Jump to content

Santa Barbara Discussion Thread


dm.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Dr. Scott Clark was Vincent Irizarry's character who had helped Gina when she was blind.  She faked recovery from blindness to hold on him (classic only-on-a-soap story because either he was a crappy eye specialist who was unable to tell if his patients were malingering, or Gina went through a lot of trouble to hold onto her doctor, rather than just admitting she liked him, either way nobody was ever concerned about the consequences of insurance fraud).

Any way, in the early 1960s Scott's uncle Hal had an affair with Pamela, she killed him, and young Scott witnessed it but suppressed the memory until he was hypnotized by busty psychiatrist Dr. Heather Donnally.  The Donnally's were a failed attempt to create another family in town besides the Capwells that never caught on.  Soaps being soaps, of course Scott fell in love with Heather.  Then they broke up, but Heather was pregnant yadda yadda yadda.  From Celeste DiNapoli to Flame Baufort, Scott fell for traumatized women and that was his defining characteristic.

Originally, CC was thought to have killed Hal, because he beat him after finding out about his affair, so he helped bury Hal in the boathouse and this was retconned into the reason he divorced Pamela and banished her to Europe.  But, Scott remembered that Pamela actually shot Hal after CC beat him.  Once Scott realized the truth as an adult, Pamela went nuts, tried to poison Kelly, (which created the opportunity for recasting the role, so when Kelly awoke from her poisoning she suddenly looked like Carrington Garland).  Pamela was sent to the sanitarium where she stayed until that one night in 1991 when Mason inexplicably brought her to dinner at the Capwells...

I conflate this with the story of Heather's brother Michael who was an ex-cop turned priest.  He found out that contrary to popular belief Mason may have killed Dr. Mark McCormack, the abusive husband of Mason's first love Mary.  However, it turned out that Mark was actually murdered by a nun.  According to legend, this was a writer's strike story meant to be a short term tale told to hold over the plot until the writers returned.  Personally, I am fascinated by writer's strike stories on soaps because they are usually so bizarre.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know this may be an impossible question to answer, but why was SB unable to develop lasting characters outside of characters related to the Capwells? It felt as if the writers/producers would bring in characters for three months and then lose interest. I would blame the constant change in writers, but even during a specific regime's tenure, the same thing would happen. I'm thinking specifically of Lenore Kasdorf's Caroline and Christopher Norris's Laura. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Was that a writer’s strike story? When I saw it during my rewatch, I assumed it was just a summer, let’s give Julia something to do while Lane Davies is on vacation storyline. I actually liked it thought that might be unpopular. It was also the only time Michael was remotely interesting for me as well because I found him to be a huge bore afterwards and he lasted on the show way too long. 

My theory is that it had to do with Capwell storylines being so front and center. They would introduce a character, give them one or two storylines, but if they weren’t tied to the Capwells in some fashion, they would disappear once the stories started cycling around and the writers would forget about them. They had some decent non-Capwell characters throughout the show but that’s why I believed that they never lasted for long. The Lockridges were probably the biggest exception to this but I think their feud with the Capwells helped and Julia’s ties to them didn’t hurt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To be fair, the Capwells were a very large family. 

You have CC, at least two wives, Sophia and Pamela, as well as their kids Mason, Channing, Eden, Elena, Kelly, Ted, and Greg.  Along with their spouses/significant others, that is 14 characters right there, and if each of them was in a love triangle that would be 21 characters.  Most establishing soap families have 2-3 kids, but the Capwells were prolific.  

Also, Gina drove stories throughout the show.  And Cruz had several families to attend to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I really don't think it was because the Capwells were a large family. I think the constant shifting of headwriters, show runners, owners at New World, and NBC hurt the show. They seemed to always be cutting corners (characters) and they x n't cut the Capwells because that would really cost viewers. The Dobsons didn't really understand "normal" people, so that was a problem from the start. Then Warren got saddled with boring woman after boring woman. Sorry, but Maggie Gillis was a SNORE. She got Joe killed and after that, no one cared.

It always seemed like when the tried to bring a new family in, instead of doing it organically, they brought in characitures, and tried to shove them down our throats.  And very often outside of the Capwell or Lockridges, the talent for the new families simply was not there.

Who wants to watch terrible acting when the show has Marcy, A, Judith, Dame Judith, Louise, Nicolas, Jed, Lane, Nancy- well you know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

While Gina and Cruz were great characters, I don’t think they would have gotten the focus the did had they not had those ties to the Capwells. Brandon fueled a lot of stories for Gina throughout her time on the show and I could see the show losing interest in Cruz over time since he was as close to a perfect guy as you can get on a soap and needed more ambiguous characters to bounce off of. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Well, I am glad to know that & for it to make sense, so thanks for the info &  the perspective, also. At the end of AMC 1.0, I thought the new young talent was really quite good, but I missed Eden & NuBianca just ... well, I wasn't 100% sold on her & Bianca was so important to me. But then, Tad & Dixie were also important & yep, there's another problem, for me I mean. I'm not your typical AMC fan but I hung in there anyway. I know what you mean because it wasn't as good as it once had been but it was still Agnes's show in Pine Valley. Some of that is a bittersweet nostalgic clinging to the past, I guess. By that time I'd been through so many show cancellations. AW, Santa Barbara, PC, The City, GL, ATWT.  

      Please register in order to view this content

          Betsy Snyder, when she was at DAYS was part of the WGA winning writing team before she died, tragically far too young.  
    • Yep Edmund and Tad went under cover to infiltrate the... Willow Lake (I think?) old folks community scandal that was exploiting Phoebe, etc.  (Which at one point led to Edmund rescuing Brooke from quicksand--common around Pine Valley I guess

      Please register in order to view this content

      ) EDIT maybe I'm wrong.  I found the quicksand scene 

      Please register in order to view this content

      But for the story all I can find is Edmund going undercover as the gigolo "preying" on older women, Eduardo (no one would recognize him with that disguise and name ) so the drag must have been.. a different story?    
    • But then he HATES the original Heather Webber (Cher's half sister played her, right?) and we know what happened when Robin would step into the role a year after this.  He does seem pretty spot on about actors who show promise otherwise.  It's interesting he knocks OLTL early on (though I loved all the recently released episodes from this era we got) but does give a lot of credit to the actress playing Cathy despite earlier complaining about her story.  And over all, while quite negative, his various pros and cons on the shows sounds about right with what I know of the shows at this time. This was a July dated issue of the magazine but and I know they date mags a month or two in advance--obviously when he wrote this he didn't know Lovers and Friends was gonna go off the air (in May I think).
    • You know one of the soap outlets posed that question just last week: Who do you want Trina with Spencer or Kai? And, of course, the picture of Spencer was NAC. I said, well, a lot. I chose Kai. I said that Spencer had been an entitled brat & that some people valued him over her, when I valued her above all others. I guess we'll see.
    • You're right. The only thing I can think of is if GH finally decides to bring back Spencer.
    • Sharon Rose Gabet told me on Facebook that she calls this "Baby Raven".
    • I imagine the storyline would now segue into Laura's accident. But I hope they manage to keep Leslie around though. I really don't want her to be written out, or get the DOOL treatment where she just pops up every so often to cause some short term trouble; the character and the actor were such a find.
    • Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy