Jump to content

SOD: June19, 2007 Issue


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Someone else said it (Kenny, I think), but you can still write good stories on the cheap. And, I'm sorry, no way was Sheffer so locked into a plan that he couldn't come up with better storylines. Even if we assume he had a nice, tight thing developed for the vets- the four that were backburnered- they wouldn't be in every story (though I guess it's possible- Marlena could go with Shawn/Belle to the island, John could hang with Sami, and Hope/Bo could be all up in Chelsea/Nick, right? that's totally plausible, because it was so the pattern before Corday came in with the budget news...). He'd have to have had a B and C storyline all developed, too, and the show didn't reflect that.

I mean, the whole show wouldn't collapse the way it did because you can't use four people, and if it did that's just bad writing, imho.

I'm also kind of surprised that Sweeney is so inexpensive to use, 'cause she didn't get shunted to the backburner for a while like the others.

NBC's totally missing out though- apparently the behind-the-scenes is still really interesting if they'll snipe at each other in the press. Why is this not a reality show?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And not with NBC as your network. :lol:

Is it time for this show to finally get a new executive producer? It's almost like NBC made Corday pay for firing James Reilly. My response to that, if it's true, is good riddance!

This show is enjoyable again, more so than it was earlier this decade. Now that Bo/Hope/John/Marlena are back front and center and Tony/Stefano are involved in story, it feels like the old show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I need to go and buy the June 19th issue of SOD. I knew it! I knew the past few months was not Hogan's style. The fact that he had to change his stories quickly and backburner the big 4 raised so many red flags.

I believe that Corday had interferred all along. How is it that Corday "opened up his purse strings" and gave Hogan more budget to write for the vets? This whole thing screamed Corday. If he had only let Hogan do his thing, Days would be in a better position today. Right now, Days is doing so well. I've been saying this for a while now that it seems like Corday and Co. finally untied the ropes on Hogan's hands and let him write.

This latest SOD interview really confirmed what I believed all these months. I'm glad Hogan finally cleared the air. I do like his jab at Corday though. I believe in Hogan and I loved what he did with ATWT. I was dumbfounded about the bad results Days had the past few months. I couldn't believe how Hogan could do so well on another similar soap and "fail" on this one. Well, my question's been finally answered through the man himself.

Hogan did make another comment that hinted Corday overrules him. He uses the word "hopefully" when mentioning romance for this summer. Uusually HW's don't say hopefully or maybe. They either confirm or deny flat out. In this SOD interview, Hogan mentions that nowadays the higher ups cut things out of the show a lot. So, I believe Corday and the higher ups really messed with the writing pot from January to April. I watched ATWT under Hogan's pen during his entire reign and it couldn't divert that much. I knew something was up and I've always believed Hogan was forced into a situation where his hands were tied.

It's obvious that no matter how much creative control HW's can have, their BOSSES can overrule them at any time. Hogan must have had detailed plans and the higher ups threw them all out. If Hogan didn't have a plan B, I can see why the show suffered as badly as it did.

I bet Corday will backtrack. Isn't that what he's infamous for, other than screwing up the show? How much can the higher ups fool us? Why are they even lying when we call them out on it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am so happy Hogan finally spoke out.

I read the full interview and it is pretty clear that he hated writing what we saw from January-April. So many of us suspected this and the fact that Hogan came out and confirmed it is good enough for me to take it as truth. Hogan was so excited when he took over and all of a sudden he stopped talked in January and the show took a hit. It's pretty clear Hogan didn't enjoy himself. Now I know one could say that it's a HW's job to be professional and keep things interesting even if he or she is being forced to write something but, if your heart isn't in it, it won't come off well no matter how hard one tries. That is what happened. I read the interview and Hogan is excited. He mentioned how much he loves writing for the vets and how he watched tapes of the 80's and it helped increase his emotional connection to the show. He wants to base this summer off that and, if that happens, watch out. If Hogan is excited and talking to the media, it will be good just like last Fall. You can tell Hogan and Corday have some tension there so it will be interesting to see what happens there.

As for Hogan playing favorites, he said in the beginning he loved the character of Sami and he loved MBE so I fully believe the Steve/Kayla and Sami/Lucas stories were his. However, I do think he was going to use the vets much more in those stories and that would've made those stories better. He couldn't use them and the stories suffered. Chelsea/Nick was all him too and that was probably in his original plan and that is why that story came out solid for the most part. Even if Hogan loves Kayla and Sami, he still used the vets perfectly right off the bat so I don't think who he likes has any bearing on anything we have seen. I think it was all Corday plain and simple.

Hogan is excited and I just loved his dig at Corday for allowing him to bring the Dimera's back. Hopefully, we can move on from earlier this year and focus on the greatness of the present.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know nothing. I'm frigid.

But I think DAYS is really stupid to let Sheffer go at this moment.

Even dumber to ax Steve Wyman.

I get the distinct feeling that people are "quitting" because they don't want to go

down with a losing ship, and as a stand-alone soap and no support from the network,

that's what this is.

Shame they're scared of controversy.

(Mystery lips...blowing out candle)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

      Why didn't Steve respect Monica and Jeff's decision?  I get he's Jeff's father, and that's how it came out, but I don't like the ethics of the story. A stranger gets to make life or death decisions over a wife's demands?   I hope Monica secretly never forgave Steve's chauvinism.
    • Question: Jon-Michael Reed's review of 1977 is up in the retro soap section.  It includes a fleeting reference to comedic scenes between Jeanne Cooper and Julianna McCarthy regarding “Kay's would-be beau, Ralph the Plumber”.  Could someone please fill me in will more details? I forgot that Kay and Liz were friendly before Jill stole Kay's husband.  And the thought of Liz playing a comedic scene blows my mind, because I only recall her being dour both in demeanor and wardrobe.  
    • I said on Twitter on Friday when Leslie mentioned Chicago that perhaps she might be related to one of Anita's bandmates. Since we hardly know anything about Leslie's childhood background. In addition, Leslie said she grew up listening to The Articulettes….
    • There was a scene in the past week or two with Leslie looking at some papers and mementos, which included an invitation or souvenir from Alan's memorial service or funeral -- it was dated as November 2024. Me just guessing but it seems to me that Martin's nightmares about the accident are from something longer ago than November.
    • ah thanks! do you know who the third one was in the blonde? the fifth one i know ive seen before in the brown wig but i forgot, and then ive never seen the psychic one before lol
    • I felt for Ted early on but as the story unfolded it has changed my opinion on him. To know he was cheating while his wife was struggling to give him a baby is a lot to deal with. Plus, this happened ages ago and still he's paying Leslie off and threatening her to leave town.  What really caused me to lose him in this episode was how even though he was busted, he still refused to take responsibility and come clean and the way he talked to Martin and Eva was terrible. To tell Smitty he better get Martin away from him when that is his SON who he used to cover up his affair? That is true dog behavior. Ted seems upset he got caught but I'm not seeing the remorse I would need to want Nicole to forgive him. I'm curious how I'll feel after Ted gets to talk to Nicole but I need him to fix it with the rest of the family as well.
    • I'm sorry. I well remember Jake doing Doris but I have no independent memory of the story around it.  Krystle with a K Lake, sure, both Tony the Tuna stories & NOT.  And, Jake also impersonated a woman named Bunny Eberhardt but he didn't know she was a woman so there was no drag. This weekend I re-watched Kevin & Mac, GH, and my strong impression is exactly what it was when I watched it in real time: They did not let them look very pretty. Of course, I think the best ever drag on GH was Alexis posing as the Q butler.  In a different use of drag at AW one Halloween, Jensen Buchanan went as Charlie Chaplin & Judi Evans went as, I think, a male gypsy.   

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I'm not sure who wanted them to dump REUNION & instead do a "Dallas-like daytime show" but it seems that it def came from NBC to AW through Rauch, so, yes, it absolutely could have been his (cough-another-stupid?) decision!!!! I've just begun the new Lisanti book so maybe I will find out. (I waited for the kindle version to come out.) I would apologize for being so critical & so sarcastic, too, but, well, I'm not actually sorry!  Silverman was NOT a friend to AW.  And, I believe the critique is on point & deserved! I wanted to explain why I think the timing is off for the 90 minute show to be a reaction to the GH Luke & Laura story & its hype. Because, for sure, networks & production companies did react to it! The first 90 minute show was Monday, March 5, 1979.  And, there was some unknown amount of time ahead of that with people arguing about it & then, planning it.  The Luke & Laura wedding was mid-November 1981.  They were on the run from Frank Smith & stayed overnight in Wyndham's Dept. Store early August 1980. 
    • terrible at using forums and inserting photos, but jake in another world had a drag persona named doris, anyone know the episode or year? http://www.anotherworldhomepage.com/ffad19.jpg
    • Yes, I am familiar with Fred Silverman. Agree, the 90 minute AW a very poor decision by Silverman. I think Silverman was behind the decision to go with Texas.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy