gloria and Natalie come to mind, even Kit. OK, maybe Kit was more Megan than Agnes, but you get my point. Maybe it's more a general soap device.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It used to be a general soap staple that characters who committed such acts had to be redeemed some way. Irna Phillips practiced it and she instilled it in her protege's nixon & Bell.

But even other writers used it.

When Bob & Kim cheated on ATWT, they had to pay with the loss of the child Kim was carrying.

On Y&R, when Jennifer Brooks was revealed to have committed adultery, Bell had her get breast cancer to redeem her.

Bell made Doug & Julie and Bill & Laura suffer through numerous unhappiness before either could be happy together on Days. I still get sick over how long I waited to see both couples happy and together - even after they got married they still went through trials and breakups. Not long after Bill & Laura married he had the affair with kate Winograd. Doug had the affair, then Julie got raped, then she got burned, the divorced, Doug remarried to Lee, took forever to get back together. Laura went crazy and of course Bill & Laura were written off and fans never really got any conclusion to that story. Then of course Doug & Julie were written off, divorced offscreen, and then got back together offscreen.

Fans who complain today that they are cheated by the writers don't know what cheating is. The Bill/Laura & Doug/Julie fans waited 6 to 8 years for their couples to even get together and never got to enjoy it much at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But the thing is, I enjoyed Janet Green's redemption on AMC in the mid 1990s. It was slow and it was organic. It wasn't "Okay, she was bad -- she was raped, now she's good." It was a slow build up. One good deed... followed by another... followed by someone showing her gratitude... followed by a friendship with Erica... followed by a bond with Amanda... followed by Trevor softening... It was growth, change and self-awareness that helped Janet become redeemed. I think all a writer has to do to "redeem" a character is present them as flawed HUMANS. You don't need to go to the extent of having them tortured or raped or beaten or victims... and you don't need to gloss over their offenses and have them become all-knowing morally superior saints. The best way to redeem a character is to simply make that character relatable. A character who realizes that they've tresspassed against someone, attempts to make reparations and humbly asks for forgiveness is, IMO, able to have a better connection to the viewing audience. A character who does something horrible, lies and covers it up, justifies their actions and plays victim to their own choices and proceeds to judge others without a single drop of humility and/or self awareness is more difficult to redeem -- even if you have them beaten or raped or shot or imprisoned.

Also, I can't get behind women who have been blatantly sexually active being raped -- as if that's how you "redeem" or "punish" a "dirty, nasty woman" who has the absolute nerve to be comfortable with her own sexuality. Erica Kane's been using sex as a weapon for years -- we find out she was raped at 14 by Richard Fields. Gloria Marsh was a slut -- raped by Will Cortlandt. Julia Santos was a slut -- raped by Louie Grecco. Kit Fisher was a slut -- raped by Braden Lavery. Bianca was a lesbian -- raped by Michael Cambias.

I honestly think the only reason Babe Carey wasn't "redeemed by rape" was due to not only the fact that Bianca was raped three months before she came on the show, but also the whole Great Baby Switch storyline had to have Babe pregnant ALREADY by the time she came on the show. But I totally believe if McTavish & Co. didn't play their Redemption by Rape card too soon with Bianca, they would've had JR rape Babe in order to gain her instant sympathy -- since they were doing everything in their power to villify the JR character at her expense already for Babe's redemption, I mean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I never thought that Babe was going to be raped. They always tried to model her character by the Dixie formula, she is basically just an extended clone of that model. The thing with redemption is that you have to unify with the character. However more often then not I find myself hating the "heroes" of the story (Zach, Jason, JR, Elizabeth) and rooting for the flawed, "evil" people (Lucky, Sam, Greenlee, Ritchie, Annie, ect.).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The part of not just you Skin but many fans today rooting for the bad guys is something that I still find interesting. I wonder if it is more of a change in the way America thinks or what, but when I grew up the HEROES were the one you rooted for. And I am still that way.

We rooted for Superman, Batman & Robin, Roy Rogers, etc.

On soaps we rooted for Alice Matthews over Rachel Davis, for Tara Brent over Erica Kane, for the Bradys over the DiMeras, etc. The classic battle of good vs evil is what made the soap world go round. You loved the villians, but you couldn't wait for the good guy to triumph and for them to get what was coming to them.

Today fans root for the bad guy and want them to prevail and to never even pay for the bad things they do. And thus writers don't even write characters with shades of gray anymore - they are all bad and never pay for the crimes they have done. Even the supposedly good guys don't pay anymore because it seems the fans don't want anyone to pay anymore.

I am not passing judgement on anyone who does root for the bad guys, but I just grew up in a different time. I would love to see soaps go back to the classic good vs. evil pattern. I like good characters who sometimes do bad things, but I like to see them pay too. I don't think there are any totally good people anywhere. We all have shades of gray and I think that needs to be explored on the soaps - but not all the people are like Carly (ATWT), Kendall (AMC), Greenlee (AMC) or Sami (Days) eitehr who are played as the central heroines we are supposed to root for today. I can't root for them because they never learn from their mistakes - they just keep making the same ones over and over and over and over.

At least when Days reformed Julie Olson and AW reformed Rachel - they paid for their mistakes and suffered big time for them.

I loved Bianca on AMC and really miss her. She was really the last classic heroine we had in Soaps. Lily on ATWT fits the mold too but they hardly ever use her for anything really good anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it would be great to have Taylor McBride connected to the Martins. They needs to bring in some new Martins. I think Pratt will have a good bible. They already have a (Donna/Chuck ) type storyline . They had alot great storylines from the 70 's like Phil Brent ,Tara . They were the most popular couple during that time. AMC was the NO. 1 daytime show during the 70's. and the best written daytime show back then thanks to Agnes Nixon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

He fits the bill always blamming others, never being made to pay for consequences of actions, doing equally duplitious deeds while calling everyone else wrong, evil and commiting vigilante justice i.e. (Jason, Zach)...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

AMC was not the #1 rated show until the 1977-78 season.

In 1970-71 it finished 17 out of 18

In 1971-72 it finished 17 out of 17

In 1972-73 it finished 8 out of 17

In 1973-74 it finished 6 out of 16

In 1974-75 it finished 5 out of 14

In 1975-76 it finished 6 out of 14

In 1976-77 it finished 6 out of 15

In 1977-78 it finished 3 out of 14

In 1978-79 it finished 1 out of 14

In 1979-80 it finished 2 out of 13

*******************************************

The top 3 rated shows of the 1970's were:

1) As The World Turns

2) Another World

3) The Guiding Light

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Something that I love about Dani is that despite her issues with Bill, she's always encouraged her daughters to have a relationship with him. I also believe that she does have a great amount of love for him which is why she is so hurt that he's sick. I've loved them including her in his recovery. It feels real and their chemistry is just insane so any chance for more of it is welcomed. That would be the perfect karma. Kat needs to learn boundaries and not be so impulsive, but I still feel like the Duprees are going to clear Leslie. How? I don't know, but that's what I think is going to happen. I feel like she'll get some kind of blackmail over them which will cause them to clear the slate. Of course the show never goes where you expect so I'm sure they'll do something different but I'm definitely curious how she will manage this.
    • Darn you Jane Elliot...you have me crying...that's how superb her acting is in these scenes with Gio. Speak on it.
    • The story has been glossed over and taken over by the lunacy redux. I wonder if they noticed how poorly the ratings are with the Liam story and went all lunacy.
    • @soapfan770Thank you so much for posting that! I know the final season of Falcon Crest is controversial but I thought it was a fantastic swing that mostly worked. The only thing that would've made it better is if they had more money which hopefully could've kept Emma full season. I feel like that was her strongest arc since season one and I wish she had remained so we could've seen her as a mother. I also wish they had more Angela but that was obviously out of their control. As different as it was, I felt season 9 to be very true to the initial gothic roots of the series.
    • You know what? I was just thinking of Klymaxx the day before you typed this and chuckled. I do love how it keeps twisting and turning, getting juicier (Eva hiding everything, knowing her mama did it only for Kat to get the goods, thinking it's Eva...not helped by her hope that it IS Eva) rather than contrived.    This. AM's acting as Eva is just so reminiscent of SMG's version of Kendall on AMC for me. She's totally going to go on to bigger and better things. She has so much nuances in her scenes.    Yeah, I really like that they played the beat of Ty wondering if Jessica was using him. I wouldn't have minded that, but we have done it before so I guess it is nice to see it is not a trick. I do wonder where it will go from here.   Thank you for the tip on Chelesa. I'm already intrigued on the stuff with Madison so Hmmmm.
    • Leslie is going to get off because of Kat.
    • If a soap actor or behind the scenes figure was roasted at any point in time, who would you have at the main table? This topic came about when I imagined a Friends episode (Joey, of course, would bomb at roasting). The Roast of Deidre Hall, circa 1997 Roastmaster: Drake Hogestyn Roasters: Jed Allan, Wayne Northrop, Joseph Mascolo, Eileen Davidson, Christie Clark, Alison Sweeney, Ken Corday, James E. Reilly, Andrea Hall, Jane Elliot, James Reynolds, Shannen Doherty, Wilford Brimley, and Frances Reid.
    • Amanda has been giving it to Abby ever since her and Chance walked in on them together. So great to hear.   I can see that. Lily and Damian are always a highlight to me. 
    • I recall @Chris B asking about this but here is an interview Sheri Anderson did with SOU back in the fall of ‘89: Here is an article that I think is interesting, it is an interview with Shery Anderson, screenwriter of the ninth season THE WRITE STUFF: FALCON CREST’S SHERI ANDERSON: FROM DAYS TO NIGHTTIME By Richard Spencer Soap Opera Update, 1989 : At a time when the success of nighttime soaps is shaky, Sheri Anderson, former headwriter for DAYS OF OUR UVES, ANOTHER WORLD, GUIDING LIGHT and GENERAL HOSPITAL, makes the jump to the evening format with some new ideas to help strenthen the CBS California vineyard based soap opera FALCON CREST. "FALCON CREST is going to have a differnet tone that it never had before," headwriter Sheri Anderson expiains. "The people that I am working with are kind of an interesting mix. The executive producer, Joel Sumow, did the first years of MIAMI VICE and THE EQUALIZER, Bob Cochran, a Harvard MBA,and Cyrus Nowrasteh, who has done a number of features, are story editors. I am co-porducer, with a history in daytime, so we are a real different mix. We all kind of balance each other out in different ways. I am sort of the emotional side (coming from daytime) and they are more the gritty side." A lack of focus is what Sheri attributes to FALCON CREST's problems the last few seasons. "No one , seemed to knwo that the characters' motivations were. Pilar was a real good example. No one seemed to know what she wanted. This season it is clear that Pilar wants Lance. That is really her dream and goal tokeep Lance. She will do anything to do that. She will be making some sacrifices thís season that really jeopardize her relationship with Lance." While Pilar's character may be strongly in place, Maggie's is not. How will the show restructure in light of Maggie's drowning? " We are not trying to replace her, but we are adding another kind of strong heroine character. That character is Laruren Daniels. She's very earthy; married to a construction worker. Lauren. is the sister of Michael Sharp, Gregory Harrison's new character. "Michael is an extremely powerful adversary to Richard Channing. He will be more cynical than Richard and less emotionally motivated. For Michael it is all power and money. The audience will be more sympathetic toward Richard. He will be going through hell," Sheri reveáis with doom in her voice, "...Paying for his past sins " The complete opposite of Richard or Michael's intensity is the the new character of Charlíe St. James."Charlie is every woman's foolish choice," Sheri character sketches. "He's kind of indescribable; charismatic, totally unpredictable, charming, unnervtng. He's coming in as a love interest for Emma. He will be the first man to make Emma feel like a woman. She's really not victimized by him...she’s addicted to him. Charlie's presence will make her a little less flakey this season." But Emma is not the only one in store for major personality changes, also in the categroy is Frank. "We arebringing back somebody from his past," Sheri reveals "there will be a great secret that will come to ight." Speaking of characters from the past, are there any Sheri would like to return? "Everyone is fond of Ana-Alicia in her original role. At this point we don't have any plans to bring her back because we have some other character that are going to take the forefront." And if one thing is going to remain the same, it will be what Sheri recognizes as the theme of FALCON CREST "Quest for control of Falcon Crest. We have people trying to take control, and they are all taking it for different reasons. Some are emotioanl, some are revenge, but they each have a different eason for which they want Falcon Crest. And that is really the pivotal center. It is very earthy." Keeping the core of lite show intact is not the only thing nighttime shows have to do to stay interesting and acording to Sheri"I din't think night time shows have kept paces with changes in the viewing audience," Sheri answers by analyzing what exactly is primetime soaps* problem. ln datyime, you do over the years the shows stay on, but you are adapting to what people are accepting:faster-paced, or slower, or addíng more comedy, depending on the audience, and what they are buying. I don't think some of these shows in primetime have done that "We are trying to make the show as much episodio as it is continuing. We are cutting down the number of scenes in each act to get the audience more involved. But some of the shows, and this happens in daytime al so, don’t let the characters really grow," Sheri certainly made chracters develop during her daytime career, but especially on DAYS OF OUR LIVES, which is the source for her favourite stories of her careen ”When Víctor carne to Salem and revealed tha the was really Bo’s father, it caused such a ripple effect for Kim, Shane, Román, Bo, Hope, Caroline and Sean. I also liked bringing Kayla back for Patch.” Having written for Kristian Alfonso' s Hope (DAYS) and now Pilar on FC, Sheri distínguishes between the two characters. "Pilar is a woman, but Hope was growing up. Hope was more innocent and Pilar is not Pilar has an intelligent strength where Hope did all the wrong things for all the right reasons." Pilar wíll be the only one retuming from her family, while Angela Channing’s appearances will be limited (per Jane Wyman's contract). "But Richard will be taking a very strong role which is very similar to Angela Angelad presence will be felt in every epísode/ Sheri informs. A lot of people complained about the women of FALCON CREST being wishy-washy They certainly aren't this season Sheri emphasizes. "Lauren will be strong, especially after her brother Michael steais Richard’s children and places them with her, Frnak’s step daughter will be very devious, indicateive of Kathleen Turner in “Body Heat” And Gregory Harrison is fabulous," Sheri reports with joy. "He is so different from his character on TRAPPER JOHN, M.D He is very similar to Michael Douglas in the film 'Wall Street'. FALCON CREST viewers will find a much richer textrae, getting away from the glamour and really going to substance and style." Sheri concludes, "it will be a show to watch, We are trying to bring in a new audience, and at the same time, respect our past audience."
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy