Jump to content

Writer's Strike Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I'm pro-JFP. Loved her OLTL and GL stints (didn't see her SB stint, but my mother watched SB at the time and said it was good.) Honestly her GH stint has been the worst of her career, but I agree with the above that she is simply not a good match for GH. I don't think she'd be right for Y&R, but would love to see her replace Goutman on ATWT. I think she could do wonders for the show. However, she is apparently on P&G's "never hire again" [!@#$%^&*] list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

If JFP had a successful time w/ GL, it was only b/c of Nancy Curlee's, and Patrick Mulcahey's, writing. Once those two quit the show, the show went to Hell in a pastel-colored handbasket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don´t know. I don´t think Corday has much to say anymore. It´s obviously Sony who makes the decisions because they desperately want DAYS to survive. I seriously doubt Corday would ever fire Steve Wyman, yet he is gone. And Ed Scott hiring seems to be a crystal clear example of crysis management. I really think if Sony wanted to get rid of Sheffer he would be let go already no matter the costs, the same like Wyman and most of his rightmen.

But Ed Scott and his crew are already in full control and it doesn´t look like he has any trouble with Sheffer. The show is slowly emerging again and the transition period is ending. I would hate if had to endure another writer change and I think it would mean the show´s suicide so I believe/hope you are wrong.

Btw. are you sure Reilly is still on the paylist? I thought his contract ended five months after he´d been fired, that´s why he stood in the credits so long.

Just wanted to add I really loved the Tom Casiello post. I love when writers are passionate over their work. All strikers have my full support.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Didn't Ed Scott replace Steve Wyman? I'm going to assume he's inheriting his duties, but that Corday still has the same power. I highly doubt Scott would've hired Dena Higley, considering her track record and the fact that they've never worked together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

QUOTE (Chris B @ Nov 22 2007, 02:20 PM)
Didn't Ed Scott replace Steve Wyman? I'm going to assume he's inheriting his duties, but that Corday still has the same power. I highly doubt Scott would've hired Dena Higley, considering her track record and the fact that they've never worked together.

Corday obviously didn´t have the power when he was forced to hire Reilly again. Nor had the power to fire him till the things got unbeliavable ugly. And all interviews and behind the scene looks lately, everybody is talking about Ed Scott and his producers and their involvement in the stories. Not Corday. Besides, we still don´t know what the deal with Highley is except the fact she worked on DAYS for 20 years under many headwriters and never had any trouble to cooperate. So I think as Sheffer´s helper and someone who oversee the writing room she could be very effective, especially if the reports are true and Sheffer is not the everyday working and everything controlling kind of writer and he let Meg Kelly do all the dailly and less creative stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Leting Higley do the daily work would be a nightmare. Also, you must consider that recently when an existing headwriter gets a new Co-Head, it usually meants the old one is out. Even if Hogan isn't out, Higley can't be an asset in any form and I still don't believe for a second that Ed Scott brought her on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

they better not fire Hogan Sheffer, he is the best HW in the business. I am loving all of Sheffer's story, come on replacing Sheffer with Higly is suicidal. Higly is his CO-HW. Days will not get rid of Mr Hogan Sheffer.

I think this year 2007 was just a settling stone for him. To end the vendetta and start something new. etc

Sheffer is the best HW days had since the first run of Reilly.

Sheffer isn't going anywhere. When that contract of Reilly is up and Corday and just focus on Sheffer. That means when the contract of reilly is up, more Vets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Sony/NBC can suggest what they want, but ultimately, Ken Corday has final say on everything and yeah, sometime he gives in to the pressure by Sony/NBC.

You're right on this one. I hear they get along fine.

Yeah, I was told (months ago) Reilly's still on the payroll.

Bingo.

Yeah he was forced by NBC to hire Reilly but what was Corday going to do? Reilly and a new contract were a package deal. NBC wanted Reilly and Corday gave in/took the deal. It took Corday/Wyman 3 years to finally convince NBC to fire Reilly, but I'm pretty sure Reilly was happy to go. He was still going to get paid and he didn't have to deal with Dumb and Dumber anymore. Lucky guy! LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree that B&E and LML will not be back after the strike... but I think Passanante will stay unless ATWT strikes gold with scabs. Remember that in 2005, Hogan Sheffer was supposed to come back from his 17 week sabbatical, but didn't when viewers preferred Passanante's work.

I can't see Guza going anywhere. Passanante, Kreizman, Bell (obviously), Sheffer, Carlivati, and Guza are all safe IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The people who should be head writer's are already on GH's writing staff - Karen Harris and Michele Val Jean. Both have had co-head writing stints in the past and both know GH's history and what makes the show click. If Guza gets fired and those two were promoted as co-head writers, I'd be all for it and I think GH would be much better off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think the pre-Barnabas episodes are very underrated both for dialogue and character. They're slow but they really create a world and fill out the characters, imbuing them with heavy dimension that ultimately will have to sustain them for years as the show largely stops writing for character after it returns from 1795. What we know about them by then is what they have to power them. (I don't think the show was bad after, I actually love it in '68 and often in times after that, but it was very different.) I think the B&W episodes with Barnabas' early days are especially frightening - they terrified me as a kid - but the color stuff in '67 is also very strong, especially in the stretch where Julia is on the run, Carolyn is under Barnabas' control, and you get the sense that events have gone off the rails for the regular characters and anything goes. As a child viewer seeing it in syndication on the Sci-Fi Channel, who had no idea who lived or who died, it was a lot. Mitch Ryan is especially powerful in the early pre-Barnabas era as the sort of Byronic Burke Devlin character. You knew they had to kill him once Barnabas comes in, despite Ryan's alcohol problem making it impossible to keep him at the show - Burke dominates the first year or so as the fulcrum character, he's incredibly magnetic and charismatic. You couldn't see him becoming a dupe for Barnabas and Julia, as Anthony George's more benign, mild version briefly does before getting unceremoniously killed off. I always found Burke's offscreen plane crash death very eerie and suspicious, and I think the show does toy with the question if Barnabas' powers somehow got him on that plane and if he took it down. I had always wanted Burke to return one day, in any revival project, as a kind of vengeful power broker and puppet master, driven by Vicki's inevitable demise to get revenge on Barnabas and co. I still have Art Wallace's "Shadows on the Wall" DS bible somewhere. IIRC in the earliest versions of the plot Vicki was going to somehow be tied to the butler or his daughter - Betty Hanscomb or something. I don't remember the exact details. I do know there's all sorts of raised and dropped plotlines and characters offscreen in '66, like Ned Calder, the man they clearly intended to pair with Liz and so on. I've always found '66 very rich, but I don't begrudge the show after for it because it's still awfully well-written, specifically the early Barnabas stuff.
    • I totally agree with this, as most of you seem to. Mary Carney was at least competent and reasonably likable; I just feel like she barely had anything of substance to do before she was abruptly given the hook. And I get the backstory of Kathleen Tolan having done a play with Helen Gallagher, but...at any point did they ever actually READ her before they greenlit her? Because...OOF. First time I saw her on SoapNet was right when this GODAWFUL actress named Charity Rahmer played Belle on Days of Our Lives for all of three weeks before she was mercifully recast; her line readings were straight out of a Charlie Brown special. I remember thinking Kathleen Tolan could have played her mother! In the Frank/Jill/Delia triangle, Delia WAS the one who was cheated on, so I got why she was upset and thought it was perfectly valid in theory at least, but of course it was blown up to Wagnerian proportions including falls involving staircases and tricycles. But with Pat/Faith/Delia I had no sympathy for her...especially because it was mainly with Catherine Hicks's Faith and I really liked her.
    • I was going through those episodes from 1984 and early 1985 before they were taken down. Some of the older characters, like Don and even Tom, looked a little out of place, like they were on the wrong show. But the newer characters were fun. It's too bad they lost the character of Melissa. I guess Jennifer took her long-term place on the canvas. 
    • How I will remember him...

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • The black and white episodes of the show are very special. An atmosphere the color run loses. Dark Shadows was filmed live-on-tape. They could do a retake but it would be very expensive. I think there was a claim that if actors wanted a retake they would curse. There was also a rumor that at one point Joan Bennett accidentally said "Hollywood" instead of "Collinwood" and that necessitated a retake.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      Angela Lansbury stars as Jessica Fletcher in one of the longest-running and most beloved TV series of all-time, Murder, She Wrote. Set in Cabot Cove, Maine, Jessica is a mystery writer and amateur detective who is quick to outwit both criminals and the police when it comes to solving a murder. Winner of 4 Golden Globes and nominated for 12 consecutive Primetime Emmy Awards for Best Actress in a Drama, the series showcases unforgettable guest stars including Tom Bosely, George Clooney, Shirley Jones, Courteney Cox, Leslie Nielsen, Mickey Rooney, Tom Selleck, John Amos, Dorothy Lamour, Cyd Charrise and many more. In Murder, She Wrote: The Complete Series, help Jessica get to the bottom of every crime she encounters in this completely remastered collection featuring all 264 episodes, 4 TV movies, and bonus features. Special Features: "Novel Connection" (Crossover Episode of Magnum P.I.); The Great 80's TV Flashback; Origin of a Series; Recipe for a Hit; America's Top Sleuths; The Perils of Success
    • Loved this IG post from Ambyr about how she and Trisha work together. You can tell these ladies go above and beyond the script, and that they really trust and enjoy working together. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DJpJufFPOQ2/?igsh=MXBmcWs0YzIwaXVhNA==  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • It is a shame that more characters didn't go the ATWT-Barbara route and make the ingénue into an antagonist. Sort of like they did with Liza/Hogan/Sunny, less successfully. It is a credit to ATWT's creativity that breathed life in that character for years after she was fighting off bulls in Spain.  But, a character like Liza can only have so many true loves and high jinks on the high seas.  They need another reason to be in the story. Liza's wealth, as well as her acumen to see through fraud, was fertile ground for tons of stories.  But, I feel like the business stories for Liza were always about her being easily overwhelmed, rather than exploring things like her leadership and managerial skills.
    • STFU!! Dante!!! This nonsense of blaming Gio is just ridiculous! Alexis and Lucky are becoming so unlikable. Why are the writers writing these characters so poorly?
    • Keith still comes off younger to me. I thought he wasn't that bad for his first day.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy