Jump to content

DAYS: Would you enjoy a serial killer storyline?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Exactly. And I don't want it to be talented vets who get the axe (ie Suzanne Rogers and James Reynolds who have talent and plenty of story left to tell)...I'm talking Shawn Sr, John, Andre...That being said I would NOT enjoy another serial killer storyline. It's a gimmick that has been burned out one too many times on this show.

And in regards to the fabulous Louise Sorel if memory serves she had a major conflict with the execs at DAYS because she felt marginalized on the show and didn't feel that DAYS was giving the actors any sort of creative freedom (which is exactly what Ed Scott has pointed out). I'd love for her to be back, but I don't think it's in the cards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Self-censorship is a double edge sword, sungrey. :lol: Simply put: No, DOOL, or any other show for that matter, should not embark on a serial killer story. But do you think they'd listen to viewers? AMC had the disasturous Satin Serial Killer that took the life of Dixie & Simone- two fan faves. They wasted two great characters for an ill-conceived, poorly executed story with a horrendous fallout for what- ratings? buzz? They were 0 for 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No.

It's too soon after the JER debacle and it would be hard to take it seriously no matter how good it was. Plus, the show would likely choose the wrong people to get rid of (namely, vets) and I don't think fans could handle something like this right now. There are other ways of getting buzz and attracting attention. Just tell good stories and provide great drama, regardless of what the fanbases say. That will do it.

Sometime down the road would be fine but doing this now would do alot more harm then good IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, the Salem Serial Killer story was a debacle from a quality storytelling perspective, but boy was daytime abuzz with all things DOOL in late 2003/early 2004. It was a ratings smash. It's been said that when the cast & crew looked at the ratings during that time, they threw mini-parties to celebrate. It was somewhat of a morale booster. GL sure needs a morale boost. No wonder why AMC chose to replicate their success with the debacle that was the Satin Serial Killer story. It seemed like everybody was talking about DOOL & the strange ways in which characters were "killed" off. Love him or loathe him, JER knew how to lure in viewers, even to the point where DOOL was the 2nd highest rated show- surpassing B&B & GH!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It may have done that but it made a mockery of death and the show itself. The show is just now finally getting over the damage that story caused.

Buzz is great but it's not worth it ruining a show's reputation. It's pretty sad how when someone dies now people think they are alive somewhere. I should also add those gimmicks won't do it anymore because I don't think the audience is there anymore. I think the past 3 years has turned so many away that I think gone are the days where cheap tricks will get you ratings success. If you get lucky, it gives you a few good weeks and what good is that? I said the same thing earlier this year with GH's hostage event. Sure, they did great for sweeps but the show crashed and burned right after the event was over. Long-term ratings success is the goal and gimmicks won't get you that anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What, go for it so I AM kicked off the board?

Just kidding... okay, you talked me into it.

I was one of the few who detested every last bit of the Salem Stalker storyline when it played out on Days. Ken Corday and James Reilly were cavalierly getting rid of veteran characters who had years of story invested in the show. Abe, Maggie, Roman, Jack, etc... and the sad thing was, had the dead stayed dead, you were being asked to watch a show that would have been a shell of its former self.

The storylines planned for these characters post-SSK wouldn't have had the same impact. You couldn't pay me enough money to watch Patrick go after Jennifer. Julie after Doug's death would've been a useless prop character who never would have had a storyline again. Mickey without Maggie? It goes back to what I said about Jennifer and Patrick... Mickey and Bonnie was a disaster from the get-go.

Sooner or later, everyone would've caught on that these characters weren't returning... and the ratings would have started a fast and irreversible decline. I know for a fact, had everyone including Alice stayed dead, I never would've watched another episode of Days ever again. What Reilly did to the longtime viewers of the show was say, in so many words, that he didn't give a damn about us.

So, in short, my answer is no. I don't want to go through another story like this again on Days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, so long, sungrey, it's been good to know ya, lol.

But seriously, you echoed alot of my sentiments regarding SSK. I just felt it was totally unnecessary, and a total slap in the face to all those who had invested years into the show, audience and actors alike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In the minority here, but I actually enjoyed the SSK story post-Melaswen. That was truly must-see-TV for me. I personally think if Melaswen never happened, less important characters(Cassie for example) were the ones killed and *stayed* dead, that story could have kept momentum and some of the viewers(including me) wouldn't have felt like we wasted an entire year of our lives. Despite that, I don't think a serial killer is the answer right now. DAYS has a teen-newbie invasion going on right now that appears to be it's main drawback. Throwing a serial killer into the mix (which more than likely will feature these said teens and the vets as glorified props) will just compound the situation, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Leslie and her family are from Chicago? Anita's background also includes being a former Chi-Town native? Might they connect this and go somewhere with it?
    • Honestly who's to say Leslie even birthed Eva, I mean she's a liar, I wouldn't believe a word she says about Eva being Ted's(or hers)
    •   1. 11/1/83 cast/set list:  

      Please register in order to view this content

          The "11/2/83" video you posted of Ruth Buzzi's scenes includes Roman and Hope in them, meaning the video you posted is actually 11/1/83, since Roman and Hope aren't in 11/2/83.   2. The video you posted of "11/2/83" has scenes with Roman and Hope. As you can see from my cast/set list, Roman and Hope are not in the 11/2/83 episode (see above note):   4573...11/2/83: Cast: Mickey, Julie, Doug, Maggie, Neil, Don, Marie, Alex, Liz, Andre as Tony, Gwen, Chris, Eugene, Sandy, Letitia, Charlene, Mrs. Whiting, Wanda/Guard, Dave, Delia, Saleslady # 1, Saleslady # 2, Figure in Dark, Raven/animal, Cats/animals, Birds/animals.   2.  11/3/83 :My video collection starts with 11/4/83. so I don't have the 11/1/83 or 11/3/83 video, but in addition to the cast/set list for 11/3/83, here is also the parking clearance call sheet for that day, showing Ruth was not only in the cast/set list but did work that day:     They even had hired the animal trainer and all the animals for the day, so It's sort of a certainty that her scenes were not cut that day, or it would have been a big waste of the budget. 3. As for 11/7/83, I just fast-forwarded through that whole episode myself. Letitia is in it from start to finish. It's her big final episode where she is killed. She starts the episode saying "Eugene, are you there?" In the next act, Marlena shows up and meets Letitia's lion. Later in the episode, Letitia is killed by "Eugene" (the Salem Slasher in a Eugene mask).   So, as we can see from your own post, the 11/2/83 date you have listed on that video is incorrect, since Hope and Roman are in that video but not in the 11/2/83 episode.It seems the dates you have on all your early November 1983 episodes are incorrect.   When you post videos and suggest that my data is incorrect, do you not first compare who is in the scenes and see if that matches who is in the episode? You didn't do that with the "11/2/83" episode, which based on Roman and Hope being in it means that is actually 11/1/83. Best to do something like that first before suggesting my data and research is incorrect.
    • Within the Dupree family, I predict Vernon/Anita will be conflicted about what to do about Bill and his role in the whole Ted/Silk Press Sheila situation... especially since Bill knows where the particular bone about Martin is buried. Dani, Chelsea, and Naomi's reactions to what Bill possibly did isn't hard to guess.. but Hayley's reactions will be interesting to hear.  Especially given her recent pregnancy scare.. she might not be so much on Bill's side, or she'll totally surprise us and be totally on Bill's side.   Either way, I think Martin's secret will be the main focus in May sweeps.. with the fall out of the Eva secret playing out in the background... while the Joey/Vanessa/Doug thing continues to boil/develop.
    • Hotel was The Love Boat on land but a little soapier. I will forever maintain that Hotel was a time slot hit. I don't believe that 1983/84 Hotel was a better show than Knots Landing.
    • The Golden Girls key episodes by ratings September 14, 1985: The Engagement (series premiere), rating 25.0, #1 Season highs February 22, 1986: Adult Education, rating 25.2 October 4, 1986: Ladies of the Evening, rating 27.3 November 8, 1986: Isn't it Romantic, rating 27.3 February 6, 1988: My Brother, My Father; rating 24.6 November 26, 1988: Sophia's Wedding (Part 2), rating 24.3, #1 September 23, 1989: Sick and Tired (Part 1) (season 5 premiere), rating 23.5 January 12, 1991: Sisters of the Bride, rating 19.3 May 9, 1992: One Flew Out of the Cuckoo's Nest (series finale), rating 18.9 Season lows October 19, 1985: The Triangle, rating 18.6 May 16, 1987: Empty Nests (season 2 finale), rating 17.8 February 20, 1988: And Ma Makes Three, rating 18.0 April 29, 1989: Rites of Spring, rating 18.7 April 28, 1990: All Bets are Off, rating 15.8 February 16, 1991: Older and Wiser, rating 11.6 October 26, 1991: Mother Load, rating 10.9 Ten highest-rated episodes October 4, 1986: Ladies of the Evening, rating 27.3 November 8, 1986: Isn't it Romantic, rating 27.3 January 3, 1987: The Sisters, rating 27.0 November 22, 1986: Family Affair, rating 26.8 January 10, 1987: The Stan Who Came to Dinner, rating 26.6 January 24, 1987: Before and After, rating 26.4 February 28, 1987: Whose Face is This, Anyway?; rating 25.8 September 27, 1986: End of the Curse (season 2 premiere), rating 25.6 November 15, 1986: Big Daddy's Little Lady, rating 25.3 February 22, 1986: Adult Education, rating 25.2 Ten lowest-rated episodes October 26, 1991: Mother Load, rating 10.9 September 28, 1991: The Case of the Libertine Belle, rating 10.9 October 19, 1991: Where's Charlie?, rating 11.0 February 15, 1992: Ebbtide VI: The Wrath of Stan, rating 11.3 February 16, 1991: Older and Wiser, rating 11.6 December 14, 1991: The Pope's Ring, rating 11.7 April 25, 1992: Home Again, Rose (Part 1); rating 12.3 October 5, 1991: Beauty and the Beast, rating 12.7 November 2, 1991: Dateline: Miami, rating 12.7 December 7, 1991: From Here to the Pharmacy, rating 12.8
    • The timing is strange, though. How far in advance would they normally be on location? The Achille Lauro hijacking was on October 7, 1985. Nancy had arrived in Egypt in the storyline by October 18. But the character of Hawk, Chris' Native American friend from Arizona, had already appeared onscreen by September and brought a letter telling Chris to be in Egypt by October 25th.  Why did they already have the link to Arizona before the reason to cancel the shoot in Egypt?  The dust and the jar it came in were from Egypt though. Nancy bought it there and sent it to Mac as a gift before she came back to the states and followed Chris to Arizona.
    • Actually that is not what happened. Nor is the timing right for it to have been. We learned from a WOST interview with Pete Lemay  in 2006, which can be found on YT, that it was Fred Silverman's idea to do the 90 minute show. I don't know how much you know about him but he had these amazing successes as head of daytime at both ABC & at CBS. Then he came to NBC where basically everything he touched turned NOT TO GOLD but to shite. Some of the most expensive shows ever produced up to that time were huge flops. Although even he, like a broken clock, could be right on occasion. However, as we know, he was not right about the 90 minute show. As a matter of fact, afterward,  NBC programmers, who worked FOR him, were asked why they did it & they were quoted as saying it was because they couldn't think of anything else to try. It was a stupid idea from a man who had reached the point where he was throwing anything at the wall to see if it would stick.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy