Jump to content

All: Have soap operas over the past few years gone


Recommended Posts

  • Members

It seems like for the past few years the soap operas seem to be more serial killer heavy in their storylines.I like serial killer storylines because it creates suspense not knowing who is going to live or die.In the past several years ATWT,GL,DAYS,Passions,AMC,OLTL,and GH have featured one or several serial killer storylines each.Y&R and B&B have yet to feature one.With Latham handling things on Y&R I wouldn't put it past her to do a serial killer storyline sometime in the near future.With B&B's Bradley Bell,Brooke and Ridge would never fall victim to a serial killer if that kind of storyline played out because Ridge would save Brooke's life at the last second before the assailant snuffs her out.Then Ridge would be a hero.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 20
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

It has become a overused and tired plot device. But also so has the mad woman/psychotic woman/mad man/psychotic man running around terrorizing the community. I have gotten so tired of that. I once appreciated them, but now there are too many and so many are just alike or rip offs of the originals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I actually love Serial Killer stories. They're my favorite kind next to the "psycho woman" stories. Obviously, DAYS' Salem Stalker has been my favorite, but I also really enjoyed GH's w/Mary Bishop and the one that AMC has going now. They're just so suspenseful, and basically one of the reasons I watch soaps.

Steve- I'm hurt to hear that you're sick of the crazy women lol. I wouldn't mind if every soap had one all the time!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly. And you can even trace it back further to DAYS. Until the Salem Strangler and Salem Slasher storylines, soaps never even did serial killer storylines, but then you had others in the 80s like AW's Sin Stalker and SB's Carnation Killer. The same thing happened 20 years later with the Salem Stalker storyline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I knew it wouldn't be a popular opinion with you especially. I just hate when soaps get on the habit of copying anything. I hated back in the 80's when every soap had to send their super couple on the run just like Luke & Laura went on the run. I think that is the reason I am not fond of Shawn & Belle being on the run now because it is just old and tired.

The psycho women were so good in the beginning and so unique. I loved them. I loved when Janet Green first came on. She was so exciting and so unique. The same for Sheila Carter on Y&R. But soon every show got one and it is just starting to get old and tired to me.

And the serial killer stories are getting to be the same. When Days did it "ORIGINALLY" in the early 80's. It was exciting and thrilling. And the outcome was special.

A few of the first ones that followed were the same way.

But now all of them are not shocking or surprising anymore. I was actually enjoying AMC's but the spoilers and having no way to seemingly avoid them has ruined the Serial Killer story for me. I mean I have tried to avoid spoilers on the AMC story to not ruin it but a SoapNet promo ruined Dixie's death for me. So now I read the spoilers and am very disappointed with who the killer is. It just doesn't interest me anymore.

Two of the last ones that have been done too were very disappointing. OLTL's was the worst, but Days was ruined by the convoluted ending.

I don't know I just get tired of the shows copying the same stories and the same gimmicks. I want something new.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree with you Steve. I have enjoyed the serial killer stories, and still love the psychos, but everything is getting old.

Something new needs to be done. No more serial killer stories. They are old. They do help cut down on the extra cast and provide shock or whatever but shock is not everything. And the cast can be trimmed in a different way. There are many ways to have a cast trim without doing a serial killer story.

I have liked serial killer storylines, but one thing I would like to see more(and soaps have done this, just not too frequently) are murders where everyone on the cast is involved. And I don't mean like Carmen Mesta. What I would like is that everyone in the cast has a GOOD reason, NOT stupid, to kill the person that was murdered. That is just a thought.

But, yeah, something new is needed besides serial killer stories, triangles, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I definately see where you're coming from. I feel that that's one reason why these serial killer stories aren't too popular with many anymore. I was spoiler free during the Salem Stalker and NEVER suspected Marlena. On the day of the reveal, when Tony looked up and said "I knew it was you" and we saw Marlena standing over him I was just in SHOCK. It was PERFECT and I loved every minute of that story (until Melaswen) for that reason. But now that I'm a spoiler-obsessed person, the shock-value has been lost on me for the most part. I wish that the world could go just one MONTH without spoilers. I wonder if things would be different and/or more positive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
    • Only thing I enjoyed was Abby / Olivia, etc., and the addiction storyline. Otherwise, I could do without the season.
    • Right? Vanessa had a ball gown for every occasion.
    • Roger's return storyline may have been silly but Roger's return was what lead to GL's last golden era.  It was the combination of Roger's return and Robert Calhoun becoming EP that got GL to finally hit it's stride after some really bad years. It will always disappoint me that the ratings during Robert Calhoun's run didn't reflect the quality of the show.
    • He also gave some of the best episodes, like the episodes surrounding Doug's death. The problem with Days was that Ron had a horrible vision from he top. I don't feel the same for MVJ and nothing that has happened in all these months suggests she doesn't have a handle on the show. Now if it becomes an issue I'll acknowledge it, but I'm not seeing it so far.
    • Jean Hackney was awful and that lead to Ben's exit story which sucked. I liked Ben/Val together. Val's love for Ben was that of a grown woman moving on with her life and Ben's love for Val made him willingly decide to raise another man's children as his own.
    • It wasn't just a GL thing, it was an 80s thing. Opulent party scenes on soaps were very big back then. Even in regular episodes where people are just going to dinner they're dressed up like they're going to see royalty.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy