Jump to content

GH: Monday


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I wonder if Becky Herbst realises how badly her character has been ruined. Because she's doing a good job at playing her as a lying, hypocritical skank at the moment.

Elizabeth won't lie on the stand about the ONS with jason, but she WILL lie about Jake being Jason's son? WTF?

And the way BH is playing it, it's like she doesn't even love Lucky. Her heart is with Jason, and only him. If that's the case, why stay with Lucky? I don't buy this "Jason's lifestyle is too dangerous" stuff. I think it's because Liz knows she'd never be #1 in Jason's heart. That top spot belongs to SonnyJason's gun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 20
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Holy Cow......enough with the paternity crap. Tell Lucky for the love of everything.....lol!! This is dragging on too long. It's taking the whole story and ruining it. When it finally comes out noone is going to care!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

First, I can't speak of Michael's paternity secret, because I didn't start watching GH regularly until early spring 2000 (via SOAPNet) -- long after Jason left and Sonny and Carly had gotten together. So I never saw the whole Michael paternity storyline.

Second, in regard to Alexis and Sonny, Guza was working off of McTavish's material. She's the one who impregnated Alexis with Sonny's baby. Guza, clearly, doesn't think highly of Alexis, so I'm sure he was trying to determine if she was worthy enough to carry the child of Saint Sonny. That's most likely why he was toying with the notion that Ned was the father. Because, rumor had it, initially, Guza wanted Sonny's bodyguard Johnny to have raped Alexis off screen explaining the pregnancy, but Maurice and NLG refused to play that angle (notice how Johnny vanished via some off screen betrayl to Sonny and Max was the new doorman).

Third, how many other secrets, in general (which is what I believe I was referring to) have been kept and outed within months on this show? Guza, typically, goes for the big bang rather than the long drawn out story. So that's why I said this is atypical of Guza's style -- not that he's never done it before. The majority of Guza's storylines climax anywhere within four to 13 weeks. Not 13 months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

:P:lol:

I really don't know what to say about Elizabeth. I love Rebecca Herbst. I think she is a wonderful actress and I find her performences have just the right amount of nuance and I think her portrayal is very realistic and sensitive but I have no clue if Elizabeth is coming or going in most scenes. There are times that I believe Liz loves Lucky (why else would she be doing all this and constructing massive castle like lies if she didn't want or love her husband?) but then she goes running to Jason and it's as if she is willing to throw Lucky under the bus for him. All in all it's just a confusing story with a shiftless (one could argue fickle) female. It's one of the worst things about triangles. No one knows how to write a good one anymore. The women either wind up looking fickle, skanky or bitchy. There is no nuances anymore.

I also just have to laugh at Liz beliving she has the moral high ground over Carly, Ric and Sam. She is nearly just as bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    •   I liked the effect of the curtains closing. Yeah it was like the end of Act I.   Or maybe they are simply trying to emphasize the drama of the end of an episode -- instead of a random abrupt end that has happened in some prior episodes.
    • I posted this in the behind the scenes thread but I know this thread is busier so wanted to mention it here as well. During their instagram live yesterday, Daphnee Duplaix and Trisha Mann-Grant mentioned that they will find out this month if the show is renewed for another season. Just a heads up so we can keep an eye out for an announcement and keep our fingers crossed for a multi-year renewal!
    • They haven't explained the ownership of the Bistro, but Doug told Holly the other day he didn't get the job there. Basically Roman just hired Doug on the spot and gave him a room.  It was really nice of Roman.  I don't know if he knows who Doug is or that he stole Julie's necklace.  That was unclear-at least to me.
    • I'm not sure how I felt about it, but I do kind of like that it felt like the show telling us this concludes the first chapter of the series. Could be interesting if they only do it for big aftermath episodes. The biggest mistake with Martin is that it's almost hard to buy his anger because we've gotten no strong scenes with him and his parents. They've all been with Anita/Vernon. I can't even remember him ever even saying one word to Nicole, even in passing.
    •   Thank you! Agreed on both posts. And the comments about Mike Manning are nonsense. 
    • I haven't watched yet, but did they explain the current ownership of The Bistro?  Because when RonC was writing, wasn't he applying for work with Sophia?
    • I think Brandon has gotten better in normal day to day scenes, but he’s very over the top when the character is meant to be angry or agitated. I did laugh when she started yelling at Leslie and then when he started to throw all those damn books, lol. He needs an acting coach to work out some of these kinks. 
    • I've never found him as bad as some. I think he's always shined in scenes with Vernon, who should be his father. I also think he has great chemistry with Kat and Dani which I hope they tap into more over time. Dani/Martin feel like such a fun and believable Auntie/Nephew relationship.
    • I'm fighting for my life on another board for my husband Brandon and I'll do it here too lmao
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy