Jump to content

DAYS: Thursday, March 1


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

LOL. I didn't mean that as stupid as it sounded.Same acress or no, Bonnie and Adrienne have very different "looks" *g* Today Bonnie's hair and mokeup looked very like Adrienne, I thought

:P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Do the people at DAYS not now what month sweeps is in? They are picking up steam now and it is March and I heard some other storylines that are coming up seem very sweeps but they are doing it in the total wrong month. Just like December was one of the best months of last year and it comes after November sweeps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I love Lumi. And it was hot. That having been said, I really, really wish they'd pull the mics back when those two start going at it. All those smacking, slurping noises literally made me mute my TV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It did have a point. Lucas gave EJ an ultimatum to move out or he'd quit his job and move his family to another town. Sami was turned on by his command of the situation. That's what I took the scene to convey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Absolutely. Sami was turned on by Lucas' aggression with EJ and let him know beyond a doubt. I love Lucas. He's so hot. Hopefully Hogan will bring more out of Lucas instead of hiding his light.

Steve and Kayla were too intense for me today. I left the room. It's just awful to see the characters I love screaming at each other and Kayla saying I love you with a face that says entirely different things. Gosh, get past this quick, please. Ugh, my stomach is knotting up just remembering what I saw.

I didn't see the need to be soft on Bonnie. She was trash the whole time she was here so why try to give her redemption by putting Mimi's welfare first. That was not character driven. It was plot driven and I hated that. Now, we have Mimi on the run so to say to let her mother take responsibility for killing her husband. That is silly. Mimi was a youngster who was protecting her mother. No judge or jury would send her to prison for that. Hated the end. Just hated it. Now Mimi will have on her conscience not only causing the death of her father, but the incarceration of her mother. Hate it.

But, it did seem obvious that Victor paid Bonnie's bail due to the knowledge of the Phimi baby and he may even can pay a judge to give her a sentence of time served. I hope we hear what happened in time.

Loved, loved, loved Jed and Abby. He is so the sort of fellow she should be with at this stage of her life. I love his voice and he is so cute. Obviously Abby noticed, too. I'm looking forward to how this develops. Max needs to allow her time to grow up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As the only Mimi fan left in the room - I was very disapointed by this exit.

They've had months, MONTHS to plot an exit for Farah. And the most we get is one episode in the middle of the week where they try, unsuccessfully, to wrap it all up? Boo! They've plotted out this story so slowly and so inconsistantly and then ... in one episode it feels like they're literally throwing Mimi and Bonnie off the show.

Why not use either Farah or Judy mon, tues, or wednesday to lead into all this? Victor paid Bonnie's bail - why did we not get to see that conversation!? Obviously he knows about the Phimi baby - why do we not get to see that? Just like, why do we not get to see Willow realize/test that she's pregnant? We're missing out on alot of key moments the show should be showing us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yup another dropped storyline and quick exit. Bonnie and the bones storyline was being built up for months and then Mimi is only on TWICE in February!? This is BAD writing. No ifs ands or buts about it. ALL of the exits on DAYS have SUCKED where as other shows turn exits into STORYLINES.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
    • Only thing I enjoyed was Abby / Olivia, etc., and the addiction storyline. Otherwise, I could do without the season.
    • Right? Vanessa had a ball gown for every occasion.
    • Roger's return storyline may have been silly but Roger's return was what lead to GL's last golden era.  It was the combination of Roger's return and Robert Calhoun becoming EP that got GL to finally hit it's stride after some really bad years. It will always disappoint me that the ratings during Robert Calhoun's run didn't reflect the quality of the show.
    • He also gave some of the best episodes, like the episodes surrounding Doug's death. The problem with Days was that Ron had a horrible vision from he top. I don't feel the same for MVJ and nothing that has happened in all these months suggests she doesn't have a handle on the show. Now if it becomes an issue I'll acknowledge it, but I'm not seeing it so far.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy