Jump to content

Loving/The City Discussion Thread


dm.

Recommended Posts

  • Members

So randolph was the original Clay/Alex? I always thought he was second for some reason...

I agree it's nice to see they tried with Loving. That last one seems almost like a huge advertisement BEGGING people to tune in (and to be fair to ABC, throughout the 90s, despite the damaging quick turnaround of EPs and HWs, it's obvious by who they hired, and what they've said, that ABC *was* trying to bring people to Loving. I mean compare the situation now where AMC has had the same crap EP for 8 or 9 years now, which is I think longer than anyone except when Agnes was EP in the 70s! The OLTL piece you posted from the same issue, about Gottlieb shows the same enthusiasm).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

He was the first Clay then revealed as Alex, then he left and returned.

It does seem like ABC made an effort with Loving. That's what I miss most about the soaps - no one upstairs makes an effort now. Just TRY.

I guess in some cases stability was what was needed, not meddling, but with Loving I'm not sure what could have helped. I just wish they'd figured it out because they had such a good cast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When I started watching I DID get him mixed up with Clay. I suppose seeing his children, he was a bit too young, but it never crossed my mind...

And you're right about their cast... I dunno, I sorta think maybe nothing would have helped raise Loving's ratings (except doing as Agnes wanted and sandwiching it between her other shows). Because often it was very good--and it had a strong cast, but did lack stability in every sense of the word.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They should have put it between the shows - I think AMC was strong enough then to survive, and that was also when OLTL was starting to climb back up.

It just makes me wonder sometimes because some of that cast was so damn good and yet I've never seen them on soaps since :(

What did you think of Shana? In the Episodes feature she seems like a spare part, even though she'd been around, off and on, for a long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

He was on ATWT during the strike, mid-1988. You can see him in some Youtube clips from that time. He worked in the stables. He seemed to have an agenda, and he made a pass at Lily and at Pam. His name was Spence. I'm surprised Marland didn't keep him, as Marland loved that type of look - the Snyder boys, for instance.

Did you like Trucker with Dinah Lee?

Did you ever see any of Trisha/Steve? I wish I could see them. He looks like such an average joe type of guy, it's very refreshing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There was actually talk in the early 90s to move AMC back a half-hour to 12:30 to compete directly with Y&R, and cushion Loving in the 1:30 slot before OLTL. I actually remember Susan Keith and James Kiberd talking about this in some SOD interview back around that time. The feeling was that AMC was strong enough to go head to head with Y&R and hold its own, but it obviously never happened. I think ABC really tried with Loving because of the Agnes Nixon pedigree but it could never get going. I really enjoyed the show for the first four or five years. I was literally in love with the show, but then pretty much stopped watching, probably around the time Millee Taggart and Tom King took over. Must've been around 1988. It was just all over the map, I grew frustrated with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What are some of your memories? Do you think getting rid of the Vocheks and Donovans was a mistake?

I keep meaning to find the Digest summaries I have from some of the 80s - when I post them they will hopefully be a memory jog. I just wish this was available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'll have to check youtube--he DOES have the Marland look, for sure.

WOST had at least one episode with Trisha and Steve--I liked them from it, I also liked her with psycho Jeff (though having her go off air with him out of the institution and her amnesiac was kinda as odd exit...) There was another episode with AVa and Paul when he was in a wheelchair, which was an interesting match I thought.

Dinah Lee and Trucker actually... weren't bad. But it wasn't Trucker and Trisha. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I mostly associate Ava with Alex so it's always strange to know she had so much else story. I'd like to see the stuff with Paul. I remember reading about the love scene the show did for them after he was paralyzed, which most soaps would never try.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I definitely think they got rid of Merrill Vochek way too soon. From what I read, and this may have been mentioned upthread, ABC expected Loving to be huge success right off the bat. When that didn't happen, I think they ran a bit scared and decided to get rid of Merrill, their central heroine, in favor of a more traditional (translation: romantic) heroine in Shana, hoping that would raise ratings. Shana essentially replaced Merrill in that capacity. Also when they dropped John Shearin as Roger Forbes, whom nobody seemed to like, in favor of Peter Brown, the whole Merrill-Roger affair fell apart. In keeping with giving the show a more "romantic" feel, I think they de-emphasized the Donovans and Forbeses, who seemed like average (translation: dull) people, in favor of families with more of a stark class difference (the OTT Aldens with Clay, Gwyneth and Tricia; the poorer than dirt Sowolsky-Rescotts), again to give the show a more romantic feel. This is all JMO, but this is what I suspect happened. From a creative standpoint, I don't think it was necessarily a mistake to make these changes, which were obviously dictated by their focus group research. I think the show maintained its tone during this transitional phase, which I believe Marland guided. I think when Millee and Tom came aboard as HWs, the tone of the show began to change. I can't put my finger on it, but it just became darker IMO, and the storylines were terrible. So many EPs and HWs came and went that any vision the show originally had was totally lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I didn't know Peter Brown was on this show. Was he any good? I didn't care for him on OLTL and I've only ever seen him on one other show, B&B (his B&B character was a non-starter so it didn't matter). I know he was also on Y&R and on DAYS. It seems like only his DAYS character was popular.

So you think all that about the haircut was just a story?

I wonder what plans Marland may have had for Lily, since he wrote heavily for Jennifer Ashe for the 4 years she was at ATWT. I don't know a lot about the teens at the time. I know that Lauren-Marie Taylor said she was meant to have a small role and then the show liked her and gave her more to do.

Do you think all the stuff about Ava passing off the baby and the pillow baby and all that was any good?

I've wondered sometimes whether they should have gotten rid of Jack Forbes or not.

What role did Cabot have before he was written out (the first time)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think they brought Peter Brown in as Roger just to tie up loose ends. I don't think they had any story plans in mind for him. Brown's son was my cousin's college roommate. My cousin met him several times and has said that he was a very nice guy.

The Lily thing was of course siderailed by the whole "Something About Amelia" thing, which I'm sure was discussed upthread. Also with Garth gone, I wonder where any conflict in a Lily-Jack romance would have come from. I'm sure Marland had plans beyond the initial incest stuff, but we'll never know. I don't know if Marland was forced to kill Garth in order to truncate the story, or if that was his plan all along. Lauren Marie Taylor always seemed likeable and she had some nice chem with Perry Stephens. I think the show was throwing anything against the wall to see what would stick, and Jack and Stacey seemed to click as a couple. She definitely lucked out in the whole Jennifer Ashe firing situation. Good point about whether or not Jack Forbes was even needed, esp. once the Forbeses were all a memory and Stephens left to be replaced by another actor.

LOL I remember Ava preggers with the pillow. It was definitely stupid, but I remember it being very entertaining. Roya Megnot RIP was pure gold.

I forgot, when was Cabot written out? Was that when his wife Celeste Holm came aboard as Isabel? I was watching on and off at the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • @Ryanc2 Welcome -you've got a lot of catching up to do! We talk about Derek/Ashley, but how much do we really know about Naomi/Jacob apart from they have a bedroom set to make out in? Maybe more time needed to be spent in the first months establishing them better-(give them a proper set for a start) as well as the Bill/Ted dynamic and other familial relationships and ditch Hayley/Derek altogether or make them supporting/talk to for Jacob/Naomi.   
    • I’m glad we’ve spent enough time with the character to know how shed Brooke Logan her way through this.
    • Felicia becomes more layered/balanced in the early 90s (circa 1991/1992/1993).   She leans more into the more down to earth element that you like, while still being Felicia of the 80s.  The process starts in 1989.. but doesn't really become apparent until the early 90s.   Iris was the rare connector character with her having a role at the hospital (I think she's on the board), working at Cory Publishing, and having romantic flirtations/connections with a lot of the male characters between 1988 and 1994.  Which resulted in her having interactions with the other female contemporaries (Donna, Felicia, Rachel) even if the three didn't always interact with one another. Writing her off in the fall of 1994 severed one of the main connections/bridges with the different orbits.  Irony that the show didn't see her value.
    • Which is why I feel that when they do introduce that family it will more than likely be Jacob's family. Otherwise why establish them slowly but surely?
    • ROFL.  priceless.   There are also countless mentions how wonderful Claire is, but I could not stomach watching a compilation of that!
    • The air...is looooooooooong gone.  
    • From what I remeber reading, it seemed as if it all completely falls apart post-Labine and Mayer around a year later when Ben is sent to prison around June 1976. Ben's departure undoes one of the major story threads that had carried the show for many months. Without a catalyst of Ben's ilk in the wings, there wasn't much to carry either story for the two women (Betsy and Arlene). Arlene was briefly paired in a one-sided attraction with Ray before becoming involved with Ian Russell. I believe the Schneiders introduced Ian as a suave businessman interested in Arlene who was also considering a dalliance with Meg. That would have been delightful but Upton arrives and quickly shifts the narrative to Arlene as a kept woman / prostitute (though I only think she was sleeping with Ian, but maybe I'm wrong).  I think it is Upton who transitioned Ben from complicated heel with a romantic appeal to a tortured, brooding romantic lead with a complicated past. I'm not sure that was the smartest move. Upton must have believed that Ben's near rape was his redemption arc, but I don't think it was enough. There is something deliciously wicked about Ben becoming involved with Mia after the death of Mia's stepson Jim Marriott, who had confessed his love for Mia before racing off on his motorbike and being hit by Ben's car. I could see the appeal, but I don't think it completely worked.  There should have been an angle involving Betsy (who had been a reporter I think when she first appeared) investigating Jim Marriott's accident, possibly with Jamie Rolins who was I believe district attorney. Betsy and Ben growing closer as Betsy grows closer to the truth. Ben confiding in Mia as Andrew continues to make Ben his surrogate son setting in motion the same dramatic situation with Andew's second wife being in love with his son/surrogate son.  I think Betsy and Jamie Rollins were together while Ben was in prison, but I don't think they had much to do. I may be wrong. Meg should have gone after custody making it seem like Jamie and/or Betsy were unfit leading to a case with social services which would have brought Diana Lamont back into the mix causing emotional angst for Diana as she works with Jamie to provide him the child she couldn't.  The Felicia / Eddie / Charles stuff seems rather generic once you get to Charles' paralysis and sexual dysfunction. Felicia's pregnancy and her death seemed to bring an end to a story that really wasn't strong enough to be frontburner. The Lynn Henderson stuff always seems rather movie of the week rather than developed for an ongoing story.  In the past, I agreed that it might have been possible that the story had become so disjointed that they needed to freshen up and add new story elements as Upton did but others have suggested that the elements themselves should have just been considered.   For example, I'm not a huge proponent of Rick and Cal as a couple, but I do think there was some mileage of actually reintroducing Barbara into the mix trying to reconnect with Hank, carrying a torch for Rick, causing conflict in the Sterlings marriage with Bruce and Van taking sides over Barbara vs. Cal, and Barbara maneuvering her way into the Beaver Ridge Complex making her business partners with Rick and Meg, which would give her a new rival.  When Ben returned, there should have been a question of how true his redemption was rather than just jumping in head first to a new role.  I think the Schneiders might have been script writers for Ann Marcus on "Search for Tomorrow," but I may be wrong on that.  Upton introduced the Marriotts in Janaury, 1977. Christian Marlowe's Andy Marriott seemed to be in the mold of Ben. I don't know if the story was any good, but I think Upton towards the end hinted an Andrew / Meg / Andy storyline which I thought would have been interesting. I think Upton had some interesting concepts, but from my understand, the execution was awful. 
    • Is there a new drinking game I don't know about?
    • But... the air of mystery and intrigue as they say it...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy