Jump to content

All: Who was the best and worst writer on your soap?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Rayfield was bad. Thankfully they got a co head writer for him with Anna Theresa Cascio. If he was the solo head writer, the show would have been a disaster. It was marginal from December/2002 to April/2003 and then it improved in May and June and then McTavish came back at the beginning of July and gave AMC a shot in the arm it deserved and did well from 2003 to 2005. 2006 she tanked

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I liked her in 2003 with Bianca's rape, Bianca hiding her pregnancy from Erica, Jack/Erica and Greenlee's paternity, Bianca/Kendall bonding and in 2005 I thought she was good too. 2003 and 2004 were her best years in the latest stint (2003-2007)

Did you see McTavish during her first head writing stint (October/1992 to May/1995)? She was on fire during those years! It helped that she had a terrific Executive Producer (Felicia Minei Behr)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's because Agnes Nixon was supervising the writing during that time period. Agnes' presence was heavily felt in the addition of the Fryes and An Li Chen, the Santos family, the racial tension... Cultural, class and ethnic diversity as well as well-written social issues... things McTavish simply can't (or possibly refuses) to do on her own (as proven by her 1998-99, 2003-2007 stints). And, as you said, FMB was terrific as an executive producer and knew what worked and what didn't, and had a feel of what the audience wanted to see.

McTavish's last two AMC stints, her mid-90s GL stint, her OLTL stint and her 2001-2002 GH garbage shows that the woman has no real skill as a dramatic head writer. She writes melodramatic camp. I swear. If Passions were still running strong and JER were to hand over the reigns to Megan, you'd hardly notice the difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think there's a huge difference between JER and McTavish. JER, except for his recent DAYS stint, has always tried to do something different and succeeded at it. He's never trying to write like all the other soap operas, so if you're expecting that then yeah, he's gonna seem bad. But he's trying to do something different. And as for that "different" thing, whether you like it or not is up to you, but he does plan his stories from beginning to end and most of the time it's pretty original. McTavish is just a bad, unoriginal hack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Megan was a stupid writer who could not think of anything original! I Hated that she broke up Jr/Babe. I hated the Unabbortion thing. Like seriously, she had nothing so she went back into history. All of her stories are unrealistic!!! :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well I have been only watching Days since 92 so my only choices are JER, SSM, LB, TL, BRASH AND CWICKLY and HS I loved B&C and JER's first stint.

Worst, Tom Lagan hands down as well as JER redux

AW, Culliton and Malone were good, worst,...uhm i really don't recall

Sunset Beach I like Guza, and Meg Bennett I hated Chis Whitesell and their last headwriter, i think it was Maggie Depressant.

Passions well alls I can really say is I liked everything up until the monkey left.

Y&R I loved Bill Bell, KA, JS, and LML

B&B BB and BB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Days:

Best: Peter Brash and Paula Cwikily. They were two of the best writers Days had in awhile. I can't believe Corday fired them so soon, they were fantastic and really should still be around at least as consultants or Co-HW with Hogan.

Margarat DePreist. Wrote some of Days BEST stories and started the serial killer era IMO. After that the storylines got really popular for all soaps in general.

Hogan Sheffer. Yes there was Feb-April but he still does his research and can remember stuff not many other writers remember. He could be better, but is one of the best ever Days has had. So much history is being remembered under him and I am SO happy about it.

Worst: Dena Higley. Do I really have to explain?

Tom Langan. Corday probably had a hand in this but he wrote the whole Teen Invasion thing of 2001 that was horrible! But again Corday probably assisted in that. :rolleyes:

SSM. I didn't really enjoy too much of what she wrote at all. At first Nicole wasn't that good, and all that stuff with mechanical chips didn't quite please me either lol

Both:

JER. I personnally enjoyed his 1993-1997 run, but also that really destroyed Days' identity and I consder it highly possible that's why there are so many Days fanbases and they are so fickle: two different versions of Days. JER's and the writers previous and a few after. On the other hand he did bring in an entire new fanbase and even some older viewers enjoyed his writing, but others were driven away.

And his 2003-2006 run had a few things I enjoyed, and the beginning of the SSK was great IMO but all just evolved into something horrible. Then the whole run turned into a huge disaster.

AMC:

Best: Agnes Nixon. The show's creator and who obviously got what it was and was supposed to be!

Worst: Megan Mctvaish. I don't think I even have to explain.

Y&R:

Best: Bill Bell. He was fantastic and I think all around the best writer on Y&R ever.

Worst: LML. I once liked her stuff, but her being promoted to Ep was such a bad move and everything has gone terrible lately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

AMC

Best: Agnes Nixon of course.

Between:

Richard Culliton-Liked the last part of his tenure on the show. Didn't he finish up the Proteus story, I loved how it ended.

Anna Theresa Cascio and Gordon Reyfield-Cascio I liked. Reyfield, I totally detested his writing. The final months of their tenure were amazing and showed improvement.

Worst: Megan McTavish-Of course. Although I liked her reign from 2003-2004. The rape, Kendall bonding with the Kane women, the trial (Kendall and Greenlee's fight), and Jackson revealed to be Greenlee's father. AMC seemed to be getting back to what it once was. However I HATED HATED the unabortion and the mess she made out of Babe and JR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Best DAYS

James E. Reilly: Honestly, I liked both his tenures, though many disagree with the latter. I may be alone there, but it's all good! Although the SSK took an unexpected turn, I don't think I was ever bored and the vets were in my face. Things were happening. Overall, he's the reason I started watching in the first place.

Cwikly & Brash: Again, great writers and I was always entertained. So upset they were abruptly fired.

Worst DAYS

Dena Higley: This goes without saying. This was DAYS' lowest point for me. Awful writer

Meh

Hogan Sheffer/Meg Kelly: I can't say they're the best, I can't say they're the worst. They're just meh for me...for several reasons. I haven't been fully enthralled/entertained yet with their stories, but I *can* watch. Time will tell I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's how I feel about Richard Culliton's 2001-2002 work at AMC -- it wasn't the worst, but it sure as hell wasn't the best. Things got a little cartoonish and haywire by month six (I'm being kind -- actually things got crazy by month four with Erica's circus of a [Frankie Stone] murder trial that made no sense). I also didn't like the fact that it became the Leo and Greenlee show. Hell, Susan Lucci's Erica was only on for a total of about six out of eighteen months, according to Carolyn Hinsey. Lucci didn't even submit herself for an Emmy nom that year because she worked so little.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That was one thing about Culiton. He brought Kendall back... but that story was all about Kendall, had little to do with Erica. Culiton far preferred Brooke over Erica. She was quite a central focus. Culiton I think was miles ahead of who he replaced, and who succeeded him, except for Anna Casico who made AMC utterly amazing when she came in and helped poor Gordon Rayfield.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I’ve reached the summer of 1998.  Until now, my impression has been that the show has steadily improved since the great quality dip of 1994, reaching as high as 8/10 in 1997. Sure, I could complain about a few things in 1997 (Claudia got wasted after her initial storyline; Thorne’s feelings for Taylor were a bit too sudden; the storyline where Sheila lived with James and Maggie while pregnant got rather boring; Mike periodically revisiting Sheila despite being on the run from authorities), but overall it was a very strong year.  I liked the Thorne/Taylor/Ridge triangle, the mystery plot about who shot Grant, the sham wedding to trap Sheila, Stephanie/Eric/Lauren, and Clarke manipulating his way back to working at Forrester. I even liked the Greenland storyline with Eric/Lauren/Rush, although I had expected to hate it. Maybe 1996 tops 1997 in raw soapy excitement (especially as Sheila got a chance to interact with a larger canvas of characters), but some problems with overall storyline cohesion puts it somewhat below 1997 for me. Unfortunately, 1998 has turned out to be a bit of a speedbump, perhaps on par with 1995 levels of quality: - Maggie’s character really got trashed after James left her to be with Sheila, and the early 1998 storylines where she imprisoned Sheila in the house from Psycho, or installed those wires and mikes and such in her house to make her think she’s going crazy, were total GARBAGE. So much so that the latter storyline (and Maggie with it) pretty much disappeared into a limbo.  - I have mixed feelings about the twins plotline with Lauren. No way did Rush survive being shot with a crossbow through the chest, and the romance between Lauren and Rush’s good twin brother Johnny was rather dry to me. I did however enjoy the camp aspect of Rush taking his brother’s place to be with Lauren, and Eric rescuing her. But it doesn’t appear like Bell cared too much about the Johnny/Lauren romance beyond the twin storyline gimmick, and it too disappeared in an unsatisfactory manner (come on, why not hire Johnny’s actor for just 5 more episodes for an arc where he realizes Lauren is not over Eric, or JUST SOMETHING?) - Clarke wormed his way back to FC in late 1997, which had exciting storytelling potential, but then he disappeared almost entirely. Sad to see my favorite character wasted in this manner. Does he get anything interesting to do between now and the Morgan saga of 2000-2001? - The Thomas saga was entertaining in 1997, but it got stretched out too much, and made some of early 1998 tiresome, with Ridge having to decide YET AGAIN which woman he wants to be with. On the plus side, I like the plotline of Thorne being neighbors with Macy and Grant, and we’ve finally been introduced to the SORASed Rick/Amber/CJ crowd. The Stephanie/James/Sheila triangle is also starting, and it makes me excited (I remember seeing some if it in my childhood). I know Sheila, Grant, and James are all leaving soon, which I honestly kind of dread - between them and Clarke’s near-absence, it feels like herd is going to get culled too much in the near future. But I know there’s the familiar 1999-2002 to look forward to.
    • LOL - this is a perfect description, and that's what I loved about it! May be a bit campy, but it immediately caught my attention in a good way.  I'm not familiar with the Fishing Trip storyline, I'll have to look that up. I've noticed that about Josh, which has made him less attractive to me overall. He just yells a lot when he's not happy. Wow, Reva was married to HB!  LOL - "Always... eventually, and again"
    • I love your ideas. I would love to see Jack grown up this confused unhinged individual. He should hold a grudge against both Brooke and Taylor.   
    • @chrisml

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Lois's return has been a bust. So disappointing that the writers have never written for her. As with Tracy, the pool of GH vets is so thin, there's no one to pair her with. Doubtful they would go to the trouble of properly recasting a legacy character and then sticking  him with Lois; they're obviously not that invested. If she wants to be on this show, it'll be as a noisy grandma who stays in the background. 
    • I love me some Anita and TT. They need to give her a good storyline and I know that it's coming. 
    • @Franko Thanks for tagging me. A few days ago I was talking in another thread about the rise of "snarky" critics for TV shows in the '90s online recaps, but this is just more along the lines of a mauling. There's also the unspoken reality that films like Steel Magnolias were seen as movies for women, so therefore they sucked. Pauline Kael also had her share of blunt, at times incredibly nasty remarks, but the vitriol is often balanced by her love for film. I'm not seeing that here.  With that said, the comment about Field's work becoming unbearable describes how I felt when I tried to sit through her and Maura Tierney on ER. 
    • I skipped most of Daniel too. I think it's awful he has kids with Nicole, Csrky5 and Chloe and Brady, Bo and Philip do not. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • A great day. Feeling happy and accomplished.

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy