Jump to content

July 2-6, 2007


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Despite having two grandchildren, Erica Kane has NEVER been referred to as a Grandmother by ANYONE. She doesn't ever say grandchildren or grandchild but refers to them as "my daughter's son" or "my daughter's daughter". It is RIDICULOUS!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Has anyone else heard the rumors that CBS is negotiating with P&G to cut both ATWT and GL to a half-hour? The story goes that CBS is apparently planning to force affiliates to air two full hours of the CBS Early Show (rather than the current one hour that's required), and to make up for this, they are going to give the affiliates an extra hour during the day.

I tried to find out if there's any validity to it, but I can't even find anything about CBS wanting to expand the Early Show, so I'm not sure where this is coming from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hmm...more of the low rated CBS Early Show?...LOL. Oy....well I wouldnt mind ATWT going down to 30 min. I enjoy B&B in the half hour form. So it wouldnt bother me. It's better than ATWT being cancelled all together.

Just look at all the viewers ATWT has lost from last year! :o Yet, Jean Passanante and Christopher Goutman are still running the show! :angry: Make changes and fire both of them CBS!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

AMC beats OLTL in HH more often than OLTL beats AMC in HH. But OLTL beats AMC more often in the 18-49 demographic than AMC beats OLTL.

The new set of numbers (the (1, etc.) at the end) denote the episode for that particular soap opera that was the most watched for the week (1) or the least watched (5, and for NBC soaps this week 3rd) for the week.

MONDAY, JULY 2, 2007

1.(1) Y&R: Monday: 4.1/5,570,000 (+318,000) (1)

2.(2) B&B: Monday: 2.9/3,841,000 (+264,000) (1)

3.(3) GH: Monday: 2.7/3,502,000 (+400,000) (1)

4.(6) OLTL: Monday: 2.3/3,008,000 (+305,000) (2)

5.(8) AMC: Monday: 2.3/2,957,000 (+455,000) (3)

6.(5) GL: Monday: 2.1/2,823,000 (+31,000) (1)

7.(4) ATWT: Monday: 2.1/2,798,000 (-13,000) (1)

8.(7) DAYS: Monday: 1.8/2,386,000 (-308,000) (2)

9.(9) PSNS: Monday: 1.2/1,572,000 (-285,000) (2)

TUESDAY, JULY 3, 2007

1.(1) Y&R: Tuesday: 3.9/5,022,000 (-548,000) (4)

2.(2) B&B: Tuesday: 2.7/3,453,000 (-388,000) (5)

3.(3) GH: Tuesday: 2.6/3,312,000 (-190,000) (3)

4.(4) OLTL: Tuesday: 2.2/2,882,000 (-126,000) (3)

5.(5) AMC: Tuesday: 2.2/2,674,000 (-283,000) (4)

6.(7) ATWT: Tuesday: 2.1/2,568,000 (-230,000) (4)

7.(6) GL: Tuesday: 2.0/2,491,000 (-332,000) (2)

8.(8) DAYS: Tuesday: 1.7/2,072,000 (-314,000) (3)

9.(9) PSNS: Tuesday: 1.3/1,508,000 (-64,000) (3)

WEDNESDAY, JULY 4, 2007

1.(1) Y&R: Wednesday: 3.7/4,960,000 (-62,000) (5)

2.(2) B&B: Wednesday: 2.7/3,573,000 (+120,000) (2)

3.(3) GH: Wednesday: 2.3/3,050,000 (-262,000) (4)

4.(5) AMC: Wednesday: 2.2/2,991,000 (+317,000) (2)

5.(4) OLTL: Wednesday: 2.0/2,630,000 (-252,000) (5)

6.(8) DAYS: Wednesday: 1.8/2,440,000 (+368,000) (1)

7.(6) ATWT: Wednesday: 1.8/2,388,000 (-180,000) (5)

8.(7) GL: Wednesday: 1.6/2,107,000 (-384,000) (5)

9.(9) PSNS: Wednesday: 1.1/1,584,000 (+76,000) (1)

THURSDAY, JULY 5, 2007

1.(1) Y&R: Thursday: 4.1/5,393,000 (+433,000) (3)

2.(2) B&B: Thursday: 2.8/3,558,000 (-15,000) (3)

3.(3) GH: Thursday: 2.7/3,434,000 (+384,000) (2)

4.(5) OLTL: Thursday: 2.5/3,149,000 (+519,000) (1)

5.(4) AMC: Thursday: 2.3/3,083,000 (+92,000) (1)

6.(7) ATWT: Thursday: 2.1/2,606,000 (+218,000) (2)

7.(8) GL: Thursday: 1.9/2,395,000 (+288,000) (4)

FRIDAY, JULY 6, 2007

1.(1) Y&R: Friday: 4.1/5,434,000 (+41,000) (2)

2.(2) B&B: Friday: 2.9/3,536,000 (-22,000) (4)

3.(3) GH: Friday: 2.4/2,926,000 (-508,000) (5)

4.(4) OLTL: Friday: 2.3/2,756,000 (-393,000) (4)

5.(6) ATWT: Friday: 2.1/2,692,000 (+86,000) (3)

6.(5) AMC: Friday: 2.1/2,535,000 (-548,000) (5)

7.(7) GL: Friday: 1.8/2,447,000 (3)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • There's some irony in Philip being forgiven, because it forces everyone to admit that Victor was wrong to change his will.  Everyone, eventually including Xander, (I presume), seems to think it was wrong for Victor to divide his estate in Xander's favor.  I appreciated Stephanie forgiving Philip, because she's got no skin in that game.  But, Belle's line about Philip missing Xander because he misses Bo did not ring true.  I think Philip would be sad if Bo dies, but I think he's more concerned currently about Xander. I am enjoying this EJ mystery so much that I am hereby taking a vow not to read spoilers.  I am also vowing — for the last time — to stop harping on this, but: the concept of a “sepsis treatment” remains absurd. Hospitals prevent sepsis through vigilant infection control; once sepsis sets in, it causes multiple organ failures. Treatment involves supporting each failing organ individually. The notion that a single medication could magically reverse organ failure is medically laughable. However, I like the contrast of Kim going through cancer, which is incurable in their universe.  Kayla's comment on the health of both of her siblings was both heartbreaking and an interesting twist.  MBE is also totally underrated.  She is carrying the weight of so many stories.   And, I like the use of Kayla as an audience surrogate.  She's arguably the most "real" person in Salem. Kayla isn't psychic, she wasn't SORASed, she's not a billionaire, and she doesn't have a bionic eye.  So, I enjoy that we get her perspective of the nuttiness that surrounds her. However, I don't get what gives her the authority to turn down EJ's offer.  I understand that they need a hospital figurehead to show us scenes of the competition to buy the hospital.  But, unless the entire administration has been let go, the Chief of Staff wouldn't make those choices.
    • But why worry about something that might not happen? Right now, most things revolve around the Duprees. We have no idea if or how long that will continue. For now, it's working.
    • The Duprees not having any staff is a bugbear for me. They've included the background staff at the Country Club but no one at the Dupree home. Even just an extra bringing in a tray of food/drinks or responding to a request from Anita would suffice.
    • Shut up, Dante and Lois.  I actually don't mind this particular soap trope, but in the context of this storyline, it just feels forced and unnecessary. If anything, this Dante/Gio tension needed to begin months ago. Plus, this storyline, in general, isn't doing Lois any favors either.  Emma comforting Gio was really sweet though. It's definitely time for the two of them to have their first kiss. And, Joss playing Secret Agent Barbie will just never work.
    • Note to makeup - Smitty’s eyebrows, bad clamshell look.  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Okay I can buy that when Brook Lynn was a teen.  Now she knows the child is a boy one would think she'd be slightly suspicious.  Then again, Gio looks nothing like either of them so maybe not lol.
    • I've been behind & just got caught up & the last 3 days were amazing!
    • Yeah.  The hot, poor bad boy with a chip on his shoulder but with a heart of gold was a common soap trope in the 80s 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's been an issue with me... the lack of a cohesive 'Have Not' crowd that has focus other than Leslie/Eva.   I would beef up Jan, Mona, Laura, Joey, and few other male characters.. and not just be out to overthrow the Duprees.. but co-existing and broadening the scope of the show since the show is called Beyond the Gates. I think the set up the show has with everything revolving around the Duprees will become predictable especially if they always win.   It would be like Victor Newman on Y & R for 40+ years.. always winning, hardly ever losing.   With MVJ/Guza.. both trained under that mindset... I fear that will happen.   I've always heard from a performer that is playing a character like Leslie/Dana that you have to find the victim/hurt beneath the surface in order to play a villain/villainess... and I think that's why I enjoy watching her.. because she brings so much more to the part than what the writers put on the page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy