Jump to content

ATWT Wednesday November 21


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Let's do away with the logic of bad soap writing for just a minute. Is associating with people who put your underage child in harm's way something to file under doing what-the-hell-you-please? :rolleyes: I know we have inalienable rights in this country, but give me a break! Even if it's not about Jack, what about JJ? Forgiveness doesn't mean she has to be Kit's business buddy. It made much more sense for her to offer Katie her settlement money out of guilt. If Carly doesn't even have boundaries where her children are concerned (not that THAT wasn't clear by now) then she might as well be a wild animal. It's not like the circumstances are forcing her to make these ass-backwards choices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My take on the whole Noah and Luke situation is that we've seen so much of Luke's feelings for Noah, but not so much the other way around. I'm not doubting that Noah has some feelings for Luke, but I have to wonder how serious they are. I mean, like stenbeck said, Noah just stood there as Winston took shots at the boy he supposedly loves. I don't get it.

I will go to my grave saying that the show missed a golden opportunity by just introducing Noah as Cheri's out and proud son. We had coming out angst with Luke, we didn't need a round two with Noah. It would have been refreshing to have him be completely sure of his sexuality. I can picture Luke being attracted to a young man like that, someone who is willing to protect him at all costs. But no. Why do that when you can have another Sheffer-inspired cartoonish villain?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You've summed up my opinion from the beginning of this tale. Luke had enough problems with Lily, Damian, and even Holden (who didn't completely get his sexuality). Noah should have been just the opposite, a confident guy with a family that showed up the Snyders for their ignorance. There may be relationships like Nuke's in real life, but having seen Luke's angst in 2006 required that his boyfriend be the antidote in 2007. From a storytelling point of view, there was no evolution. Luke used Jade as a cover, and then Noah used Maddie! I'll never understand it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And they bonded over using people they cared about as covers. It makes sense, but it's just so...ugh...unnecessary, when it's a soap and there are people who are in full control of what it is that draws these two characters together.

It would have been just great for Noah's family to be proud and fully supportive of him. Cheri would be his mother, Winston wouldn't be anywhere in sight...Cheri could have a sister in vein of OLTL's Roxy. They'd be somewhat trashy, but they'd have good morals and a good sense of what family and love really mean. They wouldn't be main characters, mind you, but they'd be recurring guests who pop in every now and then. They could write out Henry and Vienna and Noah's aunt could own Al's, and they'd spend holidays at the farm...see what I mean? I can think of something way more interesting that what's on the air just by sitting here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, the only reason Carly offered the check to Katie was because she assumed Katie had taken Jack back.

Do I wish Carly had some tangible "proof" Kit wasn't just blowing smoke up her skirt? Sure. My point was, Carly doesn't have to run things past Jack anymore, they are divorced. Unless we get into some really stupid writing, Carly's not expecting Kit to babysit her kids. How is Kit any more dangerous to her children than "Uncle" Craig, who has been semi-living with them at the farm from time to time? Or some of the other "visitors" at the farm? (Paul? Vienna? Winston?)

As long as Carly doesn't push JJ to accept Kit as his new best friend (like Jack did with Katie) and ignore what ever JJ has to say about it (again, like Jack did...) I don't think it makes Carly some "wild animal" aka, bad mother. She's teaching her children a valuable lesson...bad decisions don't always define who a person is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think that's what the point was. Carly wanted forgiveness(another chance) for what she did. Kit wanted the same thing and Carly at first didnt want to give her that. Then she realized she was doing the same thing Jack was doing to her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wouldn't think anyone would need convincing that Carly is a bad mother, or that some things aren't to be forgiven. Of course it's not about gaining Jack or JJ's approval, because nobody should have to tell Carly what decisions to make where her children are concerned. But anybody could get paid handsomely to do it, since it would be a full time job. Forgiveness is one thing, gut level instinct is another. Suppose Elizabeth Smart's parents started a business with her kidnappers' accomplices. You'd be like "SAY WHAT???" You wouldn't say it's okay because the culprit was drunk. Yeah, drunk for EVERY SINGLE DAY the of the Idaho plot. Kit was so bossy, I didn't realize the bar was actually running itself! :rolleyes: Perhaps Carly should have taken out another mortgage to pay for her rehab and complete her streak of generosity. I have always hated unholy alliances on soaps, unless somebody's being blackmailed to high heavens. Somebody has to be infinitely stupid for them to work. For the writers, anyway. I would SO run to child protective services if I were Jack! :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not all alcoholics are passed out in gutters. Some do manage to function enough to earn a living. It's not as if Kit were running a multi-million dollar company.

I think you kind of made my point. It's about Carly's "gut level" instinct. Right now, she's willing to believe Kit. And really "accomplice to kidnapping" could be on half the residents of Oakdale's resumes. I don't see Jack forbidding Meg from having contact with his children. I don't like it; but it doesn't make Carly a bad mother, any more than Lily's bedding Dusty, who not too long ago was bedding her neice and involved in Aaron's temporary paralysis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ugh I hate that Carly was alone on Thanksgiving, Jackass is pissing me off these days, and I wish Brad would have beat his ass more than he did :D

Henry & Vienna are nothing but props for the Katie and Jack gag fest

I'm starting to hate Meg, and I hope the baby IS Craig's because she doesn't want him to be the father :D

I'm really liking Brad these days

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So, Professor, do you teach classes in Perfect Objectivity? :rolleyes:

I've never had any problem admitting Carly is often wrong. I won't be surprised if this alliance with Kit backfires in her face, and Jack has to rush in and "save" her. And I won't be surprised if Metro succeeds and Kit becomes a recurring character. The ONLY thing that would surprise me is Jack admitting down the road that Carly giving Kit a chance was a good thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I'm curious the motivation for keeping Bela on beyond the circus story arc.  Did he play a character like his character on EON, or was he more of a good guy? I know he ended up with Sunny at the end of the series, but I always thought that Sunny/Hogan could have been revived once the lack of chemistry between him and the NuLiza became apparent.   Actually... the NuLiza (Louan Gideon) reminded me more of Sunny than she did Liza as played by Sherry... and she just threw off the whole vibe of the show. I see Estelle has just arrived in the late October 1985 episodes, which only means that Wendy and Stephanie are soon on their way out.   It also appears that the Sarah/Quinn/Wendy triangle was set up by Mayer.. and it looks as though Tomlin is going to deactivate it by the introduction of Colleen Dion's character.   I don't understand why no one on the show thought to look at Quinn and realize that he was the problem and write him out.
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • I kind of assume they're toning down Rachel's bad seed tendencies a bit to make it less obvious if they're going for her as the shooter. At least that's what I hope they're doing - I've really enjoyed Rachel being a bratty evil DiMera princess and Marlena finally getting a grandchild she deserves. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Jason and hemming and hawing about Sidwell taking over and being ruthless

      Please register in order to view this content

      . This show is so stupid. Sonny killed an FBI agent less than a year ago by shooting him at point blank range. But the new short bald man is much much worse cause he was a bad guy in some part of Africa and managed to not kill Lucky, Isaiah, Jason, or Anna. This show is crippled by the mob all these years after Guza has been long gone.    Laura is literally saying oooo but Sonny is a good mobster for Port Charles. Give me a [!@#$%^&*].ing break. Sometimes I don’t know why I watch this joke of a show.
    • With all the changes Sunny was one of the longest running characters by that time.  She had never been married and had heaps of story potential. I can see America getting with SFT -you know 'the circus soap'. Smart move because circuses were all the rage with the kids in the 80's. Maybe Stu and Jo could have bought the circus.
    • It is actually pathetic, that Victor’s 50 year old children are still written as scared of this man that has to sit in every scene. I get it, EB has been on the show for almost 50 years, but I don’t care. He’s a man in his 80’s and should not be the damn lead and driving force because you don’t want to upset Eric Braeden ‘s fragile ego that only exists because the writers have cowtowed to this man for so long.
    • PREACH Victor being written as he was 20 years ago to support EB's ego or some misguided belief that what worked decades ago is still relevant is destroying the show. Victor comes off as a rambling old fool holding on to vendettas and a desperate need for perceived power. His children still cow-towing to him makes them look equally foolish. If the writing portrayed Victor as  more of an irritant to them then maybe it would work.
    • They desperately need another meeting spot that isn’t Orphy Genes or the Country club. Y&R is awful now but there’s at least GCAC, Crimson Lights, Society, and the Jazz room at GCAC to meet at. 4 places is definitely better than 2 and I can’t imagine these rich folks literally only eat at their damn country club.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy