Jump to content

GH: Does The Mob Help Or Hurt?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

There is a place for everything on this show. The biggest problem is the balance. I can't really complain too much right now about the balance of GH. I would like to see the hospital shown a bit more, but I'm greatful for the hospital scenes we do get. Lord knows there was a time a few years ago where we went months without seeing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My opinion: It helps because it's never boring watching this show. Something's always happening. But that's the only positive I can give it right now.

It hurts, in my opinion, because the heros are criminals that do despicable things and the cops are viewed as horrible villains who are constantly harrassing these poor, good, innocent MOBSTERS!

It also hurts because each and every mob story is predictable. Jason will kill someone, get off scott-free. A new mobster will come to town to take over Sonny's territory, only to turn in a cartoonish psychopath. Jason will get shot. He survives. Sonny gets shot. Not only does he survive, he tends to become rather potent afterwards and get somebody pregnant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

It would be good if the mob wasn't glorified or treated like heroes and taking up all the airtime. It's troublesome to watch Bob Guza's "upside down world." In Bob Guza's world, there's a "good mob" and a "bad mob" and he uses the "bad mob" to make the "good mob" heroes of the show. Case in point, right now Guza's doing that with Anthony ("bad")/Claudia ("good"), Ian ("bad")/Jerry ("good").

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

HURT but at this point removing it would most likely kill the show.

A good writer may be abe to slowly phaze it out but Frons LOVES it even through it does not draw it's target groups of striaight men so what's the point?

HoweverIf there was no hope for most it wouldn't be GH for most viewers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As someone said, it's Guza'a skewed view of the mobsters that hurts. How in the hell is there a such thing as a "good" mobster?! Everyone who's against Sonny and Jason are "bad" and have to die all the while Jason and Sonny are glorified for their illegal actions. It would make things better if Sonny and Jason actually had to pay for that they do instead of the police being the "bad" guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It goes both ways.

It helps them because without all these MOB stop GH will not be the same. GH is know for those types of stories.

It hurts them because it is the same thing over and over. Violence.............It gets annoying at some points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

R Sinclair, y u trippin? you should know better than to try and oiffer an opinion!

i agree and disagree with ya tho. I mean, true its never really borring in port charles and something is always goin on, but as for if thats always intersting is another thing. I honestly think it does help. the poroblem is they dont have fleshed out char's with layers and dont tell good stories. it could be set in the heart of hollywood, miami, new york city and revovle around hitman, cops, models, whatever. if the char's have no debth and the stories are flat - it isnt gonna be intersting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I dont mind that, because i do assume there are good mobsters. its not like they are this crazed killers, IMHO. and 99% of people thet get hurt chose to be in that life and aroound it. The problem is Sonny has lost al layers. We use to see he was this man in this bad life that wanted more and wanted to be better. he had soem depth. now we are TOLD by the writers, carly, alexis, robin, and everyone else that sonny is a good man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The mob is really only two primary characters and their story never changes that much. I think it's a question of viewers being used to their presence. The mob exists because it is built in drama. There's no need to actually think of new and interesting plots because all you need to do is bring in a new mob family and voila!, you've got danger.

I don't think they hurt or help the show because if both characters were gone, the show would go on and probably without the mob s/l since there would have to be a new set of mobsters and rivals introduced which could turn off viewers. In the long run, the monotony of seeing these two characters eat up the show (among other factors) that probably contributes to the diminishing audience. There's really nothing new under that sun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I must be a real idiot because I don't see the problem with someone strongly disagreeing with your opinion. It's not as if Cheap said you were wrong. I thought it worked that one person expresses an opinion and another might express a dissenting opinion. I'm pretty sure that people strongly disagree with my opinions on a regular basis and it doesn't make it any less my opinion or any less their's. It's a two way street.

I don't agree with your statement either but I respect your right to your opinion and I don't think strongly disagreeing is being disrespectful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Lois and Gloria did the right thing I feel knowing it was Camila that raised Gio has BL feeling some jealousy No one is saying that Camila was a bad mother to Gio I believe it will be Gio saying that Camila was great to him, thanking Lois and Gloria to get BL to see truth
    • Its realistic for Dani and  true of how the character thinks and operates. We've known her long enough to by that this would be consistent with her past characterizatioin
    • Random takes: - What was even the point of that jeweler guy? Also—Dani was borderline harassing him. - I know I’m probably in the minority here, but I want Jacob and Kat to happen. I need something messy to completely dismantle the Duprees—and Katomas just isn’t cutting it.  - I officially can’t stand Jacob and his wife. Same goes for Anita and Vernon. - Hayley’s corset was just as ugly as it looked uncomfortable. - I genuinely don’t remember when or how Derek and Ashley reconciled—and I’m someone who didn’t even mind their storyline! LMAO. - Tuesday’s episode was a mess. - Dani finding out about Hayley’s pregnancy and immediately thinking, “She’s faking it”—huh?! What writer thought that was a realistic reaction? I get denial, but that leap was absurd. I agree the ‘Leslie Victorious’ moment was way OTT. But hey, at least I wasn’t yawning. The following episode, where she handed over her daughter’s last few belongings was much better. - I can’t with the constant back-and-forth between Orphey Gene’s and the Country Club. I forgot this was such a soap trope, but even back in my loyal viewer days (late ‘90s, early 2000s), it wasn’t this bad. While GH has a ton of beautiful sets, we’re stuck with the same three—and half of them are ugly. Also: it’s been way too long since we had a party, gala, or any kind of event. I know the Richardsons’ anniversary gala (back in late April) has had a big ripple effect, but I was kinda getting used to those large-scale episodes. Fingers crossed they don’t go with Guza.  
    • The horrific comments execs and writers make when they justify rape storylines or keeping rapists as love interests is just so icky. I remember Ron Carlivati's comments about the reraping of Marty storyline on OLTL. Made my skin crawl.  No matter what you think of her, Susan Lucci could have demanded front burner storylines but she never did. She was happy to be part of an ensemble. I never got that vibe from Zimmer.  For me, Reva was just not a character I cared that much about after a certain point no matter how talented Zimmer is/was. I think Zimmer had a keener eye for what made a good storyline, but she was less willing to take a backseat if it meant someone else got to shine. I'm trying to recall if she ever mentions Michelle Forbes in her book--one of the few times the viewers did not care about Reva in a storyline. My sense is if she did, it was probably some backhanded remark about how she had to show Forbes the ropes.    
    • GH was good? I havent watched since Joss went away to do her traininig and Lulu had just called Brooklyn out for having Dante's baby and not telling him
    • BTG: A-  DAYS: B+  Eastenders: C
    • There was a rumor that Jean will die and that’s probably why she’s back then
    • There has been some confusion about Michael & facial burns. Please see this post: https://bsky.app/profile/shallotpeel.bsky.social/post/3lqkrryu54226 I've chosen to put this here instead of the Classic Thread because it is now with the appearance of recast Michael that this has come up. Different places online, including at least one podcast, remarks have been made about how remarkable it is that he is without facial scarring. Other fans say it was clear from the first that he did not have facial burns. What is included in this post is 2 screengrabs where you can see his face at the hospital & a very quick edit of that day in the hospital. 
    • Put me in the LOVE KMH camp. As a poster alluded to above, her detractors seem to come from people who first experienced the 80s Emily actress. And that's often the case with soaps, myself included. I enjoy the original actor so much that I just never take to the recast. However, KMH played Emily far longer than the original - for almost 20 years - and when she had great material, she was great. I get the sense she didn't like playing the whiny oh-woe-is-me Emily which was all the material she got from about 1996 until she took over the Intruder in late '99/early '00 and got to play a stronger kiss-ass woman who didn't care what anyone thought of her. (Some would call that a bitch but, if a man was in that role, he'd just be called a smart and savvy businessman.) Her relationship with Hal was great. The transformation was done realistically and I thoroughly enjoyed those years the best out of all. Once the writers decided to break up those two, they went back to writing Emily half the time as whiny and pathetic. I preferred when the writers made her stronger.
    • Hahaha - I do. I've always been the type, though, that can't miss anything. I get FOMO, so I'll not skip episodes or fast forward anything. There are only a few TV shows I've dropped because they got so bad vs. sticking it out to the end.  The promise that GL 1997 is better is what keeps me going. I especially want to see the fallout of Blake's lie about her twins and then Annie's descent which I believe won Watros's Emmy.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy