Members edgeofnik Posted October 16, 2007 Members Share Posted October 16, 2007 Here's a great article == sounds like there is hope for ATWT and GL: http://www.tvweek.com/blogs/james-hibberd/..._save_turns.php Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Y&RWorldTurner Posted October 16, 2007 Members Share Posted October 16, 2007 God, Barbara Bloom needs to go live under a [!@#$%^&*] rock. She's been nothing but poison to CBSD since she got there. Looks like both GL and ATWT will look even cheaper and crappier than they do now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Khan Posted October 16, 2007 Members Share Posted October 16, 2007 All that...and not one mention of hiring better writers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members MichaelGL Posted October 16, 2007 Members Share Posted October 16, 2007 OMG hasn't that happened already? Geeezz how poorer can these two soaps get? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Ryan Posted October 16, 2007 Members Share Posted October 16, 2007 Those changes still won't solve the issue of sorry assed writing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members edgeofnik Posted October 16, 2007 Author Members Share Posted October 16, 2007 The reality is that trade publications and advertisers aren't interested in hearing about writing, etc. It's all about the bottom line. I do think that more outdoor/remote scenes help -- look at ATWT's ratings for the most recent outdoor scenes. We can only hope that better writing/writers will be forthcoming. At least, they are trying to do something to keep them going. Where's a Gloria Monty when you need her! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Graciecat Posted October 16, 2007 Members Share Posted October 16, 2007 I think perhaps the scariest part of that article for me was seeing how many people actually watch Judge Judy. And how is that possible, by the way? I think Dr. Phil and the afformentioned judge are two of the most revolting peple on television, so if they're doing better than soaps and cost a lot less, bad times lay ahead. Frankly, this article really scared me. I mean, ATWT is simply not that far behind the other soaps at all. I just wonder if we'll be down to Y&R and GH in ten years, because I don't see how soaps, in the current climate, can gain substantially more viewers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members stenbeck212 Posted October 16, 2007 Members Share Posted October 16, 2007 Getting outside of badly lit studios to actually see what Oakdale and Springfield look like is a great move with the potential to change every other soap too. But how can Bloom not know that the blueprint for success is in the writing? It seems like the changes in the article apply more to GL than ATWT. We'll see. I wonder if the new cameras will be flattering to actors, or just expose hammy soap performances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Khan Posted October 16, 2007 Members Share Posted October 16, 2007 One thing's for sure: ATWT viewers better stock up on their Dramamine now, b/c those jerky hand-held camera shots? Aren't going away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members winterguy125 Posted October 16, 2007 Members Share Posted October 16, 2007 I really like the sounds of this actually, granted like Ryan and other's said the writing also needs to change, but I do like the sounds of this, sure it is cutting costs but this article made it sound like we will be seeing better production values than we are seeing today, I mean frankly ATWT is a mess right now production wise, so this might be an improvement. I really like the idea of making it real looking, that could be a major step forward for soaps in general. I also like that it sounds like it won't be shaky cam either because the cameras will be in the walls, which means they won't be moving all around like the steady cam does, lol. I really like the idea of the outside sets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members winterguy125 Posted October 16, 2007 Members Share Posted October 16, 2007 According to that article they would be going away because they will be in the walls and not help by camera people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members P.J. Posted October 16, 2007 Members Share Posted October 16, 2007 I'm not really thrilled by lowering the production values either. I don't like the cramped feel we get now with the handheld cameras. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DaytimeFan Posted October 16, 2007 Members Share Posted October 16, 2007 This certainly SOUNDS good to me. British soaps have been filmed this way for decades and they look really excellent. I don't view it as a lowering of production values as much as a shift in production values. True, the cameras will be a bit jerky (they are not being put in the walls...what the article said is that the sets will have 4 walls instead of 3) but I think, if done well, ATWT and GL will really look fantastic. I hope it all works out and if it does that more soaps will follow suit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members NeoAngelicLiz Posted October 16, 2007 Members Share Posted October 16, 2007 "The low-rated vintage soaps are on the bubble for renewal in July and CBS is taking dramatic steps to try and keep the classic series on the air." Nothing storywise seems to be making a big change for the show it seems... When it comes to the writing I don't have a major problem with the writers or the dialogue. However I'm wouldn't mind if they made changes just so I can see whether or nto it will actually make a big difference in how people view the show or the ratings. As long as the show doesn't look ugly I'll be pleased. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members stenbeck212 Posted October 16, 2007 Members Share Posted October 16, 2007 I can't imagine that the crews would never use a tripod. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.