Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 12.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Soapsuds

    4192

  • Faulkner

    3003

  • DramatistDreamer

    2412

  • ChitHappens

    1615

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Venus Williams was just on QVC selling a pain relieve product and I just bought it!

Please register in order to view this content

She was on the air and your hear Oracene in the background ....she's like that's my mom.

Edited by Soapsuds
  • Members
Posted (edited)

Nah...Terri works during the week. She has the weekends off.  Yes the host said I guess you have to run...your mom is calling for you

Venus has been at Opelka matches this week. Tennis Channel made sure we knew about it by paning the camera to her and gushing over how she supported a serve bot.

Edited by Soapsuds
  • Members
Posted

Ah I think I heard that too but my viewing of tennis lately has been used for background noise and Grigor is just a waste of talent. Without Them playing I've lost a lot of interest in the men's tour. 

The big hoopla about the next gen is just that. Tsitsipas and Sasha have been a flop so far. 

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Tennis as a sport has made a lot of miscalculations in terms of cutting off access to the sport. They have made it much too challenging for fans and potential fans to  watch. When the sport was more accessible to basic cable (not just ESPN) and broadcast television (CBS, NBC, ABC, FOX TV) people can just click on any given weekend and catch some tennis on television. Those days are over and the audience has dwindled as a result. Many of us picked up racquet (myself included) for the first time because we a Monica or a Zina playing on television. I mean, the ATP doesn't even want fans to create GIFs to post on social media and has threatened those who do, in the past. It wasn't always stars and faves who sold the sport (it certainly helps) because there were times when the Tours were in transition periods (Martin VerKerk getting to the Roland Garros final) and when only hardcore fans knew the names of the players contesting big titles (Coria vs. Gaudio for the RG title) but people still tuned in in larger numbers than some matches featuring today's current #1 players, simply because people happened to click on NBC on a Sunday morning in early June and become interested in what they saw. We don't have that anymore. As nice a person as Barty seems, she's not compelling many non hardcore tennis to get up at 3:30 am EST to watch her keep her head down and work her way through a match. By the look of the current crop of Top 50 players, tennis is going to need a different approach than trying to use "stars" to promote the sport. There's only a half-dozen or so of those anyway.

And tennis with its numerous fiefdoms seems unlikely to coalesce around a single multi-tiered streaming platform where tennis fans (even in the U.S.) can go to watch non-glitchy tennis matches from every tournament.

Edited by DramatistDreamer
Damnit autocorrect!
  • Members
Posted (edited)

I started playing tennis at age 6. I was a fan of Connors, McEnroe and Borg. There was Martina and Chris then came Graf, Seles and Sabitinni. On the men side came Edberg, my favorite of all time, followed closely by Thiem. I was also a big Berdych fan.

I played competitive from middle school to college. 

My game oddly resembles Borna Coric  with serve and volleying Edberg twist.

Please register in order to view this content

Jim Nanez still works for CBS and he was on this weekend doing golf and his voice took me back to the good old days of coverage from CBS.

Edited by Soapsuds
  • Members
Posted

I think it's a problem.  This is happening in tons of sports, where they're being buried on newish streaming services - like the Olympics and Peacock - but NBC at least did show a lot.  Networks, other than Golf, American Football, and College Basketball are ignoring people that don't want to go look for it.  College sports like Lacrosse, Women's Softball you have to search for it.  I don't see U.S. Gymnastics covered like it used to be, not even important meets.  Ditto Figure Skating.  But Tennis I believe is by far the worst for coverage because it was a big sport.  Burying it on Tennis Channel or wherever else has killed the sport on TV.  Meanwhile networks like ESPN/ESPN2 are covering pickleball and cornhole.  Nothing against them, but they have no real history.  Yes, people play it, but it's just not the same for me.  Maybe I'm crazy.

Ditto, along with Austin, but I never played competitively in High School  because my team was too good and everyone knew who was going to make it.  LOL.  One year I was kind of excited and worked at it - then didn't 'go-out' for the team - we had Seniors graduate - 4 of them seeded, but we got 2 ridiculously talented exchange students, and other guys who had been close to making the team were clearly ahead of me in the eyes of the coaches.  So there was no point.  But I admired and followed the people you list on TV, and it was because of TV that I got to see Tennis.  That doesn't happen now.

  • Members
Posted

Dominic Thiem practicing at Crandon Park today.

Please register in order to view this content

 

Acapulco tournament starts tonight. Rafa is playing it.

Btw Novak is #2 now in the live rankings.

  • Members
Posted

Grigor loses to Kozlov who was cramping.

Sasha barely gets by Brooksby after 5 am in the morning. The Acapulco matches were lengthy last night.

Please register in order to view this content

  • Members
Posted

I saw something on Twitter yesterday about the Number 1 player returning - ATP tweeted it.  People replied...do you not even know?  Because there was a picture of Novak.  People replied isn't Medvedev #1 now?  

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • But that's not weird... nail polish is allowed in prisons via commissary. Same with general makeup, haircuts, and hair colouring products.
    • This is DAYS, the show that said you could brainwash anyone with simple kitchen appliances.  An actor's nail polish or lack thereof should be the least of our concerns, lol.
    • It was not that she wasn't wearing nail polish, it is that she managed to get a manicure in prison
    • "We're Knot Done Yet": the name of this lovely podcast AND what JVA tells her plastic surgeon at every appointment. In other news, Michele Lee is reminding me more and more of my old music teacher from elementary school, and I couldn't STAND that bitch.
    • I apologize if this has been covered already, but does anyone know whether Douglas Marland was HW'ing by that point?  If he was, then I see what he meant when he said (in so many words) that he had inherited a mess when he started at GH.  Aside from Alan and Monica, none of that material seems very promising.  The story with Mark Dante and the Corbins is the wrong kind of predictable (y'know, the kind where you know what's going to happen, but you just don't give a crap?), the stuff with Scotty and Laura is cute but toothless, I don't know WHAT the hell Gina and Steve Carlson's character are arguing about and Rick Webber has to be the dumbest man alive not to see David Hamilton practically twirling his moustache over how to make a killing off Lamont Corbin's declining health.  (By the way, "LAMONT CORBIN"?  What is this, "The Shadow"?  And "Corbin Limited" sounds like some jive I'd hear over on Y&R.) In a way, it's kind of like watching today's GH, right down to the dialogue that's serviceable and pushes plot along but says nothing about the characters' inner lives.
    • It absolutely was; the narrative was there, and they followed it promptly. Maybe that's back when women had babies at young ages?!?!?
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Thanks for asking that!  Back when we had another major event upcoming (a party or the concert), I had intended to ask what everyone here was planning to wear.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Lol. Right?  I mean the show could have framed the 60th anniversary in a different way, but the narrative was celebrating Tom and the hospital. Also, what a weirdly sexist bunch of posts about women's nail polish.  Like, yes, this is Days problem lol.  Stacy Haiduk isn't a good Kristen because she doesn't wear nail polish?  Are we in the 1950's???
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy