Jump to content

AMC: A New Interview


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I respectfully disagree. The kick ass May sweeps that you speak of included such darkness as Leora Hayward's death, Chris Stamp's death, the whole gang war mess, and Michael beginning to display sexually violent tendencies with Kendall and Erica. We also had more boredom with Maggie and Henry's university cheating and the dreadfully wooden Carlos paired with Greenlee. Remember when Carlos brought Greenlee to The Pit to show her how the "other half" lived? And he started lip-syncing to some random song. And we mustn't forget the Fusion's Sexiest Man Contest.

I admit that June 2003 was much better and lighter. We had the all-too-brief flirtations between Joni and Reggie and also Simone and Kenny, we had Edmund and Maria reuniting (me? not a fan of them at all, but others were, so yeah...), the rivalry between Erica and Mary was in full force, Henry finally left town, Laurie finally left town, etc. That was a good month. The gang war crap with Reggie was still going on, but it was pretty much done by the end of the month.

This is not to say that McTash's return was all sunshine and smiles. It was dark. Oh, it was dark. But in that darkness, I found that the theme of family and relationships was more in place. We saw characters back to interacting with each other as friends and relatives, not just as people that they were in storylines with. I distinctly remember Brooke bringing Anna to some kind of support group for people who lost their children at a young age. There was more of a togetherness with the community of Pine Valley than there was under the previous writers. Too much separation with the characters under Rayfield and Cascio.

There were things that McTash dropped, though, that I wanted to see more of. Joni and Reggie were a fun young couple and I wanted to see more of them, but before long, Joni was gone and Reggie was backburnered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

There may have been too much separation of the characters, but at the same time, I felt it was more of an ensemble show under that writing regime. It wasn't the same six characters featured every day. But I'm sure it's just my preference. I like variety and I like seeing characters have their own lives. Maggie, for instance under that regime, had her own life. She was in college. She had a boyfriend. She was studying pre-med and then of course she had scenes with her family (David and Anna). Once McTavish came back, Maggie was taken out of her own life, thrust back into the Lena/Bianca relationship, dwindled down to supporting Bianca's drama and then was backburnered completely while Babe became Bianca's best friend. Simone -- another periphery character under Casico and Rayfield that was featured strongly. She added an element to the story that only Simone could add. She was defined as wild and impetuous and always coming up with crazy ideas that saved Fusion at the last minute. She was being wooed by Kenny, flirting with Officer Lyman. Then McTavish came back, and she was relegated to being almost non-existant while Kendall and Greenlee acted like they ran the company all by themselves.

And Michael Cambias didn't start out as a sexually aggressive character under Rayfield and then Cascio. That element came in after McTavish wanted to introduce the Legacy of Rape with the Kane women. Up until that point, Michael was just a failure who was always trying to gain Daddy Cambias' respect. Then McTavish came along and he became this evil monster.

Even though there were the darker stories of Leora's death and Laurie's weird relationship with her alcoholic father and Chris Stamp's murder (which was written beautifully, by the way, with him taking the bullet for Maddie), there was humor and levity I found in some of the show as well; Simone's running joke of always getting arrested; Tad and Lysistrata; Myrtle tagging along on Bianca and Lena's first date. I had hoped that with the correct writers, it would come back... but it hasn't. It's just been depressing McTavish, boring B&E and now we have spread eagle Pratt coming...

I said all that to say considering this time period to be one of the worst times of this show is unfair. That title goes to Jean Passanante's fall 2000-fall 2001 era.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

R Sinclair, excellent post about Rayfield/Cascio's reign. The show was a lot more balanced, character-wise and story-wise. The show had plenty of light hearted and fun moments to go with the dark moments as well.

It's a soap opera, after all. "Dark storylines" are bound to happen and will always be apart of soaps. Megan McTavish, OTOH, takes "dark storylines" to a whole new level -- and every single character under her pen is wallowing in some kind of misery. It's too much after a while.

Although I have to say that Rayfield/Cascio did indeed write Michael Cambias as a sexual predator. He went after Kendall and tried to rape her. After he failed at that, he tried to rape Erica in her office. McTavish took over when Michael was in jail for that attempted rape. He was then released from jail, and that's when he went after Bianca.

I liked R&C's writing of the Kendall/Michael & Erica/Michael scenes. And R&C managed to turn Erica's attempted rape into a significant moment of growth in Kendall/Erica's relationship, once Kendall stepped in and knocked Michael out.

Here are the scenes where Michael tried to rape Erica. I thought they were well done.

">
" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344">

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I do agre the show was going in potentially interesting directions with once Cascio joined. And she should ahad more time I guess--but the show was getting so unrecognizable, at least to me. As soon as McT came in suddenly we saw Myrtle! We saw these characters who jsut weren't around at all. We had some fun lighter scenes (not enough but Simone and Myrtle sharing spiked lemonade was one scene I still love). We had some amazingly written long scenes--I still remember one early in her run between Anna and David comign to terms with the losts of their baby, what it meant ot their relationship, etc which I really felt shoulda won them an Emmy.

I do agree that McT as she went along started making if anythign the characters too connected--people there didn't seem to have their own lives, and this got worse as her regime went along (as did most things). But the change in the first few months--and not just darkness (the show had a lot of that the previous sweeps already as people said) was stunning. The level of dialogue also, at least at first, improved under McT--we got longer scenes where dialogue and drama was allowed to play out, sometimes for a whole "act" from commercial to commercial--just a lot of things as a soap fan I'd missed.

McT even briefly tried to save some of the flops--liek Carlos (the worse male character/actor on the show EVER?) by givign him a slightly more tolerable brother, cutting out the stupid "he's writing deep secret love letters" story etc etc.

Michael Cambias IMHod efinetly was heading into some sexually weird character under R/C already, not just cuz of the using Lena thing (which was an interesting story I admit). Yes, McT made him a monster. That said I honestly don't remember the Summer as all tragedy all darkness, all rape all the time but as pretty good soap opera. McT took his rape attemtps and went with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Okay, that's an excellent point and I agree with you there. There was more definition to who was leading and who was supporting during McTavish's run, and sometimes that was good, sometimes that was bad. I enjoyed seeing the characters doing their own thing (this makes reminds me that until Cascio came in, Joni had been pretty much written as a supporter for Laurie, but then she started her thing with Reggie, where she actually had a meaningful presence), and in that period, we did get to see more development of personalities, without a doubt.

R&C introduced the legacy of rape. McTash was the one who jumped on it and watered it so that it would grow into this colossal thing. Michael attacked both Kendall and Erica in June of '03, the month before McTash returned from the dead.

Thank you, thank you, thank you for reminding me of Strata! I fricken loved her and wanted them to keep her around for a while, maybe even delve into her character. But alas, like you said, McTash took her out.

What, you didn't like Ryan boning Liza on the sands of the Pine Valley beach? LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, the Rayfield/Cascio show was the worst AMC I have ever seen (and yes, I hated the Lena/Michael crap early on). But Megan McTavish's return to AMC that year was the only time I have boycotted AMC. The day Bianca was raped, I turned AMC off, and did not watch another full episode of the show until last year - after her name was off the credits. No compromise. It was disgusting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I LOVED Lysistrata too--first her therapy with Tad and Liza and then with Tad.

And yeah Passanante's era is still my all time least fave. Maybe cuz it lasted longer than Rayfield's solo run, maybe because it came out of Agnes Nixon's wonderful, brief return as HW, but, Passanante made the show into a ridiculous cartoon. Worse teen set ever (worse than Henry, etc) with Mindy, that jock who was in a coma, etc. Blah. Libidizone (which happened i believe while Agnes was still finishing up the Bianca story which made for a VERY schizophrenic show, ghost Gillian, incredibledreams.com etc etc etc etc etc. And amongst rumours that Passanante was to be fired, she just broke her contract and LEFT to join poor ATWT, leavin AMC floundering with no writer till Fall. lol Horrible :( I still just laughed when I heard she was HW on a new show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No question. There's an interview out there where Megan McTavish is actually talking about the scene KK posted and talking about how she was watching that (specifically the part where Erica hugs Kendall later on) and how she said to herself that she wants to be there writing this stuff. Michael attempted to rape Kendall before his humiliation at the Valley Inn and attempted to rape Erica right after it. He was written with a poor attitude towards women from almost the start, way before McTavish got her job back. McTavish got her job back by finding out the plan was for Kendall to be raped and putting out the idea to make it Bianca instead. Initially, I think she/Frons were thinking about the Kane family dynamics a lot more than keeping Bianca asexual.

AMC was awesome in May, June of 2003. I loved McTavish's first year, it wasn't as good as May, June of 2003 but it was one of the better products being put out there by the soaps at the time, at least from the perspective of somebody who had just escaped the DAYS hole, lol.

I loved the Erica, Kendall dynamic (the push and pull) since 1993 and was impressed at how she made Bianca, Kendall the more dominant relationship there. I was not expecting that at all. Great material for all three women (she gave Susan Lucci so much good complex s**t; that week where she told Bianca, Kendall and Jack all "the truth" - amazing work) and she brought a unity to the town that was nice that first year. It was a story of rape legacy but it was also a story of redemption and family and friendships and love and all that good crap.

I think she really jumped the rape legacy shark in July of 2004 by making Erica's father a rapist dealer. Ridiculous. It (the show in general) continued to go downhill fast from there. McTavish is a hack but she can do a good first 12-16 months, at least IMO.

So dammmn cold-blooded, but good soap (Erica decimating the kids), heh:

">
" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344">

">
" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344">

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agreed completely Angela (though I think mcTavish is a talented hack who just needs strong guidance--and prob short working terms lol). It always kinda bugs me when people complain that it's glorifying rape, or using rape to make Bianca asexual, etc. Of course it's upsetting that Bianca would be raped--more so than Kendall as awful as that is to say, but it's if anything more because of Bianca's character and her dynamic, love among all the other characters than her sexuality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ITA Angela! (almost called you Rugrat lol)

I never bought that the idea for Bianca's rape was "Let's turn the lesbian against sex in general." I always thought that the intention was to use the rape as a way to finally bring these three women together, and using Bianca was most practical thing because A, Bianca shares the rape experience with her mother (that sounds horrible, I know), and B, Bianca giving birth to a 'child of rape' connected her with Kendall. Kendall and Erica's connection, I think, was purely R&C with the thunderstorm scenes out in the rain.

McTash is best as an interim writer. If she watches the show long enough and knows enough about its history, she can come in for a year and set up some interesting tales for the real headwriters.

I think two of the finest hours of soap opera that I've ever seen were the episodes surrounding Erica's intervention. It was incredible...just Erica, Bianca, Jackson, Opal, Myrtle, and Mark for two days straight. I'll never forget the kick ass promo picture either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wouldn't have minded, I'm more (in)famous as Rugrat anyways ;)

McTavish's eagerness to play the relationship between the three women was palpable, there was no question for me that the Michael Cambias story was much more about those dynamics then anybody (McTavish specifically) being afraid of anything or avoiding anything. The story (stories) that carried on after this one "finished" for Bianca, now that's another story - I did feel it was more about avoidance.

McTavish did the thunderstorm in the rain. Kendall and Erica having these sort of tender scenes ("I'm okay because you're here with me") while Michael had Bianca cornered. Kendall and Erica had gotten closer during May, June with the MC take down and it was interesting to play that mixed with the wounds being reopened for Erica once McTavish came in.

The episodes lost me with the Eric Kane twist. But definitely had excellent moments in it.

Some of the Intervention:

">
" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344">

">
" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344">

">
" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344">

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I agree. Especially after SilkPress got back to her apartment and started to mock Nicole. Her dislike for Nicole and seeing her as a threat to her getting Teddy Bear is growing worse. So I could see her pulling a kidnapping on Nicole at some point. If anything she was going there to poke the bear and got pressed (pun unintended) when the bear gathered her.   Completely understandable. 
    • Beyond The Underwear Oops I mean Gates!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I swear this entire time I thought Roman knew about the Phillip/Vivian letter lol.  I do like how mature Roman/Kate are as a couple.  It makes me sad the new writers never got a chance to write for John/Marlena. I agree with @AbcNbc247 that the Felicity stuff is a bit after school special-y.  I am pretty sure that (most) of the viewing audience is aware that a grown man should not be shouting at any teenage girl especially one with disabilities.  Just let Xander apologize and move on. Linsey Godfrey was in her Sarah baby voice mode today and it irritates me to no end.   I know it's a cutesy thing her and Xander do but it's annoying. Bringing Kevin back is strange, but I do like the use of history.  I do think Rex probably could have been used instead, but whatever.  I don't care about Rex much either lol.
    • I mean over the past decades. But I do agree that in recent years now, the writing is not working for them as well as it used to then. It's same old, same old...which is what made the Damian storyline refreshing. At least for me.   
    • Did Denise give any interviews where she talked about her first few years on GH... '73-75? I wonder if she had any regrets leaving Days for GH, as from what I've read, the show was in the dumps writing-wise, so am thinking she didn't have great story? Any Leslie story highlights I've seen always start with '76, after Gloria Monty took charge.
    • I know! It's like second verse, here we go again!  Agreed. Certainly there was concern maybe even fear at the highest levels for the very good reason that what they had was so economically successful, so of course this risk was scary but if anyone was brave she was. Yes, he was. I have seen her associated with getting it on the air one other place but no details nor official title. Not the writer or creator so it made me wonder if she functioned as a kind of uncredited ad hoc producer, but then maybe she just supported it. At any rate that is nothing but supposition on my part. No data! Yes, not a surprise anymore but still so frustrating! On one hand I am appreciative that she is included in this book, but scholarship where are you?!
    • that wasnt her point. She wanted to further demonize Ted; that was the main focus of their talk. She wants to ensure that Nicole leaves him so that he's free and single to be with her. At this point, I dont think she really cares what Nicole thinks of her; she just wants her out of the way Eva is Nicole's stepdaughter and is a Dupree by association. If Nicole takes Ted back then its reasonable that she would accept his daughter and i that happens, Eva will have welcomed to their country club, be invited to their parties, have access to their resources, etc....much like Andre whom also isnt a blood Dupree but is accepted by them via Nicole. Eva got what she got from Anita bc of Hayley. I think its important to remember that context bc they just dealt with an interloper that infiltrated their ranks and hurt her daughter in the worse way. Now you have another unfortunate girl positioned to do the same to her other daughter. The feelings are still too fresh and she doesnt want Eva to get the idea that she would ever be allowed the opportunity to play them again
    • Oh I've seem this! That's part of why I'm curious! The show could put EastEnders to shame on the gangster Aspect! Oh I've seem this! That's part of why I'm curious! The show could put EastEnders to shame on the gangster Aspect!
    • Eve was one of those characters that had the "Jessie Brewer"role. They had heavy storyline, they burned through it and now they are there for support and a touchstone in the community (Marland wanted to give Jessie story, but I agree with Monty...she best served in her connecting role, and keeping that damn Amy Vining busy so she keeps her nose out of things) So charcters are important and why they should have kept characters like Bridget around (even as she is more volatiles then Eve) who didnt need a big storyline but could have been behind the bar making connections and expostion, but Rauch wanted JEVA/JEVA/JEVA and DRAMA (which to him meant a lot of yelling and stupidity.)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy